No, on second thought, I think it's better to make this whole structure more consistent. Personally, I would suggest that you change the notes for this early section, following the vocals and beats in harmony.
First, 00:01:579 - In this part, the LN of 1 beat comes out, followed by the single notes of 1/4 snap for 2.5 beats.
Also, the second part also seems to have placed LN at the beginning and end of the drums and vocals that are emphasized with C, and nothing has been arranged in the meantime.
If you think like this, I think you don't need to put notes on the part I mentioned above.
But I think you need to go through a lot of modifications to the latter part.
00:02:778 (2778|0) - For this note, the end snap should be replaced with the end point of the vocal, 00:02:950 - and 1/4 snap single note should be placed between 00:02:950 - and 00:03:378 -. For example, 00:01:921 - Like this part.
00:03:978 - to 00:04:236 - place single note,
00:04:321 - I suggest placing this part as below.
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/15736911/7b70
00:05:693 (5693|0) - to 00:06:036 -
nd 00:07:064 - Also I suggest changing this part to a similar pattern as the front part.
Then I personally think it can be completed for the first part.
00:13:578 - I feel a little awkward about the details of these parts.
00:14:178 (14178|0) - In the part I mentioned, the sound is the same as this, but why is it expressed only as a note here?
00:16:150 (16150|0) - too.
00:14:264 - I thk its double.
00:22:321 (22321|0) - I decorated most of the parts where you only emphasize vocals with LN. LN this note, please.
im a little confused as to what you mean for 00:13:578
00:14:178 (14178|0) & 00:16:150 (16150|0) redone
00:14:264 Doesn't fit well as a double
00:22:321 (22321|0) added LN here
00:20:778 - I feel that this part is not compatible with the previous SV feeling.
I think I know the intention of adding SV to this part. I think you put in SV to express the excitement of the beat at the louder sound while keeping the trill from looking normal.
Well, I may be completely wrong, but let me assume that I'm right.
Simply put, the trill looked very tight and actually felt that way, but the 00:20:778 - part is not at all. If imma mapper, I would definitely put SV in this part.
What do you think about this?
You obviously wanted to express various parts of this bitmap difficulty in SV. I thought, 'Oh, this is how you expressed it.' But for some parts, I thought, 'It's too bad I didn't express it.' It's my personal opinion, but I'd like to introduce you to the parts I'm sorry for.
00:23:521 - 00:24:721 (24721|2,24978|1) - 00:29:007 - 00:34:493 - 00:59:864 - 01:03:378 - 01:07:407 - 01:07:578 - 01:12:207 - 01:12:464 - 01:12:721 - 01:27:978 to 01:28:836 - 01:51:293 - 01:56:778 -
And I think SV, which is too extreme or too radical, rather interferes with the rhythm.
I find it very difficult to interpret what you were trying to express about this part.
00:44:093 (44093|3,44778|3,44950|3,45121|3) -
I think it's not a vocal, beat, or any other musical element, but it's an excerpt from a part or a part of these parts, but I think it's a part that's hard to get your thoughts fully.
00:45:293 (45293|1) - too.
None of this is intuitive except that you intended it to be a rest area. If I don't understand, I want you to explain your intention. Otherwise, I wish I could hurt this section only for one factor.
ex)Bakuretsue's suggestion-
00:49:407 (49407|3,49578|0,49750|1,49921|3,50264|2,50607|0) -
If these LNs symbolized and used vocals, I think this part is generally wrong.
00:49:493 (49493|2,49578|1) - I don't think we should just express these two parts, we should express them.
00:49:750 - 00:49:836 - 00:49:921 - no express