1. 31's Taiko (4,83 stars, 607 notes)
2. Backfire's Taiko Oni (4,83 stars, 674 notes)
3. Easy (1,76 stars, 93 notes)
4. Hard (4,87 stars, 293 notes)
5. LC (5 stars, 428 notes)
6. Normal (3,79 stars, 152 notes)

hinakome wrote:

nice map but... in LC
00;26;655 kiai time ? — No, just a fountain is enough
01;17;864 new combo? — It's already here. Well, I made it more noticeable (red colour)

Mapper 31 wrote:

May I make taiko diff?

Ryene wrote:

Y'kno that sounded quite dirty.

Bass-chan wrote:

Fu Tic when I asked you about guest you said no ((((.

1. Hmm, what about add the last kiai to LC's diff too? I think it's good, not just for consistency but because the idea is great and LC's diff deserves to have it too.
2. Very clean General TicClick.

1. 00:14:591 (1,2,1) - I think the flow in this pattern is really bad, because after the (1) slider, the player's cursor is supposed to move to the right, and if you place the note on the opposite direction much times, the map will become really boring too play. Please consider re-arrangin the pattern to look more like this.
2. New Combos:
   1. 00:13:500 (2,1) - Considering you are using New Combos once in each four big white ticks, I think permute the New Combo between this two notes would be a lot better because the fourth white tick after the last NewCombo(considering the new combo note is the end of the spinner.) is 00:13:500 and the start of the phrase is 00:13:500 too.
   2. 00:25:500 (1) - This slider is still part of the previous combo since it starts on the third big white tick of the combo. Please consider removing it for better consistency with all the other new combos.
   3. 00:28:773 (1) - Same suggestion as before, with the same explanations.
   4. 01:38:591 (3,1) - I see you changed your new combo reference since 01:18:955, and for better consistency with this new reference I suggest you to permute the new combo between these two note because your new reference looks to be once in two big white ticks, and it's the third of this combo.
      

1. New Combos:
   1. 00:16:773 (1) - You are using new combos once in each 4 ticks right? Then you need to remove this new combo for better consistency.
   2. 00:42:955 (1) - Same suggestion as before with same explanation and same everything.
   3. 00:46:228 (1) - ^
   4. 00:50:591 (1) - ^
   5. Look, you aren't making your New Combos right, you can't keep a consistency and It's very bad. Try making them all consistent. I will keep pointing and explaning.
   6. 00:59:319 (1) - Still part of the previous combo..

1. New Combos:
   1. 00:21:137 (1) - Until here you was using new combos once on each 2 big white tick. For better consistency I suggest you to remove this new combo since it's still the second big white tick of the combo.
   2. 00:34:228 (1) - Same as before, it's still part of the previous combo.
   3. 00:42:955 (1) - Still part of the previous combo.
   4. 00:51:682 (1) - And the same here.
   5. 01:00:410 (1) - Still part of the combo, but here you need to add a new combo on 01:01:500 (5) - because it's the third big white tick of the combo.
   6. 01:17:864 (1) - Here again, the new combo is placed on the second white tick since the start of the previous combo, remove this for better consistency.
   7. 01:20:046 (5,1) - You started following other new combo frequency, then for better consistency with this, you may permute this new combo, follow the frequency of New Combo on each big white tick.
   8. 01:21:137 (6,1) - Permute these for better consistency with the New Combo on each big white tick.
   9. 01:24:410 (3) - This note is a down beat(big white tick), add new combo for better consistency.
   10. 01:33:682 (1,5) - You started following the 1:2 new combo frequency, where you add one new combo on each 2 white ticks. Permute again the new combos and remove from 01:34:500 (1) - for better consistency.

Katsuri wrote:

Easy.

1. 00:14:591 (1,2,1) - I think the flow in this pattern is really bad, because after the (1) slider, the player's cursor is supposed to move to the right, and if you place the note on the opposite direction much times, the map will become really boring too play. Please consider re-arrangin the pattern to look more like this. Uhh you seem to have attached a wrong screenshot, yet alright, I changed the shape of the slider so it is a blanket now.
2. New Combos:
   1. 00:13:500 (2,1) - Considering you are using New Combos once in each four big white ticks, I think permute the New Combo between this two notes would be a lot better because the fourth white tick after the last NewCombo(considering the new combo note is the end of the spinner.) is 00:13:500 and the start of the phrase is 00:13:500 too. That makes sense I guess.
   2. 00:25:500 (1) - This slider is still part of the previous combo since it starts on the third big white tick of the combo. Please consider removing it for better consistency with all the other new combos. Not that I can really explain, but this NC kinda denotes a special moment of the whole track. Just special, and I'd like to underline that.
   3. 00:28:773 (1) - Same suggestion as before, with the same explanations. Although it works here.
   4. 01:38:591 (3,1) - I see you changed your new combo reference since 01:18:955, and for better consistency with this new reference I suggest you to permute the new combo between these two note because your new reference looks to be once in two big white ticks, and it's the third of this combo. Yeah right you are.

Hard01:17:864 (1) - Here again, the new combo is placed on the second white tick since the start of the previous combo, remove this for better consistency. — Two previous sliders were boosted up, blue means returning back to normal velocity

Loli Cjj wrote:

>Hard
00:11:319 - Remove the clap? — No, I use double claps here
00:15:410 - ^ — ^

That's for now, maybe next time I'll mod again — See you!

Loli Cjj wrote:

>Easy
01:17:864 - I'm afraid it was empty, fill with slider or circle hit maybe? Intentional break there. I tried filling it in many ways and found it the most suiting to merely leave it alone.

[LC]
00:56:727 (4) - This beat is slightly too far from (3) compared to (2) and looks pretty obvious. Try moving it around until it shows "Prev: 1.20x"

TicClick wrote:

Loli Cjj wrote:

>Hard
00:11:319 - Remove the clap? — No, I use double claps here
00:15:410 - ^ — ^

That's for now, maybe next time I'll mod again — See you!

No changes, let's see what R99 and LC will say.

La Cataline wrote:

nope

Rue wrote:

Loli Cjj wrote:

>Easy
01:17:864 - I'm afraid it was empty, fill with slider or circle hit maybe? Intentional break there. I tried filling it in many ways and found it the most suiting to merely leave it alone.

Thankies anyways.

...

51,88,82773,2,2,B|-45:160|8:352|160:328,1,349.999994784594,0|4

1. Nothing wrong here

• -- I recommend to put AR:+2
  - 00:25:500 (2,1) - Considered a spacing between those notes

• - 00:14:591 (2) - Hmm i think if you put this slider in the center would be good like this
  - 00:16:773 (2,3,4) - Considered about too center those notes
  - 00:34:228 (1) - Remove new combo to follow your pattern

• - 01:24:410 (1) - Remove new combo to follow your pattern
  - 01:33:137 (1) - ^

• - WUT

• Hard:
  Nice diff

1. 00:00:410 (1) - The tick isn't at the edge but maybe thats on purpose, however for me it looks nicer if its on the edge..
   
   Only thing i could find tbh.
   
   Hitsound suggestion for the end:
2. 01:25:500 (1) - add a whistle
3. 01:28:228 (2) - add a whislte at the end of the slider
4. 01:32:864 (3) - ^
5. 01:37:228 (3) - add whistle
6. 01:39:137 (2) - add a whislte at the end of the slider
7. 01:41:591 (3) - add whistle
8. 01:45:682 (2) - ^
9. 01:50:046 (2) - add a whistle at the end
   
   Hope i didn't forget one.
   The diff just seemed pretty easy to me for a hard. You could increase AR or HP Drain by 1.
   
   Normal:
   
10. 00:37:500 (5) - same thing as in normal there are actually a few more on this map
11. 00:59:319 (5,6,7) - Nazi-mod: Is this just me or doesn't this look perfect symmetrical ?
    Found another thing but thats uber-nazi-mod so lets skip that...
12. 01:23:319 (1,3) - ^^^
    
    Rest seems fine, you could use the same or similar hitsound suggestion than in hard...also your combos might be a bit long at times.
    
    Easy:
    
13. 00:25:500 (1) -
    This one should look better

    208,192,25500,6,0,B|204:156|228:128|284:128|308:156|304:192,1,160.000002384186,4|6
14. 00:50:319 (3,4,5,6) - this one might be to hard for beginers to play
15. 01:16:091 (2,3,4,5) - ^
16. 01:23:319 (1,2,3) - ^^
17. 01:49:500 (1,2,3) - all these patterns are nice but might be to hard for beginners
    
    I think i saw inconsistent spacing several times which is not recommended on easy maps, please take a look on it.
    
    LC:
    
    This diff has many sliders that IMO. doesn't look decent, if that was on purpose ok...i use them sometimes too, iif not you should work on those sliders.
    
18. 00:15:682 (1) - nazi mod thingy, this one isnt symmetrical
19. 00:24:410 (1) - another not-so-nice slider
20. 00:28:228 (8) - here the red sliderpoint is not in the middle
21. 00:35:319 (1) - this one isn't symmetrical but i assume you want it to be symmetrical here
22. 00:48:137 (5) - another not-so-nice slider
23. 01:28:500 (1) - why nc here ?
24. 01:21:137 (1,2) - ^^
25. 01:22:773 (3) - ^^^
    if you want to change them at all i guess you'll find the rest
    
    Another thing: You could use nc's on all these speed up sliders with x1,50 velocity
    appropos slider velocity...you use more than 3 unique slider velocities and i think this is unrankable.
    
    then some things that might be jsut my personal taste tho
26. 00:17:591 (4,5,1) - in most cases i don't like patterns like this, might ruin the flow
27. 00:23:319 (5) - this one kinda confused me and i actually can read AR 9 but i don't really like the pattern either.
28. 01:39:682 (1,2,3,4) - weird spacing change, i don't really like it

MoodyRPG wrote:

Easy

-- I recommend to put AR:+2 Oh crap, I got absolutely no idea how come it's set to zero.+3, I'll give you that.
- 00:25:500 (2,1) - Considered a spacing between those notes Sure, fixed.

Trauma- wrote:

Easy:
00:25:500 (1) -This one should look better Oh yeah, thanks.
00:50:319 (3,4,5,6) - this one might be to hard for beginers to play
01:16:091 (2,3,4,5) - ^
01:23:319 (1,2,3) - ^^
01:49:500 (1,2,3) - all these patterns are nice but might be to hard for beginners Well, neither can I let it all get to primitive 1/1 slider-slider-slider graph. Then again, those don't appear too often to avoid much confusion.

I think i saw inconsistent spacing several times which is not recommended on easy maps, please take a look on it. Hopefully I got 'em all.

1. 00:10:783 (3) - fix Spacing.
2. 00:39:147 (3) - Crosses hp-bar move it down.
3. 00:49:920 (6) - Crosses Score-bar, ^
4. 00:52:510 (4,1) - Crosses Hp-bar, move it a bit down.
5. 01:22:783 (3) - Not quite round fixed it for you:
   

   51,88,82783,2,2,B|-45:160|8:352|160:328,1,349.999994784594,0|4

6. 01:23:874 (2) - Crosses HP-bar, move it down.
7. 01:24:556 (4) - ^
8. 01:31:510 (3) - This is not so good curved, maybe move the sliderend a bit down?

• 
  This diff has many sliders that IMO. doesn't look decent, if that was on purpose ok...i use them sometimes too, iif not you should work on those sliders.

1. 00:15:692 (1) - nazi mod thingy, this one isnt symmetrical
2. 00:24:420 (1) - another not-so-nice slider
3. 00:28:238 (8) - here the red sliderpoint is not in the middle
4. 00:35:329 (1) - this one isn't symmetrical but i assume you want it to be symmetrical here
5. 00:48:147 (5) - another not-so-nice slider
6. 01:28:510 (1) - why nc here ?
7. 01:21:147 (1,2) - ^^
8. 01:22:783 (3) - ^^^
   if you want to change them at all i guess you'll find the rest
   
   Another thing: You could use nc's on all these speed up sliders with x1,50 velocity
   appropos slider velocity...you use more than 3 unique slider velocities and i think this is unrankable.
   
   then some things that might be jsut my personal taste tho
9. 00:17:601 (4,5,1) - in most cases i don't like patterns like this, might ruin the flow
10. 00:23:329 (5) - this one kinda confused me and i actually can read AR 9 but i don't really like the pattern either.
11. 01:39:692 (1,2,3,4) - weird spacing change, i don't really like it

TicClick wrote:

Compilation for LC:

1. 00:10:783 (3) - fix Spacing.
2. 00:39:147 (3) - Crosses hp-bar move it down.
3. 00:49:920 (6) - Crosses Score-bar, ^
4. 00:52:510 (4,1) - Crosses Hp-bar, move it a bit down.
5. 01:23:874 (2) - Crosses HP-bar, move it down.
6. 01:24:556 (4) - ^
7. 00:28:238 (8) - here the red sliderpoint is not in the middle
   
   Another thing: You could use nc's on all these speed up sliders with x1,50 velocity

Да, +10 (уже переправил циферки)

Trauma- wrote:

This diff has many sliders that IMO. doesn't look decent, if that was on purpose ok...i use them sometimes too, iif not you should work on those sliders.

00:28:238 (8) - here the red sliderpoint is not in the middle

Я ушла

TicClick wrote:

00:28:238 (8) - here the red sliderpoint is not in the middle

Это точно надо править?

TicClick wrote:

Не насовсем хоть?

Trauma- wrote:

Normal:
00:37:510 (5) - here i meant that the sliderpoint isn't at the edge again — doesn't matter much
01:23:329 (1,3) - same here — fixed (changed a little)
01:33:147 (2) - and here — that's exactly how I want this slider to be made, sorry

About your slidershapes LC — I'm afraid that she still doesn't care

A s g a r d wrote:

[Hard]
01:33:147 (4) - move to X: 312 Y : 248 — ok

[Normal]
OD -1? — changed, though I don't see a difference
00:05:874 (3) - move to X: 172 Y: 264 — no
00:06:965 (5) - move to X: 340 Y: 264 — no
00:31:783 (2,3) - distance? other note is 1.1 but why this is 1.3? — I use 1.1 for 2/1 notes and 1.3 for 1/1 to avoid small overlap
01:22:238 (7) - ^ — ^
01:29:874 (4) - ^ — ^
01:35:329 (6) - move to X : 352 Y : 168 — no, I don't want to make equilateral triangle here

Sync wrote:

Hard
00:10:510 (4) - This originally confused the hell out of me. After listening to the song once, I definitely expected more than 1-repeat here. Eventually it made sense but that was after playing through once. I think this could be fixed by adding a hit circle in between (4) and (5), right here: 00:10:920. I don't know, what do you think? — Great
00:14:874 (5,6) - This would be one of the same cases as above. Do as you wish. — Ok
00:28:783 (1,2) - Here too, even though it isn't exactly the same as before (okay I'll seriously stop bringing these up now) — Yeah! Gonna fix it in most of similar moments

Normal
00:34:238 (6) - Add one more repeat to follow those vocals — Sure (changed it a little)
00:50:329 (4) - Add a hit circle (vocals, etc) — umm.. you mean 00:52:510? Added
01:28:783 (3) - Add one repeat — yep!
01:32:874 (2) - Add a hit circle — added
01:35:329 (6) - Add one repeat (okay, this is getting a little redundant now, sorry ;_;) — changed to 2 notes + slider
01:44:056 (8) - :<<<< So yeah, if you did this before do it again etc (I'm not even going to repeat myself, I'm sure you catch my drift) — Yea, I tried to make little breaks between groups of notes, but now it's time to fill 'em

L_P wrote:

hard
00:47:874 (9) - cause i really cant find things to mod..orz this stack properly haiz — done
01:01:510 (1) - stack at note 3's position? suggestion only — I like it, thanks!
01:12:147 (8) - last head finish? — added normal finish
01:22:783 (5) - head finish — no
01:42:420 (7,8,9) - a little antijump? — no, thx

normal
00:04:783 (1,2,3,4,5) - i really think that 1,3,5 use whistle, 2,4 use no whistle suits more...>whitsle > clap > whistle > clap — nice

mancusojuanmattos wrote:

General:
- Tags: Maybe you can add dub in tags — it's dubstep, not dub
- (Easy/Normal/Hard): 0:1:01:647: Drag this Break to 01:02:056 (White Tick) — no, it's not worth it
- Maybe it's fine the Letterbox During Breaks, maybe you can Enable — What for?

Easy:
- Slider Multiplier: 0.400000005960464, change it manually in .osu notepad to 0.4 — haha. Changed it for Rue
01:25:510 (1): The Whistle on Slider sounds kinda weird, remove it please clicking on the Slider — it also appears in similar moments, like 01:34:238 (1) or 01:42:965 (3)

Normal:
- In this case I suggest Circle Size -1, since you have 3 difficulties with the same Circle Size — ewww, it contains 1/1 only, nothing difficult
00:27:965 (3,4): Spacing, Fix it with the Distance Snap, since it's not recommended have Spacing problems on Easy/Normal difficulties — it's not spacing problem, because I use 1.1 for 2/1 notes and 1.3 for 1/1
00:32:874 (3,4): (^) — ^
00:42:692 (4,5): (^) — ^

Hard:
01:01:510 (1): This New Combo is a little inconsistent, Remove it please — you're right

mancusojuanmattos wrote:

- The settings are a Little High in this difficulty, so, I suggest to reduce the HP Drain Rate and the Overall Difficulty by 1 Tick (HP Drain Rate/Overall Difficulty -1) Yep.
00:04:715 (T): The hitsound in this section sound a bit high, reduce the volume in 10/15% (to 75/80%) Sure.
00:09:075 (T): Same as above Done.
01:17:065 (4): In this case I think that you have to play with vocal, for this reason, I suggest you to remove this note I like it this way, neither deleting anything here nor filling the break right after in.
01:25:510 (1): The Whistle on Slider sounds kinda weird, remove it please clicking on the Slider TC commented on it already, there is a few of them. We're just keeping the things consistent.

L_P wrote:

00:50:601 (4,5) - this suddenly become hard..why not use two notes to replace them...? Let's be serious guys, since when have three 1/1 sliders become such a complicated matter?
01:34:238 (1) - orz i dont think it is pretty... Just a matter of taste bro. Not that I use such shapes any often to be honest.