Xinely
Thanks Xinely and HeatKai too!ohai grumd ~
all of my mod just suggestion, feel free to ignore.. this map nice imo ><
[Normal]
change all N become N:C1 same as hard?
yeah forgot
00:44:316 - add whsitle? feel empty in here imo
nope, the music is empty too
01:09:440 - finish?
it doesnt fit
01:28:284 (1,3) - hmm. i think it's better if (3) same curved as (1)
i dont understand this, it feels fine in my way
01:34:565 (5) - NC for consistency? also finish if you want
i dont need a NC at the last note
01:56:548 (1) - for better flow ?
i like my alternating flow style more
02:02:830 - give finish? feel empty too
yeah
[Hard]
HP-1 for same spread with normal?
hm nope, i'll keep it high here
00:25:473 (1) - change this for follow vocal too? http://puu.sh/353YF.jpg
i try to follow less vocals in the beginning part
00:36:268 (2) - spacing 0,91x in here is it itentional? normal spacing better imo
was a mistake thanks, fixed
00:42:549 (2) - spacing in here is it itentional too? i think if it itentional put it in x:208 y:224 for diagonal like this
fixed
01:12:973 (2) - hmm ctrl+G?
no
01:24:750 (6) - ctrl+G? i feel better
no
01:34:565 (7) - NC for consistency
01:59:689 (8) - ^
no
02:02:830 - finish?
yes
Good Luck ~
all of my mod just suggestion, feel free to ignore.. this map nice imo ><
[Normal]
change all N become N:C1 same as hard?
yeah forgot
00:44:316 - add whsitle? feel empty in here imo
nope, the music is empty too
01:09:440 - finish?
it doesnt fit
01:28:284 (1,3) - hmm. i think it's better if (3) same curved as (1)
i dont understand this, it feels fine in my way
01:34:565 (5) - NC for consistency? also finish if you want
i dont need a NC at the last note
01:56:548 (1) - for better flow ?
i like my alternating flow style more
02:02:830 - give finish? feel empty too
yeah
[Hard]
HP-1 for same spread with normal?
hm nope, i'll keep it high here
00:25:473 (1) - change this for follow vocal too? http://puu.sh/353YF.jpg
i try to follow less vocals in the beginning part
00:36:268 (2) - spacing 0,91x in here is it itentional? normal spacing better imo
was a mistake thanks, fixed
00:42:549 (2) - spacing in here is it itentional too? i think if it itentional put it in x:208 y:224 for diagonal like this
fixed
01:12:973 (2) - hmm ctrl+G?
no
01:24:750 (6) - ctrl+G? i feel better
no
01:34:565 (7) - NC for consistency
01:59:689 (8) - ^
no
02:02:830 - finish?
yes
Good Luck ~