I almost missed this 
join

join
Look at this cool guy.Pasonia wrote:
Shortly after this edit, I will code a C++ program that will generate your roles at random.
Hopefully not using some really crappy PRNG.Pasonia wrote:
Shortly after this edit, I will code a C++ program that will generate your roles at random.
why are you so worried huhLarto wrote:
What, does this make me suspicious? Hell, I just felt the need to say that.Rolled wrote:
[10:09] <Larto> Goddamnit Pasonia, I always get the boring roles.
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU---Pasonia wrote:
m980, you lucky sonuvagun, you get the last slot.
Just write a simple BASH script.Rolled wrote:
Look at this cool guy.Pasonia wrote:
Shortly after this edit, I will code a C++ program that will generate your roles at random.
cat names | shuf | sdiff - roles
TOO CONFUSING adlfkstrager wrote:
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU---Pasonia wrote:
m980, you lucky sonuvagun, you get the last slot.Just write a simple BASH script.Rolled wrote:
Look at this cool guy.Pasonia wrote:
Shortly after this edit, I will code a C++ program that will generate your roles at random.cat names | shuf | sdiff - roles
Or just pick names out of a hat ;Xstrager wrote:
Just write a simple BASH script.Rolled wrote:
Pasonia wrote:
Shortly after this edit, I will code a C++ program that will generate your roles at random.cat names | shuf | sdiff - roles
#include <cstdlib>
#include <cstdio>
int main() {
int a[16];
for (int i=0; i<16; ++i) {
a[i] = i;
}
for (int i=0; i<1000; ++i) {
int t1 = rand() % 16;
int t2 = rand() % 16;
int t = a[t1];
a[t1] = a[t2];
a[t2] = t;
}
for (int i=0; i<16; ++i) {
printf("%i\n", a[i]);
}
return 0;
}
This is an official Werewolf Game #3 Communicationok i responded
Please respond by 12:00PM, Singapore Standard Time (which is 12 hours from this PM). If you fail to reply by then, I will take it that your role is lapsed to another player.
Please RSVP.
Pasonia wrote:
"It's about 3AM here now, so I do suggest some of you get some sleep.
So is this night 0?Pasonia wrote:
Before anyone had a chance to figure out what Pasonia actually meant, he vanished.
Day One has started. Tension begins. Stuff will begin to fly...
It's pretty silly to say that you have one on the first day. Jesus.Agent Spin Here wrote:
Nice introduction there.
*claps*
I have an aux role, but it'd be pretty silly to reveal what it is in the first post. So I won't.
and by "anyone" I assume you mean anyone who isn't a flesh eating killer?Olinad wrote:
Anyway, good game to anyone
It's either we vote on day 1, or we lose someone on night 1... I'd rather we lynch someone =.=Olinad wrote:
I'll never understand why we are supposed to vote during the first day -.-' Anyway, good game to anyone
No comment.0_o wrote:
I vote ASH. Claiming to be an aux right off the bat makes himself a ridiculously easy wolf target. Not the smartest move.. unless he didn't have to worry about being night killed to begin with?
Personally, I don't like blind votes (to be more exact, people claiming to make blind votes) so I'll first temporarily settle on voting for YellowYoshi1.YellowYoshi1 wrote:
With that said, I'll just make a blind vote.
Lynch vote cast against Larto.
Iono. Same thing as I think about blindly voting.Echo wrote:
What did you guys think about nardi's post though?
Dear experiments,
Since it's the first day, I decided we'll have a little bit of liberty with timing and start the day in the wee hours. Don't get yourself all hot and bothered about 3AM.
Secondly, I will update the vote standings.
Thirdly, as I am an easily confused person, do not mark in bold when you're clearly not voting, puh-LEESE.
Lurk without voting わなんでやねん、バカ?
Regards
Pasonia
P.S. Execution method this game? I guess I'll just step in front of you and shoot you with my pistol. I need an excuse to do some ultraviolent shit rofl.
「わ」って何だ?「は」ってじゃない、バカ?Pasonia wrote:
Thirdly, as I am an easily confused person, do not mark in bold when you're clearly not voting, puh-LEESE.
Lurk without voting わなんでやねん、バカ?
Lurking in itself is an average tell, but remember nardi was lynched as a wolf last game (and I'm pretty sure he is/was). Reusing a phrase that garnered suspicion, even though it may not have been the ultimate cause of his lynch, is not something a villager would do.adam2046 wrote:
I don't see "admitted to lurking" as a very good point.
Uhhh... because it obviously makes you look suspicious? This isn't the kind of game to randomly joke around in.nardi11011 wrote:
Why can't I joke around without people wanting to kill me? Anyway, I'm not a wolf this time. Also, what's wrong with admitting to lurking" (especially if I'm not actually lurking, but sleeping)?
When you lurk you're soaking up information without contributing anything. As a villager we need as much information as possible to find the wolves. Hence lurking is somewhat of a wolf tell.nardi11011 wrote:
Why can't I joke around without people wanting to kill me? Anyway, I'm not a wolf this time. Also, what's wrong with admitting to lurking" (especially if I'm not actually lurking, but sleeping)?
What do you mean by that? No one even mentioned Todesengal before you made that post.nardi11011 wrote:
I don't know who to vote so I'll just jump on the bandwagon and...
Lurk without votingTodesengal
IRC wrote:
14:52 < Echo> think it through
14:52 < Echo> imagine
14:52 < Echo> you said something on the first day
14:52 < Echo> which resulted in you getting lynched
14:53 < Echo> which you onnly just backed out of by fakeclaiming
14:53 < Echo> would you seriously say the exact same thing in the next game if you were human?
Vote standings have been updated W(°0°)W
I may be able to see it as suspicious if I think about it hard enough, but probably not for the same reason as you. I'm aware that lurking in general, and not posting too much, is often a tell for wolves (I think you said that earlier), but calling Nardi out on that reason may be a bit of a stretch I think.Echo wrote:
So no one other than me sees that line as suspicious :/IRC wrote:
14:52 < Echo> think it through
14:52 < Echo> imagine
14:52 < Echo> you said something on the first day
14:52 < Echo> which resulted in you getting lynched
14:53 < Echo> which you onnly just backed out of by fakeclaiming
14:53 < Echo> would you seriously say the exact same thing in the next game if you were human?
Well, the difference would be:0_o wrote:
Wow, honestly, out of ALL of the roles to claim, you claim the only one who can't be protected at night...
I think my vote is settled now. If ASH isn't a wolf, he will likely die tonight, so whether he is lynched or not really won't make a difference. If he is a wolf, then obviously lynching him would be a good thing. So really, the worst thing that could happen is that we lynch someone who was going to die anyway. It's a neutral-win situation.
At least that's how my mind works. My vote for ASH stands.
You missed Echo unvoting me and voting m980.Pasonia wrote:
It says: VOTE STANDINGS HAVE BEEN UPDATED AGAIN. GAME ENDS IN 23 HOURS.
Yes, theoretically speaking, the Guardian Angel CAN keep protecting himself from being killed. Trouble is, the wolves are more likely not to know if it was the GA guarding himself or him being guarded by another person. Also, the Guardian Angel will sometimes have his cover blown, so if shit happens don't say I didn't warn ya.Rolled wrote:
I just want to clarify a few things. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.
The guardian angel can protect themselves, right? And if they are protected and the wolves try to kill them, the wolves will not get a kill that night, being a wasted night for the wolves? And as long as the wolves attempt to night-kill the guardian angel every night, the GA can just continue to protect themselves the whole time? (I doubt this will happen, rhetorical question)
Example: ASH protects himself on night 1, wolves attempt to kill him. Total fatalities of day 1 = 1 lynch vote, 0 night kills.
Since ASH had a successful protection on night 1, he can then protect himself on night 2 as well?
Do you have some kind of randomizing C++ program to decide that for you too?Pasonia wrote:
Yes, theoretically speaking, the Guardian Angel CAN keep protecting himself from being killed. Trouble is, the wolves are more likely not to know if it was the GA guarding himself or him being guarded by another person. Also, the Guardian Angel will sometimes have his cover blown, so if shit happens don't say I didn't warn ya.Rolled wrote:
I just want to clarify a few things. Somebody please correct me if I'm wrong.
The guardian angel can protect themselves, right? And if they are protected and the wolves try to kill them, the wolves will not get a kill that night, being a wasted night for the wolves? And as long as the wolves attempt to night-kill the guardian angel every night, the GA can just continue to protect themselves the whole time? (I doubt this will happen, rhetorical question)
Example: ASH protects himself on night 1, wolves attempt to kill him. Total fatalities of day 1 = 1 lynch vote, 0 night kills.
Since ASH had a successful protection on night 1, he can then protect himself on night 2 as well?