Egret and Willow

00:15:658 (3) - I think you should continue to follow the flute here and make those long cool sliders, not only because the song stays the same, but also because players are going to expect more of the long sliders (I was expecting them atleast)

00:16:271 ignoring the clap here feels weirdd i dunno

00:17:189 (3,4) - maybe you'd want to move these two a bit closer visually so that everything has a bit of consistent feel? in respect to 00:16:475 (1,2,3) - . e.g https://puu.sh/CZWeQ/085b36422f.png

00:21:169 (5) - the held sound here only goes up to 00:21:322 - so the silder should only go up to there imo. u could add a note at 00:21:398 - if u want or not but i think the slider only going up to 00:21:322 - would suit that sound better

00:22:699 (1) - maybe you could make the hook here a bit longer to make the flow into the next slider more pronounced, since slider leniency makes this play way less intense than it should

00:25:148 (6,1) - mm

00:25:148 (6,1) - The way these are overlapped is unreadable.

00:27:903 (1) - i think if you rotated or changed the angle here to separate from 00:27:138 (4,1,1,1) - would be cool, since these carry different sounds respectively

00:29:281 (2) - feel like having the hella strong bass on a slider end is meh, like not mapping it is cool ig but maybe at least make the first sound clickable

00:35:862 (1) - imo an nc doesn't work well here when new combos seem to be more reserved for background pitch changes (00:36:322 (1) - 00:37:087 (1,1) - 00:37:699 (1) - 00:38:771 (1) - ). seems rather non-fitting

(if applied would go wherever else)

00:51:169 (1,2,3,4) - should be emphasized since u emphasized 00:46:271 (1,2,1,2) - , 00:56:067 (1,2,1,2) - , and 01:00:965 (1,2,1,2) -

00:51:169 (1,2,1,2) - imo this could stand to be mapped the same way as 00:46:271 (1,2,1,2) - , like 00:56:067 (1,2,1,2) - and imo using the same rhythm as 00:50:556 (4,5) - but focusing on a different sound makes for a pretty bland playing experience

00:54:230 (6) - make circles instead? lotta juice on the sliderend

01:00:965 (1,2,1,2)

01:13:209 (1,2,3,4,5) - I feel like this part can be a bit confusing, on 01:05:709 (1,2,3,4,1) you have a 1/1 gap and here you have a 1/2 gap, so also having increased spacing on 01:13:669 (4,5) may make people think there is a longer pause (it also is quite hard to aim because of the angle lol)

01:16:883 - maybe have a lower sv starting here? i feel like this is a way quieter part and while the rhythm kinda helps with showing that having a lower sv would help a lot

01:18:107 (1,2) - maybe these could be more stacked since blue tick

01:30:046 (1,1) - should be 1.2x to be consistent with 00:28:822 (1,2) -

01:46:271 (1,1,1,2) - the svs here are kinda confusing for 2 reasons:

• 01:46:271 (1) - is a much quieter sound than 01:46:577 (1,1,2) - but still has relatively high sv
• 01:46:883 - the sv going down here just doesnt make sense to me, cuz it could be justified as because of the pitch decrease but then why isnt the sv going down again for 01:47:189 (2) -

also i feel like 01:47:189 (2) - should be nced along with 01:46:577 (1,1) -