Kaaruumii wrote:
honestly patatitta's thread was wayyyyy too much to read to try to understand what the thread was about
sometimes people just dont wanna read 10+ paragraphs of a thread event they dont know if they would be interested in participating in or not
idk, all my older threads kinda followed the same style, and my previous thread actually did really good, I actually mentioned wanting to make this thread, and I got a thumbs up to actually make it, something that I hadn't done with any of my previous threads, and this is the one that by has flopped the hardest, which I think it's a bit of a shame since I actually have qualifications on the stuff i'm talking about and had a possible follow up thread
it's fine to not interact with a thread, sometimes you're not in the mood for it, but what I think it's a bit hypocritical is to ask for high quality thread, and then not putting the effort to actually interact with the threads when they appear, most of the time high quality threads tend to be very dense since there is so much stuff packed in a single thread (Not calling you out specifically, just, in general)
and I know that in no time someone will complain about the current meta of appreciation threads and about how it is low effort, which is very ironic, when there have been like 2 or 3, very different, high quality threads in the last week that all have flopped
it makes sense for my thread to kinda flop, that's what 80% of my threads do, in fact that 15% are mostly threads I had no emotinal connection to and I kinda just pushed, but the fact that multiple, different high quality threads failed, at the same time, that just sucks