00:02:591 (12) - feels like song is quiet here so it shouldn't be a triple. moving this to the next blue tick at 00:02:813 - would fit more with the vocal and make it similar to 00:09:813 (45,46,47) - . OR you can put the note on the previous blue tick at 00:02:369 - to fit instrumental, if you don't want them to be too similar
00:59:368 (11,12,13) - 01:27:813 (10,11,12) - 01:42:035 (14,15,16) - same
00:08:702 (41) - k sounds better imo, and consistency with 01:05:591 (41) - 01:34:035 (40) - 01:48:257 (45) -
made k. also with consistency, made 00:08:035 (37,38,39) - 01:04:924 (37,38,39) - 01:33:368 (36,37,38) - 01:47:591 (41,42,43) - dkd. fits a bit better with the new vocals on this cover
sounds good
00:27:924 - and 00:28:591 - removed
01:17:591 - made into k d kdkdK
01:24:702 - d kkkkddk, Initially wanted to keep 01:25:591 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - as d's for the drum, but changed them to k's instead (#3966237/10600718). mono either way plays the same
00:35:368 (166,167,168,169,170) - there isn't much support for 5 note here, try this https://imgur.com/a/M4XXfaz for the hihat drums?
dont think mapping the hihat is necessary. prefer keeping a pause in the notes like at 00:28:702 (142) - removed all the d's tho at 00:35:480 (167,168,169) - , so no more 5 note patter
00:43:591 - i think its a little weird that this is the only part of the song that has 1/6's mapped out when they are present throughout the song idk
00:52:480 (247,248) - missing 1/6 here?
keeping as d, specifically for oni, wanted to map this section to the pitch change of the piano thing. matches better as d and stays consistent with 00:44:480 (197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206) -
slider will be better there i think because i really don't like this burst. consider about remove notes in 00:56:813 (262,263,264) - or add 1/2 slider in 00:56:702 - . also this pattern isnt dddd (actually dkkdd)
o ya forgot i changed to dkkdd. removed 00:56:813 (262,263,264) - and changed 00:56:702 (259) - to k for triangle
01:08:035 (51) - try removing this note, a double would be nice here. it is similar to 01:09:924 (60,61) -