The Emptiness Machine

00:05:566 (1) - ctrl+g so the gap between 00:05:566 (1,1) - isn't so suddenly big

00:06:218 (3,1) - This rhythm feels odd considering the vocal is on 00:06:381 (mapped to an slider end) and then you place a long slider for the vocal at 00:06:544 where there is no sound at all, also skipping over the kick at 00:06:707

It would be better to apply this rhythm instead to capture everything on the song:

You did it good at 00:11:109 (3,4,5) - so you can either place a circle like in my picture or place an slider like at 00:12:088 (6) -

00:06:381 (1) - unnecessary nc here ?

00:09:642 (2) - 00:20:077 (2) - these notes are following anything with the song, you would remove them and leave the gap

00:16:816 - 1/1 Would fit better here to follow the vocal imo.

00:21:381 - Maybe you could not skipping vocals here and add a circle?

00:27:414 (1,2,3) - this jump looks very spaced comparing with 00:30:022 (1,2,3) - 00:31:979 (3,4,5) - , you should decrease a bit his distance to make all jumps not too much dense as you did with the lasts

00:31:979 (3,4,5,6,7) - It feels weird to follow the drums out of a sudden when since 00:26:436 you have been following all the vocals properly, it's like a completely different change in playability and rhythm for drums that you didn't map before like in 00:27:414 (1,2,3) - so it would be better to change this rhythm and map the vocals like you have been doing before to keep the consistency

00:33:936 - Since you usually trying to follow the vocals in song, I feel this rhythm might be better:

00:36:544 - 00:46:979 SV is very high considering the equalism with 00:26:109, you would use something like 0.70x/0.60x for slow and calm vocals as you did on 00:44:207 (1) -

same as 01:28:718, the change between last section and this is very radical, you would go with 1.00x

00:50:566 (5,1) - their distance is very far considering the whole slow section, you might get closer the slider one to make the same spacing as 00:47:794 (3,4) - 00:52:686 (2,3) - etc.

same as 02:33:120 (3,4) -

00:57:740 (2) - Ctrl + G for better flow?

00:58:718 (1,2) - this pattern doesn't follow very weel the melody, you could make sure to hit this kick 00:58:881 and leave this 00:59:207 as passive

same as 01:03:936 (1) -

01:01:164 (1,2) - would ctrl g the pattern to make rhythm more comfortable to hit with the song

01:11:762 this hit is passive but 01:10:457 (1) - 01:15:675 (1) - are not, you should make it more active like ctrl g this pattern 01:11:599 (1,2) -

same as 01:16:979 01:22:196

01:16:327 (2,3,4) - This is way too much spacing considering nothing is really happening in this section, so this being so big doesn't make much sense, considering lowering the spacing to something similar as 01:11:109 (2,3,4) -

01:17:142 (2,4) - Could you please move this away so they don't overlap please 💔

01:24:153 (2) - vs 01:26:763 (2,3) - they are the same sound but they are mapped in different way, try to map the first one as the second one

01:28:718 - Starting from here, I think you made the change a bit drastic, while the music does not changing too much. You increased SV and made more spacing here, which looks a bit overdone. Making such dense rhythm without any 1/1 gaps and bigger jumps with SV might be really feels like overdone for this. For the best solution, I think mapping this just with the SV 0.9x would be enough to show how this section has been changed.

01:34:099 since you are following vocals you could hit this as well

01:39:153 (1,2) - maybe move 01:39:153 (1) - the slider end circle on the boarder of 01:39:479 (2) - this slider so that the pattern sits more nicely

01:46:653 (4) ; 02:41:436 (4) - I think, would be much cooler if you change this to circles for highlighting the snare-sounds here.

01:50:077 (2) - Repeat doesn't really follow song well in terms of intensity and rhythm.

I would just replace with circle at 01:50:077 - then a slider at --> 01:50:240

01:52:033 (1,2,3) - Maybe space this out more to better follow intensity?

02:32:631 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - This should have waaaaay more spacing because the singer is going crazy with the pitch here yet you don't give it as much emphasis as it should, in other jumps like 01:59:696 (4,5,1) - you have a bigger spacing but here the song isn't as strong as in the other timestamp. Giving it more spacing would fit really cool with what the singer is doing.

02:38:501 (4,5) - Replace this to 1/2 slider for better following the vocals in song? This will also nerf these huge spacing jumps, since you making this almost the same as for the active snares here 02:53:990 (3,1,2,3,4).

02:48:936 (3,4,5,6) - Doesn't really follow intensity of the song that well, I would just make normal jumps out of these to better represent the music.

02:59:044 (2) - slider looks weird basing on what you are trying to hitting, it would match better if there were 2 circles