LunaticMara wrote:
Hey guys what's going on this mafia thr-
OH SNAP
VOTE LUNATICMARA
LunaticMara wrote:
Hey guys what's going on this mafia thr-
OH SNAP
bmin11 wrote:
The way I recommand you to play
bmin11 wrote:
recommand
Really now bminbmin11 wrote:
recommand
This is exactly what makes your claim so hard to believe. The only pro-town vibe you're supplying is your roleclaim, which you have very blatantly acknowledged to be a power-role. Obviously WIFOM, but if you were mafia on the verge of being lynched, you'd roleclaim a power role.Salvage wrote:
realize that a lynch on me it's not a good option (also to point out that Wojjan suggested that) since i roleclaimed an important pro-town role ..
Rolled wrote:
I've considered letting Salvage live until D2 but honestly, how credible will his information be? I'm confident that the information we get from his death will be more credible and useful than anything he can supply D2.
Not to mention like half the posts in this thread have been from Salvage, and 1/8th of Salvage's posts have been informative.
Pretty much. I've already stated that I think both pieguy and Salvage are potentially scum (Alongside DxS for doing nothing but correcting the votecount after NoHItter posted it), but I'm not the type to lynch a claimed power role on D1, and I have certain suspicions about DxS's role.akrolsmir wrote:
Or you really can't think of anything, which no doubt you will claim.
I'm sorry, do you mind pointing out the part where I'm actually voting Salvage? Because I'm pretty sure I'm not.pieguy1372 wrote:
However, FoS adam2046, Wojjan
Wanting to lynch Salvage even though it's not the right move (and with adam, he specifically said it). I have a gut feeling Wojjan is town, not so much on adam2046 though. adam2046 has also been rather inactive (compared to others), which fits what I said before.
I want Wojjan lynched, more than you do, but you're making it extremely hard for me to not vote you instead entirely out of distaste.Voting someone out of distaste doesn't make sense IMO
(Not a serious HoS btw )along with an obviously invalid reason isn't enough to make it completely disregardable...
did he just decide to keep playing or something?NoHItter wrote:
Jaqennn has asked for a replacement.
Again.pieguy1372 wrote:
Voting someone out of distaste doesn't make sense IMO
I won't include your joke HoS (though arguably it is distracting)pieguy1372 wrote:
mod: votecount please?
I only changed suspicions once, from LunaticMara to DxS. (I still think DxS is the most suspicious.) I haven't changed my mind since then, so I'm not sure exactly what you mean. >.>
I'm still waiting for a reply from rust45.foulcoon wrote:
did he just decide to keep playing or something?
You said you wanted to, though... I know you didn't actually, but it's still not a good idea. (And wow, did you even pay attention to my post? I even said you didn't vote for him)adam2046 wrote:
I didn't vote for him.
...>.> It would only be suspicion hopping if I suddenly wasn't suspicious of DxS. Although I didn't explicitly state it, I still find DxS to be the most suspicious. This should have been implied by not unvoting him. I just became suspicious of more people. (And the very first one was a RV) Thus, the only time my suspicion really changed was from the first non-RV to the second one.Rantai wrote:
RVS (yeah, I know, RVS) --> First --> Second --> Third
Before you say you didn't vote them (third), you are still suspicious of them, hence suspicion hopping.
One of the goals of the mafia is to mislead people, not to come up with possible leads. The latter one is more a towntell~pieguy1372 wrote:
Maybe I just wasn't clear enough and you all are doing this because it's D1 and you want any possible lead you can get, but that's exactly one of the goals of the mafia.
Why didn't you just say that when you first voted DxS?pieguy1372 wrote:
I gave my reasoning for DxS (second one) here.
Why make the vote in the first place (Mara's one), it had the same weight as an RVS you might as well not have done anything in that regard.pieguy1372 wrote:
My LunaticMara vote (first one) had little reasoning (compared to future votes) because there wasn't much information, and was entirely a gut feeling. Then, I changed it because my gut feeling on DxS was stronger and more reliable due to additional information. Did you really think I would want to keep a vote with far less reason? ><
Of course, I am not associating that RVS to my disagreement with you.pieguy1372 wrote:
When I removed my previous vote after making my LunaticMara (first) vote, there was nothing to the previous vote at all since it was a RV, so there should be no problem with removing it. Listing that as a reason doesn't make much sense IMO.
pieguy1372 wrote:
oh wait, I remember the time I had a gut feeling on you ever since D1 and you were mafia, perhaps you and DxS are both mafia this time?
Actually, this sounds pretty bad and needs to be fixed.akrolsmir wrote:
Vote: DxS for saying absolutely nothing.