1. Hard (3.33 stars, 185 notes)
2. Liar (4.55 stars, 253 notes)
3. Normal (2.05 stars, 138 notes)
4. Easy (1.42 stars, 88 notes)

P A N wrote:

LIAR

• 
  00:41:104 - add a note?

• 
  00:58:769 - add a note
  00:54:936 (1) - move this to (136,272)(maybe a little different) to make it looks in order
  00:57:269 (7) - this to (252,312)
  01:12:769 (6) - move this slider to01:12:936 - and end at01:13:103 - and add one note at01:12:769 -

• 
  maybe AR8.5 is better
  00:26:771 (3,4) - it's very difficult to read
  00:32:104 (3,4) - i thik it's better like this
  click

  http://puu.sh/ccVDV/08bd21bc78.jpg

Setsurei wrote:

[Normal]
00:41:104 - thanks for pointing. well, density will be too high, so I'll delete 00:40:770 - for consistency
[Hard]
00:58:769 - added
00:54:936 (1) - on purpose because blanket 00:54:936 (1,4) - and DS consistency
00:57:269 (7) - diamond pattern at 00:56:603 (5,6,7,1) -
01:12:769 (6) - changed
[LIAR]
AR9 so when on reff it is suitable (actually I want this to be 9.5 but because of the slow opening, I decreased it to 9)
00:26:771 (3,4) - I'll change it to triplets
00:32:104 (3,4) - I can't open the puu.sh orz, anyway this is a parallelogram pattern here 00:32:104 (3,4,5,6) -

thanks for mod! updated

click

LucyAkuzumi wrote:

Awesome! It would've been better with a video. I can give you an HD one if you like, I wouldn't mind.

kamikin wrote:

NO KUDOSU
Consider adding 'opening' and '2' to your tags

Edit: Your default hitsound doesn't really go with the song and at the beginning of normal, consider making them quieter

1. Have a blank slider slide.. mainly since in the beginning the default sound is really annoying http://puu.sh/cdUpX/83e54e20a9.wav

1. AR 5 is too high.. doesnt fit this song. lower it a bit pls
2. 00:01:482 (1) - i suggest having a lower SV especially here(rest of the song as well) preferably around x1.10??; since this part of the song is really slow and the current SV really doesnt work well. x1.40 SV is the average SV for hard diffs
3. 00:07:082 (4) - add finish on body
4. 00:11:062 (1) - add finish
5. 00:23:937 (3,4) - maybe unstack? this stacking is kind of random since you didnt do it anywhere else up until here
6. 00:24:271 (4) - i really suggest changing this part so the strong beats on 00:24:604 - and 00:24:937 - are more emphasized
7. 00:29:604 (3) - finish on tail?
8. 00:42:937 (2) - change this part so the downbeat here is emphasized
9. 00:44:270 (1) - add finish; you can hear it in the music
10. 00:45:604 - add note? theres a sound here and it has an awkward pause right now//
11. 00:49:270 (3) - overlaps health bar; move it down
12. 00:50:270 (5) - slider is questionable.. is it really necessary ?the overlap can easily confuse beginners
13. 01:03:436 (2) - add finish on head
14. 01:04:936 (1,2) - maybe you can use 2 1/2 sliders here instead since there is the drum in the music..?
15. 01:04:936 (1,2) - i havent mentioned this much throughout the song but try to give notes a smoother transition/ flow, this is an example of an awkward flow.. doing something like this would be better
    SPOILER

    
    go through the diff and fix some of these
16. 01:09:269 (3) - slider shape doesnt really match music? put the red square on the slider tick for it to match the beat
    SPOILER

    
17. 01:28:269 (3) - you cannot silence notes according to the ranking criteria.. but silencing a spinner is ok :3

1. 00:02:282 (2) - make this a 1/1 repeat slider to follow the music better
2. 00:12:662 (1) - end this a bit earlier; for hard it is suggested to have 375ms of recovery time from a spinner to the next note; here you only have 300 t/241019
3. 00:15:438 (2,4) - remove; so you can have better consistency with 00:17:604 (1,2,3) - but its okay to have 00:22:937 (1,2,3,4,5) - since the music gets louder and more dominant
4. 00:30:271 (1) - not sure if this SV change is necessary...
5. 00:33:604 (1,2,3) - here you have two options from me. 1. remove 00:34:104 (2,3) - and add a repeat on 00:33:604 (1) - since there is a more dominant sound on 00:34:271 (3) - than 00:34:104 (2) - so it would only make sense. 2. delete 00:34:104 (2) - , same reasoning
6. 00:34:937 (5,6,7,8) - sound is all the same but 00:35:437 (8) - is a slider.. kind of random, make them all circles or 1/2 repeat sliders
7. 00:39:104 (4) - remove.. it serves no purpose
8. 00:40:770 (2,3,4) - when it comes to that you must map vocals please avoid mapping every single syllable; it becomes overmapped
9. 00:42:770 (2) - remove
10. 00:43:270 - - emphaisize this downbeat here by starting a note on it
11. 00:57:269 (7) - ovelaps (4) doesnt look so good..
12. 00:57:603 (1) - try this? matches music better imo
    SPOILER

    
13. 00:59:269 (3) - remove this and start (2) at 00:59:103 - to match the music
14. 00:59:603 (1,1) - flow is awkward here
15. 01:05:103 (2,4) - stack is off
16. 01:07:936 (2) - remove and make 01:07:603 (1) - a 1/1 slider since you map more than needed, theres no need to make the diff harder just because its a hard
17. 01:08:269 (3) - try this? to match the music better and ^
    SPOILER

    
18. 01:17:269 (3,4) - why this random distance change? nothing in the music is significant here
19. 01:29:353 (3) - same as normal

1. 00:03:082 (3,4) - this distance and the shape of (4) is inconsistent with 00:01:482 (1,2) - .. make it more consistent?
2. 00:20:271 (1) - your missing a chance here for a triplet! theres a sound on 00:20:271 - 00:20:437 - 00:20:604 - you should map
3. 00:26:771 (3,4) - remove these
4. 00:24:604 - should be emphasized and made into something clickable..
5. just a circle at 00:29:604 - is fine.. no need for the 1/2 slider 00:29:437 (3) -
6. 00:30:271 (1) - SV change imo isnt needed
7. 00:47:270 (4) - a 1/1 repeat slider would work better here to emphasize the beat at 00:47:604 -
8. 00:48:937 (2,3,4,1) - this distance inconsistency tho ;P
9. 01:00:269 (1) - ctrl+g for better circular flow
10. 01:01:936 (1,2,3,4) - these jumps are too much.. lessen them a bit
11. 01:12:769 (6) - isnt needed make (5) a slider, try not to over complicate rhythms
12. 01:19:769 (4) - stack onto (3) since this is really hard to read
13. 01:29:353 (4) - same as normal and hard
    
    map still needs some work; mainly on insane and hard where you make rhythms harder and it doesnt really follow anything; and in insane; watch out for inconsistent spacing that i didnt point out

1. Difficulty curve may be too messy. Try making Normal harder or Harder easier.

Nozhomi wrote:

[General]
Disable Widescreen Support and Letterbox during breaks. ok, lol this was automatically assigned to it so I didn't notice that it was checked
Maybe disable Countdown too ? same case as above, removed
Why mp3 is so much cut at the end ? It's like this on original 'tv size' version ? I take the mp3 from this file

Ranking Criteria wrote:

A difficulty's name must indicate its level of difficulty, with the exception of the hardest level of difficulty in a set. The mapset's hardest difficulty may use an appropriate custom difficulty name, unrelated to an username. Mapsets may also use a complete set of custom difficulty names that clearly indicate their level of difficulty to the player. Marathon maps with a single difficulty may use free naming.

• 01:19:103 (1,2,3) - DS 1.5
  01:19:436 (3,4) - normal DS
  01:20:269 (1,2,3,4,5) - DS 1.5

1. 00:30:104 - tambah not deh disini
2. 00:58:603 - ^
3. 01:08:936 - ^
4. 01:10:269 (3) - dipendekin sampe 01:10:436 coba
5. 00:15:438 - tambah not , ada lirik nya disini
6. 01:25:269 (3,4) - Ctrl+G ?

• 
  Ubah HP Drain ke 6 ?
  []

1. 00:36:771 - tambahin not disini ?
2. 00:37:771 (5) - digeser ke 00:37:937 , terus 00:37:771 tambah not
   SPOILER

   
3. 00:30:771 - tambah not ? taruh di tempat 00:30:937 (1)
4. 01:05:769 (1) - hapus , (overnote)
5. 01:21:103 (1,2) - ubah ke slider aja mendingan ..
6. 01:25:103 (2,3) - Ctrl+G disini , biar dapet flownya

NoHitter wrote:

This song is actually in compound timing. That means you have to map it in 1/3.
Edit: At least for the first part

1. 00:22:271 (6,1) - You can improve this blanket while keeping a nice flow.
2. 00:32:937 (5,1) - ^^
3. 00:33:604 (1,2) - ^^
4. 00:50:270 (5) - God, this shape is quite nice.
5. I liked the Normal. Pretty sliders. \o/

1. 00:30:271 (1) - Hard players aren't fully used to SV changes, and by making one of this kind players would most likely lose combo by disrupting the flow they got used to. Better keep SV the same or don't use such a short value.
2. From 01:20:269 - until 01:21:603 - playability becomes ankward. I know it's because of the song and not of the map, but in this part you could use sliders to make an easier to read flow, since players won't be able to read sudden beats with song's "disrupted" rhythm.

• 
  00:08:662 (1,2,3) - a bit boring, try this
  
  and 00:10:262 (1,2,3,4,5) - ctrl + h
  00:15:493 (2,3,4,5) - move tp x:75 y:220
  00:19:493 (4,5,6) - move to x:308 y:134
  00:39:271 (2) - ctrl + g
  00:43:937 (2) - move to x:401 y:274
  00:46:937 (2,3) - try
  
  00:56:158 (5) - blanket well
  00:59:603 (1,2) - the flow here is bad, try
  
  01:25:269 (3) - move to x:356 y:173

• 
  00:34:937 (4,5,6) - its a little bit too hard to read in this diff, just replace 00:34:937 (4) - by two notes
  i think this diff can be more irregular
  try to adjust the distance between notes which are closed with each other.

• 
  00:08:662 (2,3) - ther are not paralle.
  01:06:936 (2,3,1) - adjust the location. 2: x:225 y:135 3: x:248 y:367 1: x:236 y:131

Nagi awa wrote:

看首页好像是懂中文的？ 一点点

1. the spread feel nice, sadly In my opinion your normal is too hard to be the easy diff of the set, since the spacing and SV make me feel that this set need a real easy diff
2. I guess the correct tittle is ¨Liar Mask as the video show:
   
   SPOILER

   
   maybe ask for some metadata check

1. HP 7 is better for this kind of map IMO
2. OD 8 pls, try to don't have OD -2 respect to AR
3. 00:03:882 (4) - add clap on tail (the whistle that are you using as clap) since I know that broke your hitsound pattern, but the sound in the music is really clear tho
4. 00:04:682 (1,2,3,4,5) - same as above
5. 00:06:882 add a circle? since this is the place where the music is starting again
6. 00:12:662 add a circle and start the spinner 1/4 later? for better rhythm
7. 00:14:938 (1,2,3) - the spacing look the same, but in the timeline is different, this can be really confused to play, space 00:14:938 (1,2) - this a bit more, a easy solution can be just stacking 2 and 3
8. 00:16:271 (5,6,7) - same problem the spacing in 5 and 6 is too short compared to 6 and 7, this can be confused when playing, maybe make 5 and 6 a jump too?
9. 00:24:604 (8) - add clap (your fake whistle xD)
10. 00:31:382 probably adding a circle here can be a nice idea
11. 00:45:937 (6,1) - nazi, this is not stacked properly
12. 00:46:937 (2,3) - make this a slider? to fit the vocals better, since there is not a prominent sound at 00:47:104 (3) - and is a bit weird to me
13. 01:02:269 (3,6) - same as 00:45:937
14. 01:10:769 add finish or whistle? since the music need more feedback IMO
15. 01:16:103 ^
16. 01:17:769 (1,2) - CTRL G the rhythm here? it will fit better the vocals and the active beats in the music
17. 01:26:103 (2,3,4) - really confused to play, 3 and 4 should have less spacing than 2 and 3
18. 01:27:436 (2,3,4) - ^
19. 01:29:353 (4) - is just me or this slider sound a lot better ending in 01:29:603 - this apply for every diff if you agree

1. OD and HP +1
2. Hitsounds suggestion from ¨LIAR¨ can apply here as well
3. 00:12:662 (1) - same suggestion as ¨LIAR¨, adding a circle and starting the spinner 1/4 later can improve the rhythm
4. 00:15:493 add a circle? will be really nice to play, like you did on your Insane
5. 00:21:271 (4,5,6) - nazi, this is not stacked properly
6. 00:22:937 (1,2,3,4,5) - just as my personal opinion, I don't like how the 1/2 beats get overlaped at this part, by using 1.2 spacing you can avoid this, and this will look totally better IMO: (if you agree this apply for other sections as well)
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:30:160 (4,1) - can be a nice idea if you stack them, will be more intuitive to play
8. 00:40:270 (1,2,3,4) - same as 00:22:937 -, my main reason to suggest that, is cuz some of your overlapped 1/2, look kinda the same as the 1/3 pattern for example with this 00:34:604 (3,4,5,6,7) -
9. 00:43:270 (2,3,4,1) - this spacing can take some player down, mainly cuz they look visually the same, but they are different gaps in the timeline
10. 00:47:937 (5,1) - this blanket look really off
11. 00:52:270 same as 00:12:662
12. 01:29:353 (3) - same suggestion as LIAR

1. 00:14:938 (1) - too soon after a spinner, normal diff at this bpm, maybe need two beats of recovery
2. 00:54:936 (1) - ^
3. 01:22:269 (1) - ^
4. 01:28:269 (3) - same as other diff, also the last curve of this slider can be improved

CPLs wrote:

ooh great

just a thought, how about making the slider at the end of the song faster? (in hardest diff)

1. 00:29:937 (3) - Change this to repeat slider (2)? Just personal opinion but feels weird since the vocals are more of extended from the previous word.
2. 00:56:269 (1,2) - Slider (1)'s end and (2)'s head didn't start on any prominent point in the song. End (1) slightly earlier(1/2 beat?) and start (2) at 00:56:103 and extend the end to current's end?
3. 00:58:936 (1,2) - ^
4. 01:06:269 (3) - Slider seems to end awkwardly, try half beat earlier?
5. 01:08:269 (1) - ^
6. 01:10:936 (4) - Start half beat earlier?
7. 01:12:936 (6) - Slider seems to end awkwardly here too.
8. 01:16:269 (1) - Start half beat earlier at 01:16:103 ?

-Iz wrote:

I'm not sure if you're refraining from mapping on red ticks because it's an Easy, if that's the case you can probably disregard most of my mod, but it sounds really awkward (to me) because I don't feel it playing with the vocals, and there aren't a lot of other instruments to map to in those parts.

1. The distance snap between 00:07:482 (4) - and 00:07:862 (1) - is smaller than the distance snap before that (because you changed slider velocity on that slider). I'd suggest fixing that since easy maps look a lot better if they are uniform IMO.
2. 00:07:862 (1,2,3) - The distance snap between these also looks different, did you change (increase) it there?
3. 01:16:269 (1) - I had trouble with that when playing your map because starting that slider at a red tick seems more natural to me. The beat on the red tick is much more pronounced than the one on the white tick, where you started it on. I'd suggest maybe starting the slider at the red tick.