forum
Koji Kondo - Starship Mario 2
posted
Total Posts
98
Topic Starter
<3Teddiursa wrote:
Woot. ♥
hi!
maybe remove claps from easy and hard? they honestly don't fit at all
[Easy]
00:07:399 (1) - finish is way too loud here,I don't think it fits well :\
00:49:134 (1) - looks a bit out of place here..you could use a reverse-slider instead,like this:
01:12:866 (1) - spacing
01:27:869 (3) - I was expecting this note at 01:27:596 honestly..I don't think such hard rhytm is acceptable in the easiest diff,I'd also make a slider to make it easier to hit:
01:31:142 (2,3,4,5) - same,I wouldn't follow that bg music,but tried to focus on the main rhytm
[Verdi's Normal]
00:18:583 (3,4,5) - moving (5) a little farther would be better
otherwise nice,though I got a little confused with blue ticks,I'd rather used 1/1 rhytm
I'm fine with Hard,though I don't think any jumps would fit this music
I remember your "Don't Stop" map - there're really few maps like this nowadays,and I wish you mapped all your maps in that style,so I was a little dissapointed to see jumps here,but it's up to you~
maybe remove claps from easy and hard? they honestly don't fit at all
[Easy]
00:07:399 (1) - finish is way too loud here,I don't think it fits well :\
00:49:134 (1) - looks a bit out of place here..you could use a reverse-slider instead,like this:
01:12:866 (1) - spacing
01:27:869 (3) - I was expecting this note at 01:27:596 honestly..I don't think such hard rhytm is acceptable in the easiest diff,I'd also make a slider to make it easier to hit:
01:31:142 (2,3,4,5) - same,I wouldn't follow that bg music,but tried to focus on the main rhytm
[Verdi's Normal]
00:18:583 (3,4,5) - moving (5) a little farther would be better
otherwise nice,though I got a little confused with blue ticks,I'd rather used 1/1 rhytm
I'm fine with Hard,though I don't think any jumps would fit this music
I remember your "Don't Stop" map - there're really few maps like this nowadays,and I wish you mapped all your maps in that style,so I was a little dissapointed to see jumps here,but it's up to you~
Topic Starter
Thanks IceBeam ^^IceBeam wrote:
hi!
maybe remove claps from easy and hard? they honestly don't fit at all
[Easy]
00:07:399 (1) - finish is way too loud here,I don't think it fits well :\ fixed
00:49:134 (1) - looks a bit out of place here..you could use a reverse-slider instead,like this:
done
01:12:866 (1) - spacing done
01:27:869 (3) - I was expecting this note at 01:27:596 honestly..I don't think such hard rhytm is acceptable in the easiest diff,I'd also make a slider to make it easier to hit:
i change the pattern so
01:31:142 (2,3,4,5) - same,I wouldn't follow that bg music,but tried to focus on the main rhytm same ^
[Verdi's Normal]
00:18:583 (3,4,5) - moving (5) a little farther would be better
otherwise nice,though I got a little confused with blue ticks,I'd rather used 1/1 rhytm
I'm fine with Hard,though I don't think any jumps would fit this music
Waiting for Verdi diff
alright,time to rank!
congrats
Yay! Congratulation Moody! 
BIMZ <3 Congrats Moody. :3
Gratz~~~~~~~
Hasta que finalmente esto se rankeo 
Felicitaciones Moody
Felicitaciones Moody
Alfin wn <3
Topic Starter
Thank you so much IceBeamIceBeam wrote:
alright,time to rank!
And thanks guys
<3moodyeala
Unranking for the time being; the timing here is definitely off... The offset is at least 20ms early (can especially be noticed early on in the song), and it seems that the BPM is too slow.
I've tested a bunch of times, and I feel that 110.00 BPM with +30 offset (thus 7,430) works best.
Note: If it turns out that only the offset is incorrect, then this can be reranked without needing scores wiped.
I've tested a bunch of times, and I feel that 110.00 BPM with +30 offset (thus 7,430) works best.
Note: If it turns out that only the offset is incorrect, then this can be reranked without needing scores wiped.
awwww.
Topic Starter
Well i fixed the timing and resnap all the notes so i think is done in my opinion so thanks Derek ~Derekku wrote:
Unranking for the time being; the timing here is definitely off... The offset is at least 20ms early (can especially be noticed early on in the song), and it seems that the BPM is too slow.
I've tested a bunch of times, and I feel that 110.00 BPM with +30 offset (thus 7,430) works best.
Note: If it turns out that only the offset is incorrect, then this can be reranked without needing scores wiped.
Koji Kondo is credited with composition for this track, not Mahito Yokota, and the title on the soundtrack is 'Starship Mario 2' ('Starship Mario 1' and 'Starship Mario 3' have different instruments).
http://vgmdb.net/album/19454
http://vgmdb.net/album/19454
Topic Starter
I'm pretty sure about the artist you know,like the others maps ranked from SMG and about the tittle,i'm not sureQuppa wrote:
Koji Kondo is credited with composition for this track, not Mahito Yokota, and the title on the soundtrack is 'Starship Mario 2' ('Starship Mario 1' and 'Starship Mario 3' have different instruments).
http://vgmdb.net/album/19454
VGMdb is a reputable resource, and you can see Kondo's name in this scan of the album booklet: http://pixhost.me/avaxhome/a6/1c/00161ca6.jpeg (Track 12 - 近藤浩治 Kondo Koji, not 横田真人 Yokota Mahito). Yokota composed most of the soundtrack, but Kondo and Ryo Nagamatsu contributed also.MoodyRPG wrote:
I'm pretty sure about the artist you know,like the others maps ranked from SMG and about the tittle,i'm not sureQuppa wrote:
Koji Kondo is credited with composition for this track, not Mahito Yokota, and the title on the soundtrack is 'Starship Mario 2' ('Starship Mario 1' and 'Starship Mario 3' have different instruments).
http://vgmdb.net/album/19454
Thanks, Quppa!
"Koji Kondo - Starship Mario 2" should be used instead of the current artist and title. Also, shouldn't the source be "Super Mario Galaxy 2"?
By the way, the current mp3's volume is kind of low and the quality is only 128 kbps. Why not use one of better quality?
EDIT: Also, I'd like a couple more opinions on the timing from others!
"Koji Kondo - Starship Mario 2" should be used instead of the current artist and title. Also, shouldn't the source be "Super Mario Galaxy 2"?
By the way, the current mp3's volume is kind of low and the quality is only 128 kbps. Why not use one of better quality?
EDIT: Also, I'd like a couple more opinions on the timing from others!
Don't know how this could get ranked ...but here's the timing.
BPM: 110.20 Offset: 7,429
BPM: 110.14 Offset: 16,684
BPM: 110.00 Offset: 31,120
BPM: 110.60 Offset: 31,665
BPM: 104.00 Offset: 32,478
BPM: 116.70 Offset: 33,054
BPM: 105.00 Offset: 33,568
BPM: 106.00 Offset: 34,425
BPM: 108.00 Offset: 34,708
BPM: 109.00 Offset: 34,985
BPM: 69.00 Offset: 35,260
BPM: 110.00 Offset: 35,477
BPM: 100.00 Offset: 35,749
BPM: 105.00 Offset: 36,049
BPM: 108.00 Offset: 36,334
BPM: 111.40 Offset: 36,889
BPM: 118.00 Offset: 37,427
BPM: 116.00 Offset: 37,808
BPM: 108.00 Offset: 37,937
BPM: 108.00 Offset: 38,214 (Metronome Reset)
BPM: 109.00 Offset: 40,436
BPM: 110.00 Offset: 40,711
BPM: 107.00 Offset: 40,983
BPM: 116.50 Offset: 41,825
BPM: 110.15 Offset: 42,340
BPM: 109.40 Offset: 68,486
BPM: 110.10 Offset: 77,261
BPM: 110.68 Offset: 112,683
That's all, I think. Enjoy fixing.
BPM: 110.20 Offset: 7,429
BPM: 110.14 Offset: 16,684
BPM: 110.00 Offset: 31,120
BPM: 110.60 Offset: 31,665
BPM: 104.00 Offset: 32,478
BPM: 116.70 Offset: 33,054
BPM: 105.00 Offset: 33,568
BPM: 106.00 Offset: 34,425
BPM: 108.00 Offset: 34,708
BPM: 109.00 Offset: 34,985
BPM: 69.00 Offset: 35,260
BPM: 110.00 Offset: 35,477
BPM: 100.00 Offset: 35,749
BPM: 105.00 Offset: 36,049
BPM: 108.00 Offset: 36,334
BPM: 111.40 Offset: 36,889
BPM: 118.00 Offset: 37,427
BPM: 116.00 Offset: 37,808
BPM: 108.00 Offset: 37,937
BPM: 108.00 Offset: 38,214 (Metronome Reset)
BPM: 109.00 Offset: 40,436
BPM: 110.00 Offset: 40,711
BPM: 107.00 Offset: 40,983
BPM: 116.50 Offset: 41,825
BPM: 110.15 Offset: 42,340
BPM: 109.40 Offset: 68,486
BPM: 110.10 Offset: 77,261
BPM: 110.68 Offset: 112,683
That's all, I think. Enjoy fixing.
.......what
That's just completely unnecessary and crazy o.O
That's just completely unnecessary and crazy o.O
o.o
Topic Starter
Some Fixes
- Change the artist
- Change the title
- Change the BG
- Change the artist
- Change the title
- Change the BG
Sorry for the delay~
[General]
*I found it strange that all three difficulties end on different measures... Perhaps make them consistent?
[Easy]
*Lovely~
[Normal]
01:30:339 (1,2,3) - I suppose that 1 and 3 are fine, but 2 is a bit too squished together. Can you make this more like the others, please?
[Hard]
*The OD is only one higher than Normal's, so I'd suggest raising it 1 tick.
Aaaaand that should be it! It looks like my unranking post was un-kdable, but I guess you can do this one instead. I should be able to rebubble after you reply!
[General]
*I found it strange that all three difficulties end on different measures... Perhaps make them consistent?
[Easy]
*Lovely~
[Normal]
01:30:339 (1,2,3) - I suppose that 1 and 3 are fine, but 2 is a bit too squished together. Can you make this more like the others, please?
[Hard]
*The OD is only one higher than Normal's, so I'd suggest raising it 1 tick.
Aaaaand that should be it! It looks like my unranking post was un-kdable, but I guess you can do this one instead. I should be able to rebubble after you reply!
Topic Starter
Thanks for mod Derekku,FixedDerekku wrote:
Sorry for the delay~ It's ok
[General]
*I found it strange that all three difficulties end on different measures... Perhaps make them consistent? Hmm yeah,fixed
[Easy]
*Lovely~
[Normal]
01:30:339 (1,2,3) - I suppose that 1 and 3 are fine, but 2 is a bit too squished together. Can you make this more like the others, please?
[Hard]
*The OD is only one higher than Normal's, so I'd suggest raising it 1 tick. Done
Aaaaand that should be it! It looks like my unranking post was un-kdable, but I guess you can do this one instead. I should be able to rebubble after you reply!
Waiting for Verdi's diff
No one's gonna try having stable 110.038 BPM ?
lol
lol
Download: Koji Kondo - Starship Mario 2 (MoodyRPG) [Verdi's Normal].osu
Btw, the timing of Faust is very nice, you should use it imo
Btw, the timing of Faust is very nice, you should use it imo
I kinda laughed.
I don't know if going to all the trouble of using mine is worth it or not, but I've been told it need not exceed 5~10ms of difference.
So in regards, it's fine to use Derek's timing since it's a balanced average.
I don't know if going to all the trouble of using mine is worth it or not, but I've been told it need not exceed 5~10ms of difference.
So in regards, it's fine to use Derek's timing since it's a balanced average.
Yeah, I was telling Faust that it's not worth trying to get the timing perfect. If the bpm/offset is only fluctuating by 5-10ms in certain spots, then it's not worth adding a bunch of extra timing sections. One steady bpm is much nicer and my timing was only off by ~5ms after a bunch of testplays.
Topic Starter
Thanks Verdi, Updated
So is all fixed
So is all fixed
Looks good!
Rebubbled!
Rebubbled!
Topic Starter
Oh <3Derekku wrote:
Looks good!
Rebubbled!
Thanks Derek ~ !
I'd be fine with -5, but any more than that would be too much imo. Could always make the adjustment if more people agree (and/or the next BAT that looks at this).
Great! Good luck Moody <3Derekku wrote:
I'd be fine with -5, but any more than that would be too much imo. Could always make the adjustment if more people agree (and/or the next BAT that looks at this).
Topic Starter
Thanks Tony to the support !Tony wrote:
Great! Good luck Moody <3Derekku wrote:
I'd be fine with -5, but any more than that would be too much imo. Could always make the adjustment if more people agree (and/or the next BAT that looks at this).
After having a look at the timing, I don't think it needs adjusting. It sounds alright to me. With it being a live orchestra, not every drum hit will be on-the-beat, so a bit of leeway is needed.
As for the maps, they look pretty clean. I could nitpick about parts like 00:42:339 - 00:50:520 in [Hard] going off the song and mapping to non-existent patterns, or [Easy] being a little boring, but these don't hurt the map much. 'tis still a cool map.
Congrats. You get my first rank in quite a while
Ranked ~
EDIT: Oh wait, this is a re-rank. Re-ranked ~
As for the maps, they look pretty clean. I could nitpick about parts like 00:42:339 - 00:50:520 in [Hard] going off the song and mapping to non-existent patterns, or [Easy] being a little boring, but these don't hurt the map much. 'tis still a cool map.
Congrats. You get my first rank in quite a while
Ranked ~
EDIT: Oh wait, this is a re-rank. Re-ranked ~
Topic Starter
OMGDoomsday wrote:
After having a look at the timing, I don't think it needs adjusting. It sounds alright to me. With it being a live orchestra, not every drum hit will be on-the-beat, so a bit of leeway is needed.
As for the maps, they look pretty clean. I could nitpick about parts like 00:42:339 - 00:50:520 in [Hard] going off the song and mapping to non-existent patterns, or [Easy] being a little boring, but these don't hurt the map much. 'tis still a cool map.
Congrats. You get my first rank in quite a while
Ranked ~
EDIT: Oh wait, this is a re-rank. Re-ranked ~
Thanks a lot Doomsday ^^
and thanks guys for help me with the timing <3
Re-gratz
Oh... Doomsday ranked a map again!!!
Oh... Doomsday ranked a map again!!!
yay!
Had to unrank quickly again because I forgot to delete the old scores. Sorry the for the inconvenience again! .____.
Doomsday will rerank with no problems right now.
Doomsday will rerank with no problems right now.
oops.
Re-re-ranked!
Re-re-ranked!
gratz on re-re-rank,Moody
Topic Starter
Ha
Well thanks again <3
Well thanks again <3
Congrats!!
Congratulation *-*'
OMG!
Re-re-rank ftw!
moody we love u
moody we love u
Topic Starter
Thanks guys <3
Maaan congrats
Topic Starter
Thanks TonyTony wrote:
Maaan congrats