beatmap discussion
New Discussion
Discussions
00:34:297 (34297|1,34297|0,34357|2,34417|3,34537|0,34597|2,34717|1) - Similar to the other parts mentioned above, the sound here is actually quite even and could use a more even approach.
Suggestion:
Last edited by DivineJudas .
00:56:857 (56857|1,56857|0,56977|2,57097|3,57217|2,57337|1,57397|2,57457|1,57517|2,57577|1,57637|2,57697|1,57757|2) - First of all, 00:56:857 (56857|1,56977|2,57217|2) I don't understand what sound is reflected here, it can be expressed in a more regular way. Then, after a relatively long Jumptrill with a high BPM, it is quickly connected to 00:57:337 (57337|1,57397|2,57457|1,57517|2,57577|1,57637|2,57697|1,57757|2,57817|1), which is actually quite difficult for players, especially with 00:56:857 (56857|0,57097|3). Although there is no big problem in terms of musical expression, it needs to be mapped in a simpler way from the perspective of playability.
Suggestion：
01:32:437 (92437|0,92557|1,92677|3) - same as above #4617949
Suggestion：
Last edited by DivineJudas .
01:37:897 - The sound here is the same as 01:41:137, but the processing method is a bit too different. In order to unify them and leave more space while reflecting the particularity of the sound, I think it can be changed to this:
As for 01:38:017, it has obviously become another sound. I think it is reasonable to use this as the ending.