Electric Angel mapped by Amasugi‬ · beatmap discussion‬ | ‭osu!‬

beatmap discussion

4

mapped by Amasugi

submitted 21 Aug 2024

last updated 2 days ago

New Discussion

Please sign in to post or reply

Discussions

00:00:614

00:00:614 - since 00:03:814, 00:07:014, 00:10:214 were skipped, it would be more consistent if you skipped this note too.

26 days ago

oki

26 days ago

Marked as resolved by Amasugi

00:19:614

00:19:614 00:19:814 - maybe omit these as this chain kinda too long for the song's intensity here + makes the chain lengths here similar to 01:11:414

4 months ago

omitted both 2 along with making the chain lengths similar to 01:11:414

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by -[SnowFlakes]-

00:24:614

00:24:614 - i think k fits better here? the long mono feels pretty weird

26 days ago

yepyep

26 days ago

Marked as resolved by Amasugi

00:26:614

00:26:614-00:32:214 - it feels weird that the rhythm here is pretty much 1:1 matching the drums, but the coloring seems to be based on the vocals.

what do you think about adjusting the colors so it matches more with the drums as well?

26 days ago

adjusted the coloring

26 days ago

Marked as resolved by Amasugi

00:46:414

00:46:414 - can map for structure with 00:40:014 00:41:614 00:43:214 etc if you want

4 months ago

ya

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Amasugi

01:03:214

01:03:214 -> 01:03:814 to catch synth + snare? Also 01:02:414 isnt mapped so
Or maybe could map 01:02:414 instead

4 months ago

decided to map 01:02:414 instead.

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by -[SnowFlakes]-

01:11:414

01:11:414 - maybe nerf density a lil here so that it's around if not less than 01:17:814 for song progression

4 months ago

i'll deal with this since i helped fix around this part
tweaked around so it should have less density now

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Amasugi

01:35:814

01:35:814 - d maybe since snare + vocal pitch goes down a bit here for a mono to be effective?

4 months ago

ya

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Amasugi

01:50:814

01:50:814 - move this to 01:50:914 to emphasize the 3/4 vocal, and for consistency with 01:44:514?

26 days ago

this sounds like 1/2 vocal to me no?

26 days ago

02:00:614

02:00:614 - sug did you map this part

4 months ago

bro is so real for this

4 months ago

02:04:214

02:04:214 - maybe k, goes well with the song here

4 months ago

true

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Amasugi

02:28:214

02:28:214 - make all of these finishers i dare you

4 months ago

:DDD (get it? the smiley face)

4 months ago

Marked as resolved by Amasugi

02:28:214

02:28:214 - can just move this to 02:28:414 - current feels oversimplified. youre already using 1/2 finisher rhythms at 01:29:014 so i dont think this is much more

26 days ago

kinda disagree actually the finisher is based on strong drumrolling from 02:28:214 so a finisher starting from there makes more sense i think. moving it by 1/2 in feels weird as the strong drum at the beginning get ignored

02:28:814 - i could probably see the why if the suggestion is to add a note here for the 1/4s but current feels fine for me? if i were to add all 1/2 finishers in it would be 5plet finisher which i think is kinda too much hmm

26 days ago

/

›

›

›

›