HabiHolic wrote:

[Normal]

1. 03:50:738 - add whistle. your missing? fixed

[Silynn's Hard]

1. 00:02:142 (2) - Ctrl+G is flow batter fixed
2. 00:29:663 (7,8,9,1,2,3,4,1,2) - add clap here. flow drum fixed
3. 00:43:111 (1) - stack (4) note here. I changed this differently
4. 02:05:480 - note? added
5. 02:21:278 (1) - whistle fixed
6. 02:42:205 (2) - flow is bad. Ctrl+G please. if your want no fixed this I changed it
7. 02:52:095 (1) - very short spiner. delete or 02:56: 427 - increasing up here removed
8. 03:50:738 (2,3) - this note delete and change 1/2 slider batter patten fixed
9. 04:10:910 (1) - why change distance? Changed regular intervals. fixed
10. 04:13:238 - 04:13:497 - this use green line? if your not use delete please deleted

[Laurier's Insane]

1. 02:21:278 (5) - this start new vocal so NC here
2. 04:16:083 (5) - missing blanket fixed both

[Extra]

1. AR 9.5 very fast imo. change 9.3? ok
2. 00:02:659 (1) - Ctrl+G is flow batter imo. fixed
3. 00:15:293 (1) - don't need NC here
4. 01:02:896 (1) - delete NC
5. 01:04:189 (1) - same (^)
6. 01:04:965 (1) - same (^) fixed all nc

call me back

HabiHolic wrote:

Good job stuff have this

Bubbled

xxdeathx wrote:

rumia ranked standard, so pro

1. Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

HanzeR wrote:

i wanted stack leniency to be 0

alacat wrote:

Reason for Disqualification : Stack Leniency 0 on Extra diff.

1. Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

So you must change the rate between 0.2 ~ 0.7

And Do not use silent volumes on objects, You must consider turning up over 20%
Normal :
03:24:876 (2) -

Extra :
03:24:876 (1) -

Then, Please resnap previewtime before getting rebubble.

@Rumia-, HabiHolic
You should read Ranking Criteria again, Please be careful next time.

Charles445 wrote:

Please note that stack leniency has been set to 0. This is intentional. Stack leniency has already been established to not be a requirement, that's why the rule was removed.

HanzeR wrote:

Charles445 wrote:

Please note that stack leniency has been set to 0. This is intentional. Stack leniency has already been established to not be a requirement, that's why the rule was removed.

http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/2971687


...

HanzeR wrote:

alacat wrote:

Reason for Disqualification : Stack Leniency 0 on Extra diff.

1. Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

So you must change the rate between 0.2 ~ 0.7

And Do not use silent volumes on objects, You must consider turning up over 20%
Normal :
03:24:876 (2) -

Extra :
03:24:876 (1) -

Then, Please resnap previewtime before getting rebubble.

@Rumia-, HabiHolic
You should read Ranking Criteria again, Please be careful next time.

ErunamoJAZZ wrote:

Yeah, but the rule about dont change the .osu is too clear...
This is a problem of DevTeam... if it was a accepted rule, why is not available in editor?!

Kibbleru wrote:

this is probably worth discussing but i really think
02:46:989 - 02:48:152 -
these offset resets are completely unecessary/wrong

first of all these rhythms are quite common in modern japanese songs

SPOILER

also once you add them in the clap pattern is no longer 2 4


also this one changes the offset by ONE ms.. 03:08:842 - is this really necessary???

Shiro wrote:

oh my god I had no idea I was the one who timed this lol
let's see

02:46:989 (1) -
02:48:152 (1) -
03:08:842 (1) -
Their purpose was to reset the metronome but looking back at it, it is actually not needed (you can have the mapper remove both). I'm not too sure why I added them They don't change much in terms of gameplay, fortunately.

Julie wrote:

Normal?


And some distance spacing issue not detect by AImod , but those spacing issue are just like 0.02 to 0.01 difference (AImod drunk) orz, except the last 2 issues

03:46:083 (1,2) - 0.60x spacing while these 03:49:704 (3,1) and 03:51:126 (2,3) , etc are 1.0x spacing, this one can easily cause rhythm confusion for normal player =A=
There is other spacing issue, but might be the way your mapping, just the one I point out feel really different for that part.

This one 00:45:568 (3,1) and 03:25:393 not an issue at all in standard , but think of mania player? >< (even though is not mapped for mania, for people playing convert). And also for example 03:27:462 (1) , end spinner sometimes have sound, why not stop it here 03:29:402 ? There is a drum sound compare to here 03:29:466

Anyway I'm just here for quick check ><...

alacat wrote:

Reason for Disqualification : Stack Leniency 0 on Extra diff.

1. Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

So you must change the rate between 0.2 ~ 0.7

Charles445 wrote:

To any BATs:
Please note that stack leniency has been set to 0. This is intentional. Stack leniency has already been established to not be a requirement, that's why the rule was removed.

alacat wrote:

@Rumia-, HabiHolicalacat
You should read Ranking Criteria again, Please be careful next time.

Tess wrote:

alacat wrote:

Reason for Disqualification : Stack Leniency 0 on Extra diff.

1. Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

So you must change the rate between 0.2 ~ 0.7

Charles445 wrote:

To any BATs:
Please note that stack leniency has been set to 0. This is intentional. Stack leniency has already been established to not be a requirement, that's why the rule was removed.

alacat wrote:

@Rumia-, HabiHolicalacat
You should read Ranking Criteria again, Please be careful next time.

Tess wrote:

alacat wrote:

Reason for Disqualification : Stack Leniency 0 on Extra diff.

1. Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.

So you must change the rate between 0.2 ~ 0.7

Charles445 wrote:

To any BATs:
Please note that stack leniency has been set to 0. This is intentional. Stack leniency has already been established to not be a requirement, that's why the rule was removed.

alacat wrote:

@Rumia-, HabiHolicalacat
You should read Ranking Criteria again, Please be careful next time.

Garven wrote:

First you should ask why is it set that low? While I see a lot of overlapping patterns, there are some notes that should be stacking that aren't at this low leniency (mainly looking at consecutive 1/2 notes such as 00:49:448 (1,2) - ). Please point out the patterns that are messed up due to having stack leniency even at the lowest in-editor setting and we can work out how to fix the parts that need to be manually adjusted after we set the stack leniency to the highest possible setting while preserving what your goal is for the map's presentation.

Loctav wrote:

Stack leniency 0 is actual legal, if it can be applied via the editor. Any setting or modification that can only be achieved via editing the .osu file is not allowed. Afaik, you can apply stack leniency 0 with the editor. If you can not (go, try it out!), it is not rankable.

Rumia- wrote:

wew rerank hype
cap reached rip ill just mark heart icon ww

384059043 wrote:

Yeah! But why is it still in pending beatmaps thread?

Garven wrote:

Um, why did nobody actually wait for me to check on the stacking issue? Ill probably dq again if I find things that need to be adjusted still. Stay tuned.

HanzeR wrote:

Garven wrote:

First you should ask why is it set that low? While I see a lot of overlapping patterns, there are some notes that should be stacking that aren't at this low leniency (mainly looking at consecutive 1/2 notes such as 00:49:448 (1,2) - ). Please point out the patterns that are messed up due to having stack leniency even at the lowest in-editor setting and we can work out how to fix the parts that need to be manually adjusted after we set the stack leniency to the highest possible setting while preserving what your goal is for the map's presentation.

Patterns that are ruined by stack leniency

These patterns would all be ruined by any setting above 0.1
01:05:159 (1,2) -
01:05:417 (3,4) -
03:39:877 (1,1,1,1,1) - this pattern is completely ruined by any stack setting This is the only pattern that warrants the use of the low stack leniency due to 03:40:912 (1) - .
03:58:692 (2,3) -
03:58:951 (4,5) -
03:59:209 (6,7) -
03:59:468 (1,2) -
03:59:727 (3,4) -
03:59:985 (5,6) -
04:00:244 (7,8) -
04:00:502 (1,2) -
04:01:020 (4,5) -
04:02:830 (3,4) -
04:03:089 (5,6) -
04:03:347 (7,8) -
04:03:606 (1,2) -
04:03:865 (3,4) -
04:04:123 (5,6) -
04:04:382 (7,8) -
04:04:640 (1,2) -
04:05:158 (4,5) -
04:05:416 (6,7) -
04:05:675 (8,9) -
04:07:227 (3,4) -
04:07:485 (5,6) -
04:07:744 (7,8) -
04:08:002 (1,2) -
04:08:261 (3,4) -
04:08:520 (5,6) -
04:08:778 (1,2) -
04:09:296 (4,5) -
04:09:554 (6,7) -
04:09:813 (1,2) -
04:10:330 (4,5) -

Garven wrote:

HanzeR wrote:

Patterns that are ruined by stack leniency

These patterns would all be ruined by any setting above 0.1
01:05:159 (1,2) -
01:05:417 (3,4) -
03:39:877 (1,1,1,1,1) - this pattern is completely ruined by any stack setting This is the only pattern that warrants the use of the low stack leniency due to 03:40:912 (1) - .
03:58:692 (2,3) -
03:58:951 (4,5) -
03:59:209 (6,7) -
03:59:468 (1,2) -
03:59:727 (3,4) -
03:59:985 (5,6) -
04:00:244 (7,8) -
04:00:502 (1,2) -
04:01:020 (4,5) -
04:02:830 (3,4) -
04:03:089 (5,6) -
04:03:347 (7,8) -
04:03:606 (1,2) -
04:03:865 (3,4) -
04:04:123 (5,6) -
04:04:382 (7,8) -
04:04:640 (1,2) -
04:05:158 (4,5) -
04:05:416 (6,7) -
04:05:675 (8,9) -
04:07:227 (3,4) -
04:07:485 (5,6) -
04:07:744 (7,8) -
04:08:002 (1,2) -
04:08:261 (3,4) -
04:08:520 (5,6) -
04:08:778 (1,2) -
04:09:296 (4,5) -
04:09:554 (6,7) -
04:09:813 (1,2) -
04:10:330 (4,5) -

Everything else you pointed out needs to be manually stacked since that would be the expected visual with such tight consecutive object positioning.

Horo wrote:

I don't mean to kill the hype any further but Silynn's Hard needs extreme attention for flow and quality reasons. I was in communication with HanzeR and Silynn on this in the event this got DQ'd and it's ultimately his (HanzeR's) decision where he wants to go with that. Just posting this here as a reminder.

Horo wrote:

I don't mean to kill the hype any further but Silynn's Hard needs extreme attention for flow and quality reasons. I was in communication with HanzeR and Silynn on this in the event this got DQ'd and it's ultimately his (HanzeR's) decision where he wants to go with that. Just posting this here as a reminder.

Garven wrote:

Ill explain thIngs further when I return. Im out travelling for the next couple of days anyway, and I believe there were a couple people that expressed interest in modding before it was ninja reranked.

Fort wrote:

:<

Kodora wrote:

...sooo?

val0108 wrote:

where garven

inverness wrote:

where rerank

[ Setsuna ] wrote:

inverness wrote:

where rerank

Flask wrote:

;_;

Side wrote:

Hi mod thing cuz why not :v

Will focus on the hard because...

SPOILER

Silynn's Hard


General

I suggest slightly higher CS. If you really don't wanna use CS4 then 3.7 maybe even 3.8 would be better. This CS makes it feel more like a normal especially for how simple the patterns are.

Highly recommend lower OD for this diff. OD 6 or at most 6.5 because this is pretty high bpm so it's gonna be pretty tough to be accurate at this difficulty range with the current OD.


00:00:591 (1) - You miss a lot of emphasis on the first vocals at 00:01:108 - with this 2/1 slider. Consider changing this to maybe a 1/1 slider and repeat 1/1 slider and note.

00:02:142 (2,3,4) - Highly suggest this pattern. Especially if you go with the first change which I also highly suggest. The reason for the 1/2 slider is because you wanna tie the word "tame ni" together as she sings it like that.

00:04:211 (1,2) - Change to 1/2 slider. Same reason as above regarding the word being sang kinda tied together.

00:04:728 (3) - Change to 1/1 slider and add a note at 00:05:478 - There is a guitar note playing 00:05:228 - which you neglect with this slider and this way you can get that note as well as the vocal.

00:06:245 (5,6) - I see what you're going for mapping this to the vocals but I think you can get the same effect (if not arguably better) if you change 5 to a 1/1 nicer shape slider (to compliment the vocal doing the short rise in pitch) and then a note at 00:07:278 - to compliment the 2nd guitar note since the slider would play the first. Also it might be a good idea to make 6 a slider that ends at 00:08:555 - or maybe just 00:08:299 - since the last guitar note kinda holds.

00:08:865 (1,2,3) - Nothing playing at 00:09:123 - Consider this pattern where 7 is stacked over 8 slider head. It's really nice :3 If you do it exactly like that you'll have to move things around so I suggest the pattern in the timeline but you can do it however you want.

00:13:520 - Don't neglect this guitar note

00:13:778 (2,3) - Maybe better if it blankets itself? It also flows very poorly into the next combo since 3 is pointing away from it currently.

00:15:033 (1,2) - Due to the sudden change of BPM I highly sugest changing this to a 1/2 slider with repeat instead of having a note to give players enough time to recognize the bpm change.

00:18:554 (2) - Change to a note then a 1/2 slider. The half slider should compliment the 1-2-3-4 thing the guitar does so the slider should start on the 1 of that strum at 00:18:685 - instead of with the slider body.

Similarly this should be a 1/2 slider with repeat because single tapping 3 notes at 232 bpm is gonna be way too hard for this part. It doesn't quite fit to single tap here because it's not as intense as something like 00:29:275 (6,7,8,9) - where it has that 1-2-3-4 pattern.

00:21:359 (1) - Personally don't like this spinner. There's so much going on here that could be mapped even for this diff. It also doesn't start on a very intuitive note. Highly recommend mapping this section.

00:29:275 (6,7,8,9) - Change 6 to 1/2 slider and note. That 1-2-3-4 pattern at 00:29:534 - should definitely be highlighted with 4 notes. Also after the change you should use the same spacing you used for 00:30:310 (1,2,3,4) - because right now one does not read like the other even though it's the same thing playing.

00:31:344 (3,1) - Remove repeat and change to 3/4 slider into a 1/1 slider starting at 00:31:603 - (which means deleting 1) You want to emphasize the first note of the first verse and it being a part of a slider body in a repeat takes away soo much emphasis here.

00:35:094 (5,6,1) - Change to 1/1 slider so it has that 1-2 1-2 1 feel to it. Hard to explain this but trust me Finally change 1 to a note into a 1/1 slider starting on 00:35:482 (1) - to emphasize the upbeat (big white note) of the song.

00:36:258 (2,3,4) - Especially if you changed the part above I highly suggest changing 2 and 3 to a 1/1 slider that mirrors the previous one. It would look soo good :3 This is also important because 4 starting on a red tick doesn't sound good here. The guitar playing here is not as strong as the vocals playing on 00:36:775 - So highly consider reworking this combo into a pattern that compliments the more important parts playing here.

00:43:111 (1,2) - Again vocals are very strong and ignored at 00:42:982 - so I suggest this pattern.

00:47:508 (6,7,8,9) - This isn't very intuitive. I suggest this pattern or if anything [url]this pattern[/url].

00:49:189 (4,5,6,7) - Highly suggest this pattern to better compliment the vocals and instruments.

00:51:775 (6,1) - This slider loses emphasis on the vocals singing 00:52:163 - Remove repeat from 6 and add a note at 00:52:163 - then finally a 1/1 slider at 00:52:292 - . You can even make a really nice pattern this way like this.

00:53:586 (4,5) - Use 00:52:810 (3) - and mirror it instead?

00:55:784 (1,2) - Spacing should be 1/2 for this too.

00:56:430 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Suggest this pattern from the one you have currently between 00:56:430 - 00:58:758 - . It plays way better because the sliders and notes follow the vocals and instruments very well this way and more importantly they play soo well for this diff because it's almost a 1/1 single tap so it's very natural.

00:58:887 - If you changed the pattern above I suggest also having a note here.

00:59:405 (1,2,3) - Unstack. Should be differentiated because of the music here and should read better. Also 2 does not flow well into 3 so you can definitely change this pattern to resolve both of these inconsistencies.

01:00:310 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This does not follow the music well. It kinda does except it plays very VERY poorly and unintuitively. Consider this pattern instead. The drums aren't as intense here to imply this drum pattern to players so instead following the vocals is more natural here.

01:02:637 (1,2,3,4) - Unstack. Not fun to play and removes a lot of emphasis.

01:03:930 (1,2,3) - On top of the previous comment, what you can do is stack 1 over the previous 4 because of this pause but I also suggest changing 2 and 3 to a 1/2 slider instead. That way the stack on 01:04:706 (1,2,3,4) - Makes a bit more sense too.

01:05:094 (4) - Just another comment. This IS correct musically but idk it doesn't feel so good to play. I would change this to 2 1/2 notes instead with a NC on the 2nd note.

01:06:517 (4) - Change to 2 notes. Compliments low toms better.

01:14:018 (1,2,1,2) - If you're gonna do this SV change then make it a buildup increase that goes up from .6x to .7x to .8x to .9x and then kiai is 1.0x.

01:15:828 (2,3) - Poor flow from the previous notes.

01:19:061 - Might be interesting to have a note here and make a triple stacked over 01:19:190 (1) - but idk.

01:22:035 (3,1) - Change to 1/2 slider and also delete 1 and add a 1/2 slider starting 01:22:293 - to better compliment the drums.

01:25:785 (2,3,4) - Poor flow from 3 to 4 plus bad overlap.

01:28:242 (3) - Change to 1/2 slider and another 1/2 slider at 01:28:520 -

01:28:778 (5,6) - ctrl G this pattern so the 1/2 slider starts first and THEN the 1/1 slider plays. Follows the drums and the vocals WAY better. Also this doesn't mean just ctrl+g I mean just to flip the notes on the timeline the pattern should also be reworked.

01:29:554 (1,2,3,4) - This looks much better with the song since it adds good emphasis to the guitar thing :v

01:33:692 (1,2) - Add reverse to 1 and change 2 to a 1/1 slider. Also suggest for 01:34:468 (3,4) - to instead do what you did at 01:32:399 (3,4,5) - which reads much better for this diff.

01:35:244 (5,6,1) - Do not do this plz Very poor flow and looks very messy cuz overlap.

01:38:088 (3) - This covers that cool guitar rhythm at 01:38:218 - which you followed up until here.

01:39:619 (7) - 3/4 slider into note or maybe 1/2 slider.

01:41:171 (1) - Change to 1/2 slider and then move 01:41:430 (2) - over to 01:41:430 - because she does that tying-the-vocal-together thing again.

OR you can also do this pattern instead. 2nd one's cooler imo

01:42:354 (2,3) - Stack?

01:46:213 (1,2) - poor flow from the previous slider. Also suggest ctrl + g so the note is first then the slider after. Also this doesn't mean just ctrl+g I mean just to flip the notes on the timeline the pattern should also be reworked.

01:46:989 (4) - Note into 1/2 slider instead?

01:47:765 - add note

01:48:023 - maybe also here unless you want the pause.

01:48:152 (1,2) - These two sliders should mirror each other since it can be implied through the way she sings this part and the way the instruments play this part. Also current flow is very poor.

01:49:704 (3) - Remove repeat and add a note or 1/2 slider.

01:52:808 (2) - Change to 1/1 slider. Better because then it fixes that polarity question into 3.

01:55:652 (5) - Nice looking slider but would be better with the same shape and being a 1/2 slider then a note for the drum.

01:57:075 - Note here would be nice too.

01:57:463 (3) - Also nice as a note into 1/2 slider stacked over the note. Compliments the vocals nicely because she sings the same musical note here.

01:58:497 (1,2,3,4,5) - Poor flow and pattern could be better. Consider this and this (or something similar).

02:01:859 (4,5) - Delete 5 and add repeat to 4?

02:03:282 (7,1) - Again bad flow and overlap looks really bad too.

02:04:058 (2,3,4,5,6) - this DS change on this diff doesn't look nice. Stick to 1.2x spacing for this imo.

02:07:032 - Note?

02:07:549 - Note? Sound? Maybe change 02:07:290 (1) - to a 1/1 slider?

02:08:583 (6) - Should be 1/1 slider. Then note.

02:10:006 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same note about the DS change but more importantly 6 to 7 is the same 1/2 beat yet the spacing is 1.2x. Just change all of this to 1.2x instead this doesnt read well.

02:15:072 - I like this slow slider thing but they should look nicer and flow better. Maybe also try some cool slider shapes.

02:27:206 - Add 1/2 slider.

02:28:758 (6,7,8) - Looks nice in the editor but flows poorly. Might as well make this a jump section with the same spacing.

02:29:534 (1,2,3,1) - On a different note, You went with single tapping on the previous combo then switch back to the guitar rhythm. Should either stick to the guitar rhythm throughout or stick to the single tapping like before maybe with some 1/1 sliders or something but switching back and forth doesn't make much sense.

02:33:155 (1) - Add a note or 1/2 slider where the spinner starts and then start the spinner at 02:33:672 - instead.

02:35:771 (1,2) - Space 2 further from 1. Use 1.2x spacing.

02:44:015 (1,2,3) - I like this rhythm you're following for this chorus compared to the previous but still a lot of overlap/flow inconsistencies. This being one of them. Consider this pattern.

02:46:602 (2) - Move down to make a nicer wave thing.

03:15:049 (3,1,2) - I don't like this personally. Should just keep the 1/1 pattern going instead and highlighting the vocals through a different pattern.

03:16:860 (5) - Should have a 1/2 slider here instead and then a 1/1 slider starting at 03:17:119 -

03:20:351 (3) - Again poor flow and overlap.

03:27:463 (1) - Slider shape?

03:29:532 (1) - This kills a lot of the guitar building up here. Same for this 03:31:601 (1) -

03:34:187 (3,4,5,6) - 03:35:222 (3,4,5,6) - Again keep the spacing consistent. If it's too much spacing to single tap then maybe consider a different pattern.

03:37:808 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Consider that people playing hards are more than likely not alternating well yet and single tapping this is REALLY hard for these players. Revise this pattern and/or consider a different one.

03:54:877 (2) - Overlap doesnt look nice like this. Maybe just have it mirror 1 instead.

03:56:687 (2,3) - Keep spacing from 2 to 3 consistent with the rest of the spacing here.

03:59:015 (3,4,1,2) - Why 1/3 snapping? Just make these 1/2 sliders.

04:00:049 (3,4,5,6) - Again use 1.2x spacing or change pattern. Doesn't feel right to just keep single tapping when these look like 1/4 notes now.

04:00:825 (2) - Not 1/3. Change to 1/2.

04:01:601 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same as spacing comment above.

04:02:636 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Make the gap between each slider the same. This looks pretty sloppy this way.

04:04:705 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same as spacing comment above.

04:06:257 (3) - Change this one to 1/2 to better compliment the bigger drums now.

04:06:774 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - You know what I'm gonna say :v

04:09:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ...

04:10:911 (1,1) - This takes away SOOO much here. Long slider looks nice but this and the spinner completely cover up the cool drum solo I even thought the song ended here cuz of that.

04:19:187 (1) - Space this more or stack over slider end which I don't recommend.

04:24:748 (7,8) - Change to 1/2 slider with repeat?

04:26:946 (8) - Again weird 1/3 snap. Use 1/2.


Whoa that was a HUGE mod for one diff. Sorry to say that I really feel this difficulty needs a LOT of work like a LOT of work. Spacing inconsistencies, poor flow and rhythm choices, and no interesting patterns. I KNOW you can make really good maps (at least really good extras) so that's why I'm a bit upset after modding this. I highly suggest remapping this difficulty or at least overhauling it because currently I don't think this can get ranked in this state.

That might have sounded a bit harsh but again it's cuz I know you're capable of something really good if you really try.

Rest of the set looked fine at least from a quick look-through. Anyway good luck with the set :v

Side wrote:

Hi mod thing cuz why not :v

Will focus on the hard because...

SPOILER

Silynn's Hard


General

I suggest slightly higher CS. If you really don't wanna use CS4 then 3.7 maybe even 3.8 would be better. This CS makes it feel more like a normal especially for how simple the patterns are. CS was necessary for diff spread reasons

Highly recommend lower OD for this diff. OD 6 or at most 6.5 because this is pretty high bpm so it's gonna be pretty tough to be accurate at this difficulty range with the current OD. lowerd od by 1


00:00:591 (1) - You miss a lot of emphasis on the first vocals at 00:01:108 - with this 2/1 slider. Consider changing this to maybe a 1/1 slider and repeat 1/1 slider and note. ok

00:02:142 (2,3,4) - Highly suggest this pattern. Especially if you go with the first change which I also highly suggest. The reason for the 1/2 slider is because you wanna tie the word "tame ni" together as she sings it like that. ok

00:04:211 (1,2) - Change to 1/2 slider. Same reason as above regarding the word being sang kinda tied together. ok

00:04:728 (3) - Change to 1/1 slider and add a note at 00:05:478 - There is a guitar note playing 00:05:228 - which you neglect with this slider and this way you can get that note as well as the vocal. ok

00:06:245 (5,6) - I see what you're going for mapping this to the vocals but I think you can get the same effect (if not arguably better) if you change 5 to a 1/1 nicer shape slider (to compliment the vocal doing the short rise in pitch) and then a note at 00:07:278 - to compliment the 2nd guitar note since the slider would play the first. Also it might be a good idea to make 6 a slider that ends at 00:08:555 - or maybe just 00:08:299 - since the last guitar note kinda holds. ok

00:08:865 (1,2,3) - Nothing playing at 00:09:123 - Consider this pattern where 7 is stacked over 8 slider head. It's really nice :3 If you do it exactly like that you'll have to move things around so I suggest the pattern in the timeline but you can do it however you want. ok

00:13:520 - Don't neglect this guitar note following the vocals here

00:13:778 (2,3) - Maybe better if it blankets itself? It also flows very poorly into the next combo since 3 is pointing away from it currently. i dont agree

00:15:033 (1,2) - Due to the sudden change of BPM I highly sugest changing this to a 1/2 slider with repeat instead of having a note to give players enough time to recognize the bpm change. thats not nearly as fun

00:18:554 (2) - Change to a note then a 1/2 slider. The half slider should compliment the 1-2-3-4 thing the guitar does so the slider should start on the 1 of that strum at 00:18:685 - instead of with the slider body. ok

Similarly this should be a 1/2 slider with repeat because single tapping 3 notes at 232 bpm is gonna be way too hard for this part. It doesn't quite fit to single tap here because it's not as intense as something like 00:29:275 (6,7,8,9) - where it has that 1-2-3-4 pattern.

00:21:359 (1) - Personally don't like this spinner. There's so much going on here that could be mapped even for this diff. It also doesn't start on a very intuitive note. Highly recommend mapping this section. changed a little bit

00:29:275 (6,7,8,9) - Change 6 to 1/2 slider and note. That 1-2-3-4 pattern at 00:29:534 - should definitely be highlighted with 4 notes. Also after the change you should use the same spacing you used for 00:30:310 (1,2,3,4) - because right now one does not read like the other even though it's the same thing playing. yes but it i like how the pattern expands

00:31:344 (3,1) - Remove repeat and change to 3/4 slider into a 1/1 slider starting at 00:31:603 - (which means deleting 1) You want to emphasize the first note of the first verse and it being a part of a slider body in a repeat takes away soo much emphasis here. ok

00:35:094 (5,6,1) - Change to 1/1 slider so it has that 1-2 1-2 1 feel to it. Hard to explain this but trust me Finally change 1 to a note into a 1/1 slider starting on 00:35:482 (1) - to emphasize the upbeat (big white note) of the song. this doesnt fit the drum pattern as well

00:36:258 (2,3,4) - Especially if you changed the part above I highly suggest changing 2 and 3 to a 1/1 slider that mirrors the previous one. It would look soo good :3 This is also important because 4 starting on a red tick doesn't sound good here. The guitar playing here is not as strong as the vocals playing on 00:36:775 - So highly consider reworking this combo into a pattern that compliments the more important parts playing here. this section is meant to capture the 'swing' of the drums

00:43:111 (1,2) - Again vocals are very strong and ignored at 00:42:982 - so I suggest this pattern.
This is meant to follow the drums as well.

00:47:508 (6,7,8,9) - This isn't very intuitive. I suggest this pattern or if anything [url]this pattern[/url].
I enjoy the way it plays now

00:49:189 (4,5,6,7) - Highly suggest this pattern to better compliment the vocals and instruments.
I like this section as it is.

00:51:775 (6,1) - This slider loses emphasis on the vocals singing 00:52:163 - Remove repeat from 6 and add a note at 00:52:163 - then finally a 1/1 slider at 00:52:292 - . You can even make a really nice pattern this way like this.
sure

00:53:586 (4,5) - Use 00:52:810 (3) - and mirror it instead?
not sure what you mean

00:55:784 (1,2) - Spacing should be 1/2 for this too.
the aesthetic stack is nice imo

00:56:430 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Suggest this pattern from the one you have currently between 00:56:430 - 00:58:758 - . It plays way better because the sliders and notes follow the vocals and instruments very well this way and more importantly they play soo well for this diff because it's almost a 1/1 single tap so it's very natural.
ill try it

00:58:887 - If you changed the pattern above I suggest also having a note here.
i dont see why D:

00:59:405 (1,2,3) - Unstack. Should be differentiated because of the music here and should read better. Also 2 does not flow well into 3 so you can definitely change this pattern to resolve both of these inconsistencies.
ok

01:00:310 (6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This does not follow the music well. It kinda does except it plays very VERY poorly and unintuitively. Consider this pattern instead. The drums aren't as intense here to imply this drum pattern to players so instead following the vocals is more natural here.
Personally I find the drums more than intense enough to warrant this pattern.

01:02:637 (1,2,3,4) - Unstack. Not fun to play and removes a lot of emphasis.
The stacks are used here and in many other diffs

01:03:930 (1,2,3) - On top of the previous comment, what you can do is stack 1 over the previous 4 because of this pause but I also suggest changing 2 and 3 to a 1/2 slider instead. That way the stack on 01:04:706 (1,2,3,4) - Makes a bit more sense too.
ok

01:05:094 (4) - Just another comment. This IS correct musically but idk it doesn't feel so good to play. I would change this to 2 1/2 notes instead with a NC on the 2nd note.
I believe this would take away from the map.

01:06:517 (4) - Change to 2 notes. Compliments low toms better.
I believe this causes unnecessary difficulty at a point in the music where it is quieting down.

01:14:018 (1,2,1,2) - If you're gonna do this SV change then make it a buildup increase that goes up from .6x to .7x to .8x to .9x and then kiai is 1.0x.
I like this the way it is

01:15:828 (2,3) - Poor flow from the previous notes.
I don't mind it

01:19:061 - Might be interesting to have a note here and make a triple stacked over 01:19:190 (1) - but idk.
I kind of like that Idea but i dont think it would fit with the music

01:22:035 (3,1) - Change to 1/2 slider and also delete 1 and add a 1/2 slider starting 01:22:293 - to better compliment the drums.
i like this the way it is

01:25:785 (2,3,4) - Poor flow from 3 to 4 plus bad overlap.
the flow break emphasizes the vocal

01:28:242 (3) - Change to 1/2 slider and another 1/2 slider at 01:28:520 -
i like the way it is now

01:28:778 (5,6) - ctrl G this pattern so the 1/2 slider starts first and THEN the 1/1 slider plays. Follows the drums and the vocals WAY better. Also this doesn't mean just ctrl+g I mean just to flip the notes on the timeline the pattern should also be reworked.
changed differently

01:29:554 (1,2,3,4) - This looks much better with the song since it adds good emphasis to the guitar thing :v

01:33:692 (1,2) - Add reverse to 1 and change 2 to a 1/1 slider. Also suggest for 01:34:468 (3,4) - to instead do what you did at 01:32:399 (3,4,5) - which reads much better for this diff.
i like the way this is now
01:35:244 (5,6,1) - Do not do this plz Very poor flow and looks very messy cuz overlap.

01:38:088 (3) - This covers that cool guitar rhythm at 01:38:218 - which you followed up until here.

01:39:619 (7) - 3/4 slider into note or maybe 1/2 slider.

01:41:171 (1) - Change to 1/2 slider and then move 01:41:430 (2) - over to 01:41:430 - because she does that tying-the-vocal-together thing again.

OR you can also do this pattern instead. 2nd one's cooler imo

01:42:354 (2,3) - Stack?

01:46:213 (1,2) - poor flow from the previous slider. Also suggest ctrl + g so the note is first then the slider after. Also this doesn't mean just ctrl+g I mean just to flip the notes on the timeline the pattern should also be reworked.

01:46:989 (4) - Note into 1/2 slider instead?

01:47:765 - add note

01:48:023 - maybe also here unless you want the pause.

01:48:152 (1,2) - These two sliders should mirror each other since it can be implied through the way she sings this part and the way the instruments play this part. Also current flow is very poor.

01:49:704 (3) - Remove repeat and add a note or 1/2 slider.

01:52:808 (2) - Change to 1/1 slider. Better because then it fixes that polarity question into 3.

01:55:652 (5) - Nice looking slider but would be better with the same shape and being a 1/2 slider then a note for the drum.

01:57:075 - Note here would be nice too.

01:57:463 (3) - Also nice as a note into 1/2 slider stacked over the note. Compliments the vocals nicely because she sings the same musical note here.

01:58:497 (1,2,3,4,5) - Poor flow and pattern could be better. Consider this and this (or something similar).

02:01:859 (4,5) - Delete 5 and add repeat to 4?

02:03:282 (7,1) - Again bad flow and overlap looks really bad too.

02:04:058 (2,3,4,5,6) - this DS change on this diff doesn't look nice. Stick to 1.2x spacing for this imo.

02:07:032 - Note?

02:07:549 - Note? Sound? Maybe change 02:07:290 (1) - to a 1/1 slider?

02:08:583 (6) - Should be 1/1 slider. Then note.

02:10:006 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - Same note about the DS change but more importantly 6 to 7 is the same 1/2 beat yet the spacing is 1.2x. Just change all of this to 1.2x instead this doesnt read well.

02:15:072 - I like this slow slider thing but they should look nicer and flow better. Maybe also try some cool slider shapes.

02:27:206 - Add 1/2 slider.

02:28:758 (6,7,8) - Looks nice in the editor but flows poorly. Might as well make this a jump section with the same spacing.

02:29:534 (1,2,3,1) - On a different note, You went with single tapping on the previous combo then switch back to the guitar rhythm. Should either stick to the guitar rhythm throughout or stick to the single tapping like before maybe with some 1/1 sliders or something but switching back and forth doesn't make much sense.

02:33:155 (1) - Add a note or 1/2 slider where the spinner starts and then start the spinner at 02:33:672 - instead.

02:35:771 (1,2) - Space 2 further from 1. Use 1.2x spacing.

02:44:015 (1,2,3) - I like this rhythm you're following for this chorus compared to the previous but still a lot of overlap/flow inconsistencies. This being one of them. Consider this pattern.

02:46:602 (2) - Move down to make a nicer wave thing.

03:15:049 (3,1,2) - I don't like this personally. Should just keep the 1/1 pattern going instead and highlighting the vocals through a different pattern.

03:16:860 (5) - Should have a 1/2 slider here instead and then a 1/1 slider starting at 03:17:119 -

03:20:351 (3) - Again poor flow and overlap.

03:27:463 (1) - Slider shape?

03:29:532 (1) - This kills a lot of the guitar building up here. Same for this 03:31:601 (1) -

03:34:187 (3,4,5,6) - 03:35:222 (3,4,5,6) - Again keep the spacing consistent. If it's too much spacing to single tap then maybe consider a different pattern.

03:37:808 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Consider that people playing hards are more than likely not alternating well yet and single tapping this is REALLY hard for these players. Revise this pattern and/or consider a different one.

03:54:877 (2) - Overlap doesnt look nice like this. Maybe just have it mirror 1 instead.

03:56:687 (2,3) - Keep spacing from 2 to 3 consistent with the rest of the spacing here.

03:59:015 (3,4,1,2) - Why 1/3 snapping? Just make these 1/2 sliders.

04:00:049 (3,4,5,6) - Again use 1.2x spacing or change pattern. Doesn't feel right to just keep single tapping when these look like 1/4 notes now.

04:00:825 (2) - Not 1/3. Change to 1/2.

04:01:601 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same as spacing comment above.

04:02:636 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Make the gap between each slider the same. This looks pretty sloppy this way.

04:04:705 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Same as spacing comment above.

04:06:257 (3) - Change this one to 1/2 to better compliment the bigger drums now.

04:06:774 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - You know what I'm gonna say :v

04:09:877 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - ...

04:10:911 (1,1) - This takes away SOOO much here. Long slider looks nice but this and the spinner completely cover up the cool drum solo I even thought the song ended here cuz of that.

04:19:187 (1) - Space this more or stack over slider end which I don't recommend.

04:24:748 (7,8) - Change to 1/2 slider with repeat?

04:26:946 (8) - Again weird 1/3 snap. Use 1/2.


Whoa that was a HUGE mod for one diff. Sorry to say that I really feel this difficulty needs a LOT of work like a LOT of work. Spacing inconsistencies, poor flow and rhythm choices, and no interesting patterns. I KNOW you can make really good maps (at least really good extras) so that's why I'm a bit upset after modding this. I highly suggest remapping this difficulty or at least overhauling it because currently I don't think this can get ranked in this state.

That might have sounded a bit harsh but again it's cuz I know you're capable of something really good if you really try.

Rest of the set looked fine at least from a quick look-through. Anyway good luck with the set :v