1. Infel Phira (4.22 stars, 761 notes)

The Pun-nisher wrote:

came from #modreqs...my first mod ever....sorry if not helpful

00:09:124 (5) - nc Not necessary, It'll kill the combo counts
00:10:324 (1) - remove nc Nope, need to do that since it's the new section of the vocal
01:53:784 (4) - nc Unfortunately the NC won't fit at here
03:43:215 (1) - might want to be 2 beat longer Nope, the vocal actually stop at 03:44:190 - which is the current spinner's end
04:18:337 (1) - move nc to 04:18:662 (2) - Nope, the big white lines start at 04:18:337 (1) - means it's a new section
05:16:141 (5) - nc Doable but not pretty necessary
05:31:751 (5) - ^ same
05:46:141 (1) - look better if blanket imo Probably it's intentionally to be not blanketed


i like the song Thanks!

Sotarks wrote:

hi

[Infel Phira]
00:28:324 (4,5,6) - replacing those by a 1/3 slider would be better gameplay wise to avoid miss acc on 00:28:724 (5,6) - those notes.
00:30:724 (2,3,4) - ^ makes sense

00:59:312 (1) - i'd rather unstack it to get more impact on the kick here
01:07:117 (1) - ^ edit: i saw u did that everywhere feel free to keep it lo yeaaap. wanna keep the concept for the similar song

01:13:702 (2,3) - replacing those by a 1/4 slider will be nice!

01:50:450 (4) - this is so awful to play aaa did something

02:47:361 (2,3) - 1/4 slider?

02:48:093 (5,6,7) - i'd rather keep ds here

03:19:800 (1,2,3,4) - pls silence those slider ends ? Naah, the slider ends is intentionally sounded to follow the music better imo

04:29:637 (4,5,6) - pls remove this, there's no decent beat to actually put 1/6 like that

04:36:873 (2,3) - silence those ends ?

05:16:385 (6) - i missreaded this maybe reduce spacing of 05:15:898 (4,6) - this or increase 05:16:385 (6) - . did something based on the 2nd option

05:16:873 (1) - do you need such anchors for this slider ? xd Mir suggested Xd

05:35:410 (4) - extend this slider like you did previously ? Want to do something different at here, but let's just see

cute map! Thanks

Shurelia wrote:

Sotarks wrote:

hi

[Infel Phira]
00:28:324 (4,5,6) - replacing those by a 1/3 slider would be better gameplay wise to avoid miss acc on 00:28:724 (5,6) - those notes.
00:30:724 (2,3,4) - ^ makes sense

00:59:312 (1) - i'd rather unstack it to get more impact on the kick here
01:07:117 (1) - ^ edit: i saw u did that everywhere feel free to keep it lo yeaaap. wanna keep the concept for the similar song

01:13:702 (2,3) - replacing those by a 1/4 slider will be nice! - nah i don't think so, should be clickable because a 1/6 stream is very unlikely at this bpm so players will assume it's 1/4 because it's definitely not 1/3 since those are the jumps

01:50:450 (4) - this is so awful to play aaa did something

02:47:361 (2,3) - 1/4 slider? - same reasoning as above

02:48:093 (5,6,7) - i'd rather keep ds here - i don't think it's too necessary to keep ds here

03:19:800 (1,2,3,4) - pls silence those slider ends ? Naah, the slider ends is intentionally sounded to follow the music better imo

04:29:637 (4,5,6) - pls remove this, there's no decent beat to actually put 1/6 like that - it's a creative liberty in which i use those for the vocal trill, which is very noticeable imo

04:36:873 (2,3) - silence those ends ? - i don't think it's necessary o.O

05:16:385 (6) - i missreaded this maybe reduce spacing of 05:15:898 (4,6) - this or increase 05:16:385 (6) - . did something based on the 2nd option

05:16:873 (1) - do you need such anchors for this slider ? xd Mir suggested Xd

05:35:410 (4) - extend this slider like you did previously ? Want to do something different at here, but let's just see

cute map! Thanks

Thanks for the mod

[Nemesis] wrote:

M4M

00:48:654 - this slider can really be disturbing, it's faster than 00:43:924 (1) - , even though they represent the same sound, I'd recommend slowing it down a little
00:57:361 (1) - just optional, but this is really REALLY difficult to follow and flows pretty badly by itself, maybe stretch and straighten it out a little?
00:59:312 (1) - curve it a bit more
01:17:849 (3) - if you take a look from this exact moment you can clearly see a blanket being off - shurelia fix im lazy
01:19:637 (2,3) - again - shurelia fix im lazy
01:21:589 (2,3) - aaaaagain - shurelia fix im lazy
05:39:637 (2) - increase the spacing between this and (1)
05:39:637 (2) - I fucking love vocals in this part <3

solid map, only a couple of aesthetic changes are required, rest is picco bello.

Artikash wrote:

shitmodder inc
you are 100x more experienced at mapping; sry if this isn't helpful

00:09:124 (5) - NC
00:15:724 (3) - why the awkward flow?
00:18:724 (5) - NC
00:55:410 (1,2,3) - would flow better with the slider being a bit higher
01:15:735 (3) - overmap I think? - nah there's a harp there
01:39:312 (2) - I'd put 1/3 circles for this on lower spacing than the next 3, these sounds are all quite strong
01:40:288 (1,2) - I think 4 sliders starting on each vocal with 1/3 maybe 1/6 gaps would better reflect the song and be less boring to play
01:44:190 (1,2) - ^
01:51:101 (5) - move middle anchor down for better flow
02:26:141 (3) - sv 1.00 could build up to the next section the same way the song building up right now - nah i think it's fine as it is
03:03:540 (4) - overmapped - harp is there
03:52:971 (1,2) - see 1:40:288 (1,2)
03:56:873 (1,2) - ^
04:08:580 (1,2) - ^
04:12:483 (5,6) - ^ also NC
04:18:662 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - bit overboard on the overlaps, I don't think this is sightreadable
04:27:117 (2) - doesn't sound right - you're right it's 1/4, changed
05:02:239 (3,4,5) - looks kinda ugly my suggestion: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7847475 - breaks my original idea way too much and it looks fine to me

[Nemesis] wrote:

M4M

00:48:654 - this slider can really be disturbing, it's faster than 00:43:924 (1) - , even though they represent the same sound, I'd recommend slowing it down a little yeah, did slow this thing a bit
00:57:361 (1) - just optional, but this is really REALLY difficult to follow and flows pretty badly by itself, maybe stretch and straighten it out a little? did some new adjustmens
00:59:312 (1) - curve it a bit more done
01:17:849 (3) - if you take a look from this exact moment you can clearly see a blanket being off - shurelia fix im lazy
01:19:637 (2,3) - again - shurelia fix im lazy
01:21:589 (2,3) - aaaaagain - shurelia fix im lazy
05:39:637 (2) - increase the spacing between this and (1) sure
05:39:637 (2) - I fucking love vocals in this part <3 Me too!

solid map, only a couple of aesthetic changes are required, rest is picco bello.

Artikash wrote:

shitmodder inc
you are 100x more experienced at mapping; sry if this isn't helpful

00:09:124 (5) - NC Naah, not really necessary
00:15:724 (3) - why the awkward flow? Is it? Well, the sudden changes are for emphasizing things
00:18:724 (5) - NC same
00:55:410 (1,2,3) - would flow better with the slider being a bit higher did a bit adjustments
01:15:735 (3) - overmap I think? - nah there's a harp there
01:39:312 (2) - I'd put 1/3 circles for this on lower spacing than the next 3, these sounds are all quite strong But it'll kill the next 3 sounds that you mentioned since it'll play too similar on each other
01:40:288 (1,2) - I think 4 sliders starting on each vocal with 1/3 maybe 1/6 gaps would better reflect the song and be less boring to play Naah, I want to give the players a bit of rest but good idea. I'd consider when other people mention this thing again.
01:44:190 (1,2) - ^
01:51:101 (5) - move middle anchor down for better flow dunno what for but yeh
02:26:141 (3) - sv 1.00 could build up to the next section the same way the song building up right now - nah i think it's fine as it is
03:03:540 (4) - overmapped - harp is there
03:52:971 (1,2) - see 1:40:288 (1,2) same reason
03:56:873 (1,2) - ^
04:08:580 (1,2) - ^
04:12:483 (5,6) - ^ also NC NC'd
04:18:662 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - bit overboard on the overlaps, I don't think this is sightreadable Naah , did some testplays with other players, it plays fine.
04:27:117 (2) - doesn't sound right - you're right it's 1/4, changed
05:02:239 (3,4,5) - looks kinda ugly my suggestion: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7847475 - breaks my original idea way too much and it looks fine to me

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello there mod from my queue~ Hi Henry!

Infel Phira

1. 00:19:324 (6,1) - blanket? Blanket
2. 00:28:323 (4) - NC for the rhythm change, same at 00:30:724 (2) - and then 00:31:924 (5) - to separate it also. On the other hand, NCing places like 00:38:324 (5,6) - wouldn't make that much sense due the structure done, all of them
3. 00:36:124 - why no same thing as at 00:24:124 (4) - woops, missed that ,nice one
4. 00:40:324 (2,3) - timing not good enough Is it? , We'll check
5. 00:54:272 (2,3) - you might need to re-arrange this pattern a lil more to achieve it, but I recommend using sliders at first to familiarize the player with the 1/3 rhythm base. After couple iterations you can just begin using the circles then. Changed 00:54:272 - as a 1/3 slider instead, hopefully I'm doing it right
6. 00:55:410 (1,2,3,4) - looks haphazard both visually and flow-wise, you can do better done
7. 01:02:239 (4,5) - either both or just 01:02:727 (5) - needs to be slightly less curved for the intended pattern to look good Both
8. 01:08:580 (4,1) - fix blanket Sorry for making you cheacking my blankets u,u
9. 01:10:532 (4,1,2,3) - kinda unnecessary overlap imo, but atleast you could then triangle 01:11:019 (1,2,3) - for more structured feel. And then also fix the blanket between 01:11:507 (3,4) - and also 01:12:483 (5,1) - . Uh actually looks like there might be hella lot of blankets off, kinda rushed feeling. Just check yourself
10. 01:13:946 (4) - NC?
11. 01:17:361 (2) - yeah this is what we needed in the beginning of the section done
12. 01:31:995 (4,5,6) - why suddenly stream like spacing for these 1/3? Possible confusion with 1/4 inc, also I think the music would justify more spacing for these, there are distinct sounds to map. If you want to have small enough spacing to differentiate them from jumps, just have the spaced out so that they don't look like casual stream, they can still be a curved line
13. 01:37:686 (2,3) - timing point needed. There's 3 sounds, not 2 and they don't line up with the current timing. Add couple red points (one for the timing for this one and one to reset it at 01:38:337 - ) Well actually the sounds itselves don't line up to any timing either since they aren't completely on rhythm (first 2 ~100bpm 1/3, then slightly slows down) but I recommend mapping it with kickslider anyways and using timing that is as accurate as possible for all of them. (for example 90 bpm if you put the timing point at 01:37:671 - ) We'll see , but fyi We're following the HARP atm and it's should correctly snapped.
14. 01:39:800 (3) - NC right
15. 01:54:922 (5) - ^ ^
16. 02:31:019 (1,3) - fix blanket Not pretty necessary since I want to keep the triangle from 02:31:019 (1,2,3) -
17. 02:48:255 (6,1) - ^ (basically just slightly improve the slider shape, the curve could be better)
18. 02:58:337 - probably most intense part so far, why are you using kicksliders for the 1/3 here lol. Also the only non-kickslider 1/3 03:01:751 (4,5,6) - is hella low spacing compared to ones before
19. 03:05:166 (4) - NC
20. 03:13:946 (1,3) - fix stack fixed
21. 03:20:776 (3,1) - ^ ^
22. 03:22:239 (2,3) - maybe have one slider before or smth, since most of this stuff has been 1/3 gonna leave it as it be for now cause I really want to click smth on 03:22:483 - so that'y why I circle'd it instead
23. 03:25:654 (1,3) - intended like this or not? Perhaps just stack? Same at 03:29:556 (1,3) - oh well might just be intended then aaa
24. Hell yeah violin section, coulda been longer tho >.<
25. 04:18:337 (1,2) - slider these, works a lot better than circles only here slider'd the 1
26. 04:23:215 (3) - I would NC this instead due structure stuff but it doesn't really matter, this way is pretty common too I guess Indeed
27. 04:25:654 (3,1) - improve blanket
28. 04:29:637 (4,5,6) - preferably use kickslider, especially since the "sounds" you are mapping this to aren't that distinct rhythmically and aren't really exactly like this either
29. 04:38:824 (2,3,4,5) - just time this section if you want to follow the violin, these aren't sufficient. Alternatively use 2 reversing sliders to cover 3 sounds each. Preferably just do both if possible
30. 05:13:784 (3,5) - fix stack fixed
31. 05:15:572 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - god pls no. First of all, definitely NC this. Then you should also slider 05:15:898 (4,5) - uguuu
32. 05:31:182 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - same drill. This kind of stuff just doesn't work uguuu ^2
33. 06:19:312 (2) - NC like you've done with the rest of the long ones? aight

Good luck!

Lyawi wrote:

:3

Shurelia wrote:

TheKingHenry wrote:

Hello there mod from my queue~ Hi Henry!

Infel Phira

1. 00:19:324 (6,1) - blanket? Blanket
2. 00:28:323 (4) - NC for the rhythm change, same at 00:30:724 (2) - and then 00:31:924 (5) - to separate it also. On the other hand, NCing places like 00:38:324 (5,6) - wouldn't make that much sense due the structure done, all of them
3. 00:36:124 - why no same thing as at 00:24:124 (4) - woops, missed that ,nice one
4. 00:40:324 (2,3) - timing not good enough Is it? , We'll check
5. 00:54:272 (2,3) - you might need to re-arrange this pattern a lil more to achieve it, but I recommend using sliders at first to familiarize the player with the 1/3 rhythm base. After couple iterations you can just begin using the circles then. Changed 00:54:272 - as a 1/3 slider instead, hopefully I'm doing it right
6. 00:55:410 (1,2,3,4) - looks haphazard both visually and flow-wise, you can do better done
7. 01:02:239 (4,5) - either both or just 01:02:727 (5) - needs to be slightly less curved for the intended pattern to look good Both
8. 01:08:580 (4,1) - fix blanket Sorry for making you cheacking my blankets u,u
9. 01:10:532 (4,1,2,3) - kinda unnecessary overlap imo, but atleast you could then triangle 01:11:019 (1,2,3) - for more structured feel. And then also fix the blanket between 01:11:507 (3,4) - and also 01:12:483 (5,1) - . Uh actually looks like there might be hella lot of blankets off, kinda rushed feeling. Just check yourself - fixing blankets but won't reply to any more nazi points consider them dealt with
10. 01:13:946 (4) - NC?
11. 01:17:361 (2) - yeah this is what we needed in the beginning of the section done
12. 01:31:995 (4,5,6) - why suddenly stream like spacing for these 1/3? Possible confusion with 1/4 inc, also I think the music would justify more spacing for these, there are distinct sounds to map. If you want to have small enough spacing to differentiate them from jumps, just have the spaced out so that they don't look like casual stream, they can still be a curved line - i think this is very readable, if it becomes an issue i'll change it
13. 01:37:686 (2,3) - timing point needed. There's 3 sounds, not 2 and they don't line up with the current timing. Add couple red points (one for the timing for this one and one to reset it at 01:38:337 - ) Well actually the sounds itselves don't line up to any timing either since they aren't completely on rhythm (first 2 ~100bpm 1/3, then slightly slows down) but I recommend mapping it with kickslider anyways and using timing that is as accurate as possible for all of them. (for example 90 bpm if you put the timing point at 01:37:671 - ) We'll see , but fyi We're following the HARP atm and it's should correctly snapped.
14. 01:39:800 (3) - NC right
15. 01:54:922 (5) - ^ ^
16. 02:31:019 (1,3) - fix blanket Not pretty necessary since I want to keep the triangle from 02:31:019 (1,2,3) -
17. 02:48:255 (6,1) - ^ (basically just slightly improve the slider shape, the curve could be better)
18. 02:58:337 - probably most intense part so far, why are you using kicksliders for the 1/3 here lol. Also the only non-kickslider 1/3 03:01:751 (4,5,6) - is hella low spacing compared to ones before - adjusted
19. 03:05:166 (4) - NC - unnecessary
20. 03:13:946 (1,3) - fix stack fixed
21. 03:20:776 (3,1) - ^ ^
22. 03:22:239 (2,3) - maybe have one slider before or smth, since most of this stuff has been 1/3 gonna leave it as it be for now cause I really want to click smth on 03:22:483 - so that'y why I circle'd it instead
23. 03:25:654 (1,3) - intended like this or not? Perhaps just stack? Same at 03:29:556 (1,3) - oh well might just be intended then aaa
24. Hell yeah violin section, coulda been longer tho >.<
25. 04:18:337 (1,2) - slider these, works a lot better than circles only here slider'd the 1
26. 04:23:215 (3) - I would NC this instead due structure stuff but it doesn't really matter, this way is pretty common too I guess Indeed
27. 04:25:654 (3,1) - improve blanket
28. 04:29:637 (4,5,6) - preferably use kickslider, especially since the "sounds" you are mapping this to aren't that distinct rhythmically and aren't really exactly like this either - k
29. 04:38:824 (2,3,4,5) - just time this section if you want to follow the violin, these aren't sufficient. Alternatively use 2 reversing sliders to cover 3 sounds each. Preferably just do both if possible - fixed
30. 05:13:784 (3,5) - fix stack fixed
31. 05:15:572 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - god pls no. First of all, definitely NC this. Then you should also slider 05:15:898 (4,5) - uguuu
32. 05:31:182 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - same drill. This kind of stuff just doesn't work uguuu ^2
33. 06:19:312 (2) - NC like you've done with the rest of the long ones? aight

Good luck!

Thanks you very very much!

Kyle73 wrote:

From your m4m queue :d

[Infel Phira]

00:05:524 (1,2,3,4) – Make spacing even here, same spacing from 00:05:524 (1,2) – with 00:06:424 (3,4) – or vice versa
00:15:124 (1,2,3) – Move 00:15:724 (3) – to make better triangle visual here like that or something
00:27:124 (2,3,1) – Space 00:28:324 (1) – it more out or something for better spacing
01:00:288 (4) – Make triangle space equal to 01:00:125 (3) – and fix blanket 01:00:776 (5) – if you do move it
01:04:028 (3) – Stack under 01:02:239 (4) – slider end? If you do, even out spacing at 01:03:865 (2) – afterwards
01:05:816 (2) – Blanket would look cleaner if it was spaced between 01:05:166 (1,4) – equally like that imo
01:12:483 (5,1) – Blanket could be better - dealing with all of these so not gonna reply to any others
01:15:735 (3,5) – Even spacing throughout this section so I’d make this blanket spacing more equal too
01:18:337 (4) – Can make blanket + triangle better by moving the note here
01:21:751 (3) – Sliderend stack is messed up I think? Could just be the editor being dumb lol
01:30:532 (1,2,3) – Even spacing between 01:31:345 (2,3) – or 01:30:532 (1,2) – ? - done
01:40:288 (1) – Equal spacing with 01:39:800 (1,2,3) – would like nice plus you can make another sik triangle :d
01:57:361 (4,1) – Space 01:57:849 (1) – more so it looks clean and even - i think it looks okay
02:00:776 (3) – Fix blanket or changeup slider orientation
02:12:971 (3) – Can move out more to the left imo
02:26:629 (4) – I think stacking under 02:26:141 (3) – would be nice - flow would be too harsh into the next part so i won't do this
02:29:068 (1) – Sliderhead is p close to 02:28:093 (4) – blanket, I would space it out more, looks more clean
03:28:093 (2) – I would raise slider body higher to make a cleaner blanket
04:17:198 (3,4) – This overlap looks pretty messy, you don’t do it anywhere else in this section
04:27:117 (2) – Fix blanket, can change this 04:28:093 (1) – sliderbody a bit
04:30:694 (2,4) –Can move these a bit for cleaner spacing between the 04:30:044 (1,3) –
04:44:188 (2,4) – Spacing can be cleaner and more equal between the two
04:45:489 (4) – Fix stack if you do move - done both
04:48:253 (3,3) – Can be spaced further away from the blanket, like 04:48:091 (2,4,2,4) – so make it have the same spacing - fix
04:49:391 (4,2) – Editor stack bug or something I think lol
05:11:505 (2,3,4,5,6,7) – Can make this whole part similar spacing to the 05:11:017 (1) – blanket spacing here imo
05:16:626 (5) – Feels kind of distant out there, I’d move into the slider like this or something

That’s all :d, good luck!

HighTec wrote:

888th post Xd

[ General]

1. Maybe a higher resolution bg would be nice? I mean you could scale it up with waifu2x as well, getting something that's 1920x1080 orz would be nice ww

[ Map]

1. Wouldn't AR8,5 be better for the map? The BPM stays quite low for the biggest part of the song so it'd be nice if the BPM could satisfy that better. The current one makes the map more frustrating to read as it feels more like a reacting challenge for most of the time. - I don't think the map suffers too much because of the AR. The reason it's 8.7 is because there are some dense rhythms later in the kiai that would be nicer to have higher AR to read. It's a good middle ground I think at least.
2. 00:09:124 (5) - It kinda feels inappropriate to not have notes like these NCd. When I listen to the vocals, I don't think that 00:06:724 (4,5) - link in well and that (5) could use a little more emphasis on its own as well.
3. 00:34:324 (1) - I understand the emphasis that's given, but isn't this a little too much spacing compared to the rest of the notes before and after? It kinda feels like an overdone jump right now
4. 00:47:524 (5) - I think an NC here could help out a lot. You might already say that slider leniency could cover the timing change, but making it really hard to read isn't the nicest thing to make a player do either. Helping them out a bit by showing that the song changes here a bit could really help.
5. 00:59:312 (1) - Eventhough I like the pattern, the emphasis is completely killed here. The song gives way more of an impact on here than on 00:58:824 (4) - which gameplay-wise gets the same exact emphasis, which isn't right imo. You even make the beat stronger with the hitsounds so can this pls be spaced out more in a way >.<
6. 01:05:166 (1,2) - diz iz not an actula blanket lolz
7. 01:31:507 (3,4,5,6) - This feels really weird to me. The higher pitched stuff is on (3) and gets almost no tapping emphasis, but the less impactfull sounds on (4,5,6) do all get seperate tapping emphasis, which plays strange imo. Would make the notes from (3) all clickable instead and make (4,5,6) a reverse to get the emphasis right. - I actually think that while the pitch is higher, the volume is lower for those sounds, so I made the 4,5,6 clickable instead to show the decline in the music and to give more emphasis to the louder sounds
8. 02:16:385 (2,3,4) - Still doubting whether this should be the "triple?" it is currently. Given that the rest of the section is rather simple in its rythm, throwing in something that's really dense in rythm AND you have to click all of it, that can easily throw people off. I think it'd be better here to actually simplify the rythm or change the notes around so that maybe a 1/4 or 1/4 reverse can be created. - I don't think it's too much strain, it's a little flair to the vocals that I think fits quite nicely.
9. 02:24:190 (2,3) - Can these please not touch for a pixel thanks - They touch for way more than a pixel. :^)
10. 03:04:841 (3,4) - I don't get what rythm these are supposed to follow - snares and basically simplification since there's a lot of 1/3 and tapping only circles would be kind of straining imo
11. 03:07:605 (2) - NC pls i wanna regain health after a little break!
12. 03:43:215 (1) - Shouldn't this be a slider like 03:41:263 (1,2) - ? It's following kinda equal vocals
13. 04:24:028 (8,1) - Spacing feels a little too high here. The change in flow should already emphasise the change in the song but the spacing could imo be tuned a bit down because of the emphasis already being there strongly. This threw me off a lot when playing.
14. 05:15:570 (1) - Feels like an accidental NC?
15. Guess the rest are consistent errors pointed out before

sorry am bad at modding

Kyle73 wrote:

From your m4m queue :d

[Infel Phira]

00:05:524 (1,2,3,4) – Make spacing even here, same spacing from 00:05:524 (1,2) – with 00:06:424 (3,4) – or vice versa sure
00:15:124 (1,2,3) – Move 00:15:724 (3) – to make better triangle visual here like that or something it's a lready a trinagle but yeeh sure
00:27:124 (2,3,1) – Space 00:28:324 (1) – it more out or something for better spacing done
01:00:288 (4) – Make triangle space equal to 01:00:125 (3) – and fix blanket 01:00:776 (5) – if you do move it Damn, I keep missing this kind of stuffs lol
01:04:028 (3) – Stack under 01:02:239 (4) – slider end? If you do, even out spacing at 01:03:865 (2) – afterwards done
01:05:816 (2) – Blanket would look cleaner if it was spaced between 01:05:166 (1,4) – equally like that imo yeaah
01:12:483 (5,1) – Blanket could be better - dealing with all of these so not gonna reply to any others
01:15:735 (3,5) – Even spacing throughout this section so I’d make this blanket spacing more equal too
01:18:337 (4) – Can make blanket + triangle better by moving the note here
01:21:751 (3) – Sliderend stack is messed up I think? Could just be the editor being dumb lol
01:30:532 (1,2,3) – Even spacing between 01:31:345 (2,3) – or 01:30:532 (1,2) – ? - done
01:40:288 (1) – Equal spacing with 01:39:800 (1,2,3) – would like nice plus you can make another sik triangle :d right
01:57:361 (4,1) – Space 01:57:849 (1) – more so it looks clean and even - i think it looks okay
02:00:776 (3) – Fix blanket or changeup slider orientation
02:12:971 (3) – Can move out more to the left imo
02:26:629 (4) – I think stacking under 02:26:141 (3) – would be nice - flow would be too harsh into the next part so i won't do this
02:29:068 (1) – Sliderhead is p close to 02:28:093 (4) – blanket, I would space it out more, looks more clean right
03:28:093 (2) – I would raise slider body higher to make a cleaner blanket right
04:17:198 (3,4) – This overlap looks pretty messy, you don’t do it anywhere else in this section right
04:27:117 (2) – Fix blanket, can change this 04:28:093 (1) – sliderbody a bit
04:30:694 (2,4) –Can move these a bit for cleaner spacing between the 04:30:044 (1,3) – not really necessary
04:44:188 (2,4) – Spacing can be cleaner and more equal between the two
04:45:489 (4) – Fix stack if you do move - done both
04:48:253 (3,3) – Can be spaced further away from the blanket, like 04:48:091 (2,4,2,4) – so make it have the same spacing - fix
04:49:391 (4,2) – Editor stack bug or something I think lol
05:11:505 (2,3,4,5,6,7) – Can make this whole part similar spacing to the 05:11:017 (1) – blanket spacing here imo
05:16:626 (5) – Feels kind of distant out there, I’d move into the slider like this or something sure

That’s all :d, good luck!

HighTec wrote:

888th post Xd

[ General]

1. Maybe a higher resolution bg would be nice? I mean you could scale it up with waifu2x as well, getting something that's 1920x1080 orz would be nice ww

Did try but the pic would looks cluttered , also the current BG looks neat and fine in-game so yeah.

[ Map]

1. Wouldn't AR8,5 be better for the map? The BPM stays quite low for the biggest part of the song so it'd be nice if the BPM could satisfy that better. The current one makes the map more frustrating to read as it feels more like a reacting challenge for most of the time. - I don't think the map suffers too much because of the AR. The reason it's 8.7 is because there are some dense rhythms later in the kiai that would be nicer to have higher AR to read. It's a good middle ground I think at least.
2. 00:09:124 (5) - It kinda feels inappropriate to not have notes like these NCd. When I listen to the vocals, I don't think that 00:06:724 (4,5) - link in well and that (5) could use a little more emphasis on its own as well. yeaah, I can give these some NC
3. 00:34:324 (1) - I understand the emphasis that's given, but isn't this a little too much spacing compared to the rest of the notes before and after? It kinda feels like an overdone jump right now nerfed, yeah
4. 00:47:524 (5) - I think an NC here could help out a lot. You might already say that slider leniency could cover the timing change, but making it really hard to read isn't the nicest thing to make a player do either. Helping them out a bit by showing that the song changes here a bit could really help. sure thing
5. 00:59:312 (1) - Eventhough I like the pattern, the emphasis is completely killed here. The song gives way more of an impact on here than on 00:58:824 (4) - which gameplay-wise gets the same exact emphasis, which isn't right imo. You even make the beat stronger with the hitsounds so can this pls be spaced out more in a way >.< yeah, did pretty major changes because of this
6. 01:05:166 (1,2) - diz iz not an actula blanket lolz blanket
7. 01:31:507 (3,4,5,6) - This feels really weird to me. The higher pitched stuff is on (3) and gets almost no tapping emphasis, but the less impactfull sounds on (4,5,6) do all get seperate tapping emphasis, which plays strange imo. Would make the notes from (3) all clickable instead and make (4,5,6) a reverse to get the emphasis right. - I actually think that while the pitch is higher, the volume is lower for those sounds, so I made the 4,5,6 clickable instead to show the decline in the music and to give more emphasis to the louder sounds
8. 02:16:385 (2,3,4) - Still doubting whether this should be the "triple?" it is currently. Given that the rest of the section is rather simple in its rythm, throwing in something that's really dense in rythm AND you have to click all of it, that can easily throw people off. I think it'd be better here to actually simplify the rythm or change the notes around so that maybe a 1/4 or 1/4 reverse can be created. - I don't think it's too much strain, it's a little flair to the vocals that I think fits quite nicely.
9. 02:24:190 (2,3) - Can these please not touch for a pixel thanks - They touch for way more than a pixel. :^)
10. 03:04:841 (3,4) - I don't get what rythm these are supposed to follow - snares and basically simplification since there's a lot of 1/3 and tapping only circles would be kind of straining imo
11. 03:07:605 (2) - NC pls i wanna regain health after a little break! NC'd on somewhere else
12. 03:43:215 (1) - Shouldn't this be a slider like 03:41:263 (1,2) - ? It's following kinda equal vocals should be k now
13. 04:24:028 (8,1) - Spacing feels a little too high here. The change in flow should already emphasise the change in the song but the spacing could imo be tuned a bit down because of the emphasis already being there strongly. This threw me off a lot when playing. nerfed
14. 05:15:570 (1) - Feels like an accidental NC? aaa
15. Guess the rest are consistent errors pointed out before

sorry am bad at modding

Wanko wrote:

o/ Was supposed to mod it but this map is great. Love the song too So I'll just shoot a star instead.

A few things:

Are the weird bpm changes at the beginning really necessary? They feel wrong, everything plays and sounds much smoother with only the 100bpm timing you set at the beginning. Try something like this: http://screenshot.sh/ofnAEmMjlYH6f http://screenshot.sh/oAEDwFjAWUo49 , sounds better to me and almost everything is perfectly aligned to the white lines. Good idea! but i feel like the current things that we're using atm are fine as it is

Sliderends hitsounds are really annoying. Especially during the slow parts with a lot of them like 01:55:898 (1,2,3) - for example. I'd make all the sliderends like 10-15% vol... or make the hitsound different. actually using the slider-ends sounds are pretty enjoyable on the play through imo

That's it, GL with the map

1. Very solid structure!
2. consistent patterns
3. great job on the accuracy of the timing!

1. just some small spacing and emphasis ideas. I would just make sure spacing is even where it's needed!

Ambrew wrote:

Hey!! m4m from ur queue

This is going to be pretty small since the map is pretty well done as it is. xd

General:

1. Very solid structure!
2. consistent patterns
3. great job on the accuracy of the timing!

Growth areas:

1. just some small spacing and emphasis ideas. I would just make sure spacing is even where it's needed!

Mod-specific

00:15:724 (3) - you could point this toward 00:15:424 (2) - sure
00:18:724 (5) - could change to slider since there's a vocal noise right before 00:19:324 (6) - as well good idea, but it's not something that have to do, and want to be consistently with the previous part
00:28:723 (2) - spacing a little unequal, try x:191 y:73 fixed
00:31:124 (2) - same as above, x:314 y:192 ya
00:51:054 (4) - isn't quite parallel to 00:50:454 (3) - , turn your head to the side and you'll see what I mean did something
02:31:670 (2,3) - is in same kiai section as 02:47:361 (2,3) - but are mapped differently? yes, since there's a strong drum sound at around this kiai now
03:02:239 (1) - you could emphasize this like how you do 03:58:824 (3) -
05:18:335 (6) - random whistle noise on slider body fix
05:27:115 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - imo you could scale this a bit larger naah, the current one is good

Beautiful song choice, btw. Best of luck with your map!

Monstrata wrote:

Infel Phira

00:15:424 (2,3) - There's no need to use jumps here yet. Just Ctrl+G 3 and use regular spacing. The song is quite consistent here. You're already expressing the song well with slider variations.
00:27:124 (2,3,1) - Not really liking the structure here. Spacing from 1> 2's slider end and 1> 3's head is different which makes it seem less equidistant. You could try a double blanket with 2 and 3 and integrate 1 that way.

~

00:36:124 (2,1,2) - Keep the visual spacing more consistent here.
00:46:324 (4) - The curved part just feels too uh, uncurved lol.

Smoother pls, so ppl can actually notice the curve when playing

01:00:125 (3,4) - The 1/3 jump here just felt uncharacteristically large especially in comparison to 01:00:776 (5,1) - that occurs right after. Imo, keep 00:59:963 (2,3,4) - similar in spacing because circle > object jumps are much harder than slider > object jumps since theres no slider leniency involved.
01:02:076 (3,4) - Same idea. This feels harder than 01:02:727 (5,1) - . Especially since you can easily abuse slider leniency when playing 5.
01:06:141 (4,5,1) - Honestly, this structure isn't good. You're creating an extremely different gameplay experience through movement between 4>5 and 5>1. Just compare the spacing and flow. Are the notes really that different? Imo, they aren't, so the justification here isn't good.
01:16:385 (5,1,2) -Your spacing is going to confuse people honestly. Why not add another circle on 01:17:524 - ? The gap will cause ppl to jump to 2 early, thinking it's a 1/3, and the fact that there's a note on 01:17:524 - just makes it more confusing. - agreed, changed
01:18:824 (1,2) - This, (and subsequent ones) are a lot better, since you use a visibly larger spacing. Good.
01:23:540 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Idk... I don't think jumps and sharp angles are the way to go here. This doesn't deserve a jump sequence imo. If anything, you could do like small spacing (like 01:23:865 (2,3) - ) but the way this is mapped overemphasizes the importance of these notes imo... - changed entirely, i kind of agree
01:37:686 (2,3) - I recommend using a slider here instead, because there are a lot of different layers represented here. It's hard to discern snapping based on what you've been following so far, and yea, using 2/3 rhythm is a bit hard to anticipate given the 1/1 and 1/2 rhythm you used earlier.
01:56:385 (2,3,4,1) - Flow really sucks here. Why are you using flowbreaks like this ;c. It's a calm section, let the notes be where the slider is pointing towards. 01:59:800 (1,2,3,4,1) - is much better. - agreed
02:24:190 (2,3,1) - Spacing is rather questionable here... 2>3 - fixed
02:26:629 (4,5) - Use a slider too. Very tempting to click on 02:26:873 - cuz of the note there. - alright
02:30:044 (4,5,6) - Could be spaced more similar structurally.
02:44:678 (1,2) - Same as earlier about spacing being confusing due to the different rhythm being used here. 02:48:580 (1,2) - Much better.
02:52:483 (1,2) - ^ - changed
02:58:824 (2,3) - I would Ctrl+G. Flows better to me, and 1>2 since it's a slider to circle jump it won't feel as strong. Gives a structural consistency to 03:00:288 (1,2) - too. - sure
03:11:995 (4,1,2,3) - Visual spacing can definitely be improved here imo, with respect to the slider's borders this time.

Whta i mean by borders

03:20:288 (2,4) - Make these the same shape? I don't see why they are different
03:43:215 (1) - Use a slider instead. Forcing the player to play a 2-beat spinner just isn't appropriate imo. It demands very fast movement here, which I don't think it what you want, given how you've used slow SV's and are basically winding the mapping down. The song as well, is fading into a quiet section so yea. slider. - done for shurelia
03:54:922 (3) - Cool idea.
03:58:824 (3) - I don't think this follows the same idea tho, mainly cuz the voice doesn't seem that warbly. But this is subjective i guess - fixed

Last kiai was quite well done.

[]

I feel like this still could use some more polishing, though you could do that on your own by applying stuff that I said to other sections that also fit. The main concern is really spacing and emphasis control.

Monstrata wrote:

Infel Phira

00:15:424 (2,3) - There's no need to use jumps here yet. Just Ctrl+G 3 and use regular spacing. The song is quite consistent here. You're already expressing the song well with slider variations. right
00:27:124 (2,3,1) - Not really liking the structure here. Spacing from 1> 2's slider end and 1> 3's head is different which makes it seem less equidistant. You could try a double blanket with 2 and 3 and integrate 1 that way. right, double blanket is better at here

~

00:36:124 (2,1,2) - Keep the visual spacing more consistent here. ff
00:46:324 (4) - The curved part just feels too uh, uncurved lol. someone finally noticed this holy,

Smoother pls, so ppl can actually notice the curve when playing

01:00:125 (3,4) - The 1/3 jump here just felt uncharacteristically large especially in comparison to 01:00:776 (5,1) - that occurs right after. Imo, keep 00:59:963 (2,3,4) - similar in spacing because circle > object jumps are much harder than slider > object jumps since theres no slider leniency involved. right, nerfed it
01:02:076 (3,4) - Same idea. This feels harder than 01:02:727 (5,1) - . Especially since you can easily abuse slider leniency when playing 5. yea , nerfed
01:06:141 (4,5,1) - Honestly, this structure isn't good. You're creating an extremely different gameplay experience through movement between 4>5 and 5>1. Just compare the spacing and flow. Are the notes really that different? Imo, they aren't, so the justification here isn't good. yeah,
nice catch.
01:16:385 (5,1,2) -Your spacing is going to confuse people honestly. Why not add another circle on 01:17:524 - ? The gap will cause ppl to jump to 2 early, thinking it's a 1/3, and the fact that there's a note on 01:17:524 - just makes it more confusing. - agreed, changed
01:18:824 (1,2) - This, (and subsequent ones) are a lot better, since you use a visibly larger spacing. Good.
01:23:540 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Idk... I don't think jumps and sharp angles are the way to go here. This doesn't deserve a jump sequence imo. If anything, you could do like small spacing (like 01:23:865 (2,3) - ) but the way this is mapped overemphasizes the importance of these notes imo... - changed entirely, i kind of agree
01:37:686 (2,3) - I recommend using a slider here instead, because there are a lot of different layers represented here. It's hard to discern snapping based on what you've been following so far, and yea, using 2/3 rhythm is a bit hard to anticipate given the 1/1 and 1/2 rhythm you used earlier. right, changed it.
01:56:385 (2,3,4,1) - Flow really sucks here. Why are you using flowbreaks like this ;c. It's a calm section, let the notes be where the slider is pointing towards. 01:59:800 (1,2,3,4,1) - is much better. - agreed
02:24:190 (2,3,1) - Spacing is rather questionable here... 2>3 - fixed
02:26:629 (4,5) - Use a slider too. Very tempting to click on 02:26:873 - cuz of the note there. - alright
02:30:044 (4,5,6) - Could be spaced more similar structurally. whoaa, nice catch
02:44:678 (1,2) - Same as earlier about spacing being confusing due to the different rhythm being used here. 02:48:580 (1,2) - Much better.
02:52:483 (1,2) - ^ - changed
02:58:824 (2,3) - I would Ctrl+G. Flows better to me, and 1>2 since it's a slider to circle jump it won't feel as strong. Gives a structural consistency to 03:00:288 (1,2) - too. - sure
03:11:995 (4,1,2,3) - Visual spacing can definitely be improved here imo, with respect to the slider's borders this time. whoaa,learned something, Thanks

Whta i mean by borders

03:20:288 (2,4) - Make these the same shape? I don't see why they are different wooops
03:43:215 (1) - Use a slider instead. Forcing the player to play a 2-beat spinner just isn't appropriate imo. It demands very fast movement here, which I don't think it what you want, given how you've used slow SV's and are basically winding the mapping down. The song as well, is fading into a quiet section so yea. slider. - done for shurelia and i changed into something else instead
03:54:922 (3) - Cool idea. Thanks
03:58:824 (3) - I don't think this follows the same idea tho, mainly cuz the voice doesn't seem that warbly. But this is subjective i guess - fixed aaand improved

Last kiai was quite well done. Thanks

[]

I feel like this still could use some more polishing, though you could do that on your own by applying stuff that I said to other sections that also fit. The main concern is really spacing and emphasis control.

jonathanlfj wrote:

that song title tho

[Infel Phira]
01:28:580 (1,2) - this rhythm was hard to grasp the first time playing (tempted to hit as 1/2), you can fix that by adding another circle at 01:30:206 Mir's
02:25:166 (1) - missing a whistle here aaaa
03:15:410 (4) - random 1/3 slider in the middle of a 1/4 dominant section...intentional? nope, it's a mistake of mine. woops
04:06:019 (3) - if you listen at 25% you will see this is better snapped to 1/3 at 04:05:979 yeah, i can agree
04:31:019 (3) - if you want to follow the string closely it should end at 04:31:233 (1/16) Mir's
05:35:408 (4) - random 1/2 slider, everything in this section should be 1/3 snapped for consistency done, also did some adjustments for 05:35:084 (2,3,5,6,7) - so it won't damage the structure too much from the new snap. (since if I just change the slider's snap the distance between 4 and 5 would be too huge for no reasons. So, please do check about it and tell me if you're like it or not

yeah thats about it

Shurelia wrote:

jonathanlfj wrote:

that song title tho

[Infel Phira]
01:28:580 (1,2) - this rhythm was hard to grasp the first time playing (tempted to hit as 1/2), you can fix that by adding another circle at 01:30:206 Mir's
02:25:166 (1) - missing a whistle here aaaa
03:15:410 (4) - random 1/3 slider in the middle of a 1/4 dominant section...intentional? nope, it's a mistake of mine. woops
04:06:019 (3) - if you listen at 25% you will see this is better snapped to 1/3 at 04:05:979 yeah, i can agree
04:31:019 (3) - if you want to follow the string closely it should end at 04:31:233 (1/16) Mir's
05:35:408 (4) - random 1/2 slider, everything in this section should be 1/3 snapped for consistency done, also did some adjustments for 05:35:084 (2,3,5,6,7) - so it won't damage the structure too much from the new snap. (since if I just change the slider's snap the distance between 4 and 5 would be too huge for no reasons. So, please do check about it and tell me if you're like it or not

yeah thats about it

THank you!

Pentori wrote:

rip x( THE
[Infel Phira]
00:21:724 (2) - 00:27:124 (2,3) - 04:34:922 (3,4) - 05:13:944 (4,5) - 06:03:700 (1) - etc. you should snap your held slider ends to the songs beat structure. in the case where the music follows a swing beat you snap your sliders to 1/3 00:27:124 (2,3) - so 00:45:124 (2,3) - should follow the same idea as it's still the same beat structure about 00:45:124 (2,3) - i don't think the 1/3s would work at here since there's not strong supports for it to be 1/3d

also on the topic of held sliders i feel you could do more with the hitsounding. in a lot of places you have consecutive extended sliders 01:55:898 - 03:11:995 - where both slider head and end are providing the same feedback, creating a really jarring effect as there are only beats on the clickable objects. some solutions to this would be silencing the slider ends, or perhaps adding whistles to all clickable objects and lowering the volume so it isn't too overpowering

01:07:930 (2,3) - jump seems a bit big, afterwards you have similar visual spacing but a different rhythm 01:09:068 (1,2) did nerf
01:22:727 (5) - nc? fixed for Mir
01:50:044 (3,4,5) - musically this sounds like a simple 1/3 like 01:37:686 (2) - except uses different snapping which sort of breaks the playability imo. the harp actually exists on 01:50:369 - 01:51:019 - so i think it'd be beneficial to use the same snapping https://puu.sh/w5z4n/974ef892a1.jpg yeh,
1/3'd
01:52:971 (2,3,4) - personally i'd map the harp as its more rhythmic but this one is up to you barely hearing that, let's go with the vocal
01:54:028 (4) - but i think this should snap to white tick lol this actually a pretty ambigious one like the vocal is actually start on the current slider while the harp start on the big white nvm , let's use big white instead
03:00:776 (2,3,4) - 03:01:751 (6,7,8) - hm i think you should try keep the same visual spacing between these circles for a better aesthetic Mir's
04:03:093 (4) - why the weird snapping? could just shift it to the purple tick to be more coherent with stuff like 04:05:979 (3) - https://puu.sh/w5A23/f54ec0ce75.jpg yes
04:07:605 (2,3,4) - ^ they all sound the same, the minor deviations can be disregarded you sure? i mean, it's actually on the right snapping atm. But just to be safe so it'll looks a proper snap. I'm gonna change it to the 1/3s
04:17:198 (3,4) - could try spacing this more so the jump at 04:18:174 (6,1) - doesn't feel too random http://puu.sh/w5AeV/ccef841cfe.jpg sure
04:22:889 (1) - nc seems redundant de-NC'd
04:29:637 (4) - i dont think this is 1/6, there are only 3 distinct vocals here using 1/4 would be better Mir's
04:28:906 (2) - a bit questionable to map this, as the vocal can barely be heard Mir's
04:34:719 (2) - worth snapping to the red tick for playability. the variation in vocals are everywhere if u listen to stuff like 04:38:580 - the vocal is slightly late and its better to just ignore them in some cases. also 04:34:678 - has the instrument on it Mir's
04:52:481 (1,2,3,4,1) - flow gets really choppy here cause of all the sharp angles follow up by the wider angle 04:53:294 (4,1) Mir's
06:23:294 (1) - quite a strong hitsound to end on o_O theres nothing in the music, but i guess if u want to keep it for the effect then at least lower the volume lowered

drawing the line between playability and snapping perfectly to the music is always difficult, which makes modding/mapping songs like this quite hard. in a lot of these cases tho, the deviation from the main rhythm is so minor that i believe they can be simplified

popping for now due to some issues, but poke me when you reply

Shurelia wrote:

Pentori wrote:

rip x( THE
[Infel Phira]
00:21:724 (2) - 00:27:124 (2,3) - 04:34:922 (3,4) - 05:13:944 (4,5) - 06:03:700 (1) - etc. you should snap your held slider ends to the songs beat structure. in the case where the music follows a swing beat you snap your sliders to 1/3 00:27:124 (2,3) - so 00:45:124 (2,3) - should follow the same idea as it's still the same beat structure about 00:45:124 (2,3) - i don't think the 1/3s would work at here since there's not strong supports for it to be 1/3d

also on the topic of held sliders i feel you could do more with the hitsounding. in a lot of places you have consecutive extended sliders 01:55:898 - 03:11:995 - where both slider head and end are providing the same feedback, creating a really jarring effect as there are only beats on the clickable objects. some solutions to this would be silencing the slider ends, or perhaps adding whistles to all clickable objects and lowering the volume so it isn't too overpowering

01:07:930 (2,3) - jump seems a bit big, afterwards you have similar visual spacing but a different rhythm 01:09:068 (1,2) did nerf
01:22:727 (5) - nc? fixed for Mir
01:50:044 (3,4,5) - musically this sounds like a simple 1/3 like 01:37:686 (2) - except uses different snapping which sort of breaks the playability imo. the harp actually exists on 01:50:369 - 01:51:019 - so i think it'd be beneficial to use the same snapping https://puu.sh/w5z4n/974ef892a1.jpg yeh,
1/3'd
01:52:971 (2,3,4) - personally i'd map the harp as its more rhythmic but this one is up to you barely hearing that, let's go with the vocal
01:54:028 (4) - but i think this should snap to white tick lol this actually a pretty ambigious one like the vocal is actually start on the current slider while the harp start on the big white nvm , let's use big white instead
03:00:776 (2,3,4) - 03:01:751 (6,7,8) - hm i think you should try keep the same visual spacing between these circles for a better aesthetic Mir's
04:03:093 (4) - why the weird snapping? could just shift it to the purple tick to be more coherent with stuff like 04:05:979 (3) - https://puu.sh/w5A23/f54ec0ce75.jpg yes
04:07:605 (2,3,4) - ^ they all sound the same, the minor deviations can be disregarded you sure? i mean, it's actually on the right snapping atm. But just to be safe so it'll looks a proper snap. I'm gonna change it to the 1/3s
04:17:198 (3,4) - could try spacing this more so the jump at 04:18:174 (6,1) - doesn't feel too random http://puu.sh/w5AeV/ccef841cfe.jpg sure
04:22:889 (1) - nc seems redundant de-NC'd
04:29:637 (4) - i dont think this is 1/6, there are only 3 distinct vocals here using 1/4 would be better Mir's
04:28:906 (2) - a bit questionable to map this, as the vocal can barely be heard Mir's
04:34:719 (2) - worth snapping to the red tick for playability. the variation in vocals are everywhere if u listen to stuff like 04:38:580 - the vocal is slightly late and its better to just ignore them in some cases. also 04:34:678 - has the instrument on it Mir's
04:52:481 (1,2,3,4,1) - flow gets really choppy here cause of all the sharp angles follow up by the wider angle 04:53:294 (4,1) Mir's
06:23:294 (1) - quite a strong hitsound to end on o_O theres nothing in the music, but i guess if u want to keep it for the effect then at least lower the volume lowered

drawing the line between playability and snapping perfectly to the music is always difficult, which makes modding/mapping songs like this quite hard. in a lot of these cases tho, the deviation from the main rhythm is so minor that i believe they can be simplified

popping for now due to some issues, but poke me when you reply

Thanks!

PatZar wrote:

Let's map this Ar Tonelico - EXEC_CHRONICLE_KEY_.