1. fine

1. many ticks was larger than clap. so should change tick.wav volume. or change timing sections volume to 10% lower than now.
2. 00:22:947 (3,4) - [nazi] these actual distance is not same as before notes. 0.9x is better.
   
   
3. 01:19:320 (2) - [nazi] mistake? position of the section is not a straight.
4. 02:10:419 - add note here. this place has large volume on vocal imo.
5. 02:33:496 (3) - [nazi] same as 01:19:320 (2).

2. 02:22:617 - two inherited timing sections. You must remove one.
3. 02:40:090 (4,5,6) - placement suggestion
   
   
   this map had many stack. so this suggestion will be fit.

1. 00:18:331 (7,8,4) - [stupid]stack here.
2. 00:41:573 (6,1,2) - [nazi]these stack makes misalignment. move (1,2) to x475 y181. this will be fit.
3. 00:46:601 - two inherited timing sections. You must remove one.
4. 00:45:694 (3) - placement suggestion
   
   
   this placement makes good balance imo.
5. 02:15:364 (3,5,6) - [nazi]same as 00:41:573 (6,1,2). move to x86 y154.

1. fine!

1. good

NewRulerNA wrote:

hi

mods

NewRulerNA wrote:

hi

[249's Easy]

1. many ticks was larger than clap. so should change tick.wav volume. or change timing sections volume to 10% lower than now. for now i'll keep it. i'd like to hear more opinions about this.
2. 00:22:947 (3,4) - [nazi] these actual distance is not same as before notes. 0.9x is better. ahh so that's the spacing. i've been trying to find the correct DS for this .
   
   
3. 01:19:320 (2) - [nazi] mistake? position of the section is not a straight. whoops...fixed ><.
4. 02:10:419 - add note here. this place has large volume on vocal imo. i was thinking about this...fixed.
5. 02:33:496 (3) - [nazi] same as 01:19:320 (2). orz fixed ;_;

stupid mod...orz don't say that, you helped me

awesome maps

good luck

CrestRising wrote:

Hi there. As by your (the mapper's) request.
* = Slightly more suggested than others.

249's Easy:
00:18:661 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) These don't use a 1.0X distance spacing. Was this intentional? yes because of the slowdown to 0.75, i have to increase the spacing.
01:04:815 (2,3,1) Not too big of a deal but, the spacing here looks a bit odd to me. You could try lining the endpoint of 2, 3, and 1 into a line or a recognizable pattern. i wouldn't find it exciting if i do that, so that's why it isn't aligned.
* 01:12:562 (2) You could make this symmetrical with 1, or you could copy the slider from 1 and rotate it 120 degrees sideways like http://puu.sh/1LQez no this is intentional. i'd rather do something different rather than make the sliders the same. it woulsn't look that exciting IMO.
01:27:562 (1,2) You could change the rhythm to http://puu.sh/1LQmT to keep consistency with 3 and 4. no it'll break the flow in the vocal if i do that.
01:36:134 (1) The sliders kind of short. I think it might be better if the spinner went across the entire time the artist says "begin", ending at around 01:39:678 or 01:39:430 fixed this myself. i extended the spinner a bit longer that you suggested and added a slider to make it flow smoother to the song.

Nice skin & SB. Good luck with mapping.

Sagisawa-Yukari wrote:

249's Easy
00:04:156 (3) - NC? no the combo would be too short for this part
01:07:452 (2) - NC? it'd be too hard for beginners considering the previous note is a (1).
01:19:320 (2) - This rhythm is kinda odd to me,I recommend to used like this? no because i feel that the repeat slider follows the vocals nicely. the slidertick going back follows the vocals nicely and the hitsound goes along with it IMO.

SPOILER

01:27:562 (1) - remove NC no this is where the lyrics change in this part of the song.
01:28:551 (2) - NC
02:02:837 (3) - NC? same as 00:04:156.
02:30:200 (4) - NC fixed.

good luck~

CrestRising wrote:

General:
03:03:496 (1) Just a thought, but maybe try ending it at maybe 03:07:782 nah, for this part i prefer to following the end of the piano instead the videos, since i feel it was more intuitive to follow piano instead


Normal:
00:12:068 (2) It would look better if you relocated it to x:256 y:128 not at all, i think this isnt really necessary since i dont feel any big change of the flow movement, and i kinda like a non symmetrical patterns like this >_<
00:33:496 (2) Just a thought, but maybe add a finish or a hit sound on the slider's head? nah, doesnt really fit since there is no strong voice that can emphasized with finsih at all on there
01:51:958 (2) It might look better if you copied the slider (1), move it to where this slider (2) currently was, and just reverse it. nah, i think the flow is better this way, yeah i know that maybe it will looks good by make the slidershape similar with (1) but i kinda uneasy with the slider direction if i make the (2) with the S shape too. >_<

Hard:
02:34:485 (5) Just a thought, but maybe you could make it look something like this? (Not exactly perfect, but you'll get the idea.) nah, im not really like the flow of (4) and (5) since it was cutted from the previous pattern flow, yeah, i know that this can makes a nice blanked on the (4) and (5) but i think the flow is a better this way >_<

Insane:
* 00:09:430 (1) You should split it into two circles and stack them to keep consistency with 00:09:760 (2,3,4,5,6,7) hmm this is good but i kinda like this slider better, aside from it was already forming a good flow, i think it was not a bad idea to make the beatpattern not so polar at all

sorry if i like to put a different beatpattern here and there for each stanza, it happens that i love making a variety of the beat patterns and than being consistent with the polarity of the beats, since i find that it was way more interesting to play >_<

Sagisawa-Yukari wrote:

Insane
00:14:375 (4) - change like this? no, since i think that can break the flow because the direction of (4) will be to left while the (1) is on the right
01:10:254 (7) - NC no, too keep the combo pattern on that part
02:43:057 (5) - add reverse？ nah, because the percussion stop on the endslider, i think this way can emphasize the song feel more

Nichiyouki wrote:

Normal

1. 00:33:167 - Add circle? nah, i wanna make a bit of spaced spot for the starter part XD

HelloSCV wrote:

Normal
01:16:683 - is it ok kiai starts on middle of slider? i don't really know, there's no exact rule that we cant put the kiai in the middle of slider (or maybe its there, but i still dont know about it lol) the beats is way more suite if i make it like this, so i cant do much about it >_<
02:22:287 (5) - ^ ^


Insane
00:31:436 (6) - add note ( like before ) no, not really suited on that part imo
02:21:793 (9) - add note no, since i wanna follow the drum voice here
02:43:386 (6) - add note here? no, same as above [/spoilerbox]

Nichiyouki wrote:

Comment: Good job. I don't find problem more than this.[/list][/notice]

Haku's Normal+

1. 00:20:639 (1) - why? I see NO reasons to move this, and I can't see WHY is better
2. 01:05:804 (1,2) - Difference: this have "so(1) - (2...)stand up! stand up!", the other is "(1...)never give up!"
3. 02:19:815 (2,3) - Used a different rhythm
   Comment: It's between Normal and Hard, more on the normal side (i would've used more jumps, 1/4 sliders or 1/4 doublets if it was an Hard)

[/notice]

HelloSCV wrote:

From my queue

Haku's Normal+
Normal+ name seems old, just Normal is good i think It's still between Normal and Hard, And i would used some harder pattern if it was an hard

01:02:013 (1) - I would've use it if the combo ended in a different place in the music. The angle don't fit there since there is nothing that musically make it flow better
01:09:265 (2) - Nope ^
02:33:991 (3,5) - In this case, There are red tick vocal notes
02:36:298 (3) - ^

Nichiyouki wrote:

Hi, Kuria

My mod from your request in pm in-game

Red = Unrankable
Blue = You should modified
Black = My suggestion

249's Easy

1. 00:54:925 (3) - Add finish in slider end. fixed.
2. 01:36:463 (2) - Remove clap in slider begin. It doesn't fit with the rhythm of song for me. whoops fixed ><.
3. 02:12:068 (1) - Finish sound in slider begin is too loud. You should remove finish or reduce volume about 60~70%. since so many people mentioned this i'll reduce the volume of the finish. 70% sounds better.
4. 02:18:331 - Add circle? no because the rhythm would feel really awkward and the drums and cymbals would ruin that calm feeling to the song during gameplay.
   
   Comment: I think that 00:02:837 - 00:23:276 may have to add whistle more than this. In addition to the above, nice diff.

Good luck~

1. 03:07:947 - Maybe consider ending the last spinner here instead for all the diffs just like in Haku's diff. I think it's a better place to end it because the vocals stop at that point.
   
   
2. 80% volume is much too loud for the soft section until 00:23:112. 60 or 70% would be much better.

1. This diff doesn't have kiai times. Mistake? o.o
   Maybe you forgot to check kiai at 01:16:848 and 02:22:782.
   
   
2. 00:23:276 (4) - How about adding a NC here just like Kuria has done in the normal and hard diffs? I think it might fit this guitar transition a bit better.
   
   
3. 01:14:046 (1) - Hm, maybe bend this slider upwards a bit to setup a nicer flow for the spinner.
   
   

1. 00:02:837 to 00:23:936 - Consider adding some offbeat whistles just like is done in all the other diffs. This section has no hitsounds atm and is very boring because of it imo.
   
   
2. 01:10:090 (2,3) - Hm, maybe add some claps to the end of these sliders just like you did at 01:07:782 and 01:08:441. That' just a repeated section of music, I'm not sure why the offbeat clapping would stop here.
   
   
3. 00:50:969 - Maybe switch over to NC:1 here so that we could have a clap at 00:51:134 and one at 00:51:463 to hit along with claps the music. Then switch back to N at 00:51:628. Also make the tick at 00:51:298 a normal tick.
   
   
   
   
4. 00:52:782 - You could also make this tick a clap to hit with the clap in the music just like in the hard diff. Honestly you could do this all over this section because there are a lot of loud claps that happen on red ticks, like at 00:46:189 or 00:54:430. It would sound really nice imo. Right now it's a bit bland to me because you don't even use whistles like the other diffs use.

1. 01:49:980 (2) - I believe to follow the music better here, we should have this slider starting at 01:49:815 and ending at 01:50:309. This would make a consistent rhythm with 01:50:969 (1,2) and 01:53:606 (1,2) and would play much better.
   
   
2. 02:26:243 (6) - Maybe add a NC here to be consistent with 01:20:309 (1).

1. 00:41:738 (5) - Maybe add a clap on the end of this slider to hit with the one in the music just like you did at 00:31:518 (4).
   
   
2. 00:43:881 (2) - I feel like a clap is missing on the end of this slider to create a nice two clap and finish pattern just like we have in the insane diff.
   
   
3. 01:16:683 - Consider making the normal-slidertick2 a finish sound so that we could have a finish in the middle of this slider to start the kiai time better.
   
   
4. 01:22:947 (3) - Hm, maybe add a clap on the head to keep consistent with your offbeat clapping here.
   
   
5. 02:54:265 (1) - It would also be nice to have a finish in the middle of this slider.

1. Since you're the only one that maps anything before 00:02:837 you should maybe add a lead-in time because it looks bad right now to see the 00:01:189 (1) appear before draining time even starts. 1 second should be fine, maybe even less.
   
   
2. I'm sorry, I don't want to mod this diff because I don't think Haku is very fond of me and I don't want to get yelled at. It will make me sad face.

1. 01:06:134 (8) - Hm, maybe NC here instead of at 01:06:298 (1) to follow the vocals better as you have been doing and to be consistent with 01:08:771 (1).
   
   
2. 02:16:353 (5,6,7,8) - This would be more readable to me if spacing was 1.2. The jump makes it hard to read the rhythm imo.
   
   
3. 02:21:958 (6) - Again maybe NC here like in the insane diff to make this transition a little more epic.

1. 00:36:463 - You're missing out of having a clap on the slider tick here. Consider using slider tick 2 for this diff so that you could have claps on the ticks of these sliders all over the map where they are missing. It will sound much better.

1. 00:23:276 (3) - Maybe have a NC here like you do in the hard diff. I think it makes this transition much more intense.
   
   
2. 00:47:507 (4,1) - Really awkward rhythm to me. I hear a triplet in the music, and the slider should be on the white tick at 00:47:672. Can you move the 00:47:590 (1) to there and shorten it and add a circle at 00:47:590?
   
   
   Fits much better imo. Just like at 00:52:782 (1,2,3) it's the same sound. You could also NC there on the 00:47:507 (4).
   Honestly I really hate 00:46:189 (4,1) also, but I guess that one is sort of following the music.
   
   
3. 02:12:068 (1,2,3,4,5) - Hm, these seem a bit weirdly placed. Maybe try and place them in a star formation.
   
   
   I'm terrible at making stars.

1. 00:39:430 (5) - Missing clap on the head according to your pattern.
   
   
2. 01:04:485 - Again I think slider tick 2 would be better here so we could have claps on these offbeats in the middle of the slider.
   
   
3. 02:14:623 (2) - Maybe have a clap on the 2 here also to hit with the double clap in the music.

Dark Fang wrote:

[Haku's Normal+]

00:01:848 (3) - It will sound stranger, since that note is low pitched
01:45:200 (5) - a normal person will be able to see the arrow. Since that person got all the time to see it
02:00:200 - I'm following vocal after, it won't be good as now.

1. I don't like the skin having black borders on the circles, this looks ugly imo. It would be fine without these borders.
2. Sometimes it's a bit hard to recognize return arrows on the white combo colour.

1. 01:08:771 - with this rhythm I suggest doing it like this (circle-slider-circle-slider-returnslider instead of circle-circle-circle-slider-circle-returnslider):
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:45:364 (8) - I like the shape of ctrl+h+j much more, it flows way better:
   
   SPOILER

   
3. 02:27:232 (3,4) - for me it feels weird to have to click on (4) (timing wise I mean). What about slider-slider instead of returnslider-circle?
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 02:43:057 (5) - maybe add repeat? This little break right there feels a bit weird.

1. 00:26:738 (2,4) - would be better if these returnsliders would start on 00:26:573 and 00:27:562 (because of the guitar in the background)
2. 00:41:738 - there should be a beat here (I can hear a drum, so I want to click there or at least don't hold a slider)
3. 01:42:397 (5,6,7) - would do slider-circle-circle instead of circle-circle-slider, clicking these circles doesn't feel "right" atm

1. The audio lead-in may be a bit too short, I suggest 1500ms.
2. 00:03:331 (6) - this rhythm is awkward
3. 00:05:969 (4) - ^
4. 00:28:716 (7,8) - these sliders starting on red ticks doesn't feel good
5. 00:33:661 (5,6,1) - ^ sometimes they can be nice but I here I think they are just awkward
6. 00:36:298 (4,5) - ^
7. 00:45:035 (2,3) - again strange rhythm. What did you map to? It's clearly not the vocals so I assume you mapped to the instruments but I can't hear anything fitting there.

1. 01:27:892 (1) - not a perfect blanket, move the second node to grids to the right
2. 01:39:760 (5) - make this slider end 01:40:090 and add a circle 01:40:254
3. 02:00:200 (1,2,3) - are you sure about these? I would either delete them or map the whole part.
4. 02:42:232 (1,2,3) - instead of slider-slider-circle I'd do circle-slider-slider here, this moves the sliders away from the red ticks and fits the music better at the same time

1. 02:17:342 (1) - I prefer wave slider with a "symmetry point" in the centre like this, it makes them look nicer:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   184,88,137342,6,0,P|136:88|120:128|104:168|48:168,1,165.000006294251,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

2. 02:19:650 - this breaks disrupts the flow imo, instead of break-slider-slider I would use slider-slider-circle. This also makes possible to do a click on "JUST":
   
   SPOILER

   

1. Are you sure about the kiai time? It should really be consistent among the diffs: first kiai time should end 01:37:782 (for consistency)
2. second kiai time should end 02:43:716
3. 01:14:046 (1) - would end the slider 01:14:705 so that the player won't get surprised by the spinner too much (should be an Easy diff), right now the time span between these two objects is relatively low
4. 02:19:650 (2) - again I would end the spinner earlier, either 02:20:309 or 02:20:639, I don't really know which option is better
5. 02:33:167 - instead of here, there should be a beat at 02:32:507
6. 02:33:496 (3) - this slider touches the bottom border of my screen which doesn't look nice. You can fix that by turning it into a curved slider:
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 02:42:068 (3) - remove

Tshemmp wrote:

Sorry for the big delay. Catch me in-game if you have any questions.

[Haku's Normal+]

1. The audio lead-in may be a bit too short, I suggest 1500ms. Do the math: 1000 + 1189 = ????
2. 00:03:331 (6) - this rhythm is your ears are awkward.
3. 00:05:969 (4) - ^
4. 00:28:716 (7,8) - these sliders starting on red ticks kind of mods doesn't feel good
5. 00:33:661 (5,6,1) - ^ sometimes they can be nice but I here I think they you are just awkward
6. 00:36:298 (4,5) - ^
7. 00:45:035 (2,3) - again strange rhythm. What did you map[/strike ]mod to? It's clearly [strike]not the vocals so I must assume you mapped to the instruments but I can't hear anything fitting there but i'll say I don't.

Really, this diff feels like a Hard or so due to the rather complex rhythm. Therefor you should also increase the AR from 5 to 6. This makes it way clearer. I also won't mention more rhythm "errors" from now on. Man, it's better you hear the music better.

1. 01:27:892 (1) - not a perfect blanket, move the second node to grids to the right I won't completely submit it for this micy change
2. 01:39:760 (5) - make this slider end 01:40:090 and add a circle 01:40:254 What the slidertick hitsounds are for?
3. 02:00:200 (1,2,3) - are you sure about these? I would either delete them or map the whole part. nope
4. 02:42:232 (1,2,3) - instead of slider-slider-circle I'd do circle-slider-slider here, this moves the sliders away from the red ticks and fits the music better at the same time It fit both vocals and drums BETTER as now.

Sorry, I don't like this diff. Increasing the AR makes it a bit better but you should rename it to [Light Hard] or [Hard-] then, lol.

.

Tshemmp wrote:

Sorry for the big delay. Catch me in-game if you have any questions.

[General]

1. I don't like the skin having black borders on the circles, this looks ugly imo. It would be fine without these borders.
2. Sometimes it's a bit hard to recognize return arrows on the white combo colour.

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

I won't do anything just for an AR+1 (someone arleady suggested AR-1) and other useless rants.
Excuse me, but I must do this to every mod that hurt my feelings as a modder.

Tshemmp wrote:

HakuNoKaemi wrote:

I won't do anything just for an AR+1 (someone arleady suggested AR-1) and other useless rants.
Excuse me, but I must do this to every mod that hurt my feelings as a modder.

Lol, I didn't want to attack you, I just tried to give constructive criticism to your map, not you as a person, so no need to be so offended. Clearly our views of a good Normal/Hard (I still think this is more a Hard than a Normal+) differ and that's fine.

Oh, and you shouldn't use the Best of 2012 as an argument, especially not in this context. (I hope you know why.)

UnitedWeSin wrote:

Hello Kuria~
Modding from my queue.
Sorry for the delay.

[249's Easy]

Map Design

1. This diff doesn't have kiai times. Mistake? o.o no it's intentional. i don't find kiai times exciting anymore.
   Maybe you forgot to check kiai at 01:16:848 and 02:22:782. ^
   
   
2. 00:23:276 (4) - How about adding a NC here just like Kuria has done in the normal and hard diffs? I think it might fit this guitar transition a bit better. i might as well since this speeds up.
   
   
3. 01:14:046 (1) - Hm, maybe bend this slider upwards a bit to setup a nicer flow for the spinner.
   
   

no because i feel that if i do that, the flow would be broken and it'll feel somewhat awkward for me.

Hitsounds

1. 00:02:837 to 00:23:936 - Consider adding some offbeat whistles just like is done in all the other diffs. This section has no hitsounds atm and is very boring because of it imo. i'd rather not because since this part is a calm part, adding hitsounds to me would sound unfitting to a calm part.
   
   
2. 01:10:090 (2,3) - Hm, maybe add some claps to the end of these sliders just like you did at 01:07:782 and 01:08:441. That' just a repeated section of music, I'm not sure why the offbeat clapping would stop here. there's no clap at the end of (3) and the claps are for consistency. it'll sound inconsistent if i do add claps at the ends.
   
   
3. 00:50:969 - Maybe switch over to NC:1 here so that we could have a clap at 00:51:134 and one at 00:51:463 to hit along with claps the music. Then switch back to N at 00:51:628. Also make the tick at 00:51:298 a normal tick. added whistles instead since i don't wanna use the same pattern over and over again.
   
   
   
   
   
4. 00:52:782 - You could also make this tick a clap to hit with the clap in the music just like in the hard diff. Honestly you could do this all over this section because there are a lot of loud claps that happen on red ticks, like at 00:46:189 or 00:54:430. It would sound really nice imo. Right now it's a bit bland to me because you don't even use whistles like the other diffs use.

^
Nice map.

Ok I hope that helps. I enjoy your mapping style very much Kuria so I'll shoot a star.

Tshemmp wrote:

Sorry for the big delay. Catch me in-game if you have any questions.

[249's Easy]

1. Are you sure about the kiai time? It should really be consistent among the diffs: first kiai time should end 01:37:782 (for consistency) yes i'm 100% positive about kiai fountains. they can be different, but it has to make sense.
2. second kiai time should end 02:43:716
   

   Guest difficulties may have different Kiai. This is due to the fact that not everyone thinks the same spot is the "cool" spot of the beatmap; however Kiai should still be consistent.

3. 01:14:046 (1) - would end the slider 01:14:705 so that the player won't get surprised by the spinner too much (should be an Easy diff), right now the time span between these two objects is relatively low the transition to the spinner would make me feel in an awkward position because beginners may think that there's something missing in that part of the song.
4. 02:19:650 (2) - again I would end the spinner earlier, either 02:20:309 or 02:20:639, I don't really know which option is better ^
5. 02:33:167 - instead of here, there should be a beat at 02:32:507 no that slider with the sliderticks follow the vocals and it gives off a smooth feeling to the song. i did this because i feel that it flows to the vocals and it gives off a smooth feeling to the song during gameplay.
6. 02:33:496 (3) - this slider touches the bottom border of my screen which doesn't look nice. You can fix that by turning it into a curved slider:
   
   SPOILER

   
   my reason of keeping the flow steady. looking at that curved slider, the flow wouldn't flow correctly going to the repeat slider. yes it's touching the bottom, but it's not going off the screen.
7. 02:42:068 (3) - remove no i need this circle because it'll ruin the flow in the drums during gameplay. the wait would feel too long for beginners, and it may make them nervous considering that it's near the end of the song.

This diff feels really rectangular sometimes, I don't like this. Don't be afraid to put straight sliders more angular. i made these sliders straight because i want the flow to be steady. i don't wanna overdo those kinds of sliders since there are a few of the patterns that would affect on how you play, especially for beginners. in other words, the flow and transitioning in the diff.

Your diffs are great as usual, Kuria, take this star.

1. I see that in the .osb you have inserted 2 times the file "f3.png" for no reason... Be sure to delete the string of the codeless one! "Sprite,Foreground,Centre,"thebeg\f3.png",320,240"
2. The Audio Leadin is unconsistent in the diffs: While Haku's diff has got 1000 ms of audio lead-in,the other diffs have 0 ms. Please,be sure to fix this unconsistency!
3. Secondly,the timing section in the Insane diffs is late 10 ms compared to the other diffs - be sure to fix that too!

1. 00:13:386 (4,5) - This is a quite little thing,so feel free to ignore if you want: as of the oval flow introduced by 00:12:068 (2,3) - ,you should totally curve this in a upside curve: that would work totally good to follow the flow there,and it continues perfectly with 00:15:694 (1) - as of it's oval flow too! Here's what I have done,see if you like it
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   264,332,13386,2,0,P|172:356|96:312,1,180.000006866455
   68,276,14705,2,0,P|64:240|68:208,1,60.0000022888184

2. 00:18:002 (4) - Not a big deal,but anyways I don't think using a 1/1 slider there would fit that good: you have mostly followed the vocals in these sections,and this slider feels quite strange due to its ending not following the vocals at all,which continue at 00:18:661 - ,so what about simply replacing this slider with a note at 00:18:002 - ? A 2/1 gap would actually make sense for the vocals--->piano transition
3. 00:20:639 (2,3,1,2,3) - Huh,this does not really play that good,probably because of the transition 00:22:617 (2,3) - which is quite harsh to play with that linear slider you have there... Considering 00:23:276 (1) - 's oval flow,I find the best solution here to be a "V" pattern. Here's what I have done,feel free to modify it as you want!
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   256,96,20639,1,0,0:0:0
   304,148,20969,1,0,0:0:0
   356,196,21298,6,0,P|356:288,2,90.0000034332277
   412,148,22617,1,0,0:0:0
   460,96,22947,1,0,0:0:0
   416,36,23276,6,0,P|364:28|256:40,1,160,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

4. 01:02:178 (3) - This is a quite little thing,however I suggest you to do that: what about making this instead a 3/2 repeated slider with a note 1/1 later? That works really good to follow the vocals,and with this rhythmical pattern in mind you could create a pretty funny to play and flowing pattern,using opposed sliders to continue the song's progress. Here's what I have done,see if you like it
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   184,128,61848,1,8,0:0:0
   124,184,62178,2,0,P|68:200|8:184,2,120
   184,128,63496,5,0,0:0:0
   304,232,64156,1,0,0:0:0
   460,196,64815,2,0,P|460:28,1,160

   Oh,and if you do that remember to silence 01:02:178 (3) - 's sliderticks!
5. 01:07:452 (2,3,4) - Uh,using a linear slider here to continue the flow with these notes' position felt a bit harsh to me imho... It's a pretty much subjective thing,but what about smoothing out a bit the pattern using arc patterns and curved slider? Here it would actually play pretty good!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   20,152,67452,1,0,0:0:0
   68,216,67782,2,0,P|100:232|152:232,1,80,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,200,68441,1,8,0:0:0
   288,164,68771,6,0,P|364:144|440:184,1,160,4|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

6. 02:16:353 (1,2) - Oh well,I didn't like that much the rhythm used there by combining these 2 1/1 sliders... Their transition sounded quite strange,maybe because you skipped over various important elements in the beat. You have two options there: you could follow the vocals instead of the piano by using a pattern using a 3/2 repeated slider at 02:16:683 - ,or you could instead make the second slider there follow a bit more the piano,always using a 3/2 repeated slider

1. 00:18:661 (1) - Considering that the piano being played there is actually 3/2,wouldn't it be better if you actually followed this beat-per-beat using a 3/2 repeated slider with a note right 1/1 after it? I would actually see this better,as other than being a little variation of rhythm there,it plays and sounds really good!
   
   Here's a pattern that with its arc-shaped pattern could fit well in there with this rhythm setting:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   376,248,18661,6,0,P|443:228|475:188,2,123.750004720688,0|2|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   299,274,19980,1,0,0:0:0
   216,256,20309,1,0,0:0:0
   184,184,20639,1,2,0:0:0
   184,16,21298,6,0,P|104:48|72:120,1,165.000006294251,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   56,200,22287,1,0,0:0:0
   96,272,22617,2,0,P|181:314,1,82.5000031471254
   253,293,23276,6,0,P|362:301,1,110,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

2. 00:33:496 (2) - Considering the fact that you have followed almost all of these 3/2 drums,not following them here by using just a 1/1 repeated sliders sounds quite bad and out of place. What about instead making a pattern composed again by a 3/2 slider + 1/1 note? That would be the best solution,as it keeps your rhytmical logic other than actually being played quite good:
   
   I made another pattern here based on this. See if you like it ^^
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   304,344,33331,2,0,P|256:312|248:208,1,165
   344,248,34156,1,0,0:0:0
   344,248,34485,6,0,P|381:176|362:78,1,165,4|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   224,16,35474,2,0,P|187:88|206:186,1,165,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   360,200,36463,1,2,0:0:0
   360,200,36793,1,8,0:0:0
   312,299,37123,6,0,P|243:350|152:343,1,165,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   46,235,38112,2,0,P|115:184|206:191,1,165,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 00:41:079 (3,4) - Likewise the last suggestion,instead of using just a pattern composed by a pair of 1/1 notes I would actually follow again these 3/2 drums there. What about following them with a 1/2 repeated slider,replacing these two notes? It would be the best solution there,imho. I made a pattern too with the whole spacing fixed with this rhythmical setting. See if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   384,304,41079,2,0,P|392:368,2,55,0|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   272,288,41738,2,0,P|238:246|231:185,1,110,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   144,128,42397,6,0,P|109:194|113:291,2,165,8|8|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   296,200,43881,2,0,P|369:217|467:179,1,165,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   496,88,44705,1,8,0:0:0
   496,88,45035,1,4,0:0:0
   472,304,45694,5,0,0:0:0

4. 02:46:353 (1,2,3) - Considering the actual vocal setting there,following them with 3 1/1 notes is not really the best choice imho. Consider instead using a pattern using 2 1/1 sliders with a note right in the middle,just like 02:48:991 (1,2,3) - : as the vocals' progression here is composed by these 2/1 transitions + that 1/1 one,I think this would be the best pattern to follow it. You could use a slider indentical to 02:48:991 (1) - for 02:46:353 (1) - ,as it follows up pretty good with the next note,creating a nice circular flow by that returning back. See if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   454,187,165035,2,0,P|371:185|298:229,1,165.000006294251,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   240,280,166024,1,0,0:0:0
   168,320,166353,6,0,P|97:284|77:199,1,165.000006294251,4|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

1. 00:10:419 (3) - This is a really little thing and you may not agree with me,so just fix if you want: what about adding a whistle at the beginning of this slider? I kinda expected that as the vocals' pitch increased there.
2. 00:55:090 (6) - I guess you are semplyfying the 1/4 drum stream there,right? I understand your choice,but in moments like this I would see better to emphatize the whole drum stream with a 1/2 pattern,just like I have done here:
   
   This is really optional however,feel free not to fix! If you want to fix that, you could just use an arc-pattern to follow this rhythm setting,as of 00:55:584 (1) - 's curve:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   224,148,55090,2,0,P|256:136|284:136,1,60,8|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   332,148,55419,1,8,0:0:0
   368,168,55584,6,0,P|444:160|476:64,1,180,4|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

3. 01:39:595 (4,5) - I can't really understand why skipping over the drum at 01:40:090 - by following just the red tick 1/2 later... Actually following that drum there would have been better,considering that you have followed it in the other periods with these 1/2 sliders,so what about making 01:39:760 (5) - to add a note at 01:40:254 - to follow it instead of just using the press-hold rhythm there? I tried to modify the pattern trying anyways to make 01:39:760 (5) - encircle correctly 01:38:771 (3) - ,see if you like it ^^
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   228,248,98771,2,0,P|152:288|36:208,1,240,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   48,156,99595,1,0,0:0:0
   96,172,99760,2,0,P|140:216|192:192,1,120,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   240,196,100254,1,0,0:0:0
   240,140,100419,6,0,P|236:76|272:36,1,120,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

4. 01:40:914 (2) - I guess you missed a clap on the top on this slider? You have used it in the previous pattern,so I really can't see why using it here too!
5. 01:45:694 (1,2,3) - This triangle pattern feels quite cramped to play there,considering that the oval flow started from 01:45:694 (1) - to 01:46:353 (3) - got kinda broken here. What about creating something more arc-based to make the whole pattern there smoother? Here's what I have done there:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   212,220,105694,6,0,P|236:276|288:304,1,120,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   332,296,106189,1,2,0:0:0
   376,308,106353,2,0,P|430:283|456:232,2,120,2|8|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   356,208,107342,1,8,0:0:0
   308,196,107507,1,0,0:0:0
   276,160,107672,1,2,0:0:0
   264,112,107837,2,0,P|268:88|288:56,2,60,0|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

6. 02:16:683 (1) - Considering the 3/2 vocal transition being played there,why don't you make instead this slider a 3/2 one to literally follow it? Using a 1/1 repeated slider there does actually sound kinda strange because of the vocal chords being in different places :U
   
7. 02:34:485 (6,7,1) - That's a really little thing,so just fix if you want: What about structuring this pattern using a curvy/linear pattern instead of just a linear one? This transition felt actually kinda rough to play for a "stream" :\
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   312,208,154485,2,0,P|316:244|332:280,1,60
   348,308,154815,2,0,P|268:316,1,60,8|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   240,316,155145,5,0,0:0:0

   I can't really understand what's so wrong in this diff... Some of you talked about this diff like if it was a waste of time,while I actually fin this pretty much enjoable and good to play.

1. 01:01:683 (3) - Huh,I really can't a see a reason why using just a 1/1 slider here... I know you wanted to follow the guitar chord/vocals,but I'd rather follow the drum in the downbeat too,as this 1/1 red-tick slider combination could sound a bit out of place. Splitting this slider with instead a 1/2 slider ~ note here would prevent this and will vary a bit the rhythm there. I have done a pattern following this kind of rhythm without breaking the flow used there too. See if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   237,327,61683,2,0,P|269:319|309:327,1,70,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   384,360,62013,1,0,0:0:0
   456,320,62178,2,0,P|486:259|463:194,1,140,2|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   384,160,62672,2,0,P|348:126|285:189|247:153,1,140,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   168,128,63167,1,8,0:0:0
   91,165,63331,6,0,P|42:223,2,70,0|2|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

2. 01:25:914 (6) - This is a quite little thing and you may not agree with me,so just fix if you want: What about adding a New Combo there? It would break your consistency,but for a good reason,as it fits perfectly with the vocals progressing there,and it will delimitate your pattern which is increasing spacing there.
3. 01:54:595 (5) - Consider splitting this instead in 2 1/1 sliders to follow the guitar chords transition there. This 1/1 repeated slider used there kinda broke the rhythm used there,as it feels quite out of place... You see, other than keeping your rhythmical transition by doing that,you could make a pretty funny to play pattern,making the second slider encircle 01:53:771 (2) - ,and placing the following sliders to continue its flow. Here's how it will look like:
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   146,161,114595,2,0,P|81:133|16:160,1,140
   15,268,115090,2,0,P|80:296|145:269,1,140,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,224,115584,2,0,P|250:230|288:248,1,70,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   392,336,115914,1,8,0:0:0
   448,208,116078,1,4,0:0:0

4. 02:13:221 (x)- That's just a minor thing,feel free to ignore if you want: What about adding a note here? It would fit pretty good with the drum there,and skipping it imho is a bit strange as an option xD

1. 00:27:078 (2,3,4) - This triplet just feels waaaay overmapped,as it's totally random and it doesen't follow really any of the instruments,I can't really understand what this is following... :\ Just make this a 1/2 pattern there by removing 00:27:160 (3) - ,it should be fine after that
2. 00:41:253 (1) - Uhh,not a really big deal,anyways imho that New Combo doesen't feel well there...Considering that there is no element which does really change there,I expected the New Combo instead at 00:41:748 (2) - ,as there is a transition where the drums take the place there,so why not moving it there? 00:43:726 (1) - could make actually sense,as it determinates a new guitar phase.
3. 01:05:484 (3,4,5) - This is really and minor and subjective thing,just don't fix if you want it: While I think 01:05:814 (5) - does flow pretty good with 01:06:144 (1) - , I found this jump/spread pattern to be quite umpleasant to play as the improper jump needed to do it. I would instead unstack 01:05:484 (3,4) - and tweak the pattern so that a triangular pattern going downwards---->upwards: other than being spacing-wise consistent, there won't be anymore that problem,creating a nice "ping pong" effect with 01:05:814 (5) - ,which plays really good! Here's what I have done there:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   340,187,65484,1,2,0:0:0
   200,176,65649,1,2,0:0:0
   228,20,65814,2,0,P|220:56|188:92,1,85

4. 02:56:583 (2) - Not a big deal,but anyways I can't really understand why this change of flow going directly downwards xD I would personally move this so that it continues the upside oval flow created by 02:55:594 (1) - ,giving after all a smoother play... An idea could be putting it at the same position as the note 02:55:264 (2) - ,so that it continues with that returning back pretty good... Here's what I have done after some tweaking there!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   264,84,175594,6,0,P|325:103|392:88,2,127.500004863739,2|2|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   148,30,176583,2,0,P|124:92|176:88|153:153,1,127.500004863739,2|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   120,276,177242,5,0,0:0:0
   248,288,177572,1,8,0:0:0
   266,160,177902,1,0,0:0:0
   227,126,178067,1,0,0:0:0
   176,134,178231,6,0,P|116:137|55:104,2,127.500004863739,2|2|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0

• 
  "re" is means "remove"
  Black is just suggestion, if you don't like , you can skip it
  Blue is recommended to fix
  red is unrankable issue

[249's Easy]

1. Useless green line:
   00:55:914 -
   
   
2. fine to me ~

[Normal]

1. 00:33:496 (2) - I think here a little loud, try to use 65% volume

[Haku's Normal+]

1. notes too crowded let a little hard to read, try to CS +1 (edit)
2. 00:01:189 (1,2,3,4) - I feel very strange for here ..., maybe dosen't follow vocal, re them
3. 00:02:507 - there a little noisy for me, try to use 50% volume
4. 02:33:826 (2,3,4,5) - I suggest let them become 2 sliders will much easy and read
5. 02:53:112 (4) - don't stack 02:52:452 (3) - , because it is hard to read

[Hard]

1. 02:16:848 (7,8) - because there rhythm suddenly become close, try to get their distance same as forward or try to have a gentle rhythm like this
2. 02:18:167 (2,3) - I think there are not suitable for use 1.6x distance, try to 1.1x same as forward will easy to read

[Insane]

1. fine to me ~

l1106188 wrote:

[Haku's Normal+]

1. notes too crowded let a little hard to read, try to CS -1 AR+1 (uhm, you intended CS+1?)
2. 02:33:826 (2,3,4,5) - I suggest let them become 2 sliders will much easy and read Eh? It actually flow better with circles there
3. 02:53:112 (4) - don't stack 02:52:452 (3) - , because it is hard to read It's not

that's all ~
good luck ~ :3

-kevincela- wrote:

Hey!

[249's Easy]

1. 00:13:386 (4,5) - This is a quite little thing,so feel free to ignore if you want: as of the oval flow introduced by 00:12:068 (2,3) - ,you should totally curve this in a upside curve: that would work totally good to follow the flow there,and it continues perfectly with 00:15:694 (1) - as of it's oval flow too! Here's what I have done,see if you like it
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   264,332,13386,2,0,P|172:356|96:312,1,180.000006866455
   68,276,14705,2,0,P|64:240|68:208,1,60.0000022888184

   no because i wanna make the flow simple since it's "the beginning" of the song.
2. 00:18:002 (4) - Not a big deal,but anyways I don't think using a 1/1 slider there would fit that good: you have mostly followed the vocals in these sections,and this slider feels quite strange due to its ending not following the vocals at all,which continue at 00:18:661 - ,so what about simply replacing this slider with a note at 00:18:002 - ? A 2/1 gap would actually make sense for the vocals--->piano transition ahh sure done .
3. 00:20:639 (2,3,1,2,3) - Huh,this does not really play that good,probably because of the transition 00:22:617 (2,3) - which is quite harsh to play with that linear slider you have there... Considering 00:23:276 (1) - 's oval flow,I find the best solution here to be a "V" pattern. Here's what I have done,feel free to modify it as you want! ooh alright then fixed.
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   256,96,20639,1,0,0:0:0
   304,148,20969,1,0,0:0:0
   356,196,21298,6,0,P|356:288,2,90.0000034332277
   412,148,22617,1,0,0:0:0
   460,96,22947,1,0,0:0:0
   416,36,23276,6,0,P|364:28|256:40,1,160,0|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

4. 01:02:178 (3) - This is a quite little thing,however I suggest you to do that: what about making this instead a 3/2 repeated slider with a note 1/1 later? That works really good to follow the vocals,and with this rhythmical pattern in mind you could create a pretty funny to play and flowing pattern,using opposed sliders to continue the song's progress. Here's what I have done,see if you like it
   
   SPOILER

   
   
   

   184,128,61848,1,8,0:0:0
   124,184,62178,2,0,P|68:200|8:184,2,120
   184,128,63496,5,0,0:0:0
   304,232,64156,1,0,0:0:0
   460,196,64815,2,0,P|460:28,1,160

   Oh,and if you do that remember to silence 01:02:178 (3) - 's sliderticks! and done.
5. 01:07:452 (2,3,4) - Uh,using a linear slider here to continue the flow with these notes' position felt a bit harsh to me imho... It's a pretty much subjective thing,but what about smoothing out a bit the pattern using arc patterns and curved slider? Here it would actually play pretty good!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   20,152,67452,1,0,0:0:0
   68,216,67782,2,0,P|100:232|152:232,1,80,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0
   216,200,68441,1,8,0:0:0
   288,164,68771,6,0,P|364:144|440:184,1,160,4|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

   fixed it myself.
6. 02:16:353 (1,2) - Oh well,I didn't like that much the rhythm used there by combining these 2 1/1 sliders... Their transition sounded quite strange,maybe because you skipped over various important elements in the beat. You have two options there: you could follow the vocals instead of the piano by using a pattern using a 3/2 repeated slider at 02:16:683 - ,or you could instead make the second slider there follow a bit more the piano,always using a 3/2 repeated slider

alright then i'll follow the piano.

I have to go already,so I'm leaving my modpost here, tomorrow I will complete it by editing it. I hope I have been helpful in the meanwhile ^^

DakeDekaane wrote:

Hi, mod time as requested, sorry for the long but I wanted to mod this in a good mood.

[249's Easy]
00:02:837 - 00:23:936 - I feel that some soft whistles are missing here, I suggest some spots, but maybe there are more or less than those. no i find soft whistles in this part of the song unfitting to this part during gameplay.

00:02:837
00:04:156
00:05:145
00:06:793
00:07:782
00:09:101
00:10:419
00:13:057
00:15:035
00:15:694
00:18:661
00:19:650
00:21:298
00:22:287

00:02:837 (1,2,3) - This could look better if these objects follow a single smooth curve, maybe like this.

i don't see a difference in this
00:11:738 (1,2,3,4) - Something similar as above, I don't like how the almost straight flow in the end of (2), (3) and (4) looks. fixed it myself.
00:58:551 (3) - Wouldn't this look better if it's of the same shape as 00:55:914 (1) ? actually it is if you look carefully. when i made (3) look like (1), the slider didn't look symmetrical, so i adjusted it so that it'll look symmetrical.
01:01:848 (2,3) - Try to follow the curve flow of the previous slider for the placement of this. no because using too many curved sliders would break the flow during gameplay for me.
01:34:815 (1) - You can move this to x:408 y:196 to make a better circle with the next slider, I think that's what you want to make here. actually no...if you look at 01:36:463 (2) - 's end, it's stacked on 01:34:485 (4) - , so i don't wanna break that transition.
02:01:518 (1) - I was about suggesting the next object, but this is better, try move it around x:164 y:288, the curve looks nicer if you do this. no, but i adjusted (1).
02:08:112 (5) - Move 1 grid down (level 4), just to make a better shape. no i don't see that much of a difference during gameplay.
02:28:221 (3) - If your intention was to make a blanket for 02:30:200 (1) you can either: move (3) to x:380 y:164, fixing the placement for (2), or move the 2nd node to x:340 y:104 and the 3rd to x:264 y:88, if make a blanket isn't your intention, ignore this orz nahh i didn't intend this to be a blanket. i wanna make it exciting by making this pattern for beginners during gameplay.
02:40:090 (3) - Adjust a bit this curve to fit more the following circles~ i don't see a problem with this, so i think it's fine. should be easy for beginners to follow during gameplay.

That's all from my part, good luck in the way of ranking /o/

-kevincela- wrote:

[Haku's Normal+]

1. 00:55:090 (6) - Preferisco seguire lo stream come ho fatto nelle altre occasioni (anche se in quei casi era da 1/2), inoltre siccome non so se mi obbligano a chiamara Light Hard, voglio evitare di usare 1/2 anche in questi casi
2. 02:16:683 (1) - Ho preferito far cosi per seguire il Finish e devo evitare la segni come Insane >.<
3. 02:34:485 (6,7,1) - Ho preferito curvare un pò i due slider, fanno parte di una parola diversa ed ho usato un micropattern un pò diverso
   I can't really understand what's so wrong in this diff... Some of you talked about this diff like if it was a waste of time,while I actually fin this pretty much enjoable and good to play.

I have to go already,so I'm leaving my modpost here, tomorrow I will complete it by editing it. I hope I have been helpful in the meanwhile ^^

1. About lyrics
   
   SPOILER

   b2 : I risk → I'll risk
   b3 : I whisper → a whisper
   b7 : before this time → up before This time
   c1b : stand up stand up → Stand up stand up
   c2 : (Just gonna keep it when I) → Just gotta keep it I wanna
   c3 : Wake up wake up → wake up wake up
   c4 : (Just tell me how I can) → just tell me how I can
   c6 : 狂おしいほど切ないよ → 狂おしいほど刹那の艶麗
   c8 : they might → They might
   c9 : Or saying ninght cries → for saying I’ll fight
   d2 : 選考眼光は → 閃光眼光は
   d3 : 感覚的衝動くらいね → 感覚的衝動 Blinded
   d7 : 失わぬようにと・・・
   d9 : 零れ落ちそうで → こぼれ落ちそうで
   e2 : 君の惰性を → 日々の惰性を
   e8 : 何度 → 君を
   e4 : Look how far we made it → Look how far we've made it
   e7 : ことはできないでしょ → 事は出来ないでしょ
2. Please make approach circle so that it becomes an entire set of hitcircle skins.

• 02:21:144 (7,8) - Why don't you move these notes 1/2 later and add a circle at 02:21:144? I feel something unnatural with the blank of 02:21:803.
  02:43:067 (5) - I can hear the guitar sound on 02:43:396 so I'd like to suggest to make this slider reversing.

• 00:26:573 (1) - Why don't you move this slider down by 2 grids and put them on one straight line?
  02:43:221 - Almost same as Insane, how about adding a 1/2 slider here?

• 00:01:189 (1,2,3,4,5) - Hmm.. actually I think the rhythm of these notes could follow the song well, but it's really difficult to understand and will cause the mistake. I highly recommend to make the rhythm using 1/2 beat snap divisor even if the rhythm seems a bit different from the music.
  01:02:013 (1) - Half of this circle is under the previous slider and it makes us hard to see the note. Please make it looks more clear.
  01:06:134 (2) - New melody seems starting from here, so I feel it natural to put NC on this slider. If you accept this, please remove the NC of 01:05:804 (1).
  01:43:057 (1,2) - Almost same reason as above, I don't like this overlapping. Why don't you put these notes like this?
  
  SPOILER

  
  I want you to fix all notes that have this placement like 01:48:331 (1,2), but actually I don't know the criteria of Normal+ exactly, so if you think they are alright, please keep it.
  02:00:200 (1,2,3) - Hm.. I can't understand why you put only these three notes here. It looks so strange since the same melody is still continued. But if you want to keep these notes, same as 00:01:189, please reconsider the timing of (3).
  02:35:474 (2) - NC here by the same reason of 01:06:134.

• fine.

• 01:10:749 (3,1) - Putting these notes more linearly will make us easier to play.
  SPOILER

  
  01:33:167 - I felt something empty around here because you use almost all of white ticks in the previous section(I mean 01:25:584 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5)) but here the notes are put in 2/1 intervals though the melody is continued, so I suggest to put a circle.
  02:18:991 (1) - Is the length of this slider intentionally? I didn't feel it unnatural at all with a 1/1 slider here, so why don't you replace with it?