rank前纪念一下,音效很深刻
thx for modding!Oracle wrote:
helloiamcheckingthis.
01:41:157 (1) - 这个我感觉ctrl+G效果更好 还是现在这样好,不然连续两个逆向flow太别手了,
02:24:162 (8,9,10,11) - touching the HP bar due to auto stacking, please fix it. fixed.
03:06:128 (2,1) - http://puu.sh/dEiEM/c905a99413.jpg这里怎么overlap了一点啊我好伤心啊 怎么那么强迫症,其实这俩滑条overlap了一圈不是这么一点啦,感觉还行就这样吧。
03:31:619 (1,2,3,4,5) - 不知为何没音效,shi漏了么 不是,这里确实没有音效。
02:59:191 - 这段的音量可能要稍微提一点,我的劣质耳机提醒我inaudible了 changed.
03:06:128 (2) - 尾巴忘记drum sampleset了? changed. 本来确实是故意不加的,不过还是加了吧。
03:13:064 (1) - ^ ^
For the incoming drama: This map is not overmapped as those streams are mapped to the apparent sounds in the song.
Mei wrote:
恭喜
看看有沒有戏看
Gaia wrote:
we have a winner here
jk ily desu gun
xxdeathx wrote:
Kaguya Hourain wrote:
xxdeathx wrote:
and get 0ppxxdeathx wrote:
First ranked play on this map!
吓得我飞了起来Autumn wrote:
还有人记得这张图当初的模样吗?
Halozy - Gennryuu Kaiko (Hollow Wings) [Waterfall]
What was the map like when first made ↑
转眼间萌萌的HW都要AFK了.
I think even people who can play it will complain, just like when people who can't play something offer compliments. It doesn't matter as long as they aren't acting like a dick and explain their reasoning.Weed wrote:
would never have guessed this map would ever become qualified... really an amazing map, its a shame those who can't play it will proceed to QQ
hmm most of these complaints are coming from people that can't play it and i haven't yet seen one from someone who canLach wrote:
I think even people who can play it will complain, just like when people who can't play something offer compliments. It doesn't matter as long as they aren't acting like a dick and explain their reasoning.Weed wrote:
would never have guessed this map would ever become qualified... really an amazing map, its a shame those who can't play it will proceed to QQ
Darksonic wrote:
... this map is not made for humans.
Huh? https://osu.ppy.sh/s/100348ByBy_ChAn wrote:
WOW ! It's your first ranked marathon map ? If is , congrats HW !!!
pielak wrote:
we are a few days early for the qualified -> first ranked map of 2015
Just wondering, when a QAT wants to unqualify a map, can they do it on their own accord or do they actually need get the approval of other QATs aswell? There are times when I see a map get unqualified, and the QAT post say something like, '' Hello there I've talked with this other QAT and this third QAT and we decide this doesnt work so rip your map'', and other times, like Otsukimi Recital and this, where it's just one QAT saying ''This map is bad and is now unqualified''TicClick wrote:
Sorry, but this map lacks a fair bit of something that is called quality and should have not been ranked in its current state. If you need more details, this is probably due to blatant abuse of patterns like 00:47:399 (1,2,3,1,2) - and the fact there are barely any distinct and audible sounds you mapped most, if not all streams to. Oh, and also a massive pile of overlapping copypaste that starts from 03:43:584, not speaking of the stream that follows the kiai part on 04:05:781 and ignores any features provided to you by music.
I am also going to refer to this post, as similar situation has already happened once in the past; you can read first two paragraphs of it, replacing "Platinum" with "Mysterious Hymn".
yea sure, but there's also a reason for the qualifie section/qatKotonoha wrote:
Just wondering, when a QAT wants to unqualify a map, can they do it on their own accord or do they actually need get the approval of other QATs aswell? There are times when I see a map get unqualified, and the QAT post say something like, '' Hello there I've talked with this other QAT and this third QAT and we decide this doesnt work so rip your map'', and other times, like Otsukimi Recital and this, where it's just one QAT saying ''This map is bad and is now unqualified''TicClick wrote:
Sorry, but this map lacks a fair bit of something that is called quality and should have not been ranked in its current state. If you need more details, this is probably due to blatant abuse of patterns like 00:47:399 (1,2,3,1,2) - and the fact there are barely any distinct and audible sounds you mapped most, if not all streams to. Oh, and also a massive pile of overlapping copypaste that starts from 03:43:584, not speaking of the stream that follows the kiai part on 04:05:781 and ignores any features provided to you by music.
I am also going to refer to this post, as similar situation has already happened once in the past; you can read first two paragraphs of it, replacing "Platinum" with "Mysterious Hymn".
There's a reason why you need to get maps bubbled before ranking, you know...
You're completely missing my point.FlobuFlobs wrote:
yea sure, but there's also a reason for the qualifie section/qatKotonoha wrote:
Just wondering, when a QAT wants to unqualify a map, can they do it on their own accord or do they actually need get the approval of other QATs aswell? There are times when I see a map get unqualified, and the QAT post say something like, '' Hello there I've talked with this other QAT and this third QAT and we decide this doesnt work so rip your map'', and other times, like Otsukimi Recital and this, where it's just one QAT saying ''This map is bad and is now unqualified''
There's a reason why you need to get maps bubbled before ranking, you know...
What's not fitting about it, though? The song is really intense, as is the map. The sv flows quite well and the patterns match the intensity of the song really well too - I mentioned the last section being too hard earlier, but I still think it fits, despite its ridiculous difficulty. I think people are too used to easier maps. A map's difficulty isn't what makes it good or bad. It's how said difficulty is designed. I think we can all agree that Tenshi isn't a bad map and that map is miles harder than this one.SnowflakeStreet wrote:
I'm cool with difficult maps, but the song is just not fitting.
Truth has been spokencaptin1 wrote:
unfortunate that this is the reality of the QAT now, that they believe they can make subjective unranks for "map quality" without any attempt at improving the map because they believe their definition of "quality" is more important than the BATs involved in ranking the map
I personally don't have much of an opinion on the map one way or the other, but the simple fact that this was unqualified on such a weak concept just disappoints me
Yup. Make this my words.captin1 wrote:
unfortunate that this is the reality of the QAT now, that they believe they can make subjective unranks for "map quality" without any attempt at improving the map because they believe their definition of "quality" is more important than the BATs involved in ranking the map
I personally don't have much of an opinion on the map one way or the other, but the simple fact that this was unqualified on such a weak concept just disappoints me
MillhioreF wrote:
05:00:925 (2,3,4,5,1) - Not necessarily a problem, but can anyone even FC this? 1.20x note spacing on 2 x 2.8 slider velocity.
I can attest to their fcability!Pappy wrote:
MillhioreF wrote:
05:00:925 (2,3,4,5,1) - Not necessarily a problem, but can anyone even FC this? 1.20x note spacing on 2 x 2.8 slider velocity.
Just FCed this part after clicking "test" million times in editor. /o/
I fc the first of the two at the end reliably, but for some reason I always miss on the second one ):MillhioreF wrote:
Yeah, that was a bad question. I should have asked if anyone can FC them _reliably_.
I agree with this.nookls wrote:
i really don't get what qualifies as rankable and what doesn't anymore. one shitty low quality map gets ranked, the next doesn't. it's an all or none situation, so make it be that way.
I just don't see what makes this a "shitty low quality map". The map is easy to read and feels, at least to me, like it matches the song. The only gripe I can see is that it's moderately difficult to play. And I don't see why difficulty of playing should factor into ranking a map. I'm not a mapper so I know my opinion might not hold much weight at all, but as a player I'm really sad to see this map go ): it seemed like a breath of fresh air and I really enjoyed itnookls wrote:
i really don't get what qualifies as rankable and what doesn't anymore. one shitty low quality map gets ranked, the next doesn't. it's an all or none situation, so make it be that way.
OH NO people have different opinions!Soap755 wrote:
I agree with this.nookls wrote:
i really don't get what qualifies as rankable and what doesn't anymore. one shitty low quality map gets ranked, the next doesn't. it's an all or none situation, so make it be that way.
Then there's some good un-ranked maps that don't get ranked. Like gg.
this is what i mean, if everything is subjective then why can't this be ranked while maps like dadadadada can and are?MillhioreF wrote:
How do you even determine "quality" to the point that a map can be ranked or not?
- Patterns that make sense? We see less and less of those in Insane/Extra difficulties nowadays and that's not stopping anyone.
- Readability? That's subjective, I can read stuff most people would call totally unreadable.
- Playability? That's subjective too, we saw some very good plays on this map even during the short time it was ranked, so obviously some people can play it.
- Following the music? Maybe, but I'd argue there are a lot of other ranked maps that completely make up their own beats. At least this one follows the constant background 1/4.
What it boils down to in the end, since any criteria (beyond ranking criteria themselves) is subjective, is whether or not the map is the best it can be. I don't think this one is yet, but all the same what right does anyone have to say "this mapping style is unrankable"?