Why not? Voting the same person for no apparent reason is fun, these votes will not matter anything in the next bunch of postsDakeDekaane wrote:
You never stack votes for lulz.
Glad I voted Tsukasa.
Why would you associate us at this point of the game?pieguy1372 wrote:
inb4 farto + rEdo bus
trying to force an end to RVS as soon as possible is very anti-townDakeDekaane wrote:
Also pieguy, why do you vote farto when he's clearly trying to put an end to RVS as quick as possible, we have plenty of time, but that's not reason to goof around.
I see you still can't read me for shit. see: information mafiarEdo wrote:
I kinda dislike pieguy's reaction to farto's vote swap, though. That was just an action performed in order to push the game forward, yet he tries to revert it to him, huh.
scumrEdo wrote:
Why would you associate us at this point of the game?
disagree. I find that when people actively try to cut off RVS, the information gained becomes very limited and misleading. it seemed like you were trying to cut off RVS by just declaring "getting out of RVS quickly".fartownik wrote:
There's no such thing as 'RVS ending unnaturally', it always ends naturally because you can always gather some information out of the circumstances. Just like you did now, how does that differ from a 'regular' (in your point of view) end of an RVS?
my point is that forcing discussion is bad. RVS works best if you don't force it too much, although some movement is required to get the game out of RVS. farto was claiming RVS was over with just a few votes, no reasons and more than half the players hadn't even posted yet. it seems way too preliminaryDakeDekaane wrote:
We could basically spend all D1 in RVS without any sign of "ending naturally", better starting discussion as soon as possible, lefting very few spots for scum to play around, don't you think?
why not? I figured there was a chance of farto voting his scumbuddy in the first serious vote of the game. tho you two being friends also explains itrEdo wrote:
Also, please respond to my question instead of that blunt accusation with no coverage.
Raging Bull wrote:
pieguy, why are you voting for rEdo when you voted for Tsukasa too?
.............. are you fucking seriousRaging Bull wrote:
pieguy, why are you voting for rEdo when you voted for Tsukasa too?
I disagree with this statement. If RVS were to end "quickly" then the information you get is how it ended quickly.pieguy wrote:
disagree. I find that when people actively try to cut off RVS, the information gained becomes very limited and misleading. it seemed like you were trying to cut off RVS by just declaring "getting out of RVS quickly".
yeah, but just look at it. there was no information at all and farto was still saying RVS was over.NoHitter wrote:
I disagree with this statement. If RVS were to end "quickly" then the information you get is how it ended quickly.
Also what was the case behind rEdo? I didn't quite get it.
NoHitter wrote:
Also, FoS: Ono, Irre, CTs-Th
RVS has ended already, yet you guys still seemed to random vote someone.
Much time on MS would make you think like piepieguy1372 wrote:
ono isn't even this game 0.0yeah, but just look at it. there was no information at all and farto was still saying RVS was over.NoHitter wrote:
I disagree with this statement. If RVS were to end "quickly" then the information you get is how it ended quickly.
Also what was the case behind rEdo? I didn't quite get it.
This made my day.Tsukasa wrote:
town is fart
pieguy1372 wrote:
Tsukasa was a RV
rEdo was a semi-serious vote
what the fuck are you trying to accomplish with that question? I don't see how anything you could be thinking of is a scumtell. 0.0
sry for confusion, what I mean is, it's an RV as a vote that is part of RVS, and my reason for voting him was that he had a wagon on him. I was trying to get something to happen, but all that happened was farto came in and declared "RVS is over".Raging Bull wrote:
Wow so unlike you to get so mad. The purpose of that question was toreaction testsee why you voted for Tsukasa. It's hard to even say it is for RV when a shit ton of everyone voted for Tsukasa.
DakeDekaane wrote:
Yay, a vote on me
I wasn't sheeping, but whatever, you should have a stronger reason.
DakeDekaane wrote:
Vote: Tsukasa
Lol yeah not sheepingDakeDekaane wrote:
^scum pls
Actually, I'd like votes on pieguy.
Unvote
Vote: pieguy
We could basically spend all D1 in RVS without any sign of "ending naturally", better starting discussion as soon as possible, lefting very few spots for scum to play around, don't you think?
DakeDekaane wrote:
You never stack votes for lulz.
Glad I voted Tsukasa.
Unvote
Vote: rEdo
Discuss.
From meta tellsrEdo wrote:
Why not? Voting the same person for no apparent reason is fun, these votes will not matter anything in the next bunch of postsDakeDekaane wrote:
You never stack votes for lulz.
Glad I voted Tsukasa.
I kinda dislike pieguy's reaction to farto's vote swap, though. That was just an action performed in order to push the game forward, yet he tries to revert it to him, huh.
also:Why would you associate us at this point of the game?pieguy1372 wrote:
inb4 farto + rEdo bus
rEdo wrote:
Boo, I'm getting so much scumreads this early Q_Q
That's what I'm wondering about. he did the exact same thing as me, yet he said that I'm scum... should that mean that he's scum as well? Also, please respond to my question instead of that blunt accusation with no coverage. It's rather ignorant to call me out just because I can't follow/predict your process of thinking, hence my question >_>
Vote: pieguy
To sheeping the person he called scum with metaDakeDekaane wrote:
^scum pls
Actually, I'd like votes on pieguy.
Unvote
Vote: pieguy
We could basically spend all D1 in RVS without any sign of "ending naturally", better starting discussion as soon as possible, lefting very few spots for scum to play around, don't you think?
pieguy1372 wrote:
sry for confusion, what I mean is, it's an RV as a vote that is part of RVS, and my reason for voting him was that he had a wagon on him. I was trying to get something to happen, but all that happened was farto came in and declared "RVS is over".Raging Bull wrote:
Wow so unlike you to get so mad. The purpose of that question was toreaction testsee why you voted for Tsukasa. It's hard to even say it is for RV when a shit ton of everyone voted for Tsukasa.
how is it not obvious what the intent behind that vote was? Tsukasa hadn't even made a single post and he had 4 people voting him, a bunch of which (including me) jumped on there without saying anything and the other person even referenced vote stacking. as it is, this seems like a cheap way to throw blame on me. 0.0
Agreed. I've check the time for each vote to Tsukasa. Each of them have a big time gap, which enough for every player to read each player's vote.Raging Bull wrote:
How I read your vote is more like to bangwagon on Tsukasa to get him since it looked like a favorable attempt. fart never even said RVS is over, he said it is getting out of RVS. Information is helpful when it is good, but when it's just voting someone for some random ass reason because thats how games like to start, it is not good information. Seems like a cheap way to throw the blame on him.
rEdo saying stacking for lulz seems stupid but doesn't exactly seem scummy intent at all.
So I wasn't sheeping rEdo, this meaning your "Dake-rEdo scum buddies 2013" is invalid.DakeDekaane wrote:
dat ninja
Do something that's not scummyDakeDekaane wrote:
Tsukasa, if you read carefully the thread, there's a tiny post after the one with my voteSo I wasn't sheeping rEdo, this meaning your "Dake-rEdo scum buddies 2013" is invalid.DakeDekaane wrote:
dat ninja
Mod: [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=289422&t=165449][b]Sakura[/b][/url]
1. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=2061922&t=165449][b]Sephibro[/b][/url]
2. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=3047538&t=165449][b]CTs-Th[/b][/url]
3. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=49329&t=165449][b]rEdo[/b][/url]
4. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=926675&t=165449][b]Tsukasa[/b][/url]
5. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=56917&t=165449][b]fartownik[/b][/url]
6. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=1425253&t=165449][b]DakeDekaane[/b][/url]
7. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=668833&t=165449][b]CalignoBot[/b][/url] ([url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=3354548&t=165449][b]Louis13[/b][/url]) (V/LA until November 30th)
8. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=1287964&t=165449][b]Irreversible[/b][/url]
9. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=124455&t=165449][b]NoHitter[/b][/url]
10. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=617106&t=165449][b]Cookie[/b][/url]
11. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=107485&t=165449][b]pieguy1372[/b][/url]
12. [url=https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/search.php?author_id=398760&t=165449][b]Raging Bull[/b][/url]
fight me irlSephibro wrote:
farto keeps doing useless things as usual, RB keeps keeping his vote until someone is at L
The point is, nobody dare to RVS now. (Since farto announced that RVS was ended) Especially when 'somebody' keeps giving FoS to anybody who does the random vote.Sephibro wrote:
About your discussion around RVS: day1 is ALWAYS RVS, unless there is some role who can get confirmed, such as an Innocent Child. The information we get from d1 is the flip on a randomly lynched person and a VERY VERY volatile and unreliable wagon analisys
Possibly "***-rEdo" scum team A and "Dake-***" scum team B?DakeDekaane wrote:
So I wasn't sheeping rEdo, this meaning your "Dake-rEdo scum buddies 2013" is invalid.
Lynching scum D1 isn't useless. Chances are scum wouldn't lynch off their teammate early on. More likely the partner 's vote will be with someone else/voting no one.Sephibro wrote:
About your discussion around RVS: day1 is ALWAYS RVS, unless there is some role who can get confirmed, such as an Innocent Child. The information we get from d1 is the flip on a randomly lynched person and a VERY VERY volatile and unreliable wagon analisys
Generally RVS is just a means to start discussion. When it becomes obvious that you have something else to talk about, RVS should stop.Cts-Th wrote:
The point is, nobody dare to RVS now. (Since farto announced that RVS was ended) Especially when 'somebody' keeps giving FoS to anybody who does the random vote.
No, it's not always RVS. Some first-days can last even for 40-50 pages, and such long discussion is definitely not RVS. I have played in some games on this forums that involved this situation and you could pretty much make up your correct reads until the end of the game during that time.NoHitter"
day1 is ALWAYS RVS
Also, Sephi and farto still fighting over things. Please don't bicker again like in Higurashi.[/quote]
Welp, I'm not the one that bringed the argument. Also I replied in a strictly humoristic tone.
Anyways, commenting on Sephibro's post.
[quote="Sephibro wrote:
Welp, I'm not the one that bringed the argument. Also I replied in a strictly humoristic tone.NoHitter wrote:
Also, Sephi and farto still fighting over things. Please don't bicker again like in Higurashi.
No, it's not always RVS. Some first-days can last even for 40-50 pages, and such long discussion is definitely not RVS. I have played in some games on this forums that involved this situation and you could pretty much make up your correct reads until the end of the game during that time.Sephibro wrote:
day1 is ALWAYS RVS
I actually hoped that the pieguy wagon started riding as a way to give me some more clear vibes about him. Pretty much curious why he voted Tsukasa as well, and his vote on me was taken as an invitation to try pushing him a little bit.fartownik wrote:
I don't get rEdo's vote on pieguy tho. No explanation whatsoever, I wish you posted a proper reason for doing that.
"looked like a favorable attempt"? what does that mean?Raging Bull wrote:
Everything I have suspicion on you, you always claim it as a cheap way to throw blame on you. If you do something suspicious to me, then you are suspicious. How I read your vote is more like to bangwagon on Tsukasa to get him since it looked like a favorable attempt.
that's the same fucking thingRaging Bull wrote:
fart never even said RVS is over, he said it is getting out of RVS.
EXACTLY WHY I SAID IT WAS BAD. THERE WAS NO INFORMATION THERE AND FARTO WAS SAYING RVS WAS OVER WHEN THERE WAS NO INFORMATION. WHAT THE FLYING FUCKRaging Bull wrote:
Information is helpful when it is good, but when it's just voting someone for some random ass reason because thats how games like to start, it is not good information. Seems like a cheap way to throw the blame on him.
where'd you get that idea from? my vote on you was because I think you're scum. this doesn't make any sense 0.0rEdo wrote:
Pretty much curious why he voted Tsukasa as well, and his vote on me was taken as an invitation to try pushing him a little bit.
I was the one who came up with the idea of all of us attacking the shit out of each other D1, mostly because of this game where NH and I were both scum and I almost survived o/ in hindsight that was a mistake but oh wellfartownik wrote:
though he should've probably changed his playstyle after the Higurashi game anyways.