ByBy_ChAn wrote:

pls change the artist . The artist's name is not writted so , but is write so : Österreich

Is an german artist I guess so you should change the artist , since the metadata is unrankable because of artist's name ;_;

handsome wrote:

ByBy_ChAn wrote:

pls change the artist . The artist's name is not writted so , but is write so : Österreich

Is an german artist I guess so you should change the artist , since the metadata is unrankable because of artist's name ;_;

English pls Mr BAT.

ByBy_ChAn wrote:

I talk english and I'm not bat yet

OblivioN wrote:

[deetz' Normal]

1. as the easier diff of this beatmap，It's a little hard for newbie especially here：01:21:424 (1,2,3,4) -
   and ar 4.5 is enough

OblivioN wrote:

From Lazy modding team(¦3[____]

[General]

1. handsome song & map but the timing still weird ……

[Insane]

1. 00:06:246 (2) - sampleset normal my hitsound noob, too complicated, so sry no :<
2. 00:37:139 (1) - ds，246|382 and default drum clap or finish placement is ok, dont need drum
3. 00:55:889 finish on the tail of 00:55:353 (1) - also not need
4. 00:57:139 (1) - 00:57:139 remove the finish keep first
5. 01:02:674 (7) - finish no
6. 01:24:103 (6) - & head of 01:24:282 (1) - add clap,sounds good , then add drum finish at 01:24:460 (the tail of 01:24:282 (1) - ）、01:24:639 （the head of 01:24:639 (2) - ）& 01:24:996 (3) - & 01:25:174 (4) - only add finish orz
7. 01:25:353 (6) - whistle no

Okoratu wrote:

00:17:139 (1,3,4,5) - gross. ok
why do you lower SV in the circle only intro i what
I DO WAHT I WANT

412,220,12853,2,0,P|409:151|382:118,1,99.9999999999999,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

284,252,17139,2,0,P|325:278|375:276,2,99.9999999999999,8|0|0,0:0|0:0|3:0,0:0:0:0:

92,251,11960,2,0,P|128:288|225:276,1,140,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

285,159,36424,2,0,B|229:150|229:150|208:203,1,112,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

pinataman wrote:

[deetz's Normal]

00:01:425 (1) - +2x for better blanket

00:05:710 (7) – why break DS here?

00:07:139 (2) - +1 y for better blanket

00:07:496 (3) – 134, 81 to make equilateral triangle with 2 and 1's slider head

00:12:853 (5) – change slider end to blanket better, code if you want it: http://puu.sh/fhQ0L/fef3e2ec38.jpg

00:17:139 (4) – curve more like this: http://puu.sh/fhSR1/26cf3bc2fb.jpg did my own thing

00:22:496 (3,4) - There are patterns like this where the change in flow feels a little too high for a normal. So for instance rotate 12 degrees and keep DS and it feels a little more smooth. fine to me

01:25:710 (1) – Try 241, 93 for a better triangle off of 01:24:282 (4,5) -

bigfrog wrote:

00:04:282 (5,6) - blanket better
00:10:353 (2) - just think the point before red point should only use one...looks more neat meh
00:17:139 (4,6) - try symmetry :3
00:31:424 (4,5) - blanket looks fine to me
00:37:853 (1) - this way looks better and avoid to seems like blanket 00:37:139 (4) too : awkward flow to me

Nozhomi wrote:

- deetz' Normal

1. Diff name should be deetz's Normal (you forget the s). Sorry but this is very offensive. deetz identifies as a amorphous kanye west humanoid, thus should always be referred to in plural form.

bigfrog wrote:

Hard
00:04:282 (2) - NC here instead of 00:03:924 (1) - since white line keeping, since it looks better now imo
00:07:853 (4) - delete red point and replace? since you use only bend slider here 00:06:424 (2) -i like this shape lol

Insane
00:23:032 (2) - move to 296|232? nope, current plays better due to pitch change, imo

Nozhomi wrote:

[notice]- Insane :

1. 01:18:210 (2,3) - Why this jump here ? There is no sens imo. there is no jump, slider leniency

- Hard :

1. 00:11:424 (4,5) - Blanket is off, and why not center more 00:11:960 (5) - to not have him on 00:11:424 (4) - head ? only fixed blanket~

That's all for me :3
GL Mukyu~

Nozhomi wrote:

- deetz' Normal

1. Diff name should be deetz's Normal (you forget the s). i am become kanye west
2. 00:04:282 (5) - NC nah, whole thing is a pattern, don't want to be spammy and the hp drain looks fine.
3. 00:06:067 (1,2) - Blanket is off
4. 00:08:567 (4) - Add NC, remove it on 00:09:639 (1) - and add one at 00:10:353 (2) - I NC to the loud, different sound
5. 00:12:853 (5) - NC same as before. don't want to be spammy and keep as whole pattern
6. 00:17:139 (4) - NC ^
7. 00:37:139 (4,1) - Blanket a little off
8. 00:37:853 (1) - Raise a little slider end to get a better flow with 00:38:567 (2) - I like it, sorry
9. 00:49:282 (5,1) - Blanket off
10. 00:54:282 (5) - NC same
11. 01:03:567 (3) - NC same
12. 01:08:567 (1,2) - This pattern break flow. I recommande to inverse curve like this http://puu.sh/fowo5/662f2b66ce.jpg. fine to me. I like my pattern
13. 01:17:139 (2,3) - Blanket off.
14. 01:19:460 (5) - NC still same.

Okoratu wrote:

more timing signatures would still be nice for correctness D:

deetz wrote:

Okoratu wrote:

more timing signatures would still be nice for correctness D:

t/279439

If an incorrect time signature would last for more than 2 bars, add another timing section to fix it.

1. 00:51:782 - 01:03:566 - 01:04:638 - 01:08:566 - 1ms unsnapped red lines, fix! Doesn't seem to be fixable, nvm!
2. At 00:47:139 - , it's 7/4? http://puu.sh/g7F4V/bf1e1ea44d.jpg Looks like a bug :V
3. General hitsounds throughout the maps:
4. 00:35:531- I hear a weak cymbal at this point, maybe set a lower-volume finish at this point.
5. 00:37:138 - Default drum-clap or drum-finish here.
6. 00:44:281 - 00:45:888 - This section still sounds really off to me, I think you could need some confirmation that it is fine as well.
7. 00:54:282 - Soft-finish sounds better than drum-finish here as the cymbal is dominant at this beat imo.
8. 01:05:353 - How about drum-finish here.

1. 00:09:639 (1,2) - I think NCing on 2 first is the better option for consistency, as 00:10:353 - and 00:19:282 - sound really similar .
2. 00:21:782 (1) - 00:26:424 (1) -
3. 00:01:425 (1) - How about whistle on head
4. 00:09:639 (1) - Small spacing issue.
5. 00:24:639 (2) - Clap on reverse arrow.
6. 00:28:567 (1) - How about soft-sample on tail instead
7. 00:32:496 (1) - Clap on reverse arrow.
8. 00:38:389 - Setting a beat here as well would be a good idea since this section could need slightly higher density.
9. 00:44:282 (1) - Finish on tail.
10. 00:44:282 (1,2) - NC on 2 first.
11. 00:54:282 (5) - Switch this with a soft-sample finish instead.
12. 01:12:496 (4) - Clap on tail
13. 01:22:317 (4,1) - NC at 4 already for the measure change. Also Nc at 01:24:103 (4) - as well

1. 00:34:282 (1,2) - NC on 2 first.
2. 00:55:889 (6) - Drum-finish on head.
3. 01:20:710 (1,2) - NC on 2 first.
4. 01:22:139 (1,2) - ^

1. 00:03:567 (1) - Delete NC here and swap the NC places for 00:03:924 (3,1) - , fits better to the rhythm and also looks neat structure-wise.
2. 00:20:353 (5) - Optional NC would be good here to lower down the combo size.
3. 00:55:353 (5) - Drum-Finish on reverse arrow and tail.
4. 01:05:710 (1) - Unnecessary NC.
5. 01:14:102 (1) - ^ I think this is a mistake lol.

Pho wrote:

[Normal]

1. 00:09:639 (1,2) - I think NCing on 2 first is the better option for consistency, as 00:10:353 - and 00:19:282 - sound really similar . feels odd lol
2. 00:38:389 - Setting a beat here as well would be a good idea since this section could need slightly higher density. nah i dont want to make the diff any harder plus i would have to add more beats for consistency

1. 01:03:209 (6,7) - change this to repeating slider like 01:02:852 (5) - ? i thought this was 1/4 at first lol.
2. 00:55:353 (5) - i'm concerned about the loud hitsound of the middle note. kinda distracting imo http://puu.sh/g8R1B/c279ae7888.jpg
4. 00:52:674 (3) - for this note you should stack with 00:52:853 (4) - and move 00:52:674 (3,4) - all of it to x:149 y:355 http://puu.sh/g8Rau/ee66934211.jpg
   imo this plays & looks alot nicer than your previous pattern as it still emphasizes music with its larger spacing.

byfar wrote:

wtf u use so many straight sliders. this song would go perfectly with curved ones