[Cavort]
00:03:797 - You could create an anchor (basically a hidden long jack, like [23][24][23][24]) here, I think it would be underwhelming otherwise. You can make 00:03:914 - a [24], while keeping sounds like 00:03:797 - the same.
Fixed! I was thinking of buffing the start up more too.00:04:148 - Should be the same as 00:03:914 - , since they're the same sound.
Fixed!00:05:789 - Maybe change this to [14]. This is more for consistency, since the jumpjack section in 00:01:922 - has 2 minijacks (1st/2nd and 3rd/4th doubles respectively).
Fixed!00:09:422 - Same applies to this. You could do something like [14][24][13][12], though the notes before it would require some rearrangement.
Fixed!00:10:711 - to 00:13:641 - Kinda curious as to why you decided to chart the cymbals instead of the snare, I think the snare is a lot more prominent and you could definitely vary up the chart with some 1/4 bursts here. Would personally recommend charting the snares (00:10:828 - ) instead of the cymbal crashes (00:10:945 - and the like). It would make the chart more direct, you could also put 1/4s in places like 00:11:414 - as well.
Ohhhh I didn't realise this, thanks for the heads up. Fixed!00:13:172 - to 00:13:523 - These notes should be doubles.
Fixed!00:15:516 - You can probably place some 1/2s here to create minijacks, alternating minijacks at this speed is generally pretty nice to play through. Alternating minijacks being something like
this - the minijack would be on a hand and will be on the other hand every 2 notes (in this pic, left-right-left). You can do this for recurring melodies like those, they're present up to 00:41:766 - .
00:33:680 - Can be a double.
Fixed!00:36:023 - Missing note, I think a single is preferred here. A note on either 3 or 4 would be better, since it's reminiscent of the sound before it.
Fixed!00:39:656 - Should be triples, think it would be better if this triple and the consequent one to be the same, since they're the same kick+other percussion combo.
Fixed!00:41:180 - Can be a double.
Fixed!00:49:383 - You can probably create some two-handed minitrills for these (they're a lot more noticeable than one hand minitrills, since you're using your wrist instead of your fingers), rolls are generally a little bit too smooth considering the sound that you're mapping (which is a little rough). Patterns like
these are patterns with some two hand trills. This applies for all 1/4s you've mapped to record scratches.
Fixed! I never knew there were difference in roughness and smoothness in sound for such things.00:50:086 - Should be a double.
Fixed!00:50:437 - ^
Fixed!00:51:141 - Should be a triple.
Fixed!00:51:844 - Think you should create a minijack with the chord after and not the chord before, since the note after it is quite similar to this note but the note before it isn't.
Fixed! I didn't notice this @.@00:51:961 - should be the same chord as 00:52:195 - since they have the same notes. You can probably do something like
this, first chord is at 00:51:609 - .
Fixed! Thanks for the suggestion~00:58:406 - You can be a little mean and create a 1/3 jumpjack here (something like [24][34][12][24])
Fixed!01:09:305 - The entire section is almost completely alternating minijacks, so I don't see why this shouldn't be a minijack with 01:09:187 - . You'd have to rearrange the next few notes, but something like
this should be okay. Of course you can break from alternating if you're a bit too lazy when it comes to rearranging, but it's moreso for fluency.
Fixed! I kept the alternating jacks, didn't want to break the flow here.01:10:945 - These 1/4s should be doubles, along with 01:11:180 - . [12][34][12] / [12] seems ideal.
Fixed!01:12:820 - ^, but [34][12][34] / [34].
Fixed!01:16:922 - Should be doubles, generally the same arrangement as sections like 00:05:672 - and other things. This point goes for the rest of the section, until these sounds are layered as LNs.
Fixed!01:29:226 - Preferably something like [34][24][12]? It would be odd to not have minijacks at all considering that the 3-4 chords before it created minijacks.
That's true. Fixed!01:30:984 - Same suggestion as the very first one, you can create an anchor here. Something like [34][13][34][13][234] would be cute, though you would have to shift the note after to 2 to prevent too much bias (and maybe some other rearrangements..). You can do this for the entire section. Think this would be ideal, since this is the one of the last few parts of the track anyway.
That's a really cool idea. Fixed!01:45:516 - Think you can emphasise some chords here by making them the same, consecutive sounds like 01:45:516 - , 01:46:219 - , 01:45:867 - , you get the idea. You already did this with the section with triples, so it wouldn't hurt to do the same here.
All fixed!01:55:125 - Move to [34] to avoid too much left hand bias.
Fixed!01:57:469 - Should be triples.
Fixed!You can place more 1/2s, but it would make the chart way too cluttered because of the LNs going on, so I think this should be fine.