1. Easy (1,51 stars, 213 notes)
2. Hard (4,93 stars, 623 notes)
3. Insane (5 stars, 847 notes)
4. Nogard (5 stars, 965 notes)
5. Normal (3,61 stars, 330 notes)

Gaba wrote:

Faltou banana nas tags.

[Luanny PhNyx] wrote:

Gaba wrote:

Faltou banana nas tags.

s
como assim vc coloca o mundo nas tags e n poe banana?
bota banana aí e dá o cudosu pro gaba
edit: af gaba editou o post fodase da o cu pra mim então
dosu.

Caco Roth wrote:

kakakak q map daora ricardinho mt bon

Gatyaa wrote:

http://puu.sh/18c6N

aheuhuehueehuehue

• * Quite neat thing you got here.

Jenny wrote:

Why can I click this?

• * Quite neat thing you got here.

Shino wrote:

This is my favorite mashup track so I checked but something was wrong.
02:04:441 - Steel monster? That is the vocal of "Arcadepunk" and you used the cover of "So". Shame on you, Blue.
Go and use this(more fitable): http://squeedgemonster.deviantart.com/gallery/31948679

Shino wrote:

This is my favorite mashup track so I checked but something was wrong.
02:04:441 - Steel monster? That is the vocal of "Arcadepunk" and you used the cover of "So". Shame on you, Blue.
Go and use this(more fitable): http://squeedgemonster.deviantart.com/gallery/31948679

Shino wrote:

Eh... wait BD. I'm not Shi r o.

Blue Dragon wrote:

ready for mods \:D/

Zarerion wrote:

For some reason I can't import the map into my osu!.

It tells me it's importing the map, but it doesn't show up in the map listing afterwards. Anyone else having this issue?

Blue Dragon wrote:

I'll use Luanny's taiko, but i'll add that to description, thanks.

Harez wrote:

Awesome
EDIT:

Blue Dragon wrote:

I'll use Luanny's taiko, but i'll add that to description, thanks.

o..o where is it?

1. your mp3 is 320kbps prease change it to a lower rankable mp3 :3

1. tickrate 1 is better
2. i think for a easy diff is better distancespacing 0.8 - 0.9 think about to change it a bit
3. slowdown a easyer diff is not nedded the ar and the SV is not hight,and from 1 to 0.5 for new players is difficult,justd saing because it was a discussion about the same thing in my map so please think about to change it

1. 02:04:441 - in the slowdown part why did you used distance spacing from 1.47 to 1.87 ? in the 1st slowndownpart you didn't use this distance spacing

1. tickrate 1 :U
2. 00:34:709 - in the slowdiwn part try to make distancespacing more consistent here are you using spacing 1.2 but in the next slowdown part 02:04:441 - you continue to use 1.0 distance spacing :U it can be confusional somehow

• 
  Why is the maximum combo 979? Most insanes don't even have that high of a max combo. I'm not sure, but I think the BPM may be too high since it doesn't feel that highly paced to me. Maybe you could half it to 110 BPM?

• 
  00:08:800 (1) Imo, I think it would sound better if you continued the pattern from before (a 4 beat slider and a circle two beats later).
  00:10:982 (2,3) I think it would sound better if you merged these into a slider.
  00:13:163 (1,2) I think it would be better if it was (slider-circle) instead of (circle-slider). (So basically just reverse the locations [of 1 and 2] on the timeline with rearrangements in hit sounds, spacing, etc. if necessary. )
  00:16:982 (2,3) You could space these out. It seems a bit odd that this is the only place it happened so far when they're still 2 beats apart like everything else so far.
  00:34:982 (1,2) I know this is technically distance spaced because of the velocity change, but I don't think you give the player enough time to notice this change and thus, they may think that it is 2 beats away instead of 4 and hit it to early. I'm not sure, just thought I'd point that out.
  00:51:482 (1) This spinner feels weird because it starts too early. You should probably start it at around 00:52:163 or something.
  01:06:618 (4,5) Imo, it would sound better if these were merged into one slider.
  01:40:436 (4,5) I think it would sound better if these were merged into one slider to resemble 2.
  01:50:254 (3,4) I think it would sound better as (slider-circle) instead of (circle-slider).
  01:52:436 (2,1) ^
  01:54:618 (4,5) ^
  02:01:163 (3,1) ^
  Just a thought, but I think a break from 02:04:441 til 02:13:198 or 02:20:313 would fit nicely, but you can keep what you have if you want.
  02:41:040 (3) There's nothing wrong, but I find this odd that this is the only time that this slider occurs in the part of the song (up until the background change) One of these would fit perfectly at 02:50:313 when he says "murder" again.
  03:27:404 (1) I think this spinner is starting too early, but if you can't start it later, then maybe you should just delete it.
  03:38:326 (3) You could cut this slider in half and add a repeat to keep a symmetrical rhythm with 03:31:781 (1,2,3,4)

• 
  00:30:345 (6) It feels like you are following the lyrics in this section, so I don't think this circle is really necessary.
  00:51:618 (1) See Easy's suggestion.
  01:07:436 (4) Delete this maybe?
  01:37:709 (1,2) It might be better if you deleted these?
  01:40:436 (3) You should probably space this farther from 2 since that's what you did with the distance between 3 and 4, and 1 and 2.
  02:37:222 (4) This feels like its ending too soon. Maybe extend it to where 1 starts?
  02:50:586 (6,7) Maybe you could do what you did here 02:42:131 (1,2) to keep a rhythmic symmetry?
  03:53:599 This feels empty without a circle imo.

• 
  01:58:709 (6,7,8) Imo, this feels kind of weird when stacked, especially when coming from 01:57:345 (1,2,3,4)
  02:37:086 You seem to be following the "side beat" (I'm not exactly sure what to call it ) so adding a circle here would make sense imo.
  03:17:859 (2,3,4,5) I'm pretty sure you're following the lyrics during this part so deleting these would make this part flow much better.
  03:56:871 (1) It would probably be better if you just stacked this under 3 and 4.

• 
  00:12:754 (9) Imo, I think it would look and play better if this was broken into 2 circles and stacked over 11.
  01:00:891 (8,9,1) It would look better if these were all stacked.
  02:23:722 (5) Idk, maybe it would look better if it lined up with 4 and 6? I'm not sure.
  03:17:859 (1,2,3,4) See Hard.
  03:26:586 (1,2,3,4) ^

• 
  00:01:845 (4) This isn't apart of the 1,2,3 anti-jump and thus looks weird.
  01:07:163 (1) I think this shouldn't be a new combo.
  01:45:754 (6,1) Imo, I think this jump has little to no worth. You should probably just distance space it.
  03:17:859 (1,2,3,4) See Hard.
  03:20:313 (4) I think just a circle on the endpoint would be fine imo.
  03:26:586 (1,2,3) See Insane.
  04:03:417 (1) I think you should keep the pattern you had going at 04:02:326 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) and place this under 3 (with slight movement adjustments with 2,3, and 4).
  04:03:962 (1) ^

CrestRising wrote:

Why is the maximum combo 979? Most insanes don't even have that high of a max combo. I'm not sure, but I think the BPM may be too high since it doesn't feel that highly paced to me. Maybe you could half it to 110 BPM.