Yooooooo!!!!!!happy30 wrote:
I gave some suggestions for the beginning of [Posthumous] it sounds much better now.
The difficulty is a bit too hard for this song, you know that, so keep in mind what kind of song you are mapping next time.
But it still sounds good so...
here rebubble
: D D~ziin wrote:
huzzah the first overmapped song I approve of!
Garven wrote:
[General]
Tick rate 4 sounds great with this, though 2 is probably best in the easier difficulties.(for spinboxer,POSTHUMOUS I changed them)
[Calm]
00:29:590 (1) - For a .74 star rating map, I really want more time after a spinner for recovery.
00:49:801 (1) - ^
01:42:853 (1) - ^ Starting this closer to the center is also easier for recovery.
02:33:380 (1) - Soon spinner yeah
03:12:538 (2) - Doesn't look aligned with the slider very well. Sticking too far right.
Interesting how you changed up the distance snap around. It worked pretty well. Nice job with that.
Mostly just worried about the notes after spinners for such an easy-rated map.
[Romantic]
00:59:906 (1,2) - Strange that this is stacked compared to the other slider pairs around here
01:42:853 (1) - From from .5x to .75x doesn't feel right since there's no real change in intensity of the music.
[spbox]
03:35:906 (4,1) - Feels like kind of a large jump into a stream pattern.
[Posthumous]
I already posted my general opinion about the pace of the map earlier.
01:28:959 (1,1,1,1) - Set these sliders at about 1.2x - 1.25x speed to keep with the gradual increase of velocity through this pattern. 1.2x felt best to me.
03:49:169 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - The transition from 1/4s to 1/2s here, then to 1/4s again feels kind of weird since the entire song is slowing down, not winding up to a final burst right at the end.
shorthen this slider to 01:09:380 and then make a reverse-slider if you want to keep those notes?
Download: DJ Okawari - Luv Letter (nold_1702) [Spinboxer].osuIceBeam wrote:
[Spinboxer]
you shouldn't silence notes,as it's required to have all notes to be heard clearly
so,please,fix all section with volume below 20% (exceptions are spinners)
01:07:485 (5) - mind on moving it a little farther to show 1/1 space clearly? sure
01:37:801 (4,5,1) - not pretty sure of these,hm..maybe clear them a out a little more by doing suck kind of stack or anything else? sure
02:41:590 (1,2,3) - make an equal spacing between them? umm.. I don't like this~so... sorry
03:02:432 (1,2,1,2) - shouldn't it be like this? D: swtiched (1) ok
03:07:485 (1) - mind on increasing distance? looks a bit close to previous object ok
Fixed everything ><"IceBeam wrote:
nice in general
[Calm]
01:10:011 (1) - I quiet don't get why reverses are on the red ticks. it doesn's sound right..and looks like you was lazy to map this part so you filled it with a reverse-slider :p I'd like you to make something better
01:52:959 (1) - well,I got your idea,but I'd rather shorten this slider by 1/2 (01:53:590)
03:11:274 (1,2) - it's a bit our of whole mapping style,you didn't placed object closer then 1/2 yet,so I'd just continue this slider up to 03:12:538
03:21:380 (1) - and here,you could shorten it by 1/2,though this one is less evil
03:39:064 (1) - shape doesn't look cute honestly :<
also,this slowdown part is a bit awkward,as the sliders are slowdowned but objects are spaced out of 1x,so technically all these objects are "jumps",though it's not hard in any case to play
[Quiet]
probably you shouldn't use 1/4 rhytm so much in the diff next to beginner,but at least it fits well
02:38:432 (1,2,1,2) - I'd change them to simple reverse-sliders
[Romantic]
00:27:695 (1) - why no start this spinner as in other diffs? it'd make better score spread I think
01:08:748 (1) - that was akward to me
02:15:695 (1) - dat slider
02:37:485 (5) - shorten this slider to 02:37:801 and add a note to 02:37:959 (6)? sounds more right to me
02:42:538 (5,6) - ^
03:04:959 (3) - fix spacing,it looks like 1/2 here
03:52:959 (1) - start spinner from here? bpm changes a lot,but you can't see/feel it as the notes are stacked
[Spinboxer]
you shouldn't silence notes,as it's required to have all notes to be heard clearly
so,please,fix all section with volume below 20% (exceptions are spinners)
01:07:485 (5) - mind on moving it a little farther to show 1/1 space clearly?
01:37:801 (4,5,1) - not pretty sure of these,hm..maybe clear them a out a little more by doing suck kind of stack or anything else?
02:41:590 (1,2,3) - make an equal spacing between them?
03:02:432 (1,2,1,2) - shouldn't it be like this? D: swtiched (1)
03:07:485 (1) - mind on increasing distance? looks a bit close to previous object
[Posthumous]
well,I think we can't actually use tickrate 4 here,as the score is near 18 mil..
so I don't know,it will cause some issues,w/o a doubt,so better change it back to 2,and in SB's diff as well,for consistency
well,I won't say anything new - overmapped
so I actually have no idea how to mod it,so let's leave it as it is
Yoo!!IceBeam wrote:
good luck then
xD 
:>D Thanks all:<<?Shiirn wrote:
=|
^Shiirn wrote:
=|
lol~竟然開easy...你嬴了Q_QSun Rainbow wrote:
邪恶的NOLD终于被我超越了！！
。。。。。。这几个红红的不是昨天在MP里的好基友们吗竟然按名次排28.29.30.31！
承蒙夸奖，几个月没玩了呢CTB。>.<nold_1702 wrote:
lol~竟然開easy...你嬴了Q_QSun Rainbow wrote:
邪恶的NOLD终于被我超越了！！
。。。。。。这几个红红的不是昨天在MP里的好基友们吗竟然按名次排28.29.30.31！
這麼神奇的lol(其實不神奇ww
我們都不知如何玩ctb你竟然開nf 你比我更鬼觸><""
If you mean "how could this shit get ranked", let me tell you this is way more fun to play than any of your maps tbh.Shiirn wrote:
=|
It's an overmap,never got fixed.:33Wishy22 wrote:
So, is the ranked version of this "overmapped" or it got "fixed"? Still the ranked version is great, if this is overmapping damn I fucking love it.
}ziin wrote:
bad overmapping got fixed, good overmappoH ing stayed.
While I often wonder how Shiirn's maps get ranked, his maps have no relevance here they don't excuse anybody's mistakes. Sure, it's kind of hypocritical that somebody whose maps feature inexcusable quirks should slag off other people's maps, but Shiirn has a point.Wishy22 wrote:
If you mean "how could this shit get ranked", let me tell you this is way more fun to play than any of your maps tbh.Shiirn wrote:
=|
you can be a composer too. It's just a lot easier and usually sounds better to be a mapper.D33d wrote:
"You're a mapper, not a composer."
I'm not sure if you were talking about how hitsounds can be used to complement music or just composing music and mapping it, but in the sense of creating patterns to fit music, it's generally a given that one should stick to existing rhythms. If I know a song or listen to a preview, I don't want to have a load of complicated patterns foisted upon me when the song gives no indication of this.ziin wrote:
you can be a composer too. It's just a lot easier and usually sounds better to be a mapper.D33d wrote:
"You're a mapper, not a composer."
hitsounds are sounds played at certain points. A musical instrument is something that you can control to make sounds at any given time. There's no problem with writing a new drum part to a song if the hitsounds represent drums. You just have to do it well.D33d wrote:
I'm not sure if you were talking about how hitsounds can be used to complement music or just composing music and mapping it, but in the sense of creating patterns to fit music, it's generally a given that one should stick to existing rhythms. If I know a song or listen to a preview, I don't want to have a load of complicated patterns foisted upon me when the song gives no indication of this.ziin wrote:
you can be a composer too. It's just a lot easier and usually sounds better to be a mapper.
because you change the rhythm at that point. There was silence for a reason, and you shouldn't be hitting anything on silence.nold_1702 wrote:
2.I just want to lead the rhythm by using hitsound.If you set the hitsound nearly slience in a song,why you still have to add hitsounds?
What do you mean lol?yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:
Hi, I like 3.14159265.
I agreeziin wrote:
There's no problem with writing a new drum part to a song if the hitsounds represent drums. You just have to do it well.
Just posted here and said he likes 兀.Sync wrote:
he means he likes pi
get it
In regards to adding drums to a track with hitsounded objects, that's one example of overmapping which I would appreciate. However, as you said, one has to do it well--as of yet, I haven't seen it done well, so there should either be a lot of guidance provided in this regard or overmapping should be discouraged altogether. In regards to how much needless overmapping there is, I still prefer "none" to "less than."ziin wrote:
hitsounds are sounds played at certain points. A musical instrument is something that you can control to make sounds at any given time. There's no problem with writing a new drum part to a song if the hitsounds represent drums. You just have to do it well.
And by the way, the last I checked there's only like 20 overmapped notes in the song. That's less than a vicho difficulty.
ziin wrote:
because you change the rhythm at that point. There was silence for a reason, and you shouldn't be hitting anything on silence.nold_1702 wrote:
2.I just want to lead the rhythm by using hitsound.If you set the hitsound nearly slience in a song,why you still have to add hitsounds?
Again, this is not what you did here. The hit objects are almost silenced and do not add to the rhythm, nor do they match it. Who are you to say that adding all of that rhythm to such a calm song even makes it better? If I were to arrange this song based on the rhythms that you've added, then the feel of it would likely be scuppered. Even then, "overmapping" doesn't just mean adding something to nothing--it also means following too much at once.nold_1702 wrote:
3.Mapper makes the song better,therefore we are helping the composer
Natteke wrote:
Wow, this map is awesome
awwwwwwwwwwwwesome