Ohh, those posts. I have explanations for those you know. If that's all that gives suspicion on me...
strager wrote:
All of Wojjan's votes seem to be on existing bandwagons of two votes or more.
viewtopic.php?p=153950#p153950
Joke/random vote.
This vote wasn't based on any facts. I didn't really read the other votes yet, and missed out on th fact that 0_o had already 2 votes on him.
strager wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=154185#p154185
This has already been pointed out as very suspicious. I myself don't know what to think of it, but it looks pretty scummy, yes.
It was a vote with the majority to move things along to the next day. In the first day, we can't really get a lot of info so I thought we might aswell move on to day 2, with some night actions people can comment/base arguments on. (I was however proven wrong, since that post ironically flared up the discussion :/)
strager wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=154219#p154219
FOS where?
What old vote?
Maybe I missed a post or something.
This seems to have caused a bit of an uproar, so I have my DSi to blame. This post was made on the day I was on the road all the time, and to not fall behind here, I tried to establish a vote for rust in the 10 minutes I was home, since he was changing votes often, and usually for random reasons that "late" in the game. Yet, my DSi's power has a limit, and non-stop Kirby: Mouse Attack the other day didn't do it well. I lost connection thinking I made my post, and hence I referred to it in the message you quoted.
strager wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/viewtopic.php?p=155228#p155228
I see this vote as justifyable by Jinxy's reasoning but Wojjan doesn't mention this.
Wojjan seems to say that Lucidity is voting against him because Lucidity's argument is "based on things [Wojjan] said and others said aswell." Well, what else would it be based off of? Wojjan didn't say/imply at all that Lucidity knows something more than him, and he didn't try to discredit the arguments against him by Lucidity. Wojjan just votes for whoever's voting for him here. Uh, okay.
I voted for Lucidity in the way he voted me. If I don't receive any decent arguments to go on, I can't discredit a lot, now can I? Whatever I said and did others did too.
As JInxy can say it nicely
You had not posted a reason when you voted for wojjan.
Lucidity voted for me out of danger to get lynched off himself, not out of decent arguments. The only thing he has, and had repeated oftly, was that
For now I find adam and Wojjan the most suspicious.
You and Wojjan are so suspicious
U. N. Wojjan were suspicious? Yup, just like that. Reasons in the above posts mostly apply to adam instead of both, and
You and adam seem to act in unison
is supposed to pull me into suspicion too. Which apparently worked.
Second, I DID defend myself in
this post. After my post, the remnants of Lucidity's
arguments idiotic pleas for votechanges were broken down to bite-size feeble nothingness.