forum

DJ Okawari - Luv Letter

posted
Total Posts
157
show more
ziin
by the way it wasn't a collab or anything like that, just a suggestion on how to do some stuff. I literally took your diff and made a few changes, so yes, it would be silly to submit it as a guest or anything. I only changed 2 sections:
00:29:590 (1) - 00:49:801
01:42:853 (1) - 02:11:906
so those were the 2 I wanted you to look at and compare with what you have currently. By all means, place them yourself, I just wanted to show you what mapping to the piano would look and sound like.

However the important thing in it is the rhythms I used (which are all taken directly from the song itself, and I threw it together in a matter of minutes, so I'm sure you can improve on the placement, which will make it "yours"). My main point is that your style, mainly in the first part is bad. It's bad rhythms, there is no drum in that part, and I really find it hard to believe you like your overmapped rhythms rather than the rhythm of the song in the piano part. You say you have no ideas, so I don't understand why you wouldn't switch?

I copied over the the 2nd part (the part I thought you overmapped well) and it sounded very good. It just doesn't make sense to only have one section of the song be so different from the rest.
Topic Starter
Ulysses

ziin wrote:

by the way it wasn't a collab or anything like that, just a suggestion on how to do some stuff. I literally took your diff and made a few changes, so yes, it would be silly to submit it as a guest or anything. I only changed 2 sections:
00:29:590 (1) - 00:49:801
01:42:853 (1) - 02:11:906
so those were the 2 I wanted you to look at and compare with what you have currently. By all means, place them yourself, I just wanted to show you what mapping to the piano would look and sound like.

However the important thing in it is the rhythms I used (which are all taken directly from the song itself, and I threw it together in a matter of minutes, so I'm sure you can improve on the placement, which will make it "yours"). My main point is that your style, mainly in the first part is bad. It's bad rhythms, there is no drum in that part, and I really find it hard to believe you like your overmapped rhythms rather than the rhythm of the song in the piano part. You say you have no ideas, so I don't understand why you wouldn't switch?

I copied over the the 2nd part (the part I thought you overmapped well) and it sounded very good. It just doesn't make sense to only have one section of the song be so different from the rest.
Now I hv idea,Fixed the first part :>

Edit:Who said I can't even play it><"I passed it!



Download: nold_1702 - DJ Okawari - Luv Letter [Posthumous] (2012-01-05) Osu.osr
happy30
I gave some suggestions for the beginning of [Posthumous] it sounds much better now.
The difficulty is a bit too hard for this song, you know that, so keep in mind what kind of song you are mapping next time.
But it still sounds good so...

here rebubble
Topic Starter
Ulysses

happy30 wrote:

I gave some suggestions for the beginning of [Posthumous] it sounds much better now.
The difficulty is a bit too hard for this song, you know that, so keep in mind what kind of song you are mapping next time.
But it still sounds good so...

here rebubble
Yooooooo!!!!!!
Thank you again Hp30><"
Wait for BAT 's modding >M<"
ziin
huzzah the first overmapped song I approve of!
Topic Starter
Ulysses

ziin wrote:

huzzah the first overmapped song I approve of!
: D D~
Garven
[General]
Tick rate 4 sounds great with this, though 2 is probably best in the easier difficulties.

[Calm]
00:29:590 (1) - For a .74 star rating map, I really want more time after a spinner for recovery.
00:49:801 (1) - ^
01:42:853 (1) - ^ Starting this closer to the center is also easier for recovery.
02:33:380 (1) - Soon spinner yeah
03:12:538 (2) - Doesn't look aligned with the slider very well. Sticking too far right.
Interesting how you changed up the distance snap around. It worked pretty well. Nice job with that.
Mostly just worried about the notes after spinners for such an easy-rated map.

[Romantic]
00:59:906 (1,2) - Strange that this is stacked compared to the other slider pairs around here
01:42:853 (1) - From from .5x to .75x doesn't feel right since there's no real change in intensity of the music.

[spbox]
03:35:906 (4,1) - Feels like kind of a large jump into a stream pattern.

[Posthumous]
I already posted my general opinion about the pace of the map earlier.
01:28:959 (1,1,1,1) - Set these sliders at about 1.2x - 1.25x speed to keep with the gradual increase of velocity through this pattern. 1.2x felt best to me.
03:49:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The transition from 1/4s to 1/2s here, then to 1/4s again feels kind of weird since the entire song is slowing down, not winding up to a final burst right at the end.
spboxer3
Topic Starter
Ulysses

Garven wrote:

[General]
Tick rate 4 sounds great with this, though 2 is probably best in the easier difficulties. :arrow: (for spinboxer,POSTHUMOUS I changed them)
[Calm]
00:29:590 (1) - For a .74 star rating map, I really want more time after a spinner for recovery. :arrow: (done)
00:49:801 (1) - ^ :arrow: (done)
01:42:853 (1) - ^ Starting this closer to the center is also easier for recovery. :arrow: (done)
02:33:380 (1) - Soon spinner yeah :arrow: (done)
03:12:538 (2) - Doesn't look aligned with the slider very well. Sticking too far right. :arrow: (done)
Interesting how you changed up the distance snap around. It worked pretty well. Nice job with that.
Mostly just worried about the notes after spinners for such an easy-rated map. :arrow: (thank you:d)

[Romantic]
00:59:906 (1,2) - Strange that this is stacked compared to the other slider pairs around here :arrow: (I think it's done...)
01:42:853 (1) - From from .5x to .75x doesn't feel right since there's no real change in intensity of the music. :arrow: (I think it's not a problem.Also,I don't want a sudden slider speed increase from 0.5 to 1.0 at 02:13:169 .Therefore,I didn't change them.(The play is weel with it too.))

[spbox]
03:35:906 (4,1) - Feels like kind of a large jump into a stream pattern. :arrow: (It's spboxer3's diff)

[Posthumous]
I already posted my general opinion about the pace of the map earlier.
01:28:959 (1,1,1,1) - Set these sliders at about 1.2x - 1.25x speed to keep with the gradual increase of velocity through this pattern. 1.2x felt best to me. :arrow: (DONE)
03:49:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The transition from 1/4s to 1/2s here, then to 1/4s again feels kind of weird since the entire song is slowing down, not winding up to a final burst right at the end. :arrow:(I changed it to only 1/2 notes.)
IceBeam
nice in general

[Calm]
01:10:011 (1) - I quiet don't get why reverses are on the red ticks. it doesn's sound right..and looks like you was lazy to map this part so you filled it with a reverse-slider :p I'd like you to make something better
01:52:959 (1) - well,I got your idea,but I'd rather shorten this slider by 1/2 (01:53:590)
03:11:274 (1,2) - it's a bit our of whole mapping style,you didn't placed object closer then 1/2 yet,so I'd just continue this slider up to 03:12:538
03:21:380 (1) - and here,you could shorten it by 1/2,though this one is less evil
03:39:064 (1) - shape doesn't look cute honestly :<

also,this slowdown part is a bit awkward,as the sliders are slowdowned but objects are spaced out of 1x,so technically all these objects are "jumps",though it's not hard in any case to play

[Quiet]
probably you shouldn't use 1/4 rhytm so much in the diff next to beginner,but at least it fits well

02:38:432 (1,2,1,2) - I'd change them to simple reverse-sliders

[Romantic]
00:27:695 (1) - why no start this spinner as in other diffs? it'd make better score spread I think
01:08:748 (1) - that was akward to me :| shorthen this slider to 01:09:380 and then make a reverse-slider if you want to keep those notes?
02:15:695 (1) - dat slider 8-)
02:37:485 (5) - shorten this slider to 02:37:801 and add a note to 02:37:959 (6)? sounds more right to me
02:42:538 (5,6) - ^
03:04:959 (3) - fix spacing,it looks like 1/2 here
03:52:959 (1) - start spinner from here? bpm changes a lot,but you can't see/feel it as the notes are stacked

[Spinboxer]
you shouldn't silence notes,as it's required to have all notes to be heard clearly
so,please,fix all section with volume below 20% (exceptions are spinners)

01:07:485 (5) - mind on moving it a little farther to show 1/1 space clearly?
01:37:801 (4,5,1) - not pretty sure of these,hm..maybe clear them a out a little more by doing suck kind of stack or anything else?
02:41:590 (1,2,3) - make an equal spacing between them?
03:02:432 (1,2,1,2) - shouldn't it be like this? D: swtiched (1)
03:07:485 (1) - mind on increasing distance? looks a bit close to previous object

[Posthumous]
well,I think we can't actually use tickrate 4 here,as the score is near 18 mil..
so I don't know,it will cause some issues,w/o a doubt,so better change it back to 2,and in SB's diff as well,for consistency

well,I won't say anything new - overmapped ;)
so I actually have no idea how to mod it,so let's leave it as it is
spboxer3

IceBeam wrote:

[Spinboxer]
you shouldn't silence notes,as it's required to have all notes to be heard clearly
so,please,fix all section with volume below 20% (exceptions are spinners)

01:07:485 (5) - mind on moving it a little farther to show 1/1 space clearly? sure
01:37:801 (4,5,1) - not pretty sure of these,hm..maybe clear them a out a little more by doing suck kind of stack or anything else? sure

02:41:590 (1,2,3) - make an equal spacing between them? umm.. I don't like this~so... sorry :P
03:02:432 (1,2,1,2) - shouldn't it be like this? D: swtiched (1) ok
03:07:485 (1) - mind on increasing distance? looks a bit close to previous object ok
Download: DJ Okawari - Luv Letter (nold_1702) [Spinboxer].osu
Topic Starter
Ulysses

IceBeam wrote:

nice in general

[Calm]
01:10:011 (1) - I quiet don't get why reverses are on the red ticks. it doesn's sound right..and looks like you was lazy to map this part so you filled it with a reverse-slider :p I'd like you to make something better
01:52:959 (1) - well,I got your idea,but I'd rather shorten this slider by 1/2 (01:53:590)
03:11:274 (1,2) - it's a bit our of whole mapping style,you didn't placed object closer then 1/2 yet,so I'd just continue this slider up to 03:12:538
03:21:380 (1) - and here,you could shorten it by 1/2,though this one is less evil
03:39:064 (1) - shape doesn't look cute honestly :<

also,this slowdown part is a bit awkward,as the sliders are slowdowned but objects are spaced out of 1x,so technically all these objects are "jumps",though it's not hard in any case to play

[Quiet]
probably you shouldn't use 1/4 rhytm so much in the diff next to beginner,but at least it fits well

02:38:432 (1,2,1,2) - I'd change them to simple reverse-sliders

[Romantic]
00:27:695 (1) - why no start this spinner as in other diffs? it'd make better score spread I think
01:08:748 (1) - that was akward to me :| shorthen this slider to 01:09:380 and then make a reverse-slider if you want to keep those notes?
02:15:695 (1) - dat slider 8-)
02:37:485 (5) - shorten this slider to 02:37:801 and add a note to 02:37:959 (6)? sounds more right to me
02:42:538 (5,6) - ^
03:04:959 (3) - fix spacing,it looks like 1/2 here
03:52:959 (1) - start spinner from here? bpm changes a lot,but you can't see/feel it as the notes are stacked

[Spinboxer]
you shouldn't silence notes,as it's required to have all notes to be heard clearly
so,please,fix all section with volume below 20% (exceptions are spinners)

01:07:485 (5) - mind on moving it a little farther to show 1/1 space clearly?
01:37:801 (4,5,1) - not pretty sure of these,hm..maybe clear them a out a little more by doing suck kind of stack or anything else?
02:41:590 (1,2,3) - make an equal spacing between them?
03:02:432 (1,2,1,2) - shouldn't it be like this? D: swtiched (1)
03:07:485 (1) - mind on increasing distance? looks a bit close to previous object

[Posthumous]
well,I think we can't actually use tickrate 4 here,as the score is near 18 mil..
so I don't know,it will cause some issues,w/o a doubt,so better change it back to 2,and in SB's diff as well,for consistency

well,I won't say anything new - overmapped ;)
so I actually have no idea how to mod it,so let's leave it as it is
Fixed everything ><"
IceBeam
good luck then
Topic Starter
Ulysses

IceBeam wrote:

good luck then
Yoo!!
Garven
Did one small spinner-> note conversion in Calm.

Ranked!
Kurai
Congratulations ~
OnosakiHito
Congratulations ~
cRyo[iceeicee]
Overmap is your way ! :)

Graats !! \:D/
LKs
finally congrts
spboxer3
:P
Kert
Oh yes!
Graz \=w=/
ertyukjh010
Rank >< GJ

真心覺得好圖
Topic Starter
Ulysses
thank you!!!
DampfNudel
I have know it nold <33
Love ya :D xD :P :>
and your map ^-^
Topic Starter
Ulysses
><"thanks damp
Dino99
Congratz!!~~ ;)
Topic Starter
Ulysses
:>>
zenki0013
gratz! nice map!! GO on
Kite
congratulations !~
eveless
恭喜~
AIR315
Congratz~

:)
Gaba
Nice map, gratz.
Nanaya_cock
good
Topic Starter
Ulysses
:DD Thanks all
Maraiga
This map is absolutely amazing and fun to play. Grats (:
Topic Starter
Ulysses
: D D
NatsumeRin
congrats!
Topic Starter
Ulysses
LOL Thanks~
wule

Gaba wrote:

Nice map, gratz.
Topic Starter
Ulysses
: d d thank you><"
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply