1. ANOTHER effected by N/A (5.2 stars, 409 notes)
2. BEGINNER effected by N/A (1.51 stars, 111 notes)
3. BLACK ANOTHER (5.57 stars, 571 notes)
4. HYPER (3.27 stars, 260 notes)
5. INSANE effected by ProBox (4.87 stars, 406 notes)
6. LIGHT INSANE (4.16 stars, 359 notes)
7. NORMAL effected by Rizen (2.11 stars, 152 notes)

Nerova Riuz GX wrote:

lemme add a star

chat log

20:23 Rohit6: yo
20:23 Rohit6: did you like it?
20:23 Nerova Riuz GX: yo
20:23 Nerova Riuz GX: umm
20:23 Nerova Riuz GX: better than XENNA
20:23 Rohit6: kek
20:24 Rohit6: well this isnt loaded with doubles
20:24 Rohit6: like xenna
20:24 Rohit6: should i try to rank xenna or this?
20:29 Nerova Riuz GX: this one, maybe
20:30 Nerova Riuz GX: it is shorter and easier to fix those issues
20:30 Rohit6: hmm
20:30 Rohit6: the streams?
20:32 Nerova Riuz GX: fix some shape on streams
20:32 Nerova Riuz GX: and make some stops
20:33 Nerova Riuz GX: and also, some unrankable issues
20:33 Rohit6: like?
20:33 Rohit6: i can justify streams
20:33 Rohit6: if you hear closely
20:33 Rohit6: its 1-2-1-2
20:33 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:11:211 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - 
20:34 Nerova Riuz GX: make them a circle
20:35 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:23:342 (3,1) - make these two stack on the same place, it can get better effect
20:35 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:26:129 (4,1) - ^
20:35 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:28:752 (6,1) - ^
20:36 Nerova Riuz GX: or some more places like this
20:38 Rohit6: sorry i got dced
20:38 Nerova Riuz GX: D:
20:38 Rohit6: 00:11:211 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1) - this was the last thing i got
20:38 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:23:342 (3,1) - make these two stack on the same place, it can get better effect
20:38 Rohit6: rip
20:38 Nerova Riuz GX: the same on those places like that
20:38 Rohit6: okay done
20:38 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:39:571 (1,2,3,4,5,7) - make them a regular triangle
20:39 Rohit6: stacked 3 with 1's sliderhead
20:39 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:42:194 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - change their speed
20:39 Nerova Riuz GX: low speed first, then accel
20:40 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:49:817 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - use stream here
20:41 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:51:211 (1,2,3,4) - DS, and stack 3,4
20:41 Rohit6: but the00:39:571 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - here
20:41 Rohit6: the 7th circle has individual pressure
20:42 Nerova Riuz GX: why not just move 6 and 8?
20:42 Nerova Riuz GX: then you can replace 7 as you wish
20:42 Nerova Riuz GX: or maybe, just replace 1~5
20:43 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:43:342 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - bad flow
20:44 Nerova Riuz GX: 01:22:686 (1,3) - don't stack them, make them blanket
20:45 Nerova Riuz GX: 01:25:309 (1,2) - believe me, all of those connections will be better in 1/2, not 1/4
20:45 Rohit6: 00:49:817 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - why stream here?
20:46 Nerova Riuz GX: much more sounds are skipped, and they are clear
20:46 Nerova Riuz GX: also they are quite fast
20:47 Nerova Riuz GX: 01:43:670 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1) - re-shape this stram pls
20:47 Nerova Riuz GX: 01:51:538 (1,2,3) - stack them properly, it's too far now
20:48 Rohit6: you sure about that
20:48 Rohit6: i mean people might confuse it for 1/4
20:48 Nerova Riuz GX: no, im sure they will be better in stacked
20:49 Nerova Riuz GX: or only stack 3 under 2
20:49 Nerova Riuz GX: Also please use "Jun Kuroda & aaaa" as Romanized Artist
20:50 Rohit6: lol
20:50 Rohit6: i thought someone was kidding
20:50 Nerova Riuz GX: no
20:50 Nerova Riuz GX: it is a name of an artist
20:50 Rohit6: caps ?
20:50 Nerova Riuz GX: and he's a BMS artist
20:50 Nerova Riuz GX: just do that in undercase
20:51 Rohit6: i had those stacked actually
20:51 Rohit6: sergio told me to use ds there
20:51 Rohit6: 00:21:211 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - no problem with these types of streams right?
20:51 Nerova Riuz GX: umm
20:52 Nerova Riuz GX: it's okay
20:52 Nerova Riuz GX: but, i think you need to reset NCs on this map
20:52 Rohit6: what why
20:53 Nerova Riuz GX: first, you can NC them on the heads of streams
20:53 Nerova Riuz GX: second, lots of big numbers
20:53 Rohit6: also od8.8 overkill?
20:53 Nerova Riuz GX: 8~8.5 might be great
20:53 Rohit6: i already have 8 on insane
20:53 Nerova Riuz GX: OD can be the same
20:54 Nerova Riuz GX: no need to be higher
20:54 Nerova Riuz GX: and AR can shift in 9.3 or 9.4
20:55 Rohit6: also
20:55 Rohit6: whats the problem in the last stream?
20:55 Nerova Riuz GX: just reshape
20:55 Nerova Riuz GX: make them more like a circle
20:56 Nerova Riuz GX: i mean, that stream is good, but not beautiful
21:07 Rohit6: post this log
21:07 Rohit6: lemme kd you up
21:07 Nerova Riuz GX: wat
21:07 Nerova Riuz GX: u sure
21:08 Rohit6: mod insane as well doe
21:08 Rohit6: :^)
21:08 Nerova Riuz GX: remap
21:08 Rohit6: rood
21:08 Nerova Riuz GX: no, im not kidding this time
21:09 Rohit6: wait why
21:09 Nerova Riuz GX: unrankable issues
21:09 Nerova Riuz GX: and those doubles
21:09 Nerova Riuz GX: actually Expert is much more better than Insane, imo
21:10 Nerova Riuz GX: those doubles are all replaced by sliders in Insane
21:11 Nerova Riuz GX: but they just can't fit downbeats and really hard to play, seriously
21:11 Rohit6: lemme remap that in insane
21:11 Nerova Riuz GX: but wait
21:11 Nerova Riuz GX: you need 3~4 diffs
21:12 Nerova Riuz GX: you know that right
21:12 Rohit6: i know
21:12 Rohit6: im making those
21:12 Rohit6: in a couple of days
21:12 Nerova Riuz GX: umm okay
21:15 Rohit6: but
21:15 Rohit6: is the map >fun
21:15 Nerova Riuz GX: quality first
21:16 Nerova Riuz GX: if it has quality then it will be fun, ofc
21:30 Rohit6: post on the forum
21:31 Nerova Riuz GX: ok then
21:31 Rohit6: fixed the thing on insane
21:32 Nerova Riuz GX: still not fixed :(
21:32 Nerova Riuz GX: unrankable things
21:33 Rohit6: wait what
21:33 Nerova Riuz GX: blocked reverse arrows
21:33 Rohit6: where
21:33 Nerova Riuz GX: many of them
21:33 Rohit6: send link so i can fix them
21:34 Rohit6: 00:11:538 (8) - if youre talking about this
21:34 Rohit6: i dont think its unrankable
21:34 Nerova Riuz GX: no
21:35 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:17:604 (2) - this might probably one of them
21:35 Rohit6: how is it blocked...
21:35 Nerova Riuz GX: it is blocked by hitburst
21:36 Rohit6: i dont get it
21:36 Rohit6: elaborate please
21:36 Nerova Riuz GX: meh whatever
21:36 Nerova Riuz GX: lemme find more of them
21:36 Nerova Riuz GX: wit
21:36 Nerova Riuz GX: wait
21:36 Nerova Riuz GX: 00:44:817 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - wtf is this
21:36 Rohit6: wait but what is hitburst
21:37 Nerova Riuz GX: hitburst is that picture when you hit the note
21:37 Nerova Riuz GX: like "300" "100" "50"
21:37 Rohit6: ohh
21:37 Rohit6: 00:44:817 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - fixing this
21:38 Rohit6: didnt notice it started on blue tick
21:38 Nerova Riuz GX: all of those short sliders are passive sliders
21:38 Nerova Riuz GX: fix them
21:38 Rohit6: ye
21:39 Nerova Riuz GX: this is an obvious one, unrankable
21:39 Nerova Riuz GX: 01:08:752 (3) - 
21:39 Nerova Riuz GX: 01:09:571 (5) - this might probably the same
21:39 Nerova Riuz GX: 01:15:637 (4) - this too
21:40 Nerova Riuz GX: 01:19:243 (2) - 
21:40 Rohit6: 01:15:637 (4) - whats wrong with this one
21:40 Nerova Riuz GX: blocked by 01:14:817 (1) - 
21:41 Rohit6: 01:14:817 (1,4) - this is just a regualr blanket man
21:41 Rohit6: i dont think so
21:41 Rohit6: that its unrankable
21:41 Nerova Riuz GX: watch that in original osu skin
21:41 Nerova Riuz GX: 4 appears before 1 disapper
21:41 Rohit6: alright
21:41 Nerova Riuz GX: 02:01:538 (3) - and this is the most obvious one
21:42 Rohit6: in auto?
21:42 Nerova Riuz GX: test mode will be faster
21:43 Rohit6: hmm okay
21:44 Rohit6: alright fixed almost all of that
21:45 Nerova Riuz GX: okay
21:47 Rohit6: anything else man?
21:47 Nerova Riuz GX: k no
21:48 Rohit6: ok then post
21:48 Rohit6: <3
21:48 Nerova Riuz GX: lemme make another insane
21:48 *Nerova Riuz GX runs

Arphimigon wrote:

hi
[General]
00:10:950 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - In the harder difficulties, the slider points away from the stream meaning the player has to stay put on this slider and making the 1/4 snap to the sliders feel much more pressured, I find this myself pretty unnecessary.
00:57:425 - Consider adding notes before the spinners here in harder diffs for effect.
Almost 20% of the outro isnt mapped, I'd seriously cut the mp3.
I mentioned a bunch of NCs kill me

[Scrubs effected by n/a]
I love this easy, its perfect.
00:22:343 (5) - NC for last note emphasis!
00:27:589 (1) - I would remove this since there is hardly much reason to add it and it is kind of long/arm straining for an easy.
00:42:015 (2,3,1) - These are really sharp angles for easiest diff, sure they are fine but just pointing out that they are generally pretty sharp for easiest diffs. You don't need to respond to this line.
01:10:868 (3,4,1) - This is really hard to play, mostly due to the note and last slider not really complimenting each other at all but instead being very anti-flowy. I feel as though making the slider more linear on both ends of it can make it be played more straight so making this part easier (changing the section is too many work)
Can you NC 01:27:917 (2) - and 01:33:163 (2) - ?
01:46:278 (5) - Oh and that.

Love the easy.

[Normal]
00:19:064 (5) - The sections of this aren't equal, also the start and end angles aren't equal either. You may want to check this over.
00:29:392 (1,2,3,4) - This is a bit confusing spacing wise, if you play it fully then the angles are kind of tricky, and if you play it linearly then the spacing is too low. I would try making these play more straight than this. Made this curved flow
00:32:671 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This feels like too many notes, I'd add some sliders in here. Preferably longer ones.
01:10:048 - Awkwardly missed sound
01:13:163 - And this, it feels more obvious than 01:13:327 -
01:15:130 - I would fill in this empty space, its weird without.
01:37:753 (6,1) - Blanket!

[Hyper]
00:01:360 (1,2,3,4,5) - These are all the same so there is no reason for that end two objects to be different. If you placed the sliders in a square to fix the pattern that could be better. I see you have all these later on the same, if you don't change then perhaps at least making the notes follow the slider so they feel less pressured.
00:27:589 (3) - This should be NCed not the next slider due to downbeat
00:31:359 - Why skipped noise?
00:38:081 (2) - My god I hate saying NC but NC
00:39:556 (1,2) - I'd slider-note these as it fits the music more, the later sliders after are fine.
00:42:179 (1) - Start the slider 1/2 before or add a sound there?
01:04:310 (1,2,3) - This rhythm is awkward, that slider doesnt really fit how the music is in sets of three.
01:11:687 (6,1,2,3) - Due to stacking this plays weird, put on stacking and see for yourself.
Later things are really just repetitions/not important

[Another]
00:16:278 (3) - Instead of stopping all tapping and movement here, how about a triple with a reverse at the end or two slider jumps?
00:29:556 (2,3,4,5) - These really don't feel like they are good in pairs, just having mini-jumps or so feels nicer for the music.
00:39:228 (2,1) - This spacing
00:43:327 (1,2) - I'd much prefer to tap both of those sounds on that 2 slider here
00:46:605 (2) - Pls NC to separate from the last stacked notes, due to followpoints that kinda ruins the feel here
01:03:327 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - This sounds so much more intense than it is mapped, pls add spacing
01:23:819 (6,7,1) - IF you gonna add a triangle triplet, dont make it so spaced. These usually play bad with all the sudden 1/4 snaps unless the map has a lot of them in this sense and its a common theme. made it slightly angled so the last circle feels pressured


[Dark Another]
00:03:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - What's with the jagged point in this stream?
00:08:655 (1) - Remove nc here or on the slider before
00:10:704 (1,2,3) - Stream starting on blue tick + slider jump on blue tick make this misread almost every time. I'd remove the short slider and start the stream 00:11:032 - for simplicity
00:24:146 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is a relatively calm section, can you keep the spacing lower?
01:18:409 (7,8) - Kinda large spacing compared to the last parts if you consider 1/4 snap. I'd reduce a bit.
01:19:392 (4,5,6,7,1) - It makes sense here to go from high spacing to low considering the lowering pitch here.
01:46:278 (1,1) - Pretty close. If I hit one more note on that stream I might risk hitting that early!

*flies*

BOUYAAA wrote:

hi xd

I'd like a full response explaining why you deny stuff pls ty


some diffs end on different spots. Fix that.


Black another

I honestly dont thing the map is dense enough to justify AR9.4 idk i can lower to 9.2 but then it conflicts with the insane diff which feels slow at ar9
there is some pretty spaced stuff compared to what I'm used to see in CS5 diff

00:03:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I know what you're trying to do here but if the edge of the stream is on the last circle of the first 4 circles it puts emphasis on this one 00:03:573 (4) - which is a blue one so that's not what you want. The general shape of the stream isn't that great either imo made it a regular curve
00:08:409 (1) - this should not end on the white tick because that's where your stream should start. Right now your stream starts on a blue tick which is not good. NC might be a mistake here
00:10:704 (1) - same xd
00:12:343 (3) - has its repeat on a strong tick while beginning and end are on weak red ticks. This is counter intuitive and should be avoided. We'll call them a passive slider for now. the ones in the beginning work because you can only hear the synth, but the ones where there are snares and stuff don't work as well. If you're wondering why I'd say that, here is the music theory that explains it a bit better than I do : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30GBgmww1q4. this is also the explanation for the spacing stuff I'll point out later helpful vid
00:14:966 (4) - same applies to that one. the end of this slider has a super loud snare sound which should be clickable while the beginning has nothing. 00:16:605 (7) - 00:17:589 (2) - here are a few other bad ones, try going through your diff and fix the ones that don't fit
00:21:441 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - this transition doesnt work very well because it breaks the player's intuitive movement. I don't think a pich change justifies suchh a break in what people usually call "flow". Separating woth streams should be fine but make sure the gap follow the player's cursor movement.
00:24:310 (3,4,5) - this is where I start to think your spacing is a bit random, it seems like it doesn't complement the music very well. Spacing should be used to create emphasis on strong beats and strong sounds. here you have higher spacing from 3 to 4 which is a red (and thus weak) tick than from 4 to 5 which is a white (and thus strong) tick.
00:27:261 (5,6,1) - same here
00:31:769 (1) - stream starting on blue tick again which is kidn fo meh because it starts on the red tick ended slider on blue and started stream on red
00:32:507 (10,1,2) - this is a bit more minor but having jump patterns like this one with really obtuse angles wakes this harder than it should be since these will rely more on your speed than your aim. changed the angles to make it more comfortable to hit
00:32:835 (2,1) - when objects have a 1/1 gap between them like that it's usually better to either stack them or put higher spacing between them (stack is better though)
00:35:130 (2,3,1) - same spacing stuff as mentionned before. The jump to 1 is super small but has a clap hitsound on it. This is just awkward and doesn't make any sense. Things like that will make your map unintuitive and the wrong objects will be emphasised. there is a lot that is wrong with your spacing in your map and you should go throught it and fix it all unless you have a really good reason to keep it as is (other than aesthetics obviously)
00:48:819 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - this might be just me but the sudden apparition of these doubles makes the whole thing awkward used sliders because everyone complained about the doubles
01:06:933 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - spacing is a bit overdone here compared to the rest of the map imo adjusted the sapcing
01:11:851 (4,5,1) - I got rekt by this but it's probably more because I expected higher spacing to 1
01:13:819 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - I knw this one xd :')
01:15:786 (4,5,6) - another example of jumps with obtuse angles
01:42:179 (8,1) - nc should probably be inverted here to follow the crash cymbal
02:05:950 (1) - this is not snapped correctly

another w/e that title means

00:09:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same remark on spacing than in black another. You know how it works now so try to find these and fix them APPLY TO ALL OTHER DIFFS TOO
00:10:704 (1) - why nc
00:51:687 (2) - would be better if it was mover up a bit for "flow"
01:21:523 (2,3) - same ramark on passive sliders than in the black another APPLY TO ALL OTHER DIFFS TOO
01:30:129 (4,5) - spacing seems high for such a calm part idk
01:40:376 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this doesnt work at all. Sharp turn + spacing means this is very hard and unfitting

insane

00:09:228 (1,2,3,4,5) - obtuse angles blablabla
00:13:819 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - this is aesthetics but you know how this can be improved
00:34:966 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - 00:39:556 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - alot of these jump patterns play meh but this is mainly tied to spacing increased the spacing for emphasis
00:49:802 (1) - you're missing the downbeat. please map it
00:50:048 (2,3,4) - baground sound are probably not audible enough for you to change instrument focus like that idk
01:26:441 (2) - ew what is this shape is this 2009 or something rood , but changed
01:31:687 (2) - ctrl g for better flow
02:05:950 (1) - not snapped correctly should end on blue tick

hyper

00:10:704 (4) - nc should be here if you want one. you probably had issues with ncing here but tthat's mainly because a repeat slider is covering the downbeat
00:48:573 (2,3,4,5) - you can probably find a better rythm for that
00:52:835 - feels empty
01:17:261 (5) - nc should be here since that where the change in the music happens
01:10:048 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - confusing since spacing is almost the same but snapping is different
01:15:950 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - same here
02:05:950 (1) - idk

normal

00:12:507 (2,3) - invert them because passive slider blablablablabal
00:16:441 (5,1,2) - confusing pattern 5 points towards 2 so the most intuitive cursor movement is towards the wrong object. Avoid that.
00:30:212 (4) - shape could really be improved by making the end circular
00:32:671 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - talking about confusing patterns, this should be spaced out more imo
01:13:491 (1) - big question is : would this go through qats
01:15:622 (2,3) - i'd avoid stacking in easier diffs since beginners can't see how many objects there will be this has another issue already mentionned

ez

00:42:015 (2,3,1) - confusing pattern 2 points to 1 so most intuitive thing is to click 1. this might actually cause misses
01:13:491 (2,3,1) - same here, most intuitive movement goes to the end of 1
I think I saw others but I'm too lazy to go through again tbh

k that's it
sry if I sounded mean or something, that's not my intention
most of the issues I pointed out in harder diffs apply to other diffs aswell so make sure you understand them and search for them. Especially spacing.
You can join me ingame if you have questions

Good luck with the map!

Rohit6 wrote:

BOUYAAA wrote:

hi xd

I'd like a full response explaining why you deny stuff pls ty


some diffs end on different spots. Fix that.


Black another

I honestly dont thing the map is dense enough to justify AR9.4 idk i can lower to 9.2 but then it conflicts with the insane diff which feels slow at ar9
there is some pretty spaced stuff compared to what I'm used to see in CS5 diff

00:03:327 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I know what you're trying to do here but if the edge of the stream is on the last circle of the first 4 circles it puts emphasis on this one 00:03:573 (4) - which is a blue one so that's not what you want. The general shape of the stream isn't that great either imo made it a regular curve
00:08:409 (1) - this should not end on the white tick because that's where your stream should start. Right now your stream starts on a blue tick which is not good. NC might be a mistake here
00:10:704 (1) - same xd
00:12:343 (3) - has its repeat on a strong tick while beginning and end are on weak red ticks. This is counter intuitive and should be avoided. We'll call them a passive slider for now. the ones in the beginning work because you can only hear the synth, but the ones where there are snares and stuff don't work as well. If you're wondering why I'd say that, here is the music theory that explains it a bit better than I do : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30GBgmww1q4. this is also the explanation for the spacing stuff I'll point out later helpful vid
00:14:966 (4) - same applies to that one. the end of this slider has a super loud snare sound which should be clickable while the beginning has nothing. 00:16:605 (7) - 00:17:589 (2) - here are a few other bad ones, try going through your diff and fix the ones that don't fit
00:21:441 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - this transition doesnt work very well because it breaks the player's intuitive movement. I don't think a pich change justifies suchh a break in what people usually call "flow". Separating woth streams should be fine but make sure the gap follow the player's cursor movement.
00:24:310 (3,4,5) - this is where I start to think your spacing is a bit random, it seems like it doesn't complement the music very well. Spacing should be used to create emphasis on strong beats and strong sounds. here you have higher spacing from 3 to 4 which is a red (and thus weak) tick than from 4 to 5 which is a white (and thus strong) tick.
00:27:261 (5,6,1) - same here
00:31:769 (1) - stream starting on blue tick again which is kidn fo meh because it starts on the red tick ended slider on blue and started stream on red
00:32:507 (10,1,2) - this is a bit more minor but having jump patterns like this one with really obtuse angles wakes this harder than it should be since these will rely more on your speed than your aim. changed the angles to make it more comfortable to hit
00:32:835 (2,1) - when objects have a 1/1 gap between them like that it's usually better to either stack them or put higher spacing between them (stack is better though)
00:35:130 (2,3,1) - same spacing stuff as mentionned before. The jump to 1 is super small but has a clap hitsound on it. This is just awkward and doesn't make any sense. Things like that will make your map unintuitive and the wrong objects will be emphasised. there is a lot that is wrong with your spacing in your map and you should go throught it and fix it all unless you have a really good reason to keep it as is (other than aesthetics obviously)
00:48:819 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3) - this might be just me but the sudden apparition of these doubles makes the whole thing awkward used sliders because everyone complained about the doubles
01:06:933 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - spacing is a bit overdone here compared to the rest of the map imo adjusted the sapcing
01:11:851 (4,5,1) - I got rekt by this but it's probably more because I expected higher spacing to 1
01:13:819 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4) - I knw this one xd :')
01:15:786 (4,5,6) - another example of jumps with obtuse angles
01:42:179 (8,1) - nc should probably be inverted here to follow the crash cymbal
02:05:950 (1) - this is not snapped correctly

another w/e that title means

00:09:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same remark on spacing than in black another. You know how it works now so try to find these and fix them APPLY TO ALL OTHER DIFFS TOO
00:10:704 (1) - why nc
00:51:687 (2) - would be better if it was mover up a bit for "flow"
01:21:523 (2,3) - same ramark on passive sliders than in the black another APPLY TO ALL OTHER DIFFS TOO
01:30:129 (4,5) - spacing seems high for such a calm part idk
01:40:376 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this doesnt work at all. Sharp turn + spacing means this is very hard and unfitting

insane

00:09:228 (1,2,3,4,5) - obtuse angles blablabla
00:13:819 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - this is aesthetics but you know how this can be improved
00:34:966 (1,2,3,1,2,1,2) - 00:39:556 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - alot of these jump patterns play meh but this is mainly tied to spacing increased the spacing for emphasis
00:49:802 (1) - you're missing the downbeat. please map it
00:50:048 (2,3,4) - baground sound are probably not audible enough for you to change instrument focus like that idk
01:26:441 (2) - ew what is this shape is this 2009 or something rood , but changed
01:31:687 (2) - ctrl g for better flow
02:05:950 (1) - not snapped correctly should end on blue tick

hyper

00:10:704 (4) - nc should be here if you want one. you probably had issues with ncing here but tthat's mainly because a repeat slider is covering the downbeat
00:48:573 (2,3,4,5) - you can probably find a better rythm for that
00:52:835 - feels empty
01:17:261 (5) - nc should be here since that where the change in the music happens
01:10:048 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - confusing since spacing is almost the same but snapping is different
01:15:950 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3) - same here
02:05:950 (1) - idk

normal

00:12:507 (2,3) - invert them because passive slider blablablablabal
00:16:441 (5,1,2) - confusing pattern 5 points towards 2 so the most intuitive cursor movement is towards the wrong object. Avoid that.
00:30:212 (4) - shape could really be improved by making the end circular
00:32:671 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - talking about confusing patterns, this should be spaced out more imo
01:13:491 (1) - big question is : would this go through qats ;-;
01:15:622 (2,3) - i'd avoid stacking in easier diffs since beginners can't see how many objects there will be this has another issue already mentionned

ez

00:42:015 (2,3,1) - confusing pattern 2 points to 1 so most intuitive thing is to click 1. this might actually cause misses
01:13:491 (2,3,1) - same here, most intuitive movement goes to the end of 1
I think I saw others but I'm too lazy to go through again tbh

k that's it
sry if I sounded mean or something, that's not my intention
most of the issues I pointed out in harder diffs apply to other diffs aswell so make sure you understand them and search for them. Especially spacing.
You can join me ingame if you have questions

Good luck with the map!

Arphimigon wrote:

hi
[General]
00:10:950 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - In the harder difficulties, the slider points away from the stream meaning the player has to stay put on this slider and making the 1/4 snap to the sliders feel much more pressured, I find this myself pretty unnecessary.
00:57:425 - Consider adding notes before the spinners here in harder diffs for effect.
Almost 20% of the outro isnt mapped, I'd seriously cut the mp3.
I mentioned a bunch of NCs kill me

[Scrubs effected by n/a]
I love this easy, its perfect.
00:22:343 (5) - NC for last note emphasis!
00:27:589 (1) - I would remove this since there is hardly much reason to add it and it is kind of long/arm straining for an easy.
00:42:015 (2,3,1) - These are really sharp angles for easiest diff, sure they are fine but just pointing out that they are generally pretty sharp for easiest diffs. You don't need to respond to this line.
01:10:868 (3,4,1) - This is really hard to play, mostly due to the note and last slider not really complimenting each other at all but instead being very anti-flowy. I feel as though making the slider more linear on both ends of it can make it be played more straight so making this part easier (changing the section is too many work) changed the angle, it might be better now
Can you NC 01:27:917 (2) - and 01:33:163 (2) - ?
01:46:278 (5) - Oh and that.
All of them are fixed. (maybe.)

Love the easy. thanks.


[Another Another (n/a)]
00:02:671 (6,7) - Unnecesary jump compared to the last parts. i don't think so, this jump is a trail about the stream with jumps after this note.
00:06:605 (1,2) - As with the next sliders, i would make this note come from the slider direction more slightly fixed
00:10:704 (1) - Remove NC? yep i failed on that sht
00:21:605 (6,7,1) - Playing with blueticks and 1/4s then having a weird 1/2 stack is reallllllllllll hard to read. At least space that slider at the end so people don't hit it too early! no i can be sure it's pretty good on gameplay. most ppl can hit that slider correctly at the first time, it can be seen clearly by watching the approach circle.
01:00:212 (1,2) - Can note 2 follow from the slider more since the slider is longer? (longer sliders generally are harder to do angles from) ok im trying
01:14:310 (7,8) - Same as before, I really think there should be like a jump here same
01:30:212 (5) - NC to help justify the change in spacing? ok i'll do that
01:40:704 (5) - ^ (also this spacing is lower) same, and also do sth on that spacing

*flies*

BOUYAAA wrote:

hi xd

I'd like a full response explaining why you deny stuff pls ty im trying my best


some diffs end on different spots. Fix that. I don't think that is an issue actually. Ending on different spots is acceptable

another w/e that title means

00:09:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same remark on spacing than in black another. You know how it works now so try to find these and fix them APPLY TO ALL OTHER DIFFS TOO im sure those spacings here is pretty good, or just because i cant get what you're talking about
00:10:704 (1) - why nc because im retarded! fixed.
00:51:687 (2) - would be better if it was mover up a bit for "flow" ummm nope, it flows good like a wave.
01:21:523 (2,3) - same ramark on passive sliders than in the black another APPLY TO ALL OTHER DIFFS TOO idk but imo passive sliders work well here. no change
01:30:129 (4,5) - spacing seems high for such a calm part idk it separate two different way on expressing. I think it's fine.
01:40:376 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this doesnt work at all. Sharp turn + spacing means this is very hard and unfitting same above. also, it's a circle flow, it won't be too hard to unfit

ez

00:42:015 (2,3,1) - confusing pattern 2 points to 1 so most intuitive thing is to click 1. this might actually cause misses to me it's pretty fine to make a movement like this as an emphases
01:13:491 (2,3,1) - same here, most intuitive movement goes to the end of 1 Umm you mentioned me that here i should use another different parallel pattern, nice
I think I saw others but I'm too lazy to go through again tbh

k that's it
sry if I sounded mean or something, that's not my intention it's okay because i did that for many times ;w;
most of the issues I pointed out in harder diffs apply to other diffs aswell so make sure you understand them and search for them. Especially spacing.
You can join me ingame if you have questions

Good luck with the map!

riktoi wrote:

mod from my mod queue (now with an actual link to the queue111!!) nice banner ayy lmao

[ANOTHER EFFECTED BY.... N / A]

00:50:211 (5,6,7) - up the spacing for quick liftoff well i think raise spacing in only 3 notes here is not really necessary so im going to keep the current

00:57:425 (1) - make spinner end sound silent and move the end to the white tick on the left and add a hitcircle to 00:58:900 - umm that sounds not that good to me :/

[bEGGGINNER EFFECTED BY: N/A]

-nice thx

good luck with your map

riktoi wrote:

mod from my mod queue (now with an actual link to the queue111!!)

[BLACKKKK ANOTHER]

00:25:040 - 00:22:343 - you could increase the sv here a bit to better fit the fast feeling the part has If i increase the sv then it doesnt remain consistent with the rest of the slow parts so no chaneg :c

00:45:294 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - make this less squarey pls like this one 00:49:884 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ugh FINE

01:08:573 (2,3,4,5) - change up the pattern, square no work here

I think this works a bit better (lol still a square)

Changed it to make 3,4,5 more impactful

01:10:376 (3,3) - these are intended to use the background melody as hitsound right Yes

02:01:359 (3,4,5,6) - the square fits, good jobthank


[...INSANE?]

00:35:458 (1,2,1,2) - I don't think this massive spacing is needed Toned down the spacing

00:39:556 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - do you hate fun Yes

01:10:048 (1,2,3) - disrupts flow too much, use the same pattern as here 01:12:671 (2,3,4) Done

01:27:917 (1,2) - is 2 supposed to be blanketed by 1? >2015
>blanket modding

01:33:163 (1) - the sliderstart stacks whistle, finish and clap on it(finish being the sliderslide). I don't think this is what you want(unless I'm missing something) Removed Finnish :^)

01:53:327 (1,2,3,4,5) - tilt this a bit so 01:53:327 (1,4) - overlap 01:54:146 (1) - equally Okay , comrade

[HYpER]

00:21:196 (1) - I don't really like how this skips the drum, try a reverse slider or something I wanted to keep this diff a bit mroe lenient than the rest ,so I avoided the drum here
00:31:687 (6) - (and this misses the electronic sound)Same as above

00:56:441 - drag the break here Good thinking

02:04:966 - you can just start the spinner hereAdded a few beats before the spinner like 00:41:032 (1,2,1,2) here

[NoRMAL]

00:59:064 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - FAR TOO LOUDmade it 80% jeez


good luck with your mapthank

1. 01:18:737 (3) - Should be straight to make it blanket better
2. 01:27:917 (1) - Fix blanket lol
3. 01:27:917 (1,1) - The curve near the sliders' start should be parallel

1. 00:13:491 (5) - Reduce roundness this curves too much
2. 00:15:622 - This beat here should be mapped with a circle
3. 00:24:638 (2,3,4) - Fix ds
4. 00:30:212 (4) - Fix curve
5. 01:00:540 (4,5,6,7) - Maybe change pattern the flow here is kinda bad for new players
6. 01:24:802 (4,1) - Since 4 is curving ''up'' so it'll be better if 1's head starts where the curve is pointing to
7. 01:41:359 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I think 7 notes is too much change 2 of them to a 1/2 slider

1. 00:06:605 (1,2,3,4) - These should have same ds since its same rhythm. change the pattern to make that because ik 4 gunna be out of grid
2. 00:21:196 (1) - remove nc
3. 00:49:556 (6) - ctrl+h makes flow better
4. 00:57:425 (1) - fix curving O.o the S is weird right now
5. 01:25:294 - I Think SV change at this part is too much for a hyper diff
6. 01:48:081 - HS is too loud after this

1. 00:01:360 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - nice pattern
2. 00:09:228 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Its same rhythm so this should have same patterns (fix 00:10:704 (1) - )
3. 00:24:146 (1,2,3,4) - Fix square
4. 00:25:786 (1,2,3) - should be same with 00:25:130 (5,6,7)
5. 00:26:769 (1,2,3,4) - Fix square
6. 00:29:392 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - Should have same ds
7. 01:05:622 (1,2,3) - start on red ticks
8. 01:18:409 (4,5) - Should be 2 circles
9. 01:23:819 (6,7,1) - make a straight line or fix the curve, make it smoother pls
10. 01:27:917 (1,2) - blanket
11. 01:46:605 - after this part hs is too loud

1. 00:53:819 (8) - Stack on 00:52:998 (4)
2. 01:30:130 (4,1) - 4 -> 1 ds is too much imo

1. 00:01:360 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I think the ds from slider -> circle should be increasing like 3 -> 4 should hav more ds than 1 -> 2
2. 01:13:819 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1) - Fix stream shape its weird
   
   Sry i didnt point much in this. since ''extra'' is mapping that shows creativity of the mapper, so some mapper specific pattern should be fine