08:24:804 - @melon boy The rest of the song starting here repeats while growing in intensity, but the map only repeats so it feels fairly underwhelming. Suggest you do something to gradually increase intensity

04:48:184 (1,2,3) - 04:49:632 (1,2,3) - @defectum These should probably have the same type of idea somehow.

06:53:356 (2) - @liiraye why is this not a mushroom :werf:

06:48:804 (1,1,2,3,4,1,2) - this transition is really awkward to grok because of 06:48:804 (1,1,2,3,4,1) - overlap for non-obvious number of beats followed by odd-rhythm cutstreams 06:49:425 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - . I would move both 06:48:804 (1) - and 06:49:425 (1) - to different locations

06:47:977 (1,2,3,4) - spacing could be higher here, this is really free to play compared to everything else in this section

05:34:322 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - @Hysteria I appreciate the idea of this bit, but it feels really shallow to have 15 seconds with a grand total of two distinct object placements and a spinner on a weak sound. There's plenty of placefield to place mushrooms elsewhere, and I'd do completely away with the spinner (maybe put a non-mushroom slider there?)

01:36:487 (1,2,3) - is a bit mean at the corner for a unique kind of spacing

01:37:522 (1,2,3,4,1) - slider obfuscates how big the spacing is, i'd probably hate playing this pattern since there's also a direction change (also lowkey ugly imo). 01:38:143 (2,3,4,5,1) - or even 01:41:453 (2,3,4,5,1) - are nicer

01:42:177 (2,3) - curve bothers me so much

01:52:625 (2,3,4) - this is a fine idea, but IMO a triple stack is a bit underwhelming compared to previous section where the spaced triples were a regular customer. i think maybe something like https://werfu.s-ul.eu/B0Tcq0Vp (3,4 being stacked) could be interesting

02:30:586 (3,1,2,3,4,1) - this looks like a really harsh transition, both the linear movement and the 1/8 sliders can be real annoyances. breaking the linear movement would make this less hazardous i think, something like https://werfu.s-ul.eu/udy7zd93 (maybe 02:30:586 (3) - could also be moved somewhere nicer)

02:49:968 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6) - looks really spiky, the hanzer doubles alone i think would be a big spike already

03:10:851 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - this business needs playtesting IMO, looks really ruthless. for now though i'm just wondering why 03:11:173 (3) - is a slider and not circle+slider since the drum fill didn't change from 03:10:530 (1,2,1,2) -

03:12:672 (1,2,3,4,5) - compare with 01:38:143 (2,3,4,5,1) - , even if that much spacing isn't appropriate here for what else is going on, it looks odd at a glance. just mentioning this here for discussion about overall difficulty curve

03:24:024 (4) - would have expected a kickslider here

03:31:733 (1,2) - idk would have just overlapped these but nbd. is a real outlier of this bit tho

03:35:375 (3) - this slider being concave irks me since previous sliders were convex 🤓

03:39:374 (2) - think just a circle is more appropriate, we don't really have this fast sliders elsewhere

03:48:015 (1,2,3,1,2,1) - this looks really awkward and uncomfortable to play since it's really small circle spacing but big sv and 1/4 time between sliders. even https://werfu.s-ul.eu/fLYFdiR8 or https://werfu.s-ul.eu/8TQsq0lZ would be a lot nicer to play

03:58:298 (1,1,1) - this rhythm isn't there but w/e

03:58:512 (1,2,3,4) - not a fan of this rhythm. easy improvement imo: https://werfu.s-ul.eu/1w41sSig, then 04:01:940 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - suddenly make way more sense as a buildup

04:03:225 (3) - this slider is sick, but i think it would be nicer if you could avoid the notch at the end (lower sv or increase loop size to make this work)

04:05:689 - 04:05:903 - 04:06:117 - 04:06:546 - all these syncopated beats are being ignored RN, at least a couple of these could be mapped (even just as 1/4 stack or sliderends). 04:10:509 (7,8,9) - is an example

04:09:224 (5,6,7,8) - something involving ctrl+j on this could make the pattern also have a bit of movement going on

04:10:938 (9) - imo make this a flip of 04:10:509 (7) -

04:11:366 (1,2) - definite 1/4 jumps candidate, many earlier sections had pattern ideas you could borrow (arbane, fisky, chai parts)

04:14:151 (2,3,4) - broken stack

04:14:151 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - on full speed this sounds like it could be 1/6 instead

04:17:365 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - madx mentioned this, but here's one kind of idea (less intense than the chill bit but closer to it) https://werfu.s-ul.eu/z9Ievq4J. made by rotating 04:17:365 (1,2) - by 144 degrees then repeating that rotation (adjusting for visual spacing)

04:18:864 (5,6) - can be 1/6

04:21:649 (7,8,9,10) - overlap is not pretty and makes for underwhelming movement, compare with https://werfu.s-ul.eu/4P0Ix5O0