Maybe it has to do with you not realizing you're looking scummy, otherwise you'd be avoiding said things, zzz
?Drezi wrote:
And I'm actually still waiting for that since I honestly was not sure about it, and haven't really recieved a proper explanation. Sakura you can answer that too now.
not even going to use my modding experience as an excuse but yes, I definitely learned from all of this.Sakura wrote:
Im not going to be harsh on navi tho, since it was his first time modding. I'm pretty sure he probably learned from all of this.
That specific comment was regarding my town game, actually.Drezi wrote:
Maybe it has to do with you not realizing you're looking scummy, otherwise you'd be avoiding said things, zzz
Did the bolded really happen i don't remember it.Drezi wrote:
Amianki: Design around massclaims D1.
Drezi: Whynot here D1?
Amianki: GIF setup cannot be broken.
Drezi: Oh ok.
Drezi: Whynot now, though considering we have farto eating NK prolly anyway, and a fair share of claims/softs having been outed already? Please explain if I'm wrong.
Amianki: I don't feel comfortable, don't ask me, you're scum.
Drezi: I think you are...
My role said the target gets an extra ACTION the following night, I didn't think it works on passive BP?fartownik wrote:
Couldn't you have motivated me knowing I had a used-up Bulletproof (it wasn't used-up, but it was implied from the lack of the nightkill n2) to bring it back and possibly save a confirmed Town's life?
Just FYI, I don't think I've ever been the one to suggest a massclaim as either alignment before. If I did, it was only one or two games out of the dozens I've played.Drezi wrote:
Amianki: Design around massclaims D1.
Drezi: Whynot here D1?
Amianki: GIF setup cannot be broken.
Drezi: Oh ok.
Drezi: Whynot now, though considering we have farto eating NK prolly anyway, and a fair share of claims/softs having been outed already? Please explain if I'm wrong.
Amianki: I don't feel comfortable, don't ask me, you're scum.
Drezi: I think you are...
????Sakura wrote:
Oh yeah, i actually forgot about the fact that Navizel said that roles were made before alignments, that meant that godfather gave scum an auto win button.
Please dont ever do that, that'd be grounds for voiding wins on MS.
^fartownik wrote:
I'm pretty GiF actually THOUGHT you mean '1-shot Strongman' as in a factional kill-modifier, not a Vigilante. I think you misunderstood that role completely.Navizel wrote:
http://www.quicktopic.com/51/H/nVyx8FcaGrH
Navizel wrote:
Roles were assigned before alignments. Roles cannot be used to determine alignment.Drezi wrote:
@mod: can we know if roles were assigned after alignments or not?