everlasting snow

00:01:360 - The pianos are using 1/6 snapping, consider making it either a 1/6 double or 1/12 triple

00:02:742 - Consider deleting it because the piano sound is too feint, same for 00:05:900 -

00:07:479 - I think the sv + slowdown is too drastic, consider reducing it to 1,1x -> 1,13x smh -> 2,0x

00:17:603 - Maybe add d so the rhythm bridge feels consistent + piano sound (similar to 00:25:498, 00:28:656 - )
00:36:551 - same ^
00:46:024 - same ^
00:54:314 - This note can be moved to 00:53:130 - and ctrl+g the double for similar reasons above
02:18:393 - not exactly like the issue above, but the idea is overall similar, could add d for the drums

00:20:761 - Ddd k for consistency with 00:23:919 - + the piano being mapped sounds good

00:22:735 - Maybe remove to emphasize the vocals better
00:25:103 - ^ same
00:41:090 - ^ same
01:02:209 - ^ same
01:16:419 (168,169) - Remove them too the vocal emphasis, like 01:09:709 -

00:26:288 - Change to k because the vocals are more prominent
00:30:235 - ^ same
01:38:524 - k for vocal pitch
01:48:590 - ^ same
01:52:143 - ^ same + fits better drums
02:42:669 - ^ same

00:46:321 - I think this note is slightly too early, try placing it at 00:46:353 - (1/12), it sound similar to 00:40:235 (63,64) -

00:47:998 - This note can be moved to 00:48:393 - because current place does not any sound

00:48:985 - I suggest mapping it kdk for the vocal, similar to all the others instances

00:55:498 - Try using this rhythm instead, it is more accurate to the piano:

00:58:853 - Because you mapped 00:58:656 -, i think this piano sound can also be mapped with k

01:03:590 (127,128) - ctrl+g so you can differentiate the vocal mapping vs. piano mapping on 01:04:182 (129,130,131,132,133) -

01:14:051 - I think you can remove it because this instance is not as strong as 01:12:077 (152,153,154,155,156) -

01:20:564 - In a section where most of the drums/strings are mapped, I think you can use this rhythm to follow them more:

01:23:722 - Move it to 01:23:327 - , the vocal is too strong to be ignored
03:19:774 - ^ similar to above

01:24:314 - Consider mapping it, the drum is strong, and if you want, you can even make this 1/8 ddk 01:24:511 - to emphasize it even further

01:31:617 - k for the finisher emphasis

01:41:978 - I would suggest removing this note, there's no very signifiant sounds you would want to emphasize in this triple, unlike 01:42:867 - for the drums + vocals
03:38:821 - ^ same
04:51:452 - ^ same

01:43:656 - You could at least map it because the snare + vocal is pretty strong
if applied, either change 01:43:064 - into kddkd or dkkdk to either follow drum, or follow better vocal pitch (and if you sticked with dkkdk, ctrl+g 01:44:248 (271,272) - )

01:46:024 (277,278) - Maybe ctrl+g because the piano sound 01:46:024 - is siginificant + differentiate it better from the snare
02:42:472 (467,468) - ^ same

01:47:603 - I think this note is worth a finisher, as you did for 01:53:919 - , which is also as strong

01:50:761 - , 01:51:551 - I don't think those finishers are need, it makes those notes over-emphasized compared to other finisher notes
Same in the others kiais

01:51:353 - Add note for consistency with 01:50:564 -

01:59:446 (325,326) - Switching to piano is weird considering that before you follow mostly vocals + drums, consider moving them 1/4 backward

02:01:617 - You can map the drum, like 02:04:972 -

02:04:972 (337,338) - ctrl+g for piano pitch

02:10:893 - Maybe k for instrument? It will differentiate a bit more from the pattern at 02:11:682 -

02:14:051 - Either you move 02:14:248 (367,368) - 1/4 backward or map 02:14:051 - to follow vocals better

02:39:117 (458,459,460) - I really don't think these sounds are worth mapping because they remove the focus on the piano sounds
02:40:498 - You could perhaps map the string sounds with kddkd

02:48:294 - Consider removing because there's no drum sound unlike 02:47:505 - and there's no extra vocal sound here