00:22:506 (1,2,3,4) - this pattern could very easily be misread, especially with the sliderarrow pointing towards (4) instead of (3), I'd change this to have more linear movement like you do on 00:28:017 (2,3,4,5,1) for example.
00:40:568 (2) - breaking the RC since it's technically overlapping.
I personally don't think newer players would have that big of an issue with it, but if you could move it a bit upwards so it doesn't overlap that would be cool. You could also flip 00:40:874 (3) so it doesn't break DS
example:
00:48:221 (3,4) - shouldn't these be 1/2 sliders into a circle like you did on 00:58:017 (3,4,5,6,1)? Also doesn't make sense for 00:53:119 (3,4,5,6) to be so active. I'd invert these two rhythms.
02:35:976 (4) - having the overlap be here feels kinda cluttered idk, I'd make 02:34:751 (3) vertical that way you don't run out of space on the right hand side and you can use the left side to place 02:35:976 (4).
02:36:588 (5) - lowkey I think you can use 1/2 rhythms here, like a circle into a 1/2 slider then a final circle.
example:
02:36:588 - 02:36:894 - are the most important snare after this note 02:35:976 (4) - . mapping it as shown here remove all emphasis on 02:36:894 - with 02:36:741 - now active. As for mapping it as 1/2 slider into circle, making it 1/2 slider + 1/2 circle later + circle later is too much for this part