If you want more pressure on me Sakura, I'm happy to provide it.
unvote
vote: Royston
unvote
vote: Royston
Sakura wrote:
I'm not the same person you played with before tho, I have about 10+ games under my belt
So what is the town motivation behind this again?Royston wrote:
If you want more pressure on me Sakura, I'm happy to provide it.
unvote
vote: Royston
I've probably improved at reading people (or not, that's still up for debate) that's what I mean. If you're town I'll probably notice one way or another, but for now that other post of yours seems townish to me, so i'm giving you the benefit of doubt, as i'm not sure to what extend you'd fake emotions or if you're even able to fake them at all.Irreversible wrote:
What do you mean with that Sakura, you seem pretty much the same o.o
Don't quite get that, if you were town, why would do something stupid like this?Royston wrote:
If you want more pressure on me Sakura, I'm happy to provide it.
unvote
vote: Royston
Hint: he's not town.Irreversible wrote:
if you were town
Irreversible wrote:
Well Royston, you haven't posted anything useful, except that you were talking for CalignoBot, for whatever reason.
Sure Sakura, why don't we also discuss that you always want to put pressure on me so I get lynched for some silly reasons? Why are you so bothered by this 'discrediting' btw? It isn't meant to be this, it's a fact. I won't vote for anyone until I got some better reasons to do so. So Sakura, I'd like you to give some statements to some other players, except me. Thank you.
Irreversible wrote:
Don't quite get that, if you were town, why would do something stupid like this?Royston wrote:
If you want more pressure on me Sakura, I'm happy to provide it.
unvote
vote: Royston
This is a classic example of pushing forward a wagon while trying not to leave a trail. He also has yet to vote this entire game. As an addition, he's sheeping one of my town reads pretty hard.Irreversible wrote:
Let's see how he's going to react further. FoS on Royston for now~
This is a misrep. My case isn't that you're attacking Royston. My case is the way you're attacking Royston. You're trying to further suspicion on him, but you're doing it in a way that's not truly taking a stance.Irreversible wrote:
Next thing, it's quite funny how you both work together, first Royston defends you, then you defend him. You don't have to care at all if my FoS is on Royston or not, that's just my opinion about him, well yeah.
1. His response to your comment about me unvoting.Irreversible wrote:
1) I don't understand, what post about your post, what?
2) This should be answered if you scroll a bit to the top, I said why he's doing this, if he was town he'd never do that.
3) And I don't understand this question as well, if I didn't think he's mafia, why would I vote him? Non-sense again.
If that's a mafia rule, alright, but I don't like throwing out my votes without any reasons.
1. This is a question I literally cannot answer.Irreversible wrote:
I'm just impressed how much you want to talk about Royston, I've got a few questions for you as well.
1) Why did Royston talk for you?
2) What do you think yourself about his selfvote? Are you worried about it?
3) Why exactly are kookook and ReDo your other primary subjects? And afaik, Jinxy didn't post that much, how are you so sure he's town?
How confident are you in that?Sakura wrote:
Hint: he's not town.
Hehe, matches so nicely with my thoughts.Sakura wrote:
Hint: he's not town.
You're just sitting on the fence here. You don't think he would do that if he was town, and then you flip around and say you're not voting him because you don't think he's scum.Irreversible wrote:
2) This should be answered if you scroll a bit to the top, I said why he's doing this, if he was town he'd never do that.
3) And I don't understand this question as well, if I didn't think he's mafia, why would I vote him? Non-sense again.
so at first you were like against anything that Sakura said, started to shift between your statements, and now that she's claimed that she started to think that you're town, you've started to sheep to the wagons that she starts push? tsk, tsk. something doesn't seem right.DakeDekaane wrote:
Hehe, matches so nicely with my thoughts.Sakura wrote:
Hint: he's not town.
his vote is only temporary and has no real relevance nor connection with him being scum, as you just implied - he'll just change it when the right time comes.Irreversible wrote:
I still don't think that his 'selfvote' was just for talking stuff, if it was, he would've unvoted hisself already, wouldn't he?
Yes I did, it has a reason and I'll explain after Irre's reply.rEdo wrote:
@Sakura: is "who's scum" a catch-phrase (since I saw people randomly using this a lot, even in this thread), or did you actually ask him who's scum?
What an answer, why can't you offer us some real support? Well, there must be a reason that you aren't talking.Royston wrote:
Well, I can offer moral support.
Well Caligno, you were pushing forward a wagon as well. But the special thing here is, that you've done this, because I was putting pressure on Royston, so you had to put some pressure on me as well, to get rid of the attention of Royston.CalignoBot wrote:
I finally got off my lazy ass and read some things again.
Vote: Irreversible
This is a classic example of pushing forward a wagon while trying not to leave a trail. He also has yet to vote this entire game. As an addition, he's sheeping one of my town reads pretty hard.
kookookook and rEdo are my other primary suspects.
I'm satisfied with Jinxy and Sakura as town for now. Their posts look town-motivated.
DakeDekaane, Royston, and SenaSaki are in varying forms of null.
Your first paragraph is a huge stretch.Irreversible wrote:
Well Caligno, you were pushing forward a wagon as well. But the special thing here is, that you've done this, because I was putting pressure on Royston, so you had to put some pressure on me as well, to get rid of the attention of Royston.
Also, you're voting me again, but this time for no reason. You've also said that his selfvote was irrelevant due to your experience. But you know, games can change, and you also want to defend Royston with that, don't you?
I think you just want to be with Sakura and reDo (even if reDo is your other primary subject), so you voted me that the others won't get their FoS on you.
Unvote
Vote: CalignoBot
Simple reason: Royston is inactive again, too many things happened to him, so he prefers staying quiet. You immediately turned active, would be a bit too suspicious if you both were inactive, hm?
just wanted to make it clear: at first his twist of statements seemed as mere confusion of his to me, but every further post started to ping me pretty hard he's scum, that's why I intervened just recently and started to pressure him.CalignoBot wrote:
(...) and rEdo didn't have an opinion at all (...)
rEdo, who is 'us' ?rEdo wrote:
it's not us trying to be mean
And sorry that i missed this question, i actually didn't see it, too many things at once.rEdo wrote:
his vote is only temporary and has no real relevance nor connection with him being scum, as you just implied - he'll just change it when the right time comes.Irreversible wrote:
I still don't think that his 'selfvote' was just for talking stuff, if it was, he would've unvoted hisself already, wouldn't he?
also, I do work for town - I wanna lynch scum, and with every post you just prove yourself being one more and more. is there a particular reason why you think Royston is scum, or just "a gut feeling"? or perhaps you're just following Sakura's wagon just to divert the attention from yourself?
Sakura and me, as we're pushing you quite hard and you started to say stuff like "I don't even care anymore", so yeahIrreversible wrote:
rEdo, who is 'us' ?
CalignoBot apparently got active because your posts started to ping scum, as I've mentioned before, and that's what he's focusing on. he hasn't defended nor said a word about Royston (except for saying that he has no idea why Royston defended him). not sure about Roy's case, though, but he seems less scummy than you right now.Irreversible wrote:
There is a particular reason, his inactivity when we voted him. calignobot immediately got active then, what lets me think they work together. It's obviously a good choice to stay quiet while you guys focus on me, isn't it?
I might as well say that you'reIrreversible wrote:
Why would he say something about Royston? That's the defending actually imo, because he doesn't want to put attention on him.
It's a newbie game, deal with itIrreversible wrote:
It's funny how nearly all mafias i play in turn into a tutorial.. eh
Royston wrote:
How confident are you in that?Sakura wrote:
Hint: he's not town.
[/quote]Royston wrote:
How confident are you in that?
Caught appeasing scum is caught.Irreversible wrote:
still don't get why you unvoted so late..
I just noticed this, page 13. rEdo's talking about Dake, but then turns around and votes Irre? Like, no one has talked about this as far as I know?rEdo wrote:
so at first you were like against anything that Sakura said, started to shift between your statements, and now that she's claimed that she started to think that you're town, you've started to sheep to the wagons that she starts push? tsk, tsk. something doesn't seem right.DakeDekaane wrote:
Hehe, matches so nicely with my thoughts.
Unvote
Vote: Irreversible
Honestly, this doesn't really ping at me, he's just helping to clarify for someone else. I can't really read an ulterior motive from this.Royston wrote:
Um, I'm pretty sure he unvoted to avoid having kook at L-1. He said that in his post...
Yeah, as I've said, seems to be clarification imo. However, "I felt like I had to say something" seems a little oddly phrased, like "posting for the sake of posting" kind of way, which makes me slightly uncomfortable.Royston wrote:
To explain my thought process, I just finished reading Caligno's post saying he unvoted kook because he was afraid he was at L-1 and then I saw Irreversible ask why he unvoted kook. Well... I felt like I had to say something.
ahaha, these goddamn avatars, I was sure it's Irreversible's post, thus started talking to him immediately XDJinxy wrote:
I just noticed this, page 13. rEdo's talking about Dake, but then turns around and votes Irre? Like, no one has talked about this as far as I know?
I have my reasons to askCalignoBot wrote:
How is his thoughts on his predecessor useful?
wut. For like 3/4 of that post you were saying Irreversible was acting really suspicious and you decide to unvote him and say he's getting town points? I don't get it.rEdo wrote:
ahaha, these goddamn avatars, I was sure it's Irreversible's post, thus started talking to him immediately XDJinxy wrote:
I just noticed this, page 13. rEdo's talking about Dake, but then turns around and votes Irre? Like, no one has talked about this as far as I know?
elaborating: he's been picked on by Sakura until the end of page 11, where Royston voted himself, and that's where he started to be suspicious as hell in my eyes (p/2559420 pinged me like real hard, looks as if he was really relieved that he's clean from suspicion and immediately started sheeping to Sakura for a town-like read). apart from defending himself so boldly from a mere one vote, he also (after being asked for his reads) started to point his finger rather blatantly at Royston with a reason being him self-voting and defending Caligno for no particular reason. what worries me, though, Royston himself hasn't even responded to all of this, or rather, he responded with a mere "I felt like I had to say something".
Unvote
gotta rethink about stuff for now. good job Irreversible, you're getting town points :)
I'd like to read something more relevant from Royston now.
I was afraid Lilac was going to modkill me for being retarded (see rule 1) or something like that.Irreversible wrote:
still don't get why you unvoted so late..
YesCalignoBot wrote:
Are they going to be explained later?
Interesting catch there. Another thing thing I also noticed was rEdo's vote that placed kook on L-1 was also after Sakura talked about Saki liking to Quickhammer.Quotes wrote:
rEdo knowingly jumps onto a bandwagon when it has been very obvious - as well as stated in-thread through the screen cap of kook being idle from some silence from his avatar - that kook isn't going to reply any time soon, or will simply not respond to any post of his in any meaningful way and puts him at L-1. This reeks scum to me. Virtually everything else outside of early RVS looks like either it's speculating on set up or speculating on why the person I subbed in for speculated on set up.
Now I'm wondering o.oSakura wrote:
YesCalignoBot wrote:
Are they going to be explained later?