When will this start?
Also, who are the participating BN?
Also, who are the participating BN?
Does this include all mods, or only taiko mods?OzzyOzrock wrote:
- You show three recent mods of yours on any map you want.
Only Taiko.CXu wrote:
Does this include all mods, or only taiko mods?OzzyOzrock wrote:
- You show three recent mods of yours on any map you want.
www http://puu.sh/jLpte/590109d261.jpgOnosakiHito wrote:
Edit: lol, three people posted at the same time.
Sorry that I didn't explain it in a more detailed way in PM. You may coordinate with the guests and let them have a try when the TNA queue is formally open.CXu wrote:
Does this include all mods, or only taiko mods?OzzyOzrock wrote:
- You show three recent mods of yours on any map you want.
Your GDers need to fulfill the requirements and submit the map.NolanM wrote:
What if I need BNs to check a hybrid mapset of STD and Taiko, but I only mod STD (don't know how to mod Taiko)? Does this queue just not work for me then?
Thursdays are the SCHEDULED openings.IntelliTroodon wrote:
I think this system is really flawed because if you aren't on for some reason during that one specific time it opens on thursday you have to wait a whole nother week just to get your map checked. BNs should be allowed to look at maps not put through the queue, just maybe a limited amount.
Speaking of this, maybe have the scheduled opening at Thursday 00:00 UTC, ending at Thursday 23:59 UTC, and then use a random number generator to determine which 4 maps to pick? Gives everyone a chance to post in every timezone that way.IntelliTroodon wrote:
I think this system is really flawed because if you aren't on for some reason during that one specific time it opens on thursday you have to wait a whole nother week just to get your map checked. BNs should be allowed to look at maps not put through the queue, just maybe a limited amount.
That way it would be flawed as well because no one knows which maps are going to be rejected (unless you have a good amount of knowledge regarding Taiko mapping), and so people might as well spam F5 while they wait if the TNA has rejected any map.CXu wrote:
Speaking of this, maybe have the scheduled opening at Thursday 00:00 UTC, ending at Thursday 23:59 UTC, and then use a random number generator to determine which 4 maps to pick? Gives everyone a chance to post in every timezone that way.
So far so good. I haven't seen any problem beside one thing that just happens to bug me a bit:OnosakiHito wrote:
Interesting... let's keep that in mind for now, okay? We would like to see how current system works. After that we could do such refinings. Does this sound good?
I said more or less the exact same thing and you said I wasn't right to say that the system was flawed in this way T.TRaiden wrote:
Obviously the red highlight. While it might be a valid reason to "organize the Nominators in a more structured way and ensure that we can fairly split the work among each other", it however cuts away any freedom the BNs have. I suggest revoking this rule completely as it denies the BNs the freedom they should have, while still taking this as an additional or complementary queue instead.
I agree, as the participating BNs are only allowed to mod stuff from this queue, I am limited to request mods from the Taiko BNs that are not participants. I'm required to show 3 Taiko mods, but I am an STD modder trying to get a BN took look at the Taiko portion of a hybrid mapset. As answered earlier, I have to get the GDers to mod 3 maps.. something Id rather not make them do (also one GDer is a participant BN in this queue) sorry if this doesn't make sense, I'm bad at explaining and just wanted to add my opinion. :3Raiden wrote:
So far so good. I haven't seen any problem beside one thing that just happens to bug me a bit:OnosakiHito wrote:
Interesting... let's keep that in mind for now, okay? We would like to see how current system works. After that we could do such refinings. Does this sound good?
Obviously the red highlight. While it might be a valid reason to "organize the Nominators in a more structured way and ensure that we can fairly split the work among each other", it however cuts away any freedom the BNs have. I suggest revoking this rule completely as it denies the BNs the freedom they should have, while still taking this as an additional or complementary queue instead.