forum

BN Cleaning: Ending the Standstill.

posted
Total Posts
160
show more
ztrot
Yeah sorry that we have been a bit on the silent front but that ends today! HAPPY THURSDAY everyone tho it is actually wednesday my time :P
Mercurial
At least, I'm happy that some pieces are being moved. Although more communication about the current situation would be appreciated...
ztrot
Then simply ask? we have stated we are here willing to talk just tell us what is on your mind.
xxdeathx

Reditum wrote:

https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/4495311

Happy Thursday!
How is it Thursday in our time zone CDFA

ztrot wrote:

Then simply ask? we have stated we are here willing to talk just tell us what is on your mind.
Sure, when are you gonna unveil the new system in its entirety? Ever since the BNG ranking was abolished it's been all talk and no solid numbers or names of anything until these kicks today. But we all want to see the numbers.
ztrot

xxdeathx wrote:

Reditum wrote:

https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/4495311

Happy Thursday!
How is it Thursday in our time zone CDFA

ztrot wrote:

Then simply ask? we have stated we are here willing to talk just tell us what is on your mind.
Sure, when are you gonna unveil the new system in its entirety? Ever since the BNG ranking was abolished it's been all talk and no solid numbers or names of anything until these kicks today. But we all want to see the numbers.
Glad you asked as you can see the post in the beatmap management forum that post will be updated and all the hard numbers will be there! Now mind you we are using this as a base for activity the automated system is not in place we have tired other formats but remember what we have been saying from the start all of these systems have been more or less tests, as we get ever closer to FINALIZED format we will keep you updated.

Edit: our main goal is to keep the ranking process moving while testing new things
xxdeathx
if you mean this thread t/334994, it hasn't been updated since it was posted. People have been waiting quite some time for the finalized system.
Zero__wind
oh this is a good thing and should've been done much earlier and more frequently imo
people should know that they have to work hard to deserve their BN membership and rights, of course I mean, people who still want to stay in
and wow I'm still not out yet, I'm so surprised
ztrot

xxdeathx wrote:

if you mean this thread t/334994, it hasn't been updated since it was posted. People have been waiting quite some time for the finalized system.
no not that thread keep an eye on the beatmap management forum
Bara-
Good to see it happened
Happy thursday guys!
Raiden
My, my. I expected a big clean but not THIS BIG O_o

Happy Thursday and good job people!
Loctav

Raiden wrote:

My, my. I expected a good clean but not THIS BIG O_o

Happy Thursday and good job people!
We are not done yet
Bara-
Not yet? O.o
How many BN will go away / are already removed?
Nyukai
BN who are inactive for months have been removed, that was kinda obvious I think.

I just hope people read my post and took care of that ;_;
Raiden
That's still to be cleared up. If I remember correctly, they are calculating numbers and scores and getting exact values /refer to this post/

If the value is not even close to the required activity, I guess they'll be kicked without further ado. In case they are close, discuss it with the BN in question.

/by the way when I said I expected a "good clean" I didn't imply that it was bad, sorry if I made you guys think that. I guess my wording is not the best. I think y'all doing great work moving this forward/
Stefan
Cherry Blossom

Stefan wrote:

Finally.

Don't eat me please D:

_______________________________________


After looking at my recent activity, People could think i'm not really active as BN, concerning mods and icons. But I'm always here to help people, and if i were posting chatlogs with mappers i helped, i could get more kds, but i was too lazy for that or not really interested in earning a kd, maybe ? :o

For those who doubt about my activity, i will be always active as BN and and i'm willing to help anyone, help doesn't mean mod & icon. But i think i should give more icons now, in order to show I still do my BN job...
Yauxo
Finally². Only took me 3 month to get out of that group, thats like no time at all \:D/ /s.

Seriously though, I kinda want to see if this system ever gets to the point where it's actually balanced. Would be a shame if it wouldnt ever reach that. Also, why exactly isnt there a way to opt out of the group yet? I dont quite get why people are forced to stay in there whenever they first enter.
BeatofIke
I'm actually a bit inactive atm, but I still mod and nominate from time to time.
My recent mods are just my leftovers (old mod requests, old timing requests, old M4M requests, etc.)
Mercurial
You guys (recent non-nominators and nominators as well) should say this to the administration, I really don't think this is the place to say such things.
ztrot

Yauxo wrote:

Finally². Only took me 3 month to get out of that group, thats like no time at all \:D/ /s.

Seriously though, I kinda want to see if this system ever gets to the point where it's actually balanced. Would be a shame if it wouldnt ever reach that. Also, why exactly isnt there a way to opt out of the group yet? I dont quite get why people are forced to stay in there whenever they first enter.
why opt out when just not taking part yields the same result?
Topic Starter
Shohei Ohtani
Because then you get shit like this where the team completely overflows with people who arent actively contributing ; )
Mercurial

ztrot wrote:

why opt out when just not taking part yields the same result?
Because people sometimes feel useful, but they don't want to have to charge with some responsabilities on their back.

Ex: I can be the best modder out there and be nominated to be a Nominator or even a QAT, but I would decline that because I want to mod freely, without chains or holds.
Topic Starter
Shohei Ohtani
Also, note that literally every other team allows you to leave if you dont wish to contribute.

The reason I was told that leaving wasnt allowed is that "BN is a simulation of modding v2, and you cant leave in modding v2 either", although i honestly havent heard ANYTHING about moddingv2 other than as a reason to NOT fix problems.
Mercurial
Nominators are MATs without a title, which for me it's worse than MATs.
Crimmi

Mercurial wrote:

Nominators are MATs without a title, which for me it's worse than MATs.
And the MAT with their purple name was unique for the time, maybe bring that back sometime in the future?
Stefan

Mercurial wrote:

Nominators are MATs without a title, which for me it's worse than MATs.
If you're a BN - or want to become one - for a different name colour and title at the forums then you're probably wrong in the team imo.


I guess it's somewhere discussable to say "I don't want to be a BN anymore, I want to leave it". You just to be inactive at all if you don't wish to be part of it, that's how it always worked since the newBAT addition.
Deimos
Leaving the group due to inactivity is one thing, but to force the members to be inactive so they can leave the group another. Not everyone might want to stop modding maps just 'cause they don't longer want to be a BN for whatever reasons. It should be a normal thing when you have to make an application to join the group that you can leave the group by making an application as well. Just 'cause that's how it was since the beginning doesn't mean it has to stay at it is forever.

Be more flexible.
Yauxo
I dont quite get why there has to be a "you wont leave, eff you" mentality in the first place. What do you get out of that? The modder has to stop modding/doing what they like just to leave the group, like that'll help...

There have been some points made in previous posts, I dont think that it'd change anything if I were re-post them.
Bara-
And more people are out
How many (in numbers) are removed and how many are still in it?
I'm quite curious to see how much people (percentually) got removed
Raiden
Around 13 more got removed which leaves BN to the number of 76 if I'm not mistaken out of 10X. Around 25-30% of the BNG removed

Huge, really huge purge I must admit lol
Crimmi

Raiden wrote:

Around 13 more got removed which leaves BN to the number of 76 if I'm not mistaken out of 10X. Around 25-30% of the BNG removed

Huge, really huge purge I must admit lol
30% to be exact out of the 106
whymeman

Stefan wrote:

I guess it's somewhere discussable to say "I don't want to be a BN anymore, I want to leave it". You just to be inactive at all if you don't wish to be part of it, that's how it always worked since the newBAT addition.
Not actually true. Some BATs in the past actually requested for some downtime or when they feel they have to leave. If we played that "waiting game" back then, you would see maybe 100 or so Alumni. There's also some members who completely quit which has to be considered.
Bara-
That's quite a lot O,o
Still quite some left, I though we had +- 70, good to see that's what's left
whymeman
Another thing I've noticed that I forgot to say. When there was a lot of BNs active, it also put a lot of stress with the bubble / qualify limit that created this "rank race" problem. Even with the purge, will this limit be the same or re-balanced to the new activity count?
Yauxo

whymeman wrote:

Another thing I've noticed that I forgot to say. When there was a lot of BNs active, it also put a lot of stress with the bubble / qualify limit that created this "rank race" problem. Even with the purge, will this limit be the same or re-balanced to the new activity count?
We've already requested this multiple times and nobody (staff) wanted to change this. There were multiple reasons given (such as QAT limitations) while we had tons of BNs, I dont see them changing anything with less BNs now.
Bara-
I think it'll be the same, as the inactive ones are removed, bit the actives' activity is still the same
I for example found out I was insanely active is August
And in July too actually
whymeman
Hmmm...... as long as the team don't get worked up over the limit issue and worry more about the maps themselves, then mappers can relax easier with less DQ fears. As I would see it, that "room" given from the limit is wasted on every DQ that is made from carelessness caused by modding too fast on demand while under pressure trying to provide results. Because of the excess of mistakes in the past, the limit got tighter but also increased that stress of trying to get more maps up and ready before being bared down by the limit. If maps can be qualified and clear through the trial period without faults and onward for lets say.... 3 months, then maybe the limit can be set a bit higher. But, the opposite can be true if the work is sloppy for those 3 months, the limit can be tighter and more strict.
Yauxo
So that we'll eventually reach 1 qualify/day? There will always be disqualifications, no matter what you do - There will always be something that the BNs think is okay, but the QATs dont.
Loctav
You can to consider the membership as some attribute you unlock and eventually lose or keep.
On a system that is based on automation and score, you can neither retire or quit. It's like you want to quit being Top20 in Catch the Beat. There is no "Contact the staff and we delete you out of that".
The logic behind "you can not resign" was, that you join upon your score and leave upon your score. No more, no less. And in any future and automated system, you will neither be able to simply quit, unless you just stop doing things.

You unlocked an ability. You either keep it by keeping score or lose it by losing score. This is not a club you can join and leave as you wish, because that's not how future automated systems will work anyways.

And better get used to it now, before it changes and you start finding it troublesome again :U
xxdeathx
Honestly I don't get why it's a big deal to some people that they can't ask to be removed. As others have said, if you don't want to do it, just don't do it. Don't mod if you don't want to. If you want to be able to mod on your own accord, don't give icons then. Too simple.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply