oh shit
unvote vote DxS
hahahaha omgus
unvote vote DxS
hahahaha omgus
Objection?bmin11 wrote:
I don't really care for the perfect win, but why throw away our shields AKA jesters? We can have more nights to perform our abilities if we just no-lynch and let them kill those jesters one by one.
13 vs 11 (assuming mafia want to help town)Salvage wrote:
That's assuming some jesters want to risk their win to give the win to others since they will lose that power on later days and town will right asap know who all the jesters are making it much easier and taking everything out of the question, aka won't happen.
..as long as it's not mafia.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
...wait. I just realized, that means nothing at this moment.
I honestly don't care who wins.
get the townieSwiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
I've said it before. I'm as town as town can be.
Yes, because I'm never townie. >_> (In your eyes, that is)Wojjan wrote:
get the townieSwiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
I've said it before. I'm as town as town can be.
vote: vash
Rantai wrote:
Again you don't have the majority, Salvage.
Even if you convinced every mafia and town to work with you, you'll be 3 votes short.
Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
You do a no-lynch, and you get a 0% chance of hitting town, mafia, and jesters. Cool, but wouldn't you rather try to hit a mafia instead? Sure, odds are, you'll hit a jester, but think about it for a moment, would you rather go for a lynch and at least TRY to get a mafia instead of doing this no-lynch strategy?
Now, about the survivor. Why do you want to lynch a survivor in the first place? Unless he really IS a jester (which I doubt, by the way), I don't think doing this is a good idea.