Bad for me (Dz'Xa's Amenpunk)

00:05:066 (5066|1) - does it really needs a note here? I barely hear anything, also upper diff don't have a note here

00:11:291 (11291|0) - Probablemente quieras hacer esto un doble si 00:11:141 (11141|2,11141|3) es un doble; desde luego tiene más preferencia que 00:10:991 (10991|0,10991|1)

00:20:741 (20741|0,20891|0,21041|0) - might be a bit of a stretch but i think this might be just a bit too hard. i just try to avoid anchors on Hard especially over 180 bpm since they can be a bit difficult at times, especially when you have more options available. i'd move this over to 00:20:891 (20891|0) - [2] as a solution

00:28:241 (28241|2,28241|0,28241|3) - it is just a piano, no drum sound, the sound also not that loud that I think make it triplets is overkill

00:31:841 - Esto deberia ser un doble y en 00:31:916 (31916|0) no haber ninguna nota

00:33:641 (33641|0,33641|1,33791|1,33791|2,33941|2,33941|3,34091|3,34091|0) - ok so im definitely against these being in a Hard, especially at 200bpm. pretty sure this also breaks a guideline where u can only double on 1/1 ticks during 1/4th patterns. i'd make these singles since i just think they're too hard at this level. you can leave the double at the end since its not violating the guideline.

00:34:223 - Could be a double

00:34:991 (34991|0,35009|1,35028|2) - for very similar reasons, would probably be against these too since i think 1/16th stuff at 200bpm can be challenging for players at this level. graces are typically ok but usually ok for things 180bpm and under. this doesnt fall into that criteria so I would probably not grace here for those reasons. doubling would be just as fine imo.

00:35:439 (35439|0,35439|3,35439|2) - also i cant help but wonder why this is a triple? none of the other diffs do this and I think for good reason and thats because there isnt really a significant sound to warrant a triple here. it sounds like any normal kick tick so i'd just double here even if its the start of the chorus.

00:49:372 & 00:49:672- should these be doubles? Since previously you used doubles for base and snare (00:48:622 & 00:48:922) I would suggest to move note on col 3 up to 00:49:822

00:53:122 - Same sound as the others (00:52:222 , 00:52:672) could be another double

Minor sug - Maybe add 2 LNs on 00:56:863 and 00:57:010 for vocal since it's quite empty but yours is perfectly fine https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18230214/7cfa

01:00:475 - Suggest move this note to col 4 as a 3 stack note may be uncomfortable and moving to col 4 can play better as a transition from 01:00:175

01:09:925 - 01:11:275 - Sug to change the pattern to this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18230210/0be5 as the notes on col 1 and 3 are quite congested and I feel it will flow better

01:10:825 - Suggestion to mirror the pattern from 01:10:375 for comfort, but you may need to rearrange the other notes e.g - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18230186/6743

01:15:175 - sug to move to col 4 because of heavy density on col 1 01:15:025 (75025|0,75175|0,75475|0,75625|0,75925|0,76225|0) - additionally it will mirror 01:15:475 (75475|2,75475|0,75625|0) -

01:18:172 - Pretty significant sound + cymbals, could justify a double or maybe even a triple. You can make one of them an LN if you want :3

01:18:341 (78341|3) - though there is a sound here, i would actually opt out from using here. its not very noticeable and I think the transition between 01:18:191 (78191|1,78491|2) - would be a lot nicer considering that its nice 1/1 break into the next section.

01:18:640 (78640|3,78641|0) - Object is not snapped!

01:34:222 - I recommend changing this pattern to https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18230191/36c5 as it would flow better and the jack will mimick the previous section 01:33:622 (93622|3,93622|2,93772|3,93922|0,93922|1,94072|0)

01:36:115 (96115|0) - any reason why this sound is charted out? cant hear any sound here.

01:39:472 (99472|1) - The vocal cuts out at 01:41:947 instead of 01:42:022

For 01:43:673 & 01:48:473 You used a stack note after the double but you didn't for 01:44:873 , 01:46:073 , 01:49:673 , 01:50:873

01:47:291 (107291|0,107291|1) - Esto no lo haces un doble en ningun otro sitio, probablemente deberia ser un single

01:59:573 (119573|2) - move to col 4 to stay consistent with what you did on 01:58:373 (118373|0,118673|0,118973|0) - You could also move 01:59:273 (119273|3) - to col 3 to avoid anchor

02:00:041 (120041|1,120191|2,120341|1,120491|2,120641|1,120791|2,120941|1,121091|2,121241|1,121391|2,121541|1) - this very long trill col2-3 might not very well visually and you also not use long trill pattern before, I guess you need to rearrange some, subjective tho

02:03:473 - Perhaps the trill can be made into 13 24 instead of 2323 https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18230222/ae4b

02:14:516 (134516|0) - you never add a note on this instance before, also after -> 02:24:116

02:16:091 - I think you can twist more 1/4 like what you did on kiai 2 at this kiai 3 section to make some progression

02:26:366 - 1/4 seems more like here than 02:26:516 (146516|2)

02:27:641 - I think you should catch the synth sound on red line, suggestion pattern:

02:35:441 (155441|2) - I think double is enough here looking at you never put triplets on this vocal start before

02:46:223 is the same as 01:39:022 so I recommend you make them the same (also if you apply #3385212)

03:07:673 - Double perhaps