Eviternity

00:05:137 - 00:34:777 - in the intro here, it's more like to Beginner diff imo using only simple LNs and some the LNs are too long imo while the Normal diff start to following the melody. So to fill the gap, I think you can insert some of the melody and cut the LN to not make it too complex for Easy player. e.g.

^ not too sure about this, just use this as reference. Up to your style

I think that example can cover some section in this intro

can be applied on 01:51:577 - too

00:05:137 (5137|0) - I suggest setting the starting of this LN to 00:04:057 or 00:05:977. The former represents the time when this sound obviously appears, while the latter can be consistent with the LN in the following paragraph. You can choose one of them for reference and modify it. In any case feels a bit strange currently imo.

00:50:137 - 00:55:897 - This LNs 00:50:497 (50497|1,51457|2,52417|1) - on 1/4 snap release are a bit complex here for Easy player imo. I suggest to stop the LNs on the white tick (1/1 snap). Then, this LNs 00:50:137 (50137|0) - and similar, yo can connect it with 00:50:497 - LN to reduce the complexity so Easy player are more comfortable to hit and release this LN.

And lastly, you can split this LN 00:53:977 (53977|1) - into 2 beat LN to cover the drum in more appropriate way, considering Normal is also following the drum

02:22:297 - section too

00:58:057 - subjective, you can move this note to col 4 to not make a shield with LN below. Considering this is 250 BPM, it's not best to put shield with this BPM on Easy

02:42:697 (162697|1) -

01:00:697 (60697|2,60937|1) - para un mejor hand balance con el patron que va despues te recomiendo que le hagas CTRL + G a esto

01:08:377 (68377|1,68617|2) - igual

01:10:777 - I suggest using this or similar to cover synth sound.

01:13:177 - 01:27:577
Although it does not strictly violate RC, I think the 1/2 note in this part is a bit too dense at this BPM. It is not suitable for the playability of this difficulty. It is better to nerf it.

As shown in the picture, the left side is my suggestion, and the right side is your current arrangement. I only keep the more obvious triplet part, which can also highlight the key points of this paragraph. The following paragraphs are also recommended to be modified based on this.

01:16:417 (76417|1,76537|3,76657|0,76777|2,76897|3,77017|1) - aqui rompes el ranking criteria porque usas 6 notas en 1/2 cuando el limite es 5, te recomiendo eliminar esta nota 01:16:657 -

Aplica esto en todas las ocasiones

01:17:017 (77017|2) - move this to col 4 to not make 1/1 (count as 1/2 when BPM is >240) jack, as like what you did on the similar sound

01:20:857 (80857|1) - , 01:24:697 (84697|2) -

01:28:537 - esto deberia de ser una doble para expresar el platillo

01:31:417 - termina aqui la ln y añade otra
01:32:377 - same

01:33:337 - 01:34:777 - leaving this empty is not good imo, there are still sound that you can cover here.

Can also be applied on Normal at 01:34:777 -

01:35:257 (95257|1) - could extend this 01:35:737 - and move 01:35:617 (95617|3) - to 01:35:737 - , as I think right now is kinda off with the background

apply to Normal too

01:39:217 - aqui puedes poner una nota
01:39:817 - same
01:39:937 - same
01:41:137 - same
01:41:857 - 01:46:897 - 01:47:497 - 01:47:617 - 01:48:817 - 01:49:537 -

01:39:217 (99217|2) - Me personally found this weird when playing this, I think it's best to just make this simple pattern for Easy, sacrificing some of the sound to make Easy player more comfortable to play.

While on this 01:41:017 - , because 01:41:137 - is very loud and it'll weird to not map it, I suggest make this double 01:41:017 (101017|1,101017|3) - on one hand and 01:41:137 (101137|0) - on the other hand to make it more comfortable. Also sound like 01:39:937 - can be ignored, not too noticeable for this diff

You can re-arrange the later pattern based on your style

01:41:857 (101857|1) - could move to 01:41:737 - because sound here are more noticeable for this level of player imo

01:49:537 (109537|2) - too

02:45:337
Similarly, I also suggest nerfing according to the ideas I provided above. Here is an example.

However, 02:48:937 (168937|3) 02:52:777 (172777|1) This design can be retained. I think it is good 'w'b

02:45:997 (165997|1) - mueve esto aqui 02:46:057 -
02:49:837 (169837|2) - mueve esto aqui 02:49:897 -
02:53:677 (173677|1) - aqui 02:53:737 -
02:57:517 (177517|2) - aqui 02:57:577 -
la razon es porque no tiene sentido que haya una nota ahi sin razon alguna, solo haces que sea inconsistente

02:46:537 (166537|2,166657|1,166777|0) - I think this can just simply 1/1 rice rather than 1/2. You can also see no 1/2 here on Normal. Just make it simple pattern for Easy diff.

Applied to later section

02:49:057 - no hay nada que explique porque hay una nota aqui, eliminala
02:56:737 - same
02:52:897 - same

03:16:057 - gusto personal, estaria bien que esto fuese una doble para expresar el "fhum"