Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Lucidity wrote:
Yeah, I don't buy that you were a Jester...
0_o and Echo shared the same reasoning as me about your fake claim, yet they're both highly respected by you...If anything strager should be classified as the "weakest" player for believing your claim to be truthful and even defending you on numerous occasions. Anyway, basing weakness on who guessed your role right is a silly measure to begin with. You're not even taking possible aux roles into account.
actually you kinda have a point on strager there. 0_o i dont really trust as much as you say i do...i just think he has a bit of a leg over you since i know how he plays. Echo, I know well enough to be able to differentiate as mafia or not by his actions once it gets to endgame, or at least i have confidence that i will know what side he is on by the time i would need to vote him were he mafia.
I'm glad we sorted out the bs "weakest player" nonsense. So you're voting me because you don't know how I play? That's a good reason.
Yes that's sarcasm.Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Here's why I think the role is fishy:
*There is no reason for the role to exist. If who we save is based on votes from the players then what's the point in having a middleman to forward every single vote to LS? Why not send our votes to LS in the first place?
good reason #1. if Subi suspects im cheating he can check when he is over at my place and modkill me if i lied to him. he obviously trusts me, but he ALSO left room for you guys to change it if YOU dont trust me to play a game i hold in high respect the way im supposed to. there are places to be underhanded, deceiving, misleading, yes, but im no cheater and actually rather offended that youre trying to classify me as one.
I never implied that you were a cheater. I pointed out how a middleman is rather useless to have. Reread my post if you didn't get it. It's funny how things that you have on your mind tend to come out in posts and affect what you see when you read other posts. Feeling guilty much?
Saturos-fangirl wrote:
*If there are 7 alive you'd need 4-7 votes (4 being highly unlikely) for any kind of majority. This could take a while to be received by you and then forwarded. Indeed, if the Mafia are sharp (or only 1 person) then they'd submit their night kill as soon as Twilight is announced. I'll go look for it later, but LS mentioned earlier in this thread that actions are carried out immediately when they're received. A doctor role that works like this would be useless.
1. there will be six alive if we lynch someone. that means that as long as at least two people vote for the same person, i can add my vote to that and protect that person. (6/2 = 3)
2. LS said that DAY actions occur immediately. He also specifically said that TWILIGHT actions function like normal twilight - if he gets all of them in early, he'll start Day early, but other actions get precedence over NK. Nice try though.
1. As pointed out by strager, you need 4 for a majority.
2. Also pointed out by strager, it wasn't restricted to DAY actions only. LS clarified that the Doctor's PM will be waited for before the Mafia get theire kill in a later post, but
your reason was made up. Why would you need to make things up~
Saturos-fangirl wrote:
*The existence of this role makes you innocent. The need for it to be public doesn't make sense to me. Why would LS give us a publicly innocent player?
1. I'm exactly as safe as any other role claim here is. you can choose to believe me or not and the only way for you guys to know who everyone voted to protect is to ask in-thread, in which case if i were mafia i could read it and use it anyways.
2. I did NOT make up this role, im just acting on it, so if you have complaints about it bring them to Subi kthnxbai
1. Relates to my issue with the role being redundant. It is also a nice way for you to obtain information from the town if you're not who you claim to be.
2. I'll take your word for it.
Saturos-fangirl wrote:
*There exists the possibility that you're a 3rd party/mafia that needs a majority of our votes to kill someone. This would be a powerful twist in that we'll kill the player that we think is most valuable.
ok cool, theres a lot of possibilities out there and im sure this is one of them. its also possible that im Spartacus and now that ive claimed it i can magically acquire the roles of Doctor, Cop, Ninja, and Traitor and do whatever the heck i feel like. How much do you want to think about possibility?
Oh hey heres a good one! what if im some new kind of role that mindwipes everyone that sends a pm to me and makes them my minions~ i could even minionize the MAFIA that way and instantly win. thatd be cool. Thats a possibility.
Actually i think this falls under the realm of "giving the GM ideas" so ill stop now cus i think ive made my point.
I don't think the role was such a big stretch. The reason I listed it as a possibility is because a number of things point towards the role being viable. I'm not suggesting we vote you based purely on that. It's great to see that you're getting so angry about it though. A common response when confronted about something when you're guilty..
Saturos-fangirl wrote:
I've had a look at the supposed "confirmation" of SFG's role by LS and I don't think it's a confirmation at all. The post is here. She acknowledges that forwarding is safe. She says that we can have a vote on it and we can change to something else if we want. There's no way that she'd publicly acknowledge SFG's role though. Those posts are too general to be considered a confirmation anyway. SFG is back on my suspect list ~
congratulations, you have figured out that Subi is a good enough GM that he wont screw the game up if people start fishing for confirmations. again, i think its kind of insulting to doubt the ability of your GM but hey, you have the freedom to flame up a storm and all we'll do is edit/delete/ban things that get overly out of hand. *sarcastic round of applause*
A total freak out to a misinterpreted post. I never meant that LS was a bad GM. I went to bed at page 12 and woke up at page 19. I had a lot to catch up and it was close to the deadline so I skimmed the posts rather hurriedly. At first I thought LS basically confirmed your role with his post, and I mentioned it in a post somewhere. strager said the same thing (That you were cleared). When I reread it I realised that your role wasn't confirmed and I obviously pointed it out, because I claimed otherwise previously. If I did not point it out it would be really weird for me to add you to my suspect list, wouldn't it?
I'm not sure where I flamed. Could you point it out? You're overreacting way too much for my liking...The signs of a guilty mind. You're putting words in my mouth, which I don't like and I don't think is particularly helpful.
Saturos-fangirl wrote:
Lucidity wrote:
As I mentioned earlier, if we do have a Jester in the game I think we should just ignore it. Would everyone be OK with that?
If SFG turns out to be a Jester I think it would even benefit the town to vote her off on Day 1 as all a jester does is cause confusion and delay Mafia convictions ~_~ Sharing a win is still a win! 
im NOT a freaking JESTER ANYMORE. lynching me will NOT make me win. it will just make the TOWN less likely to lose.
That post had nothing to do with you really...All I'm saying is that if we have a Jester in this game, we shouldn't worry about voting him/her off.
Also, by your own admission lynching you will help the town, so
Unvote.Vote: SFG.strager has made me less suspicious of him somehow-.-
Derekku please post more?
It might not matter as much if SFG actually does hold a third-party role, but whatever. I'm just stating my opinion that most of us probably agree with =/