Garven wrote:

[General]
Tick rate 4 sounds great with this, though 2 is probably best in the easier difficulties. (for spinboxer,POSTHUMOUS I changed them)
[Calm]
00:29:590 (1) - For a .74 star rating map, I really want more time after a spinner for recovery. (done)
00:49:801 (1) - ^ (done)
01:42:853 (1) - ^ Starting this closer to the center is also easier for recovery. (done)
02:33:380 (1) - Soon spinner yeah (done)
03:12:538 (2) - Doesn't look aligned with the slider very well. Sticking too far right. (done)
Interesting how you changed up the distance snap around. It worked pretty well. Nice job with that.
Mostly just worried about the notes after spinners for such an easy-rated map. (thank you:d)

[Romantic]
00:59:906 (1,2) - Strange that this is stacked compared to the other slider pairs around here (I think it's done...)
01:42:853 (1) - From from .5x to .75x doesn't feel right since there's no real change in intensity of the music. (I think it's not a problem.Also,I don't want a sudden slider speed increase from 0.5 to 1.0 at 02:13:169 .Therefore,I didn't change them.(The play is weel with it too.))

[spbox]
03:35:906 (4,1) - Feels like kind of a large jump into a stream pattern. (It's spboxer3's diff)

[Posthumous]
I already posted my general opinion about the pace of the map earlier.
01:28:959 (1,1,1,1) - Set these sliders at about 1.2x - 1.25x speed to keep with the gradual increase of velocity through this pattern. 1.2x felt best to me. (DONE)
03:49:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The transition from 1/4s to 1/2s here, then to 1/4s again feels kind of weird since the entire song is slowing down, not winding up to a final burst right at the end. (I changed it to only 1/2 notes.)

IceBeam wrote:

[Spinboxer]
you shouldn't silence notes,as it's required to have all notes to be heard clearly
so,please,fix all section with volume below 20% (exceptions are spinners)

01:07:485 (5) - mind on moving it a little farther to show 1/1 space clearly? sure
01:37:801 (4,5,1) - not pretty sure of these,hm..maybe clear them a out a little more by doing suck kind of stack or anything else? sure

SPOILER

02:41:590 (1,2,3) - make an equal spacing between them? umm.. I don't like this~so... sorry
03:02:432 (1,2,1,2) - shouldn't it be like this? D: swtiched (1) ok

SPOILER

03:07:485 (1) - mind on increasing distance? looks a bit close to previous object ok

IceBeam wrote:

nice in general

[Calm]
01:10:011 (1) - I quiet don't get why reverses are on the red ticks. it doesn's sound right..and looks like you was lazy to map this part so you filled it with a reverse-slider :p I'd like you to make something better
01:52:959 (1) - well,I got your idea,but I'd rather shorten this slider by 1/2 (01:53:590)
03:11:274 (1,2) - it's a bit our of whole mapping style,you didn't placed object closer then 1/2 yet,so I'd just continue this slider up to 03:12:538
03:21:380 (1) - and here,you could shorten it by 1/2,though this one is less evil
03:39:064 (1) - shape doesn't look cute honestly :<

also,this slowdown part is a bit awkward,as the sliders are slowdowned but objects are spaced out of 1x,so technically all these objects are "jumps",though it's not hard in any case to play

[Quiet]
probably you shouldn't use 1/4 rhytm so much in the diff next to beginner,but at least it fits well

02:38:432 (1,2,1,2) - I'd change them to simple reverse-sliders

[Romantic]
00:27:695 (1) - why no start this spinner as in other diffs? it'd make better score spread I think
01:08:748 (1) - that was akward to me shorthen this slider to 01:09:380 and then make a reverse-slider if you want to keep those notes?
02:15:695 (1) - dat slider
02:37:485 (5) - shorten this slider to 02:37:801 and add a note to 02:37:959 (6)? sounds more right to me
02:42:538 (5,6) - ^
03:04:959 (3) - fix spacing,it looks like 1/2 here
03:52:959 (1) - start spinner from here? bpm changes a lot,but you can't see/feel it as the notes are stacked

[Spinboxer]
you shouldn't silence notes,as it's required to have all notes to be heard clearly
so,please,fix all section with volume below 20% (exceptions are spinners)

01:07:485 (5) - mind on moving it a little farther to show 1/1 space clearly?
01:37:801 (4,5,1) - not pretty sure of these,hm..maybe clear them a out a little more by doing suck kind of stack or anything else?

SPOILER

02:41:590 (1,2,3) - make an equal spacing between them?
03:02:432 (1,2,1,2) - shouldn't it be like this? D: swtiched (1)

SPOILER

03:07:485 (1) - mind on increasing distance? looks a bit close to previous object

[Posthumous]
well,I think we can't actually use tickrate 4 here,as the score is near 18 mil..
so I don't know,it will cause some issues,w/o a doubt,so better change it back to 2,and in SB's diff as well,for consistency

well,I won't say anything new - overmapped
so I actually have no idea how to mod it,so let's leave it as it is

IceBeam wrote:

good luck then

Gaba wrote:

Nice map, gratz.

Shiirn wrote:

=|

Shiirn wrote:

=|

Sun Rainbow wrote:

邪恶的NOLD终于被我超越了！！

。。。。。。

这几个红红的不是昨天在MP里的好基友们吗

竟然按名次排28.29.30.31！

nold_1702 wrote:

Sun Rainbow wrote:

邪恶的NOLD终于被我超越了！！

。。。。。。

这几个红红的不是昨天在MP里的好基友们吗

竟然按名次排28.29.30.31！

lol~竟然開easy...你嬴了Q_Q


這麼神奇的lol(其實不神奇ww
我們都不知如何玩ctb你竟然開nf 你比我更鬼觸><""

Shiirn wrote:

=|

Wishy22 wrote:

So, is the ranked version of this "overmapped" or it got "fixed"? Still the ranked version is great, if this is overmapping damn I fucking love it.

ziin wrote:

bad overmapping got fixed, good overmappoH ing stayed.

Wishy22 wrote:

Shiirn wrote:

=|

If you mean "how could this shit get ranked", let me tell you this is way more fun to play than any of your maps tbh.

D33d wrote:

"You're a mapper, not a composer."

D33d wrote:

ziin wrote:

you can be a composer too. It's just a lot easier and usually sounds better to be a mapper.

I'm not sure if you were talking about how hitsounds can be used to complement music or just composing music and mapping it, but in the sense of creating patterns to fit music, it's generally a given that one should stick to existing rhythms. If I know a song or listen to a preview, I don't want to have a load of complicated patterns foisted upon me when the song gives no indication of this.

nold_1702 wrote:

2.I just want to lead the rhythm by using hitsound.If you set the hitsound nearly slience in a song,why you still have to add hitsounds?

yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:

Hi, I like 3.14159265.

ziin wrote:

There's no problem with writing a new drum part to a song if the hitsounds represent drums. You just have to do it well.

Sync wrote:

he means he likes pi

get it

ziin wrote:

hitsounds are sounds played at certain points. A musical instrument is something that you can control to make sounds at any given time. There's no problem with writing a new drum part to a song if the hitsounds represent drums. You just have to do it well.

And by the way, the last I checked there's only like 20 overmapped notes in the song. That's less than a vicho difficulty.

ziin wrote:

nold_1702 wrote:

2.I just want to lead the rhythm by using hitsound.If you set the hitsound nearly slience in a song,why you still have to add hitsounds?

because you change the rhythm at that point. There was silence for a reason, and you shouldn't be hitting anything on silence.

nold_1702 wrote:

3.Mapper makes the song better,therefore we are helping the composer

Natteke wrote:

Wow, this map is awesome