/me placeholds this post to protect the 2kd power from any random shtstorm
Forgive me, for my painting skills...
No need to kds for instance unless I told so. yay 2kds power!!
Forgive me, for my painting skills...
[> General <]
EDIT2: I removed some details from some mods because it was too stupid, and would even make you bored to read them lmao k sry only two lines on most mods. I'll check the hitsounds LATER- - Are you using normal-whistle.wav?
- - Okay, everything seems fine!
- 00:26:331 (1,1) - Great slider, I appreciate your efforts! But nyeh, you broke a flow here just for a single circle being blanketed. I've drew another choice for flowing nicely, so pick on what your heart want.
- 00:40:731 (4,5) - Wow, this blanket... Is this on purpose? ayy
- 00:58:902 (5,1) - Well, acceptable flow. It's almost the same as 00:26:331 (1,1) -, but not really close. I suggest curving it down, or Ctrl + J, or sth... to 'improve" flow(?)... wth
- 01:06:102 (1,2,3) - Okay, so... I don't think this pattern's distance spacing is appropriate with the others, for pattern consistency or w/e. You can keep it if you have a good reason for it. But hey, you don't wanna try messing this up if you want to underestimate a single disqualification. Might look major to me, but not really to you, so yeah...
- 01:19:816 (1) - When I played until this part, I felt a little odd because of the straightness of this slider on the song track's part. It's probably optional if you want to curve it or not. Something like this would do, just an example:
- 01:22:216 (9) - When I saw this slider's spacing, it looked fine to me even though I played this part. Actually, the slider's placement is
shtnot really right. It feels like you've just randomly placed there for nothing... or for a jump, If I can recall? Well ofc, a new track or a song is there, but the placement is not right imo. - 01:25:645 (2) - OH MY VOLKSWAGEN You ended this slider on 1/4 tick, but the next slider on a similar part ended on a simple white tick. Is this a mistake? or purposely doing it? If intentional... GJ!
- 01:32:159 (1,2) - Likely optional, and... minor. I suggest 2.2x spacing here for consistency with the previous similar part. This, 2.33x spacing, looks pretty much bigger. Or better use lower for this gap to have an indication for players, just my opinion.
- 01:33:188 (7,8,1) - This looks pretty fun to play, but wait... WHAT??! Spacing between (7) and (8) has a jump, (8) and (1) don't. I prefer swapping because the new track showed up a little quickly, but it's up to you.
- 01:49:645 (6,7,1) - Likely the same as before, it has a good flow similar to a triangle, but wth it's randomly placed. Make a triangle as you did before, here's just an example:
- 01:58:216 (1,3) - I almost can't read this stacking while playing, but I suppose I won't have to kill you for making the flow and playstyle good to play. Well... How about trying a manual stacking here? Might look better to me.
- 02:31:474 (2) - This song track is taking a huge emphasis over this kind of pattern density, I mean... 1.65x spacing? That's, kinda, small, for, this, part. So maybe you should extend the spacing to 1.8x or 2x, like the part you did on 02:24:274 (1) - , That one introduces good spacing and makes more sense, so why not here too?
- 02:34:559 (3,4,5,6,7) - This flow is....... WHY?!?!? Is this on purpose just for a back-and-forth flow or sth?
- 03:04:216 (1) - Oh, please this placement blah:
- 03:15:016 (1,2) - This plays great, but the flow is... 'broken'. It's kinda repetitive repeating the same thing again, but just do as you want.
- 03:23:931 (3,1) - I prefer a manual stacking here, I know it's similar but not really to me. Just because of "aesthetics" doesn't mean it just shows the appreciation of beauty, might be great for the player's playstyle too. But watch it, keep it readable.
- 03:34:902 (3,4,5,6) - Is this pattern like, "the more density the bigger spacing"? Or... weirdly placed? Because the song is probably a normal intensity chorus.
- 03:53:759 (3,4) - Probably optional; I suggest replace these two circle to a slider, uhh for rhythm consistency ofc, just like what you did on some patterns next to this track. Because I'm pretty sure this might face inconsistency, furthermore. Or maybe 03:53:416 (1,2) - this one also, if possible.
- 03:56:759 (3,4,5,6,1) -
- 04:08:159 (7) - This looks fine, but the sliding position seems odd, likely random or sth. Try rotating this 40, 50 or 60 for a Cyclone or cycle formation flow... ehh It's might be a little bit, if only you moved it somewhere else better than the current place ofc. Sth like this for example:
- 04:23:588 (1) - Does this slider, looked like a question mark to me or sth ... "?", This will surely be ... "fun".
- 04:52:045 (3,4,5) - I cannot explain repeatable reasons for now, so... uhh balance distance spacing pls.
- 05:18:445 (1,3) - You just heard people in #modhelp, this overlap
is sikmight be okay, but not really sure if it'd be fine due to it's aethetics. - 05:35:931 (5) - Almost the same as 01:33:188 (7,8,1) -, try this for this circle (5). No need explanation :^)
- 05:55:816 (2,3) - Sameme as 04:52:045 (3,4,5) -
- 06:04:388 (3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Nooooo the floooow!!! It was really cool at start, then you broke it :^(((999
- 06:22:131 (3,4,5,6,8) - Saaaame 05:18:445 (1,3) -
- - IT'S THE EEEEND OF AN ARPHHIIIIRREE /caps lock breaks.