00:03:990 (1,1,2,3,4,5) - super minor but is there any reason for this nc pattern instead of 1,2,1,... or 1,2,3,...? (or even 3,4,5,... with no nc)
the blue tick doesn't seem especially notable, whereas there's vocal emphasis on the white tick, which makes me hear the burst as breaking down into a double and a quint
some missing sounds. I believe this section is slightly undermapped
regardless you swap from following the piano (whatever it is), and drums and lyrics. Which is lower emphasis then it could be. I'd do this. Or something similar (just slight spacing)
.
00:20:614 - adding a note here to make a double
00:21:188 - 00:21:379 - adding notes here to make it a triple
etc for all missing drums / piano.
00:24:340 (3) - make this a 1/4 slider to emphasize the middle note. Or a double. 00:24:531 - there's no sound here no reason to end the slider here over the active sound
making the slider 1/4 will take away the tension to the 00:24:628 (4) - which is for emphasising the 3/4 rhythm, will leave open tho if this is really a big issue
00:28:258 (7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5) - same spacing being used here for a 1/2 (00:28:449 (9,1)) and 1/4 (00:28:926 (2,3)) jump might be a bit hard to read for players at this level
i didnt even notice the 1/4 jumps for the earlier parts of the map, but the combination of using small spacing for the 1/4 gap here (00:27:875 (5,6)) and then large spacing for the 1/2 gap and 1/4 gap so close together, was what got me
maybe stack 00:28:926 (2,3) like 00:27:875 (5,6)?
00:34:372 (1,1,1,1) - the ncing here is pretty confusing given that we've just had two of these nc doubles, and they were both 1/8 gaps starting on a white tick, whereas here it's a 1/4 gap starting on a blue tick; made especially confusing by these doubles being over/near the same "bling" vocal from the singer
ncing the blings like in the kiai or removing the nc from the 1/4 double would be better (imo)
01:11:824 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - would be neat if this used the same sort of progressive pattern as here 00:59:595 (1,2,3,1,2,3) & 00:53:481 (1,2,3,1,2,3)
01:13:735 (1,1,1) - after having this triplet of nced notes be mapped onto background vocals it feels a bit weird to have them mapped as filler here, especially with how much they stand out visually
maybe a reverse slider or just un-ncing the 2nd two notes?
maybe i am stupid but could you elaborate what you mean?
01:13:735 (1,1,1) - these three are mapped to the xylophone in the bg, no vocal. And also what did you mean with mapped as filler before, couldnt grasp it
oh yeah poorly phrased, i meant previous versions of this same nc pattern were mapped onto vocals