EZ
00:16:387 Why didn't you put a note here? To avoid repetition? Or no drum? Tone changes here.
00:19:589 I'm sure that this note placement was intentional, but I feel that it would be better served at 00:19:758 because not only is it a drum sound, but it changes tone there as well.
00:28:353 Why not something like this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8545333
I feel that the doubles are awkward, so I changed it. Doesn't change star rating as well.
00:59:364 I like what you did here, but are you sure that the lower ranking will feel the same? (Talking about the stack) I suggest something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8545840
01:12:847 are you sure that this stack is good? it's small. (Honestly with the stacks, I'm just swinging at air right now. I don't mind them, but I'm trying to think that it would be a lower ranking 100K~ player playing this. Although it's hard to do that when you aren't one, you know?)
01:22:454 I'm just pointing out that you didn't do these with the others before it. Changed up your style? or?
00:19:589 I'm sure that this note placement was intentional, but I feel that it would be better served at 00:19:758 because not only is it a drum sound, but it changes tone there as well.
00:28:353 Why not something like this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8545333
I feel that the doubles are awkward, so I changed it. Doesn't change star rating as well.
00:59:364 I like what you did here, but are you sure that the lower ranking will feel the same? (Talking about the stack) I suggest something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/8545840
01:12:847 are you sure that this stack is good? it's small. (Honestly with the stacks, I'm just swinging at air right now. I don't mind them, but I'm trying to think that it would be a lower ranking 100K~ player playing this. Although it's hard to do that when you aren't one, you know?)
01:22:454 I'm just pointing out that you didn't do these with the others before it. Changed up your style? or?
HXJ's NM
Why are these 00:03:241 different leingths then these 00:04:505 I'm asking because They sound very similar and if anything, it would help differentiate between 00:03:241 and 00:02:904 Although I would like to see your POV here.
00:22:960 It would seem that you mapped the long tone here, (There's a long tone and a short tone) yet around it, you mapped the short tones before and after. The short tone here is abrupt. Lower the tail to the blue tick in between the white and red ticks.
00:22:286 Actually looking from here, all LN short tone sounds end on a blue tick. Are you doing that to make the LN's easier? Or were you genuinly trying to map it exactly to the music? (I'm not questioning your mapping ability, just your intent. I don't understand what you wanted this section to be.)
00:24:814 why is this note a LN? wouldn't it be better as a triplet?
00:33:072 here is hard to play accuratly when I don't do my usual HD mod. (I should be fine at this difficulty without HD, trust me xD)
The way I'd map this part (Just if it was me) is that (along with the LN in column |3|) I would add a single to the following time points.
00:33:746 00:34:589 00:35:482 00:36:106
and then turn the singles to LN with the tail of the previous note attached to the head of the next note. (I hope I explained myself well)
01:12:005 I feel like it'd be cool if you made this 1 long note and mapped the sextuplets (2 triplets.) with the 1st note of each triplet in the same column to give it a bit of accent.
00:22:960 It would seem that you mapped the long tone here, (There's a long tone and a short tone) yet around it, you mapped the short tones before and after. The short tone here is abrupt. Lower the tail to the blue tick in between the white and red ticks.
00:22:286 Actually looking from here, all LN short tone sounds end on a blue tick. Are you doing that to make the LN's easier? Or were you genuinly trying to map it exactly to the music? (I'm not questioning your mapping ability, just your intent. I don't understand what you wanted this section to be.)
00:24:814 why is this note a LN? wouldn't it be better as a triplet?
00:33:072 here is hard to play accuratly when I don't do my usual HD mod. (I should be fine at this difficulty without HD, trust me xD)
The way I'd map this part (Just if it was me) is that (along with the LN in column |3|) I would add a single to the following time points.
00:33:746 00:34:589 00:35:482 00:36:106
and then turn the singles to LN with the tail of the previous note attached to the head of the next note. (I hope I explained myself well)
01:12:005 I feel like it'd be cool if you made this 1 long note and mapped the sextuplets (2 triplets.) with the 1st note of each triplet in the same column to give it a bit of accent.
HD
00:33:072 why is this less dense then the NM?
Don't have much else to say about this difficulty. (Nothing I could see anyways)
Don't have much else to say about this difficulty. (Nothing I could see anyways)
Mx
00:11:668 are you sure you want this LN to be a Shield LN?
00:11:836 I don't think this should be a hand.
00:12:005 I think this should be a hand.
00:12:089 Ghost note? (I went back over it and played the song without notes. I can barely hear that tone, you sure you want a note there? It's not a ghost note, but it might as well be.)
00:13:582 Should also be a hand I think.
A little self modding could go for the rest of that section (Similar parts as 00:11:668)
00:20:937 These Hand hammers are something else.
01:17:904 Whats with the stack bruh? (Column |2|)
(The rest of the part had "Some" stacking, but not as long as that one, so I figured I'd point it out)
00:11:836 I don't think this should be a hand.
00:12:005 I think this should be a hand.
00:12:089 Ghost note? (I went back over it and played the song without notes. I can barely hear that tone, you sure you want a note there? It's not a ghost note, but it might as well be.)
00:13:582 Should also be a hand I think.
A little self modding could go for the rest of that section (Similar parts as 00:11:668)
00:20:937 These Hand hammers are something else.
01:17:904 Whats with the stack bruh? (Column |2|)
(The rest of the part had "Some" stacking, but not as long as that one, so I figured I'd point it out)
Nightmare is it's own monster. I don't really have any experience modding anything greater than 4.8*'s So I think I'll pass on that one.
It's a good map in general, honestly, most of the things I pointed out are just small minor inconsistancies or something along those lines. Good luck on getting ranked!