mapped by Iraq
submitted
last updated
This beatmap wasn't updated since 8 February 2025 so it was graveyarded...
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:02:758 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i would rotate this to this cuz people will prob snap aim this and sharp angles are good 4 sharp aims

permalink

that doesn't change anything tho, it still has the same flow, that just makes the spacing bigger

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:03:442 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23) - Imo i feel like this can be lower down (as in playfield-Placement) Cuz atleast to me it seems to be quite a massive jump out of no where while prior for a similar sound the jump was not as big here : 00:02:071 (3) -

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:11:557 (5,1) - Shouldn't 00:11:671 (1) - be shorter to leave room for a clickable circle for following the same action (2 clicks) since the sound are the same for (slider-tail of (1) and 00:12:014 (2) -

permalink

i think it works well as it is, there's not much going on here anyways

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:32:579 (1) - Can remove NC here to keep consistent with the 2-beat NCing across the rest of this short burst section

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

I'm not quite sure what 00:34:185 (8,8) - follows
Might be better to extend both (7) ? would require some replacement and a slight remap tho

permalink

it's monotonous just with the reverse. i'll leave it the way it is now. It kinda emphasises the jump from one arpeggio to another one.

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:34:979 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - Would honestly just full NC this like top diff, with the large variety in spacing changes across the 1/6 streams like 00:32:922 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 00:33:608 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - vs 00:37:036 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) -

It could totally be interpreted as just another 1/6 with different spacing so NCing would prob help here

permalink

true

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:35:671 (9) - NC????

permalink

no? this could be misinterpreted as a rhythm change

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

I was saying NC for stream flow change and downbeat buut

permalink

00:37:042 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - Feel like you could extand more on this by following a similar idea with the spacing like you did previously at :
00:34:985 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) -
and 00:33:614 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - / 00:34:300 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) -

permalink

spaced out a bit to make the deceleration more visible

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:38:071 (2) - i'd ctrl+g this slider to fix the flow: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19184199/873e , since there's no reason to break it bcause the drum sound goes the same

permalink

sure

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:40:642 (1) - i would map the sound on the sliderend here cuz that's the only place where you mapped the guitar passively in this section

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:41:500 (1,2,3) - ok that's optional but PLEASE fix the overlap ):

permalink

ok

permalink

a

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

00:45:785 (1) - i'd nc this note to emphasize nc 00:46:042 (1) - here more, so player will understand obviously that 00:46:042 (1) - here's another rhythm scale

permalink

nah

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

01:00:471 (5) - Feel like this is a bit too hard to see the slider-tail maybe you could do something like :
atleast to me it would help in term of readability

permalink

increased sv instead

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary

01:05:270 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2) - here's 1/9 which can be emphasized by just buzz-slider

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by Your Stary
/