huh, wasn't massclaim happening D3 anyway? D2 is usually not a good idea for a massclaim.
Did the bolded really happen i don't remember it.Drezi wrote:
Amianki: Design around massclaims D1.
Drezi: Whynot here D1?
Amianki: GIF setup cannot be broken.
Drezi: Oh ok.
Drezi: Whynot now, though considering we have farto eating NK prolly anyway, and a fair share of claims/softs having been outed already? Please explain if I'm wrong.
Amianki: I don't feel comfortable, don't ask me, you're scum.
Drezi: I think you are...
My role said the target gets an extra ACTION the following night, I didn't think it works on passive BP?fartownik wrote:
Couldn't you have motivated me knowing I had a used-up Bulletproof (it wasn't used-up, but it was implied from the lack of the nightkill n2) to bring it back and possibly save a confirmed Town's life?
Just FYI, I don't think I've ever been the one to suggest a massclaim as either alignment before. If I did, it was only one or two games out of the dozens I've played.Drezi wrote:
Amianki: Design around massclaims D1.
Drezi: Whynot here D1?
Amianki: GIF setup cannot be broken.
Drezi: Oh ok.
Drezi: Whynot now, though considering we have farto eating NK prolly anyway, and a fair share of claims/softs having been outed already? Please explain if I'm wrong.
Amianki: I don't feel comfortable, don't ask me, you're scum.
Drezi: I think you are...
????Sakura wrote:
Oh yeah, i actually forgot about the fact that Navizel said that roles were made before alignments, that meant that godfather gave scum an auto win button.
Please dont ever do that, that'd be grounds for voiding wins on MS.
^fartownik wrote:
I'm pretty GiF actually THOUGHT you mean '1-shot Strongman' as in a factional kill-modifier, not a Vigilante. I think you misunderstood that role completely.Navizel wrote:
http://www.quicktopic.com/51/H/nVyx8FcaGrH
Navizel wrote:
Roles were assigned before alignments. Roles cannot be used to determine alignment.Drezi wrote:
@mod: can we know if roles were assigned after alignments or not?