00:08:933 (3) - it might be better for this to follow what you did on 00:12:488 (3,4) - due to the strong sound on the downbeat, that is much preferable for it to be clicked
00:25:377 (1,2) - vs 00:25:155 (7,1) - they are visually spaced with the same distance but one of these is 1/2 gap, this would bring to an istant miss hit since you would think this is the same rhythm as the last two notes. Rather you can make more distant 00:25:377 (1,2) - since the next pattern is overlapped 00:25:711 (2,3) -
00:51:266 00:54:822 are you not suppose to hit this as 00:44:155 (5,6) - 00:45:933 (5,6) - 00:47:711 (5,6) - ? pls give reason cause they are pretty much the same sound
01:13:377 (1) - this is unrankable atm, just space out the head and tail by like 1px or smt https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19348078/df4d
01:36:488 (3) - There's a more noticeable change in pitch here, so it would be nice to NC here instead of at 01:36:266 (1).
01:41:593 (1,2,3) - hell nah... Either way nerf the spacing significantly or just stack like u do with the rest of the triples
01:47:155 (5) - maybe nc for downbeat and easier reading cuz of the duplet plays in this section? like what you did on 02:01:377 (1) -
01:52:926 - same as #4544189/12076451 I think a break here should be fine for reaction time on hard difficulty.
02:34:488 (7) - 02:38:044 (7) - 02:41:600 (6) - you could make them circles, i find the reverse next to them complex to read without a lil gap between them imo
You have to be more careful with this kind of 1/4 spacing 02:34:704 (8,1) - , players at that level will think it's 1/2