They are more like Extra abilities I guess, I just called them "hidden" because it sounded cooler. Also forgot to note that hidden abilities arent necessarily X-Shot but that seemed way more general to type it like that on the sample role PMs.
pieguy1372 wrote:
in as emergency replacement tho
Thanks! That helped loadspieguy1372 wrote:
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Quick_Guide_to_Mafia
Why not? Voting the same person for no apparent reason is fun, these votes will not matter anything in the next bunch of postsDakeDekaane wrote:
You never stack votes for lulz.
Glad I voted Tsukasa.
Why would you associate us at this point of the game?pieguy1372 wrote:
inb4 farto + rEdo bus
trying to force an end to RVS as soon as possible is very anti-townDakeDekaane wrote:
Also pieguy, why do you vote farto when he's clearly trying to put an end to RVS as quick as possible, we have plenty of time, but that's not reason to goof around.
I see you still can't read me for shit. see: information mafiarEdo wrote:
I kinda dislike pieguy's reaction to farto's vote swap, though. That was just an action performed in order to push the game forward, yet he tries to revert it to him, huh.
scumrEdo wrote:
Why would you associate us at this point of the game?
disagree. I find that when people actively try to cut off RVS, the information gained becomes very limited and misleading. it seemed like you were trying to cut off RVS by just declaring "getting out of RVS quickly".fartownik wrote:
There's no such thing as 'RVS ending unnaturally', it always ends naturally because you can always gather some information out of the circumstances. Just like you did now, how does that differ from a 'regular' (in your point of view) end of an RVS?
my point is that forcing discussion is bad. RVS works best if you don't force it too much, although some movement is required to get the game out of RVS. farto was claiming RVS was over with just a few votes, no reasons and more than half the players hadn't even posted yet. it seems way too preliminaryDakeDekaane wrote:
We could basically spend all D1 in RVS without any sign of "ending naturally", better starting discussion as soon as possible, lefting very few spots for scum to play around, don't you think?
why not? I figured there was a chance of farto voting his scumbuddy in the first serious vote of the game. tho you two being friends also explains itrEdo wrote:
Also, please respond to my question instead of that blunt accusation with no coverage.
Raging Bull wrote:
pieguy, why are you voting for rEdo when you voted for Tsukasa too?
.............. are you fucking seriousRaging Bull wrote:
pieguy, why are you voting for rEdo when you voted for Tsukasa too?
I disagree with this statement. If RVS were to end "quickly" then the information you get is how it ended quickly.pieguy wrote:
disagree. I find that when people actively try to cut off RVS, the information gained becomes very limited and misleading. it seemed like you were trying to cut off RVS by just declaring "getting out of RVS quickly".
yeah, but just look at it. there was no information at all and farto was still saying RVS was over.NoHitter wrote:
I disagree with this statement. If RVS were to end "quickly" then the information you get is how it ended quickly.
Also what was the case behind rEdo? I didn't quite get it.
NoHitter wrote:
Also, FoS: Ono, Irre, CTs-Th
RVS has ended already, yet you guys still seemed to random vote someone.
Much time on MS would make you think like piepieguy1372 wrote:
ono isn't even this game 0.0yeah, but just look at it. there was no information at all and farto was still saying RVS was over.NoHitter wrote:
I disagree with this statement. If RVS were to end "quickly" then the information you get is how it ended quickly.
Also what was the case behind rEdo? I didn't quite get it.