mapped by Person
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 22 November 2023 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:01:591 (7,9) - i prefer to make them kats because of vocal brighter here,and only use dons are too simple

permalink

o true, made 00:02:702 (10,11) - kats as well + others similar. had something like this at 01:40:924 (62,63,64,65) -

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person

00:13:591 - how about make this note d for better emphasize the snares in 00:13:813 - 00:14:035 - ?

permalink
permalink

sure, applied to oni as well. consistent with the lower diffs

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person

also changed 00:13:368 (62) - (+ others) to d, matches pitch on 00:13:146 (61) - and a little easier to hit

permalink
Reopened by Person

oops

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person

jk it's kk d d k k now for consistency with other diffs

permalink

00:15:591 (58,61,64) - make them kats to fit the flute instrument background is a better choice in my opinion,which are better be appropriate for it.

permalink

00:22:702 (84,87,90,96,99) - if you would like to accept it,i think it is also a good choice to make them kats to make the pattern smoother

permalink
permalink

made kats and other similar ones

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person

00:28:480 (107) - 00:42:702 (155) - listen carefully,becausethe drum here isn't completely 5 combo 1/4,but 4,which means these two notes are okay to be deleted i think

permalink

o dam, good ear

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person

00:30:035 (110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120) - vs 00:44:257 (158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168) - there should be more of a difference between these sections since the song picks up in intensity here

permalink

added some ddd's, extra notes, and some variance to the d's and k's starting from 00:42:924 (154) - to 00:52:702 (194) -

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person

01:16:702 - 01:18:480 - this chain of K d K d ... might be going on too long for players at this level that it's straining.

Could consider deleting 01:17:369 - person-ally think it's also neater this way as the red dons now better follow the pianos.

permalink

ok, deleted. also made 01:18:035 (79) - into d for readability and to match the build up. feels more muzu-y now, but maybe coloring can change

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person

01:17:368 (75,79) - this big 1/2 may make muzu players feel dizzy,so in my opinion i would recommend to delete these two big dons to make it easier and more readable

permalink

true am dizzy. i prefer the consistent notes used for the build up. Used to actually have small d's here, but didnt like how they came outta nowhere so just made them into big d's just to try it out. I think the small d's are more readable so reverted them to that, but added d's at 01:15:146 (69,72) - to kinda prep the player before this part. maybe it's still too hard, but def plays a little better

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person

01:55:813 - i think in this moment after mono 5plet should be something like break instead 1/3 doublet, because 5plets is really hard for muzu. i can suggest you make here 4/1 gap or 1/1 notes after 5plet

permalink

made gap after the 5-plet

permalink
Marked as resolved by Person
/