07:14:620 (5,6,7) - this really threw me off on testplay. It shouldn't be the same spacing as the 1/4 gap 07:13:953 (1,2). This is played like a jump into a triple whereas 07:14:620 (5,6,7) - is played as a really quick jump into a double; when you're expecting a triple bc the same spacing
Easily fixed by moving 07:14:870 (6,7) - to x368 y239
00:42:193 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - The only big thing I'd worry about wanting to change are these patterns. Giving the 1/8 some difference here is much easier to read. It'd be more commonly mapped like this - in relation to how you have mapped it https://imgur.com/m32ES9M
00:22:118 (1,2,3) - If you're worried 00:22:507 - the vocal around here I think it's fine the way you map it.
If you're worried you could make 00:22:118 (1) - a 1/2 slider
you do this a lot; and it's consistent. so you can probably disregard this it's not an issue. ME personally I would try to tie each of these patterns together a little more aesthetically. but the generic slider rotation & spacings you give has it's own good aesthetic. Definitely nothing wrong with how anything is mapped
Tying into this; I would differentiate the 1/3 a little more. Giving it a change in direction & moderate spacing difference comparative to the 1/4 would be nice
ex move 01:31:461 (1) - to x84 y238 & 01:31:672 (1) - to x46 y73