YAY! Rod!
forum
Big Mafia 1! (Ended and Old)
posted
Total Posts
412
Normally, when you vote for someone, you see or create arguments against the person you are voting for, before you vote for them. You did so after, you say?Wojjan wrote:
I voted for Lucidity in the way he voted me. If I don't receive any decent arguments to go on, I can't discredit a lot, now can I? Whatever I said and did others did too.strager wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=155228#p155228
I see this vote as justifyable by Jinxy's reasoning but Wojjan doesn't mention this.
Wojjan seems to say that Lucidity is voting against him because Lucidity's argument is "based on things [Wojjan] said and others said aswell." Well, what else would it be based off of? Wojjan didn't say/imply at all that Lucidity knows something more than him, and he didn't try to discredit the arguments against him by Lucidity. Wojjan just votes for whoever's voting for him here. Uh, okay.
[...]
Second, I DID defend myself in this post. After my post, the remnants of Lucidity'sargumentsidiotic pleas for votechanges were broken down to bite-size feeble nothingness.
And Lucidity was using other peoples' arguments as reason to vote for you, in addition to her own personal arguments (even if they really aren't arguments; they're still a side to an issue).
Lucidity's inexperienced. I and someone else have mentioned that she is behaving here like I did in my first game, M2.Wojjan wrote:
As JInxy can say it nicelyYou had not posted a reason when you voted for wojjan.Lucidity voted for me out of danger to get lynched off himself, not out of decent arguments. The only thing he has, and had repeated oftly, was thatFor now I find adam and Wojjan the most suspicious.You and Wojjan are so suspiciousU. N. Wojjan were suspicious? Yup, just like that. Reasons in the above posts mostly apply to adam instead of both, andYou and adam seem to act in unisonis supposed to pull me into suspicion too. Which apparently worked.
lolz.Echo wrote:
Adam was "more" buddying than the Pasonia example you gave. Pasonia said "I like strager's logic", whereas Adam said "I'm going to do whatever strager does".
It's more like, "strager's doing what I would be doing (or would want to be doing), so I'll just say that and be bashed for apparently buddying etc. etc."
Echo, I know you're not stupid enough to vote for people who aren't very active. That makes you more suspicious in my eyes.
Also, I'm inclined to believe neo@lex is a Mafia with you and you're trying to alleviate suspicion of you two both being Mafia together... (I.e. when one of you dies and is shown to be a Mafia, the other will be less suspicious.) Yes, this is WIFOM, but your choice seems too intentional and too controversial to have no hidden meaning behind it, I think.
Aaaaaaaaaaaand...
Hello, Starrodkirby2046. Don't fail us. =]
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Why do I have a feeling that Wojjan is using me?
FOS: Wojjan
FOS: Wojjan
Oh well.. Unvote
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
I'm going to a cottage with friends for the weekend, so I'll be inactive for 36 hours or so. I'll read through everything and post my thoughts when I get back.
You can't do that yourself?Pasonia wrote:
Think, Ival, THINK! We need you to kick-start your brain juices!
Ehh ... That's a pretty fishy statement if you ask me.Pasonia wrote:
Also withholding vote until more information arrives.
It's not a scum tell. It just so happens that they were inactive. Again, see M2: Derekku, nardi, Olinad were all inactive pretty much, but Derekku was the only of the three who was a Mafia. Maybe Derekku was hiding behind that fact; I don't know, but that seems kinda smart.Echo wrote:
Wrong - look at all the past ww/m games. Most of the people who didn't talk much were the bad guys. Back in M1 I didn't vote YK because I wasn't sure of this tell. Now I know better.strager wrote:
Echo, I know you're not stupid enough to vote for people who aren't very active.
If you can provide convincing arguments otherwise, e.g. supporting your inactive == scum idea, I still think your vote is pretty baseless.
Hmm, I guess I have. adam hasn't commented on anything really. I didn't realize I was "returning" the "buddying." What do you have to say for this, adam?Ivalset wrote:
"Buddying": In the past four pages or so, strager did all of adam's defense for him.
Topic Starter
Votecount:
Echo - 3 (strager, adam2046, 0_o)
Wojjan - 1 (StarrodKirby86)
neo@lex - 1 (Echo)
adam2046 - 1 (rust45)
Echo - 3 (strager, adam2046, 0_o)
Wojjan - 1 (StarrodKirby86)
neo@lex - 1 (Echo)
adam2046 - 1 (rust45)
Topic Starter
Note to all: Deadline is in 2.5 hours.
Very likely giving an extension.
Very likely giving an extension.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
Note: If I do extend, it won't be a long extention.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
adam, do you completely agree with all I've said? Do you have anything to comment on at ALL? I find it hard to believe you could only agree with one side of all my arguments.
If I do, I'll be sure to point it out.
adam's a Mafia!
Topic Starter
Unknown Shadow: Analyzing the situation, I would have to find adam's actions the most suspicious.
Vote: adam2046
Vote: adam2046
Unknown Shadow, what actions in particular? To me it seems as if his most major actions are (1) pointing out Jester, and (2) buddying with me. This seems to be Echo's argument against adam too (correct me if I'm wrong).
Topic Starter
Unknown Shadow: He seems to be buddying with you, that is part of it, yes. However, he also is doing a lot of wishy-washy voting. Not only that, but he's not really trying to defend himself, and sometimes votes with no reason, or votes following behind someone else.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
I don't need to defend myself (and when I do, strager gets in first...)
And I'm still yet to go make a vote. I have done some neglectfulness around, but I'll try and update myself fully into this world. 
Topic Starter
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Ehh ... That's a pretty fishy statement if you ask me.Pasonia wrote:
Also withholding vote until more information arrives.
I wouldn't think that withholding votes until later would be fishy. Informed decisions are win! lol.
strager seems to be attacking most statements made by everyone. oh well.
to be truthful, I do think that adam's the jester. [/avoids vote] he wanted an extension on day one and didn't mind the possibility of getting lynched. I think something like...
viewtopic.php?p=154303#p154303
viewtopic.php?p=154960#p154960
viewtopic.php?p=155053#p155053
viewtopic.php?p=155886#p155886
It's a hunch and doesn't mean anything... much of his posts weren't too meaningful.
Vote Derekku Chan
His posts are slightly more meaningful than adam's but not as much so...
...If my posts are meaningful, then why are you voting for me? That makes no sense.thepianist wrote:
Vote Derekku Chan
His posts are slightly more meaningful than adam's but not as much so...
EDIT: IIRC, your posts have only agreed with others and to vote. That's not very "meaningful" in my eyes =|
Vote adam2046
Derekku seems suspicious to me, but adam seems stupiddr. Refusing to defend yourself is kinda stupid considering you had the chance to throw all the suspicion right back at Strager. If you've got a hax role, we're fucked.
Derekku seems suspicious to me, but adam seems stupiddr. Refusing to defend yourself is kinda stupid considering you had the chance to throw all the suspicion right back at Strager. If you've got a hax role, we're fucked.
Find where I say that I wouldn't mind being lynched.thepianist wrote:
to be truthful, I do think that adam's the jester. [/avoids vote] he wanted an extension on day one and didn't mind the possibility of getting lynched. I think something like...
viewtopic.php?p=154303#p154303
Figure of speech
viewtopic.php?p=154960#p154960
Joke
viewtopic.php?p=155053#p155053
What are you trying to say? This seems irrelevant.
viewtopic.php?p=155886#p155886
Extra time = extra discussion
I have no idea what the fuck you are saying.neo@lex wrote:
Vote adam2046
Derekku seems suspicious to me, but adam seems stupiddr. Refusing to defend yourself is kinda stupid considering you had the chance to throw all the suspicion right back at Strager. If you've got a hax role, we're fucked.
You want me to accuse strager of being mafia or something?
I refuse to defend myself because what people have been saying up till now is quite true, I have been "buddying" with strager and my votes have been quite wishy washy.
He doesn't want to vote me because he thinks I'm the jester so the next best person to vote for is apparently you.Derekku Chan wrote:
...If my posts are meaningful, then why are you voting for me? That makes no sense.
It wasn't certain that Lucidity was going to be lynched. Only a few people were suspicious of Lucidity. You were pretty determined to move things quickly and kill them. BUT, Lucidity turned out to be innocent. HMMWojjan wrote:
Let's score a majority then, if he'll get lynched anyway. No point in waiting for 2 more days for the deadline to kick in
Vote Lucidity to move things along
Lucidity made random votes and joked around like everyone else. Why were you their case so harshly? I thought this was pretty retarded.Wojjan wrote:
Lucidity, don't act all "you're trying to kill me ;((" since you tried to kill yourself aswell. You VOTED for you, you claimed Mafia, and now you suddenly turn around, jump the shark, and try to survive.
I think the town won't buy your show and if the Mafia doesn't get you, we WILL.
The suspicion is on you because you were acting fucking stupid and doing what I've already said multiple times.Wojjan wrote:
Wait wait wait, did I miss something? Is Lucidity suddenly the general force of truth that should be listened to at all times? Because seeing as his argument is only based on things I said and others said as well, I don't see why his suspicion is on me.
vote: Lucidity if I haven't done so already
In your post here, you made a list of all the votes. Your multiple serious vote changes made me even more suspicious of you. Great job nailing yourself on that
In this post you defended yourself, but I'm going to comment on some things from there below.
Regarding ending the day to move to Day 2
True, but I personally saw nothing wrong with Lucidity. They were joking and having fun, yet you kept attacking them for the stupidest shit. You obviously won't change your opinion of this matter, so I have nothing else to say either.Wojjan wrote:
It was a vote with the majority to move things along to the next day. In the first day, we can't really get a lot of info so I thought we might as well move on to day 2, with some night actions people can comment/base arguments on. (I was however proven wrong, since that post ironically flared up the discussion :/)
Regarding Lucidity voting for Wojjan
I believe Lucidity voted for you for the same reasons I did (throwing all the suspicion at them). You voted for Lucidity because they were joking around. I don't see how that's "the same".Wojjan wrote:
I voted for Lucidity in the way he voted me. If I don't receive any decent arguments to go on, I can't discredit a lot, now can I? Whatever I said and did others did too.
Also this
You don't know that for sure. I guess this is strengthened by the fact that Lucidity was innocent.Wojjan wrote:
Lucidity voted for me out of danger to get lynched off himself, not out of decent arguments. The only thing he has, and had repeated oftly
I think that's it.
Topic Starter
Five minute warning.
Unvote
Vote: Adam2046
Vote: Adam2046
Topic Starter
Time's Up.
Topic Starter
*There was about to be no lynch, there weren't enough supporters for any group. However...*
adam2046: Fools! Behold the beauty of my guts!
*and adam killed himself on the spot (via cutting his stomach open). A few people chuckled, most stared in shock. Adam's face, was smiling the whole time.*
adam2046 - Jester - Lynched D2
adam2046 wins!
But wait!
The game's not over.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
It is now Night 2. Please send all night actions by this time tomorrow.
adam2046: Fools! Behold the beauty of my guts!
*and adam killed himself on the spot (via cutting his stomach open). A few people chuckled, most stared in shock. Adam's face, was smiling the whole time.*
adam2046 - Jester - Lynched D2
adam2046 wins!
But wait!
The game's not over.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
It is now Night 2. Please send all night actions by this time tomorrow.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
strager: Please do not post anything at all at night. Even if it is just a smiley.
Topic Starter
*After the night passes, you find strager dead, bullet through the chest. Looking through his belongings, you find a police badge, and a list of suspects whom he was almost sure were guilty.*
*...*
*Everyone's name was on the list.*
strager - Overly Paranoid Cop - Killed N2.
-----------------------------------------
It is now day three. With 13 alive it's 7 to lynch.
Deadline is Tuesday at the time of this post.
*...*
*Everyone's name was on the list.*
strager - Overly Paranoid Cop - Killed N2.
-----------------------------------------
It is now day three. With 13 alive it's 7 to lynch.
Deadline is Tuesday at the time of this post.
My vote for Wojjan still stands. :S
Great, now I don't know who to vote for, I'll just wait and see how the conversation goes, but it's not looking good for the town.
[quote="I wrote here":4c401]
Already pointed out by Lucidity - you're seem compelled to kill Lucidty for some reason, to the extent that you would openly invite everyone to join your lynch. This move is obviously extremely scummy, which I'm sure you know. Furthermore, you were the first person to even suggest the Jester existed. It's much more likely that you are the Jester, if such a role exists.I won't say "I told you so"adam2046 wrote:
So if Lucidity is jester, it's in the mafia's best interests to NK her tonight (since the jester loses that way) if she's still alive tomorrow I will lynch her. (and I strongly urge everyone else to do so aswell)
Why didn't I see this earlier?
vote: BagelBob
BagelBob wrote:
Also, I want to strongly recommend that all night actions be used on Echo.
If you have an investigation, it's important for the town to know if Echo is an evil wolf and going to doom us all.
If you have a protection, it's important that Echo is alive, because Echo is smart and could doom the wolves.
If you have an invite to a secret society, having Echo in there could really give you a boost.
If you have a night kill, you might want to save it. Or you might want to kill Echo on if you think he's a wolf.
If you have a revive, why are you considering a night action?
If you have a voteblock, are you a member of the Mafia?
Super scummy power activateBagelBob really wrote:
Also, I want Echo out of here since he's a threat to me.
If you have an investigation, tell me if he has an Aux so if it's worth lynching him
If you have a protection, use it on Echo, because then I can kill him the next night.
If you have an invite to a secret society, invite Echo, then he's no longer going a townie going for the Mafia but a third party.
If you have a night kill, you might want to save it. Then I'll kill him instead.
Blah
Unimportance
vote: BagelBob
Voting for dead people can never be a good strategy.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
I'm back, and still a little suspicious of Echo but Wojjan is still irking me (I'm pretty sure I explained why earlier)
vote Wojjan
vote Wojjan
Can we ban strager from threads he's dead in since it seems like he can't control himself?
I think "I lol'd" was his last words...Echo wrote:
Can we ban strager from threads he's dead in since it seems like he can't control himself?
...Wow. neo@lex made only 2 gameplay posts. Inactivity is one thing, but this...
Vote: neo@lex
Vote: neo@lex
Hm, who to vote for...to many people being inactive hurts this game from moving on so...
Vote: Neo@lex
Vote: Neo@lex
Saying that someone is scum based on inactivity is WIFOM thinking. In every game I've been in so far, the inactive people have been innocent. I don't think someone with an important role like mafia/aux would be inactive. But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
Keeping my vote as is for now, though.
Keeping my vote as is for now, though.
Wow derekku
/sarcasm
Vote: Derekku Chan
In this post you say that people who are inactive are usually innocent humans, but you don't seem to care if we vote them or not, seen as inDerekku Chan wrote:
Saying that someone is scum based on inactivity is WIFOM thinking. In every game I've been in so far, the inactive people have been innocent. I don't think someone with an important role like mafia/aux would be inactive. But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
Keeping my vote as is for now, though.
Also, you're really steadfast to tell everyone your vote for me still stands. Really, that's a very serious vote you have going there and I can't wait to see you say it's really gonna stay for a third/fourth time. Really, nothing scummy about that at all.Derekku Chan wrote:
But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
/sarcasm
Vote: Derekku Chan
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
1) 3 edits. What the hell.
2)This
inb4WIFOM
also, this
2)This
contradicts thisDerekku Chan wrote:
EDIT: Actually, it should've been implied by my most that I DO care if inactives are killed off. If they haven't posted, then we know nothing about them and thus shouldn't be lynched just for being inactive. We could by killing an important aux role.
since you obviously try to keep the votes here, and have a possible townie lynched offDerekku Chan wrote:
But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
inb4WIFOM
also, this
Derekku Chan wrote:
I was just stating that I'm not going to change my vote to someone else.
Derekku Chan wrote:
Keeping my vote as is for now, though.
makes 3 times. we KNOW you won't change your vote by not changing your vote. Why so dedicated to making us know for sure?Derekku Chan wrote:
My vote for Wojjan still stands. :S
I have a habit of thinking of more things after hitting the post button XPWojjan wrote:
1) 3 edits. What the hell.
Uh, no it doesn't. Let me elaborate since you're obviously not understanding me. I said that we SHOULDN'T lynch someone JUST for being inactive. It SEEMS like the inactives are USUALLY innocent, but we don't know for sure. Do you get what I'm saying now?Wojjan wrote:
2)Thiscontradicts thisDerekku Chan wrote:
EDIT: Actually, it should've been implied by my most that I DO care if inactives are killed off. If they haven't posted, then we know nothing about them and thus shouldn't be lynched just for being inactive. We could by killing an important aux role.since you obviously try to keep the votes here, and have a possible townie lynched offDerekku Chan wrote:
But who knows, it could be scum this time :<
inb4WIFOM
The third one you pointed out was my vote for the day. The second one in your list is what I elaborated on in your first list item. I'm not "reinforcing" my vote, I'm just elaborating on it.Wojjan wrote:
also, thisDerekku Chan wrote:
I was just stating that I'm not going to change my vote to someone else.Derekku Chan wrote:
Keeping my vote as is for now, though.makes 3 times. we KNOW you won't change your vote by not changing your vote. Why so dedicated to making us know for sure?Derekku Chan wrote:
My vote for Wojjan still stands. :S
Seriously, stop twisting my words around using these little word arguments. They're not helping your case and it's just making you look even more scummy
there's this handy thing called previewDerekku Chan wrote:
I have a habit of thinking of more things after hitting the post button XP
Uh, no it doesn't. Let me elaborate since you're obviously not understanding me. I said that we SHOULDN'T lynch someone JUST for being inactive. It SEEMS like the inactives are USUALLY innocent, but we don't know for sure. Do you get what I'm saying now?then why are you bringing it up in the first place? Simply to get us distracted from the case, as Bobby would put it.
I'm not "reinforcing" my vote, I'm just elaborating on it.you said the exact same 3 times. You vote for me. How is that elaborated?
Seriously, stop twisting my words around using these little word arguments. They're not helping your case and it's just making you look even more scummy :PYes, since pointing out the holes in your posts is obviously scummy and should be punished with my very life.
Bad me, stop looking for scum in posts.
Wojjan wrote:
/sarcasm
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Screw you, I have work.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Hm, who to vote for...to many people being inactive hurts this game from moving on so...
... and you haven't made a post since.Starrodkirby86 (day 2) wrote:
And I'm still yet to go make a vote. I have done some neglectfulness around, but I'll try and update myself fully into this world.
Lurking is a scumtell because by doing so you're avoiding talking (posting). And by doing that, people can't gather any information or evidence about said people, which means it's virtually impossible to get them lynched for anything except for lurking.
If you guys decide lurking is a null tell, then good luck finding scum. All they would have to do is just not post and you'll never lynch them.
Iono - I don't think it is a definite scumtell since sometimes RL gets in the way and you don't want to make a 1 min post that makes no sense. It's slightly easier to just read and post a reply sometime when free time comes around.Echo wrote:
Lurking is a scumtell because by doing so you're avoiding talking (posting). And by doing that, people can't gather any information or evidence about said people, which means it's virtually impossible to get them lynched for anything except for lurking.
But I feel that DeathxShinigami is bandwagoning on JInxyjem's post.
Vote DeathxShinigami
(at least for now.)
Unless its importance is higher than HIGH, I don't see why you only have time to post 4 times in this thread.neo@lex wrote:
Screw you, I have work.
ooh yes.
votecount please?
votecount please?
And also how many hours until deadline?
Bandwagoning isn't really a way to tell scum in bigger Mafia games, since there exist roles as Masons, who know certain people which are human. Similar roles can be Siblings and Cults. There might be other, but those are the ones I can name from the top of my head.thepianist wrote:
But I feel that DeathxShinigami is bandwagoning on JInxyjem's post.
Vote DeathxShinigami
(at least for now.)
Mm, Echo, it's more of that I'm rather lurking or looking at the thread trying to think of who to vote...but my indecisive self seems to get the best of me, resulting not.
I made a decision, and I kind of forgive any offense in it...
Vote: Wojjan
(still <3 you)
I made a decision, and I kind of forgive any offense in it...
Vote: Wojjan
(still <3 you)
This begs the question - are you a mason, sibling, or cult member/leader? I'm sure you one of the above.Wojjan wrote:
Bandwagoning isn't really a way to tell scum in bigger Mafia games, since there exist roles as Masons, who know certain people which are human. Similar roles can be Siblings and Cults.
If you're mason, then we can find out who we don't need to lynch.
If you're siblings with a mafia member (or you're mafia yourself) then it's not that huge a price to pay, since 1 for 1 is acceptable for town.
If you're a cult member (or the leader), then of course we don't want another third party to win
Topic Starter
Wojjan - 3 (Derekku, 0_o, StarrodKirby)
neo@lex - 2 (JInxyjem, DeathxShinigami)
Derekku - 1 (Wojjan)
DxS - 1 (thepianist)
Deadline is thurday. If you want the time, please go check the day start, it's not many pages back. <.<
neo@lex - 2 (JInxyjem, DeathxShinigami)
Derekku - 1 (Wojjan)
DxS - 1 (thepianist)
Deadline is thurday. If you want the time, please go check the day start, it's not many pages back. <.<
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
Oh hey, I got deadlines messed up.
You're entirely right, deadline is indeed today.
You're entirely right, deadline is indeed today.
Topic Starter
Mmk, I gave you all a chance.
----------------------------------
*The day ended... just like that. Nobody seemed interested in a lynch. So, there was none.*
Day Three is now over, Night Three begins now.
Please send all night actions by this time tomorrow. (Please send them earlier if possible.)
----------------------------------
*The day ended... just like that. Nobody seemed interested in a lynch. So, there was none.*
Day Three is now over, Night Three begins now.
Please send all night actions by this time tomorrow. (Please send them earlier if possible.)
Topic Starter
*The day begins again, with the corpse of someone you all recognized around. 0_o, whom you all just now remembered was the Govenor, was dead.*
0_o - Govenor - Killed N3
--------------------------------------------------
With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch. Deadline is Saturday at this time.
0_o - Govenor - Killed N3
--------------------------------------------------
With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch. Deadline is Saturday at this time.
Vote thepianist
Retaining my vote for Wojjan.
inb4whiningfromhim
inb4whiningfromhim
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Looks like the governor just got whacked~
I have some faint thoughts of who I should vote for, but I'd rather think it out thoroughly before making a rash decision. o3o
(And it's late here, yadda yadda)
I have some faint thoughts of who I should vote for, but I'd rather think it out thoroughly before making a rash decision. o3o
(And it's late here, yadda yadda)
Rather than just "thinking it out thoroughly", why not post your thoughts and both give and gather more information that way instead?Starrodkirby86 wrote:
I have some faint thoughts of who I should vote for, but I'd rather think it out thoroughly before making a rash decision.
Also, it'd be nice if Wojjan can come in and post.
No reason for Wojjan to post. He's already done for.
Vote: thepianist
Vote: thepianist
I can't even begin to fathom why thepianist is voting for himself.
I have an idea to why thepianist is voting himself, but it's close to impossible.
thepianist is probably a Sibling, and seeing we have not killed even ONE mafia (Sound famillar with the other games?), he decided to sacrifice himself to pin down his mafia sibling.
thepianist is probably a Sibling, and seeing we have not killed even ONE mafia (Sound famillar with the other games?), he decided to sacrifice himself to pin down his mafia sibling.
Wouldn't it be tempting to go vote for thepianist?
And I'm really basing some of this reasoning towards activity, particularly during the period when the killing happened and moments before (i.e. actions taken).
It doesn't leave me much choices left.
I'm having to vote for...Mmh...Randomizer, do your thing...
Vote JInxyjem
Sadly, I got that...Seriously.
And I'm really basing some of this reasoning towards activity, particularly during the period when the killing happened and moments before (i.e. actions taken).
It doesn't leave me much choices left.
I'm having to vote for...Mmh...Randomizer, do your thing...
Vote JInxyjem
Sadly, I got that...Seriously.
I really wish that people would be ACTIVE -_-
HEY GUYS! LISTEN UP! IF YOU DON'T VOTE, THEN THE MAFIA GETS A FREE KILL AT NIGHT
Or maybe it's the mafia whom aren't voting in the first place (insert wifom here)
HEY GUYS! LISTEN UP! IF YOU DON'T VOTE, THEN THE MAFIA GETS A FREE KILL AT NIGHT
Or maybe it's the mafia whom aren't voting in the first place (insert wifom here)
Hm... More thepianist stuff.
I don't think he is the cop sibling, as he would have given us names of people he checked.
1. Mafia sibling, sacrifice to kill the cop sibling. If killed: Bad
2. Mafia, playing WIFOM. If killed: Good.
3. Cop with wierd sainity. If killed: Neutral, more on Bad
4. A special townie, like Lucidity and Bagelbob. Sucidal to give us information collected over the days.* If killed: Neutral
*If this is the case, I think the special townie earns more info each day phase, that is why Bagel only had 1 information.
I don't think he is the cop sibling, as he would have given us names of people he checked.
1. Mafia sibling, sacrifice to kill the cop sibling. If killed: Bad
2. Mafia, playing WIFOM. If killed: Good.
3. Cop with wierd sainity. If killed: Neutral, more on Bad
4. A special townie, like Lucidity and Bagelbob. Sucidal to give us information collected over the days.* If killed: Neutral
*If this is the case, I think the special townie earns more info each day phase, that is why Bagel only had 1 information.
This is getting pretty retarded.
The way the roles are makes it extremely hard to actually identify who the Mafia are, whilst they just sit back and send in their kills under the cover of the suicidal roles.
Has anyone tried personally asking thepianist stuff related to his spontaneous self-accusation?
The way the roles are makes it extremely hard to actually identify who the Mafia are, whilst they just sit back and send in their kills under the cover of the suicidal roles.
Has anyone tried personally asking thepianist stuff related to his spontaneous self-accusation?
Everything about this game should have been in this thread only, so all you have to do is read through the last 15 posts or so.neo@lex wrote:
Has anyone tried personally asking thepianist stuff related to his spontaneous self-accusation?
I'm still waiting for Wojjan to make a post.
Topic Starter
The day should end now. I'm currently considering extending it for a bit. Until further notice, the day is not over yet.
Oh by the way, when did the Highest Votes Is Killed rule go? I thought the highest is automatically killed?
Topic Starter
Please read rule #10.
Topic Starter
Day blah blah Night blah blah tomorrow at this time.
Blah.
Blah.
Taking after me eh?LadySuburu wrote:
Day blah blah Night blah blah tomorrow at this time.
Blah.
Topic Starter
This game is just Meh now.strager wrote:
Taking after me eh?LadySuburu wrote:
Day blah blah Night blah blah tomorrow at this time.
Blah.
Topic Starter
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
I vote we continue.
It's the first time I've played mafia ;_;
It's the first time I've played mafia ;_;
I vote the game ends, 'cus I'm dead. =[
Game End...doubt nothing is going to happen anymore since we already lost all the key players.
I'd like to continue, but if people aren't going to post, then it's just a waste of time. Vote: Undecided
EDIT: Vote: End
EDIT: Vote: End
Truly, it doesn't really matter to me, but i would vote to continue.
I vote we end since I really aren't interested in this anymore anyway, I'm that's why I'm not really posting.