mapped by tacoyaki5
submitted
ranked
This beatmap was ranked on 21 November 2024!
nominated by Basensorex and Malphs
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:47:754 (5,6,7) - decrease spacing progressively for drums going down in intensity would be cool

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

00:53:505 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - I think this buildup could be improved a little bit as the progression doesn't really feel that noticeable until the very loud drums at 00:55:681 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) -

Would try to nerf the very first few sliders of the buildup at 00:53:505 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - and slowly building the spacing up at 00:54:438 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - as the drums grow louder.

Spacing for 00:55:681 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - is actually fine, so no need to do major adjustments.

permalink

adjusted all

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

00:57:857 - missing whistle

permalink

added

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

01:07:650 (2,1) - manual fix stack

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

01:20:552 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - these feel a bit underwhelming for how much the song goes, would either buff spacing or nerf spacing from previous patterning to make them feel more appropriately spaced

permalink
permalink
permalink
permalink
permalink

agreeee

permalink

ok, kept 03:24:904 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) because I think current spacing is difficult enough for aiming, and 04:14:023 (1,2,1,2) for avoiding ending kill

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

01:32:365 (1,2,3,4) - Spacing here got really big a little too quickly from 01:30:500 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) -

Would try to tone the spacing down a bit, while also buffing the spacing of 01:31:433 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - a bit to make this spacing buildup progression more noticeable.

permalink

I don't think it is necessary considering 01:30:966 (4,5,6) - is a sudden braking pattern which is harder than it looks like

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

It is more about how the spacing exploded way too quickly compared to 01:30:500 (1,2,3) - 01:31:433 (1,2,3) - which are definitely not proportional to 01:32:365 (1,2,3,4) -

Yes, I know there are more cymbals for 01:32:365 (1,2,3,4) - but it doesn't warrant such high spacing.
Spacing should still be higher than 01:30:500 (1,2,3) - 01:31:433 (1,2,3) - but not this much.

permalink
Reopened by Malphs

toned 01:32:365 (1,2,3,4) - down a bit, but I didn't change too much with another pattern. Considering the pitch change is 4/6, so I placed 01:30:500 (1,2,3) - with more spacing than 01:30:966 (4,5,6) - Then the song has a higher pitch in 01:32:365 (1,3) - so I use a larger spacing.

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

01:34:231 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Would buff spacing for these to keep up with the intensity and represent the very high pitched melody.

permalink

buffed

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

02:49:463 (9,1,2,3,4,5,6) - This should all be 1/3, not 1/4.

permalink

revised

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

03:05:008 (1) - budget dorchadas

permalink

03:31:976 (7,8) - Not a big fan of this overmapped triple here, but would at least hitsound it.

permalink

added

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

03:32:054 (8) - Would be so much cooler to have this as a single circle instead to represent the lack of instrumentals so the next pattern feels very impactful.

permalink

shortened to 1/2 for carry the vocal btw

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas

04:01:277 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - gradually decreasing spacing for the 1/3s would be nice to represent drum rhythms decreasing in intensity so would buff first two basically

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by dahkjdas
/