mapped by mrekk
submitted
last updated
Hype Train279 / 5
Nomination Status0 / 2
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:04:642 (5,1) - slightly broken stack gg

permalink

yez

permalink
Marked as resolved by mrekk

00:36:523 (3) - unintended sv from 2ms green line unsnap

permalink

yez

permalink
Marked as resolved by mrekk

00:49:238 (3) - this slider is supposed to be 0.5x (like 00:48:434 (2) -). an update broke this

permalink

fix

permalink
Marked as resolved by mrekk

01:13:685 (1) - Why not end the spinner on 01:15:627 - instead so you can emphasize 01:15:761 - the downbeat with active rhythms?

01:15:627 - 01:16:028- Otherwise just feels kinda off otherwise to ignore all the drums here.

permalink

doesn't "feel off" to me, no change

permalink
Marked as resolved by Rita Summers

01:21:118 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1) - Are the fiery jumps really necessary here when 01:21:519, 01:21:787, 01:22:055 - the song is changing?

01:21:118 (1,2,3) - Would use a different flow here to differentiate from 01:21:519 (1,2,1,2,1) - at least, similar to what you did at 00:08:261 (6,7,8,1,2,1,2,1).

permalink

think an nc change is enough to signal the song change by influencing reading

permalink
Marked as resolved by Rita Summers

An nc change barely influences the reading here and doesn't change the fact that you're using the same exact flow idea for completely different phrases in the song.

Would prefer to keep this open for now so we can get more opinions.

permalink
Reopened by Bloxi

I'm all for these kind of jumps when they support the song well, but IMO they just work kinda poorly here which also breaks consistency.

permalink

agree with bloxi

permalink

im one to say these seem fine to me with just the nc rn

permalink

its fine

permalink

its fine

permalink
Marked as resolved by mrekk
/