Flamewall

00:04:079 (4,5) - would make more sense to have this as a 3/2 slider to follow violin, having 5 be clickable isn't entirely necessary imo given its minimal impact here

00:13:179 (3,4,5) - unsnapped :(

00:21:679 (6,7) - these should just be triples-rhythm instead of burst-rhythm, slowing down the song to 25% here shows the song emphasizing triples for this part

the given rhythm works for simplification, i guess, but it would be nice to follow the song a bit more accurately here by mapping these as active triples imo

I think this note 00:22:479 (1) - needs a good selection, since on drums you usually have very good notes apart from this one (here's an example 00:19:279 (1) )

00:33:979 (4,5) - slider makes more sense for this rhythm to reduce density, i don't see a reason to have this section as entirely jumps compared to smth like 00:37:679 (1,2,3,4) - this, just as an example

i get it's probably for rhythm differentiation, but given the fact this is a 300 BPM song, having jumps for this just feels pretty overkill

00:54:279 (9,10,11) - NC these? the bursts prior were all 300 BPM (including the ones after), so this would help differentiate it a bit more

02:09:279 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - same

00:57:879 (2) - move this circle to x:458 y:275

it is worth considering this spacing 01:06:679 (6,7) - because from this 01:06:479 (4,5) - it does not differ in anything, although the sound becomes more intense than before, it is enough to increase the spacing or something to distinguish this spacing from the original

01:11:879 (11,12,13,14) - 01:15:079 (11,12,13,14) - these should just be 1/2 jumps like they are in 04:14:783 (1) - this section, the hitsounds do make this a bit more justifiable to overmap, but it doesn't really make sense to do it here and not the other (almost identical) place tbh

01:17:579 (5,6,7) - This triple isn't perfectly snapped (same thing for the triples I listed below)
01:30:379 (5,6,7) -
01:38:579 (1,2,3) -
01:55:579 (3,4,5) -
01:55:879 (7,8,9) -

there seems to be a lot of spacing given that the sound becomes less intense 01:19:779 (9,10) -

01:19:879 (10,3) - stack (?)

01:30:479 (7) - stack is a sta ck

01:40:879 (3,1,1) - would make way more sense to have this grouped as one pattern instead of the way it's done currently, right now 01:40:879 (3,1) - this doesn't look all that much different from a 1/2 jump aside from the NC

04:45:183 (3,1) - same

doesnt an nc on those two 01:41:012 (2,3) - would make more sense? since you've nc'ed the 1/3's just after but not those ones, it would help the player too

02:16:079 (1,3) - this overlap doesnt look really good, just moving it a little bit so that they dont overlap would probably better maybe?

02:26:879 (3) - to highlight the bell, you can stretch the slider up to 1/4

02:26:879 (3,4) - nerf this spacing, this is gunga big for what's supposed to be a slow section, especially when 02:28:079 (2,3) - this is tiny in comparison

02:31:279 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - it would be nice to give the player a hint for the rhythm change here by NCing the mentioned objects, cause the player would be extremely exhausted after the intense part before, so, such hint would be fair and reasonable

02:45:979 (1,2,3) - 02:48:574 (1,2) - 02:50:844 (5,6) - 02:52:546 (2,3) - 02:56:357 (1,2,3) - sry for being followpoint police but MAN

02:49:871 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - maybe you could make something like 02:55:059 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - for the drum sound stuffs

02:49:952 you forgot to put hs here

02:49:952 (2,5) - remove the claps on these, the snare doesn't play on these notes

03:00:249 (1,2,3) - 03:00:574 (5,6,7) - could make these into 1/6 repeat sliders if you wanted to break up the monotony a bit here, since there are actually 1/6 drums during this part

03:04:790 (1,1,1,1,2,3,1,1,1,1,2,3,1,1,1,1,2) - actually kind of cool pattern, though i'd nerf 03:04:790 (1,1,1,1) - the wiggle parts of these since they space out a bit too much horizontally to be really comfortable to hit imo (given the streams prior)

03:08:682 - missing 2 circles lo

you can add to these jumps an increase in sound through the green timing lines 03:09:006 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) -

03:11:276 - 03:32:033 amazing

03:28:303 (9) - 1/4

03:30:411 (7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - this barely fits what drum rhythm does in the song doesn't fit how u hs it at all, might do something like this with kicks https://i.imgur.com/MqTDShA.jpeg or come up with smth else, but slapping nearly equal stream for this is just sad

03:33:330 (3) - 03:38:519 (1) - would make way more sense to have the red tick sliderend of these be clickable as a triple instead for drum emphasis

03:42:411 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - vs 03:45:006 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - imo you dont really show the piano intensity difference on second part because you use that same spacing. i recommend you to buff the second 1/3 jumps spacing to show that intensity change

03:43:546 (2,3) - kickslider might work more intuitively here since most of this section is 1/3 rhythm in terms of clickables

03:47:125 (2) - 1/16?

03:47:883 (1) - this is really pog

04:03:783 (2,3) - 04:04:083 (2,3) - yeah it's a 10 star so this is "technically" fine, but i still think these should be 1/2 sliders because of the huge break prior -- makes this more intuitive and a nicer re-introduction to gameplay

04:12:983 (9,10) - reason for this omega big space? for information, there is more space between nine and ten than here 04:13:783 (3,4) - the sound is more intense of course here

04:14:783 - 04:21:183 i really like the circular flow idea you had for this earlier ( 01:10:479 - ). It made it stand out immensely, and i feel like just completely dropping the idea entirely doesnt make all too much sense

04:20:383 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - maybe gradually decrease the spacing of the stream to show the drum intensity drop?

04:20:383 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - either add some difference in spacings or rhythms in this stream or hs it equally with just drum claps (Basically change 04:20:783 (7,8,9,10,11,12) - to claps instead of finishes) so it would sound more fitting with the way u mapped it

04:35:783 (3) - wouldn't two 1/2 sliders make sense here to follow guitar?

04:47:083 (5,9,13) - yo nc these

04:47:983 (1) - end this on the blue tick prior to downbeat and have it clickable?

05:05:983 (1,2,3) - there really should be a 1/2 slider for at least one part of these rhythms, these are out of place as jumps given the intensity of the drums after

05:14:783 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - kinda too much bro, do something similar to 01:43:279 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - so it gets progression instead of being almost fullscreen jumps everywhere

05:31:483 (1) - circle into 1/2 slider would make more sense for the guitar here if that's what you're trying to emphasize with the sudden slowdown

05:36:383 (1,2,3,4,5) - here u follow guitar with the sliders, then u change to whatever on 05:37:183 (1,2,3,4,5) - so slider-circle-slider-circle-slider

05:45:183 (1) - object isnt snapped you silly goose

that's supposed to be just 1-2-3 patterning 05:52:383 see 02:01:679

06:03:583 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1) - the guitar follows 1/3 here, not 1/4 -- see kujinn's diff

06:04:783 (1) - offscreen

06:04:783 (4) - supposed to have normal hit + finish

06:10:783 (1) - here the electric guitar is heard much weaker than here 05:33:983 (1) - so just put on your favorite wave

06:21:383 (3,5) - missing claps

06:24:383 - 06:35:583 - would suggest a kiai here cause this section is very very intense and it makes no sense for it to not be represented as kiai

06:35:583 why don't you just map the piano

06:35:783 - could map piano with passive reverse sliders instead of fully ignoring, altho current ver works as well up to you

Wouldn't it be better to remove the hitcircle on 06:40:783 and let the slider beginn there

06:40:983 (1) - this flame is so pog